Expansion of the phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein family in legumes: A case study of Lupinus angustifolius L. FLOWERING LOCUS T homologs, LanFTc1 and LanFTc2

BMC Genomics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Ksiazkiewicz, Michał ^a   Rychel, Sandra ^a   Nelson, Matthew N ^b,c   Wyrwa, Katarzyna ^a   Naganowska, Barbara ^a   Wolko, Bogdan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT GENETICS   (Poland)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

BAC FISH; DNA sequencing; Duplication; Flowering locus T; Genomics; Lupinus angustifolius; Phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein; Synteny

Indexed keywords

CCAAT BINDING FACTOR; PHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINE BINDING PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; BAYES THEOREM; CHROMOSOME; CLADISTICS; FTC1 GENE; FTC2 GENE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE LOCATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC LINKAGE; LEGUME; LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS; MITOSIS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PAPILIONOIDEA; PHYLOGENY; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN MOTIF; PURIFYING SELECTION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SYNTENY; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; CLASSIFICATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; GENOMICS; LUPIN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT GENOME;

CHROMOSOME MAPPING; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; LUPINUS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHOSPHATIDYLETHANOLAMINE BINDING PROTEIN; PHYLOGENY; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SYNTENY;

EID: 84992036652     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3150-z     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Liu L, Adrian J, Pankin A, Hu J, Dong X, von Korff M, Turck F. Induced and natural variation of promoter length modulates the photoperiodic response of FLOWERING LOCUS T. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4558.
2. Hengst U, Albrecht H, Hess D, Monard D. The phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein is the prototype of a novel family of serine protease inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(1):535-40.
3. Banfield MJ, Barker JJ, Perry AC, Brady RL. Function from structure? The crystal structure of human phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein suggests a role in membrane signal transduction. Structure. 1998;6(10):1245-54.
4. Danilevskaya ON, Meng X, Hou Z, Ananiev EV, Simmons CR. A genomic and expression compendium of the expanded PEBP gene family from maize. Plant Physiol. 2008;146(1):250-64.
5. Turck F, Fornara F, Coupland G. Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:573-94.
6. Andres F, Coupland G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(9):627-39.
7. Michaels SD, Himelblau E, Kim SY, Schomburg FM, Amasino RM. Integration of flowering signals in winter-annual Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005;137(1):149-56.
8. Hecht V, Laurie RE, Vander Schoor JK, Ridge S, Knowles CL, Liew LC, Sussmilch FC, Murfet IC, Macknight RC, Weller JL. The pea GIGAS gene is a FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog necessary for graft-transmissible specification of flowering but not for responsiveness to photoperiod. Plant Cell. 2011;23(1):147-61.
9. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. Functional divergence of duplicated genes formed by polyploidy during Arabidopsis evolution. Plant Cell. 2004;16:1679-91.
10. Cusack BP, Wolfe KH. When gene marriages don't work out: divorce by subfunctionalization. Trends Genet. 2007;23:270-2.
11. Laurie RE, Diwadkar P, Jaudal M, Zhang L, Hecht V, Wen J, Tadege M, Mysore KS, Putterill J, Weller JL, et al. The Medicago FLOWERING LOCUS T homolog, MtFTa1, is a key regulator of flowering time. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(4):2207-24.
12. Kong F, Liu B, Xia Z, Sato S, Kim BM, Watanabe S, Yamada T, Tabata S, Kanazawa A, Harada K, et al. Two coordinately regulated homologs of FLOWERING LOCUS T are involved in the control of photoperiodic flowering in soybean. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(3):1220-31.
13. Nelson MN, Ksiazkiewicz M, Rychel S, Besharat N, Taylor CM, Wyrwa K, Jost R, Erskine W, Cowling WA, Berger JD, et al. The loss of vernalisation requirement in narrow-leafed lupin is associated with a deletion in the promoter and de-repressed expression of an FT homologue. New Phytol. 2016. doi: 10.1111/nph.14094.
