메뉴 건너뛰기
JAMA
Volumn 295, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 314-317
Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; WRITING;
EID: 30944437076     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.3.314     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (112)
References (11)
  • 2
    • 0032527568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What makes a good reviewer and a good review in a general medical journal
    • Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review in a general medical journal. JAMA. 1998;280:231-233.
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 231-233
    • Black, N.1    Van Rooyen, S.2    Godlee, F.3    Smith, R.4    Evans, S.5
  • 3
    • 0034169752 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process
    • Earnshaw JJ, Farndon JR, Guillou PJ, Johnson CD, Murie JA, Murray GD. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000;82(suppl 4):133-135.
    • (2000) Ann R Coll Surg Engl , vol.82 , Issue.4 SUPPL. , pp. 133-135
    • Earnshaw, J.J.1    Farndon, J.R.2    Guillou, P.J.3    Johnson, C.D.4    Murie, J.A.5    Murray, G.D.6
  • 4
    • 0033051347 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts
    • van Rooyen S, Black N, Godlee F. Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999;52:625-629.
    • (1999) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.52 , pp. 625-629
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Black, N.2    Godlee, F.3
  • 5
    • 1642325520 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of training on the quality of peer review: A randomised controlled trial
    • Schroter S, Black N, Evans S, Smith R, Carpenter J, Godlee F. Effects of training on the quality of peer review: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2004;328:673-675.
    • (2004) BMJ , vol.328 , pp. 673-675
    • Schroter, S.1    Black, N.2    Evans, S.3    Smith, R.4    Carpenter, J.5    Godlee, F.6
  • 6
    • 0032527564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial
    • van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, Evans S, Black N. The effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1998;280:234-237.
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 234-237
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Godlee, F.2    Smith, R.3    Evans, S.4    Black, N.5
  • 7
    • 0033514073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: A randomised trial
    • van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Evans S, Black N, Smith R. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial. BMJ. 1999;318:23-27.
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.318 , pp. 23-27
    • Van Rooyen, S.1    Godlee, F.2    Evans, S.3    Black, N.4    Smith, R.5
  • 8
    • 0017360990 scopus 로고
    • The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
    • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
    • (1977) Biometrics , vol.33 , pp. 159-174
    • Landis, J.R.1    Koch, G.G.2
  • 9
    • 26644442193 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study
    • Abstract published; Chicago, Ill; September
    • Wager E, Parkin E, Tamber PS. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study. Abstract published in 5th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication conference proceedings; Chicago, Ill; September 2005. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/prc2005prog.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2005.
    • (2005) 5th International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication Conference Proceedings
    • Wager, E.1    Parkin, E.2    Tamber, P.S.3
  • 10
    • 0010348769 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editorial peer review: Its development and rationale
    • Godlee F, Jefferson T, eds. London, England: BMJ Books
    • Rennie D. Editorial peer review: its development and rationale. In: Godlee F, Jefferson T, eds. Peer Review in Health Sciences. London, England: BMJ Books; 1999.
    • (1999) Peer Review in Health Sciences
    • Rennie, D.1
  • 11
    • 0028365095 scopus 로고
    • Peer review: Crude and understudied, but indispensable
    • Kassirer JP, Campion EW. Peer review: crude and understudied, but indispensable. JAMA. 1994;272:96-97.
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 96-97
    • Kassirer, J.P.1    Campion, E.W.2

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.