Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Gynecologic Surgery: Improving Outcomes Through Evidence-Based Medicine

Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 551-573

  Kalogera, Eleftheria ^a   Dowdy, Sean C ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Abdominal hysterectomy; Benign; Enhanced recovery; Gynecologic surgery; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Perioperative care; Vaginal hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; LAXATIVE; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ANALGESIA; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; CATHETER REMOVAL; CONVALESCENCE; ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HYPERVOLEMIA; INTESTINE PREPARATION; INTRAPERITONEAL LOCAL ANESTHETIC; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOBILIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGIONAL ANALGESIA; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCK; URINARY CATHETER; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; WOUND INFILTRATION; CLINICAL PATHWAY; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES;

CRITICAL PATHWAYS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GENITAL DISEASES, FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 84991279554     PISSN: 08898545     EISSN: 15580474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2016.04.006     Document Type: Review

References (163)

1. 1 Kehlet, H., Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78 (1997), 606–617.
2. 2 Kehlet, H., Wilmore, D.W., Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248 (2008), 189–198.
3. 3 Kehlet, H., Labat lecture 2005: surgical stress and postoperative outcome-from here to where?. Reg Anesth Pain Med 31 (2006), 47–52.
4. 4 Wilmore, D.W., From Cuthbertson to fast-track surgery: 70 years of progress in reducing stress in surgical patients. Ann Surg 236 (2002), 643–648.
5. 5 Adamina, M., Kehlet, H., Tomlinson, G.A., et al. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149 (2011), 830–840.
6. 6 Anderson, A.D., McNaught, C.E., MacFie, J., et al. Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 90 (2003), 1497–1504.
7. 7 Khan, S., Wilson, T., Ahmed, J., et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction with enhanced recovery protocols. Colorectal Dis 12 (2010), 1175–1182.
8. 8 Khoo, C.K., Vickery, C.J., Forsyth, N., et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg 245 (2007), 867–872.
9. 9 Lovely, J.K., Maxson, P.M., Jacob, A.K., et al. Case-matched series of enhanced versus standard recovery pathway in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 99 (2012), 120–126.
10. 10 Sammour, T., Zargar-Shoshtari, K., Bhat, A., et al. A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 123 (2010), 61–70.
11. 11 Spanjersberg, W.R., Reurings, J., Keus, F., et al. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(2), 2011 CD007635.
12. 12 Department of Health. Enhanced recovery partnership programme, report March 2011. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_. Accessed February 25, 2016.
13. 13 Knott, A., Pathak, S., McGrath, J.S., et al. Consensus views on implementation and measurement of enhanced recovery after surgery in England: Delphi study. BMJ Open, 2, 2012, 1V.
14. 14 Varadhan, K.K., Neal, K.R., Dejong, C.H., et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29 (2010), 434–440.
15. 15 Halaszynski, T.M., Juda, R., Silverman, D.G., Optimizing postoperative outcomes with efficient preoperative assessment and management. Crit Care Med 32 (2004), S76–S86.
16. 16 Callesen, T., Klarskov, B., Bech, K., et al. Short convalescence after inguinal herniorrhaphy with standardised recommendations: duration and reasons for delayed return to work. Eur J Surg 165 (1999), 236–241.
17. 17 Soop, M., Nygren, J., Myrenfors, P., et al. Preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment attenuates immediate postoperative insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 280 (2001), E576–E583.
18. 18 Greisen, J., Juhl, C.B., Grofte, T., et al. Acute pain induces insulin resistance in humans. Anesthesiology 95 (2001), 578–584.
19. 19 Svanfeldt, M., Thorell, A., Brismar, K., et al. Effects of 3 days of “postoperative” low caloric feeding with or without bed rest on insulin sensitivity in healthy subjects. Clin Nutr 22 (2003), 31–38.
20. 20 Brady, M., Kinn, S., Stuart, P., Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(4), 2003 CD004423.
21. 21 American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee, Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology 114 (2011), 495–511.
22. 22 Yuill, K.A., Richardson, R.A., Davidson, H.I., et al. The administration of an oral carbohydrate-containing fluid prior to major elective upper-gastrointestinal surgery preserves skeletal muscle mass postoperatively–a randomised clinical trial. Clin Nutr 24 (2005), 32–37.