14. Naganowska B, Wolko B, Sliwińska E, Kaczmarek Z. Nuclear DNA content variation and species relationships in the genus Lupinus (Fabaceae). Ann Bot. 2003;92:349-55.
15. Boersma JG, Pallotta M, Li C, Buirchell BJ, Sivasithamparam K, Yang H. Construction of a genetic linkage map using MFLP and identification of molecular markers linked to domestication genes in narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2005;10:331-44.
16. Nelson MN, Phan HTT, Ellwood SR, Moolhuijzen PM, Hane J, Williams A, O'Lone CE, Fosu-Nyarko J, Scobie M, Cakir M, et al. The first gene-based map of Lupinus angustifolius L.-location of domestication genes and conserved synteny with Medicago truncatula. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;113:225-38.
17. Kamphuis LG, Hane JK, Nelson MN, Gao L, Atkins CA, Singh KB. Transcriptome sequencing of different narrow-leafed lupin tissue types provides a comprehensive uni-gene assembly and extensive gene-based molecular markers. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:14-25.
18. Kroc M, Koczyk G, Świecicki W, Kilian A, Nelson MN. New evidence of ancestral polyploidy in the Genistoid legume Lupinus angustifolius L. (narrow-leafed lupin). Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127:1237-49.
19. Nelson MN, Moolhuijzen PM, Boersma JG, Chudy M, Lesniewska K, Bellgard M, Oliver RP, Swiecicki W, Wolko B, Cowling WA, et al. Aligning a new reference genetic map of Lupinus angustifolius with the genome sequence of the model legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 2010;17:73-83.
20. Kasprzak A, Safár J, Janda J, Dolezel J, Wolko B, Naganowska B. The bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library of the narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2006;11:396-407.
21. Gao L-L, Hane JK, Kamphuis LG, Foley R, Shi B-J, Atkins CA, Singh KB. Development of genomic resources for the narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius): construction of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library and BAC-end sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:521.
22. Kaczmarek A, Naganowska B, Wolko B. Karyotyping of the narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) by using FISH, PRINS and computer measurements of chromosomes. J Appl Genet. 2009;50:77-82.
23. Ksiazkiewicz M, Wyrwa K, Szczepaniak A, Rychel S, Majcherkiewicz K, Przysiecka Ł, Karlowski W, Wolko B, Naganowska B. Comparative genomics of Lupinus angustifolius gene-rich regions: BAC library exploration, genetic mapping and cytogenetics. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:79.
24. Ksiazkiewicz M, Zielezinski A, Wyrwa K, Szczepaniak A, Rychel S, Karlowski W, Wolko B, Naganowska B. Remnants of the legume ancestral genome preserved in gene-rich regions: insights from Lupinus angustifolius physical, genetic, and comparative mapping. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2015;33:84-101.
25. Lesniewska K, Ksiazkiewicz M, Nelson MN, Mahé F, Aïnouche A, Wolko B, Naganowska B. Assignment of 3 genetic linkage groups to 3 chromosomes of narrow-leafed lupin. J Hered. 2011;102:228-36.
26. Przysiecka L, Ksiazkiewicz M, Wolko B, Naganowska B. Structure, expression profile and phylogenetic inference of chalcone isomerase-like genes from the narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) genome. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:268.
27. Wyrwa K, Ksiazkiewicz M, Szczepaniak A, Susek K, Podkowinski J, Naganowska B. Integration of Lupinus angustifolius L. (narrow-leafed lupin) genome maps and comparative mapping within legumes. Chromosome Res. 2016;24:355-378.
28. Zielezinski A, Potarzycki P, Ksiazkiewicz M, Karłowski W. Annotating a non-model plant genome - a study on the narrow-leafed lupin. Biotechnologia. 2012;93:318-32.
29. Yang H, Tao Y, Zheng Z, Zhang Q, Zhou G, Sweetingham MW, Howieson JG, Li C. Draft genome sequence, and a sequence-defined genetic linkage map of the legume crop species Lupinus angustifolius L. PLoS One. 2013;8:e64799.