23. 23 Mathur, S., Plank, L.D., McCall, J.L., et al. Randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral carbohydrate treatment in major abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 97 (2010), 485–494.
24. 24 Nygren, J., Thorell, A., Ljungqvist, O., Preoperative oral carbohydrate nutrition: an update. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 4 (2001), 255–259.
25. 25 Fanning, J., Valea, F.A., Perioperative bowel management for gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205 (2011), 309–314.
26. 26 Arnold, A., Aitchison, L.P., Abbott, J., Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation for abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22 (2015), 737–752.
27. 27 Siedhoff, M.T., Clark, L.H., Hobbs, K.A., et al. Mechanical bowel preparation before laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 123 (2014), 562–567.
28. 28 Morris, M.S., Graham, L.A., Chu, D.I., et al. Oral antibiotic bowel preparation significantly reduces surgical site infection rates and readmission rates in elective colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 261 (2015), 1034–1040.
29. 29 Toneva, G.D., Deierhoi, R.J., Morris, M., et al. Oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces length of stay and readmissions after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 216 (2013), 756–762 [discussion: 762–3].
30. 30 Kantartzis, K.L., Shepherd, J.P., The use of mechanical bowel preparation in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213 (2015), 721.e1–721.e5.
31. 31 Turan, A., Karamanlioglu, B., Memis, D., et al. The analgesic effects of gabapentin after total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 98 (2004), 1370–1373.
32. 32 Fassoulaki, A., Stamatakis, E., Petropoulos, G., et al. Gabapentin attenuates late but not acute pain after abdominal hysterectomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 23 (2006), 136–141.
33. 33 Ajori, L., Nazari, L., Mazloomfard, M.M., et al. Effects of gabapentin on postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting after abdominal hysterectomy: a double blind randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285 (2012), 677–682.
34. 34 Ong, C.K., Seymour, R.A., Lirk, P., et al. Combining paracetamol (acetaminophen) with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a qualitative systematic review of analgesic efficacy for acute postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 110 (2010), 1170–1179.
35. 35 Maund, E., McDaid, C., Rice, S., et al. Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the reduction in morphine-related side-effects after major surgery: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth 106 (2011), 292–297.
36. 36 Gupta, A., Stierer, T., Zuckerman, R., et al. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 98 (2004), 632–641.
37. 37 White, P.F., O'Hara, J.F., Roberson, C.R., et al. The impact of current antiemetic practices on patient outcomes: a prospective study on high-risk patients. Anesth Analg 107 (2008), 452–458.
38. 38 Apfel, C.C., Korttila, K., Abdalla, M., et al. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med 350 (2004), 2441–2451.
39. 39 Apfel, C.C., Heidrich, F.M., Jukar-Rao, S., et al. Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth 109 (2012), 742–753.
40. 40 Borendal Wodlin, N., Nilsson, L., Kjolhede, P., The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG 118 (2011), 299–308.
41. 41 Acheson, N., Crawford, R., The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG 118 (2011), 271–273.
42. 42 Carli, F., Kehlet, H., Baldini, G., et al. Evidence basis for regional anesthesia in multidisciplinary fast-track surgical care pathways. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36 (2011), 63–72.
43. 43 Kurz, A., Sessler, D.I., Lenhardt, R., Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hospitalization. Study of Wound Infection and Temperature Group. N Engl J Med 334 (1996), 1209–1215.
44. 44 Rajagopalan, S., Mascha, E., Na, J., et al. The effects of mild perioperative hypothermia on blood loss and transfusion requirement. Anesthesiology 108 (2008), 71–77.
45. 45 Scott, E.M., Buckland, R., A systematic review of intraoperative warming to prevent postoperative complications. AORN J 83 (2006), 1090–1104 1107–13.
46. 46 Wong, P.F., Kumar, S., Bohra, A., et al. Randomized clinical trial of perioperative systemic warming in major elective abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 94 (2007), 421–426.
47. 47 Galvao, C.M., Marck, P.B., Sawada, N.O., et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of cutaneous warming systems to prevent hypothermia. J Clin Nurs 18 (2009), 627–636.