30. Bertioli DJ, Cannon SB, Froenicke L, Huang G, Farmer AD, Cannon EKS, Liu X, Gao D, Clevenger J, Dash S, et al. The genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut. Nat Genet. 2016;48(4):438-46.
31. Varshney RK, Chen W, Li Y, Bharti AK, Saxena RK, Schlueter JA, Donoghue MTA, Azam S, Fan G, Whaley AM, et al. Draft genome sequence of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan), an orphan legume crop of resource-poor farmers. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:83-9.
32. Varshney RK, Song C, Saxena RK, Azam S, Yu S, Sharpe AG, Cannon S, Baek J, Rosen BD, Tar'an B, et al. Draft genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:240-6.
33. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Hyten DL, Song Q, Thelen JJ, Cheng J, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature. 2010;463:178-83.
34. Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Kato T, Nakao M, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Ono A, Kawashima K, et al. Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 2008;15:227-39.
35. Young ND, Debellé F, Oldroyd GED, Geurts R, Cannon SB, Udvardi MK, Benedito VA, Mayer KFX, Gouzy J, Schoof H, et al. The Medicago genome provides insight into the evolution of rhizobial symbioses. Nature. 2011;480:520-4.
36. Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu S, Song Q, Chavarro C, et al. A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet. 2014;46:707-13.
37. Kang YJ, Kim SK, Kim MY, Lestari P, Kim KH, Ha B-K, Jun TH, Hwang WJ, Lee T, Lee J, et al. Genome sequence of mungbean and insights into evolution within Vigna species. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5443.
38. Gladstones J, Hill G. Selection for economic characters in Lupinus angustifolius and L. digitatus. 2. Time of flowering. Aust J Exp Agric. 1969;9(37):213-20.
39. Boersma JG, Buirchell BJ, Sivasithamparam K, Yang H. Development of a sequence-specific PCR marker linked to the Ku gene which removes the vernalization requirement in narrow-leafed lupin. Plant Breeding. 2007;126:306-9.
40. Cannon SB, McKain MR, Harkess A, Nelson MN, Dash S, Deyholos MK, Peng Y, Joyce B, Stewart CN, Rolf M, et al. Multiple polyploidy events in the early radiation of nodulating and nonnodulating legumes. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:193-210.
41. O'Rourke JA, Yang SS, Miller SS, Bucciarelli B, Liu J, Rydeen A, Bozsoki Z, Uhde-Stone C, Tu ZJ, Allan D, et al. An RNA-Seq transcriptome analysis of orthophosphate-deficient white lupin reveals novel insights into phosphorus acclimation in plants. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:705-24.
42. Parra-González LB, Aravena-Abarzúa GA, Navarro-Navarro CS, Udall J, Maughan J, Peterson LM, Salvo-Garrido HE, Maureira-Butler IJ. Yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.) transcriptome sequencing: molecular marker development and comparative studies. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:425.
43. Galvao VC, Nordstrom KJ, Lanz C, Sulz P, Mathieu J, Pose D, Schmid M, Weigel D, Schneeberger K. Synteny-based mapping-by-sequencing enabled by targeted enrichment. Plant J. 2012;71(3):517-26.
44. Fan C, Hu R, Zhang X, Wang X, Zhang W, Zhang Q, Ma J, Fu YF. Conserved CO-FT regulons contribute to the photoperiod flowering control in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:9.
45. Zhang LF, Xu R, Zhang YW, Dai HY, Wang CJ, Li W, Zhang J. Preliminary analysis of the PEBP gene family in soybean (Glycine max). J Plant Genet Res. 2015;16(1):151-7.
46. Wang Z, Zhou Z, Liu Y, Liu T, Li Q, Ji Y, Li C, Fang C, Wang M, Wu M, et al. Functional evolution of phosphatidylethanolamine binding proteins in soybean and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2015;27(2):323-36.