48. 48 Perez-Protto, S., Sessler, D.I., Reynolds, L.F., et al. Circulating-water garment or the combination of a circulating-water mattress and forced-air cover to maintain core temperature during major upper-abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth 105 (2010), 466–470.
49. 49 MacKay, G., Fearon, K., McConnachie, A., et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 93 (2006), 1469–1474.
50. 50 Nisanevich, V., Felsenstein, I., Almogy, G., et al. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 103 (2005), 25–32.
51. 51 Varadhan, K.K., Lobo, D.N., A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc 69 (2010), 488–498.
52. 52 Brandstrup, B., Tonnesen, H., Beier-Holgersen, R., et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238 (2003), 641–648.
53. 53 Rahbari, N.N., Zimmermann, J.B., Schmidt, T., et al. Meta-analysis of standard, restrictive and supplemental fluid administration in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 96 (2009), 331–341.
54. 54 Lobo, D.N., Bostock, K.A., Neal, K.R., et al. Effect of salt and water balance on recovery of gastrointestinal function after elective colonic resection: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359 (2002), 1812–1818.
55. 55 Gomez-Izquierdo, J.C., Feldman, L.S., Carli, F., et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of goal-directed therapy on bowel function after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg 102 (2015), 577–589.
56. 56 Gan, T.J., Diemunsch, P., Habib, A.S., et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 118 (2014), 85–113.
57. 57 Karanicolas, P.J., Smith, S.E., Kanbur, B., et al. The impact of prophylactic dexamethasone on nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 248 (2008), 751–762.
58. 58 Carlisle, J.B., Stevenson, C.A., Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(3), 2006 CD004125.
59. 59 Charlton, S., Cyna, A.M., Middleton, P., et al. Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(12), 2010 CD007705.
60. 60 Antor, M.A., Uribe, A.A., Erminy-Falcon, N., et al. The effect of transdermal scopolamine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Front Pharmacol, 5, 2014, 55.
61. 61 Nelson, R., Edwards, S., Tse, B., Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(3), 2007 CD004929.
62. 62 Cheatham, M.L., Chapman, W.C., Key, S.P., et al. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 221 (1995), 469–476 [discussion: 476–8].
63. 63 Cutillo, G., Maneschi, F., Franchi, M., et al. Early feeding compared with nasogastric decompression after major oncologic gynecologic surgery: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 93 (1999), 41–45.
64. 64 Nelson, G., Altman, A.D., Nick, A., et al. Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) society recommendations - part I. Gynecol Oncol 140 (2016), 313–322.
65. 65 Kalogera, E., Dowdy, S.C., Mariani, A., et al. Utility of closed suction pelvic drains at time of large bowel resection for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 126 (2012), 391–396.
66. 66 Karliczek, A., Jesus, E.C., Matos, D., et al. Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 8 (2006), 259–265.
67. 67 Charoenkwan, K., Kietpeerakool, C., Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(6), 2014 CD007387.
68. 68 Morice, P., Lassau, N., Pautier, P., et al. Retroperitoneal drainage after complete Para-aortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 97 (2001), 243–247.
69. 69 Hoffmann, J., Shokouh-Amiri, M.H., Damm, P., et al. A prospective, controlled study of prophylactic drainage after colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 30 (1987), 449–452.
70. 70 Merad, F., Yahchouchi, E., Hay, J.M., et al. Prophylactic abdominal drainage after elective colonic resection and suprapromontory anastomosis: a multicenter study controlled by randomization. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 133 (1998), 309–314.
71. 71 Tytherleigh, M.G., Bokey, L., Chapuis, P.H., et al. Is a minor clinical anastomotic leak clinically significant after resection of colorectal cancer?. J Am Coll Surg 205 (2007), 648–653.
72. 72 Vignali, A., Fazio, V.W., Lavery, I.C., et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185 (1997), 105–113.
73. 73 Hoffman, M.S., Zervose, E., Colon resection for ovarian cancer: intraoperative decisions. Gynecol Oncol 111 (2008), S56–S65.
74. 74 Jurado, M., Alcazar, J.L., Baixauli, J., et al. Low colorectal anastomosis after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: risk factors analysis for leakage. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21 (2011), 397–402.