47. Hecht V, Foucher F, Ferrandiz C, Macknight R, Navarro C, Morin J, Vardy ME, Ellis N, Beltran JP, Rameau C, et al. Conservation of Arabidopsis flowering genes in model legumes. Plant Physiol. 2005;137(4):1420-34.
48. Liew LC, Hecht V, Laurie RE, Knowles CL, Vander Schoor JK, Macknight RC, Weller JL. DIE NEUTRALIS and LATE BLOOMER 1 contribute to regulation of the pea circadian clock. Plant Cell. 2009;21(10):3198-211.
49. Yeoh CC, Balcerowicz M, Laurie R, Macknight R, Putterill J. Developing a method for customized induction of flowering. BMC Biotechnol. 2011;11:36.
50. Korkuc P, Schippers JH, Walther D. Characterization and identification of cis-regulatory elements in Arabidopsis based on single-nucleotide polymorphism information. Plant Physiol. 2014;164(1):181-200.
51. Adrian J, Farrona S, Reimer JJ, Albani MC, Coupland G, Turck F. cis-Regulatory elements and chromatin state coordinately control temporal and spatial expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22(5):1425-40.
52. Cao S, Kumimoto RW, Gnesutta N, Calogero AM, Mantovani R, Holt 3rd BF. A distal CCAAT/NUCLEAR FACTOR Y complex promotes chromatin looping at the FLOWERING LOCUS T promoter and regulates the timing of flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(3):1009-17.
53. Korves TM, Schmid KJ, Caicedo AL, Mays C, Stinchcombe JR, Purugganan MD, Schmitt J. Fitness effects associated with the major flowering time gene FRIGIDA in Arabidopsis thaliana in the field. Am Nat. 2007;169(5):E141-157.
54. Preston JC, Sandve SR. Adaptation to seasonality and the winter freeze. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:167.
55. Ream TS, Woods DP, Amasino RM. The molecular basis of vernalization in different plant groups. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2012;77:105-15.
56. Bratzel F, Turck F. Molecular memories in the regulation of seasonal flowering: from competence to cessation. Genome Biol. 2015;16:192.
57. Bastow R, Mylne JS, Lister C, Lippman Z, Martienssen RA, Dean C. Vernalization requires epigenetic silencing of FLC by histone methylation. Nature. 2004;427(6970):164-7.
58. Johanson U, West J, Lister C, Michaels S, Amasino R, Dean C. Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time. Science. 2000;290(5490):344-7.
59. Michaels SD, He Y, Scortecci KC, Amasino RM. Attenuation of FLOWERING LOCUS C activity as a mechanism for the evolution of summer-annual flowering behavior in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(17):10102-7.
60. Werner JD, Borevitz JO, Uhlenhaut NH, Ecker JR, Chory J, Weigel D. FRIGIDA-independent variation in flowering time of natural Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. Genetics. 2005;170(3):1197-207.
61. Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, Lindsay BG, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ, Soltis PS, Carlson JE, Arumuganathan K, Barakat A, et al. Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 2006;16(6):738-49.
62. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, Tomsho LP, Hu Y, Liang H, Soltis PS, et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature. 2011;473(7345):97-100.
63. Jiao Y, Leebens-Mack J, Ayyampalayam S, Bowers JE, McKain MR, McNeal J, Rolf M, Ruzicka DR, Wafula E, Wickett NJ, et al. A genome triplication associated with early diversification of the core eudicots. Genome Biol. 2012;13(1):R3.
64. Van de Peer Y. A mystery unveiled. Genome Biol. 2011;12(5):113.
65. Schlueter JA, Dixon P, Granger C, Grant D, Clark L, Doyle JJ, Shoemaker RC. Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome. 2004;47(5):868-76.
66. Pfeil BE, Schlueter JA, Shoemaker RC, Doyle JJ. Placing paleopolyploidy in relation to taxon divergence: a phylogenetic analysis in legumes using 39 gene families. Syst Biol. 2005;54(3):441-54.