75. 75 Sagar, P.M., Hartley, M.N., Macfie, J., et al. Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 38 (1995), 254–258.
76. 76 Jesus, E.C., Karliczek, A., Matos, D., et al. Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(4), 2004 CD002100.
77. 77 Lopes, A.D., Hall, J.R., Monaghan, J.M., Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?. Obstet Gynecol 86 (1995), 960–963.
78. 78 Minig, L., Biffi, R., Zanagnolo, V., et al. Early oral versus “traditional” postoperative feeding in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intestinal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg Oncol 16 (2009), 1660–1668.
79. 79 Charoenkwan, K., Phillipson, G., Vutyavanich, T., Early versus delayed (traditional) oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(4), 2007 CD004508.
80. 80 Pearl, M.L., Valea, F.A., Fischer, M., et al. A randomized controlled trial of early postoperative feeding in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery. Obstet Gynecol 92 (1998), 94–97.
81. 81 Schilder, J.M., Hurteau, J.A., Look, K.Y., et al. A prospective controlled trial of early postoperative oral intake following major abdominal gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 67 (1997), 235–240.
82. 82 Han-Geurts, I.J., Hop, W.C., Kok, N.F., et al. Randomized clinical trial of the impact of early enteral feeding on postoperative ileus and recovery. Br J Surg 94 (2007), 555–561.
83. 83 Lewis, S.J., Egger, M., Sylvester, P.A., et al. Early enteral feeding versus “nil by mouth” after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BMJ 323 (2001), 773–776.
84. 84 Kalogera, E., Bakkum-Gamez, J.N., Jankowski, C.J., et al. Enhanced recovery in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 122 (2013), 319–328.
85. 85 van der Leeden, M., Huijsmans, R., Geleijn, E., et al. Early enforced mobilisation following surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: feasibility and outcomes. Physiotherapy 102 (2016), 103–110.
86. 86 Kehlet, H., Wilmore, D.W., Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183 (2002), 630–641.
87. 87 Lassen, K., Soop, M., Nygren, J., et al. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg 144 (2009), 961–969.
88. 88 Ind, T.E.J., Brown, R., Pyneeandee, V.M., et al. Midnight removal of urinary catheters—improved outcome after gynecological surgery. Int Urogynecol J 4 (1993), 342–345.
89. 89 Griffiths, R., Fernandez, R., Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(2), 2007 CD004011.
90. 90 Ahmed, M.R., Sayed Ahmed, W.A., Atwa, K.A., et al. Timing of urinary catheter removal after uncomplicated total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 176 (2014), 60–63.
91. 91 Buvanendran, A., Kroin, J.S., Multimodal analgesia for controlling acute postoperative pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 22 (2009), 588–593.
92. 92 Niruthisard, S., Werawataganon, T., Bunburaphong, P., et al. Improving the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal morphine with parecoxib after total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 105 (2007), 822–824.
93. 93 Blackburn, A., Stevens, J.D., Wheatley, R.G., et al. Balanced analgesia with intravenous ketorolac and patient-controlled morphine following lower abdominal surgery. J Clin Anesth 7 (1995), 103–108.
94. 94 Bhangu, A., Singh, P., Fitzgerald, J.E., et al. Postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of anastomotic leak: meta-analysis of clinical and experimental studies. World J Surg 38 (2014), 2247–2257.
95. 95 Klein, M., Gogenur, I., Rosenberg, J., Postoperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation after colorectal resection: cohort study based on prospective data. BMJ, 345, 2012, e6166.
96. 96 Gorissen, K.J., Benning, D., Berghmans, T., et al. Risk of anastomotic leakage with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 99 (2012), 721–727.
97. 97 Holte, K., Andersen, J., Jakobsen, D.H., et al. Cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors and the risk of anastomotic leakage after fast-track colonic surgery. Br J Surg 96 (2009), 650–654.
98. 98 STARSurg Collaborative. Impact of postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on adverse events after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 101 (2014), 1413–1423.
99. 99 Gobble, R.M., Hoang, H.L., Kachniarz, B., et al. Ketorolac does not increase perioperative bleeding: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast Reconstr Surg 133 (2014), 741–755.