67. Bertioli DJ, Moretzsohn MC, Madsen LH, Sandal N, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Guimarães PM, Hougaard BK, Fredslund J, Schauser L, Nielsen AM, et al. An analysis of synteny of Arachis with Lotus and Medicago sheds new light on the structure, stability and evolution of legume genomes. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:45.
68. Cannon SB, Sterck L, Rombauts S, Sato S, Cheung F, Gouzy J, Wang X, Mudge J, Vasdewani J, Schiex T, et al. Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(40):14959-64.
69. Cannon SB, Ilut D, Farmer AD, Maki SL, May GD, Singer SR, Doyle JJ. Polyploidy did not predate the evolution of nodulation in all legumes. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11630.
70. Lavin M, Herendeen PS, Wojciechowski MF. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. Syst Biol. 2005;54:575-94.
71. Karlgren A, Gyllenstrand N, Kallman T, Sundstrom JF, Moore D, Lascoux M, Lagercrantz U. Evolution of the PEBP gene family in plants: functional diversification in seed plant evolution. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(4):1967-77.
72. Hedman H, Kallman T, Lagercrantz U. Early evolution of the MFT-like gene family in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;70(4):359-69.
73. Moore RC, Purugganan MD. The evolutionary dynamics of plant duplicate genes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005;8:122-8.
74. De Mita S, Chantret N, Loridon K, Ronfort J, Bataillon T. Molecular adaptation in flowering and symbiotic recognition pathways: insights from patterns of polymorphism in the legume Medicago truncatula. BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:229.
75. James LC, Tawfik DS. Conformational diversity and protein evolution--a 60-year-old hypothesis revisited. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003;28(7):361-8.
76. Kobayashi Y, Kaya H, Goto K, Iwabuchi M, Araki T. A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. Science. 1999;286(5446):1960-2.
77. Hanzawa Y, Money T, Bradley D. A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(21):7748-53.
78. Ahn JH, Miller D, Winter VJ, Banfield MJ, Lee JH, Yoo SY, Henz SR, Brady RL, Weigel D. A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1. EMBO J. 2006;25(3):605-14.
79. Bradley D, Ratcliffe O, Vincent C, Carpenter R, Coen E. Inflorescence commitment and architecture in Arabidopsis. Science. 1997;275(5296):80-3.
80. Tian Z, Wang X, Lee R, Li Y, Specht JE, Nelson RL, McClean PE, Qiu L, Ma J. Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(19):8563-8.
81. Ho WW, Weigel D. Structural features determining flower-promoting activity of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T. Plant Cell. 2014;26(2):552-64.
82. Manly KF, Robert H, Cudmore J, Meer JM. Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mamm Genome. 2001;12:930-2.
83. Voorrips RE. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered. 2002;93:77-8.
84. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403-10.
85. Kohany O, Gentles AJ, Hankus L, Jurka J. Annotation, submission and screening of repetitive elements in Repbase: RepbaseSubmitter and Censor. BMC Bioinf. 2006;7:474.
86. Lyons E, Pedersen B, Kane J, Alam M, Ming R, Tang H, Wang X, Bowers J, Paterson A, Lisch D, et al. Finding and comparing syntenic regions among Arabidopsis and the outgroups papaya, poplar, and grape: CoGe with rosids. Plant Physiol. 2008;148:1772-81.
87. Solovyev V. Statistical approaches in eukaryotic gene prediction. In: Handbook of Statistical Genetics. West Sussex, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2004.
88. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647-9.
89. Revanna KV, Chiu C-C, Bierschank E, Dong Q. GSV: a web-based genome synteny viewer for customized data. BMC Bioinf. 2011;12:316.
90. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19:1639-45.
91. Li J, Dai X, Liu T, Zhao PX. LegumeIP: an integrative database for comparative genomics and transcriptomics of model legumes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D1221-1229.
92. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K-i, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059-66.
93. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(8):754-5.
94. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1451-2.