100. 100 Gustafsson, U.O., Scott, M.J., Schwenk, W., et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37 (2013), 259–284.
101. 101 Nygren, J., Thacker, J., Carli, F., et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31 (2012), 801–816.
102. 102 de Leon-Casasola, O.A., Karabella, D., Lema, M.J., Bowel function recovery after radical hysterectomies: thoracic epidural bupivacaine-morphine versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine: a pilot study. J Clin Anesth 8 (1996), 87–92.
103. 103 Ferguson, S.E., Malhotra, T., Seshan, V.E., et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled epidural analgesia to patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after major open gynecologic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 114 (2009), 111–116.
104. 104 Chen, L.M., Weinberg, V.K., Chen, C., et al. Perioperative outcomes comparing patient controlled epidural versus intravenous analgesia in gynecologic oncology surgery. Gynecol Oncol 115 (2009), 357–361.
105. 105 Ready, L.B., Acute pain: lessons learned from 25,000 patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 24 (1999), 499–505.
106. 106 Rafi, A.N., Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia 56 (2001), 1024–1026.
107. 107 Atim, A., Bilgin, F., Kilickaya, O., et al. The efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 39 (2011), 630–634.
108. 108 Bharti, N., Kumar, P., Bala, I., et al. The efficacy of a novel approach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 112 (2011), 1504–1508.
109. 109 Owen, D.J., Harrod, I., Ford, J., et al. The surgical transversus abdominis plane block–a novel approach for performing an established technique. BJOG 118 (2011), 24–27.
110. 110 Johns, N., O'Neill, S., Ventham, N.T., et al. Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 14 (2012), e635–e642.
111. 111 Champaneria, R., Shah, L., Geoghegan, J., et al. Analgesic effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane blocks after hysterectomy: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 166 (2013), 1–9.
112. 112 Nelson, G., Altman, A.D., Nick, A., et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations– part II. Gynecol Oncol 140 (2016), 323–332.
113. 113 American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management, Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology 116 (2012), 248–273.
114. 114 Liu, S.S., Richman, J.M., Thirlby, R.C., et al. Efficacy of continuous wound catheters delivering local anesthetic for postoperative analgesia: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg 203 (2006), 914–932.
115. 115 Maric, S., Banovic, M., Sakic, Z.K., et al. Continuous wound infusion of levobupivacaine after total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Period Biol 111 (2009), 299–302.
116. 116 Zohar, E., Fredman, B., Phillipov, A., et al. The analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled bupivacaine wound instillation after total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Anesth Analg 93 (2001), 482–487 4th contents page.
117. 117 Kushner, D.M., LaGalbo, R., Connor, J.P., et al. Use of a bupivacaine continuous wound infusion system in gynecologic oncology: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 106 (2005), 227–233.
118. 118 Leong, W.M., Lo, W.K., Chiu, J.W., Analgesic efficacy of continuous delivery of bupivacaine by an elastomeric balloon infusor after abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42 (2002), 515–518.
119. 119 Kristensen, B.B., Christensen, D.S., Ostergaard, M., et al. Lack of postoperative pain relief after hysterectomy using preperitoneally administered bupivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 24 (1999), 576–580.
120. 120 Davidson, E.M., Barenholz, Y., Cohen, R., et al. High-dose bupivacaine remotely loaded into multivesicular liposomes demonstrates slow drug release without systemic toxic plasma concentrations after subcutaneous administration in humans. Anesth Analg 110 (2010), 1018–1023.
121. 121 Bramlett KW, Jones RK, Pink M, et al. A single administration of depobupivacaine intraoperatively provides analgesia and reduction in use of rescue opiates compared with bupivacaine HCl in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty [poster]. In: Presented at the XXXVI Biennial World Congress of the International College of Surgeons. Vienna, Austria; December 3–6, 2008.
122. 122 Golf, M., Daniels, S.E., Onel, E., A phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of DepoFoam(R) bupivacaine (extended-release bupivacaine local analgesic) in bunionectomy. Adv Ther 28 (2011), 776–788.
123. 123 Gorfine, S.R., Onel, E., Patou, G., et al. Bupivacaine extended-release liposome injection for prolonged postsurgical analgesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis colon rectum 54 (2011), 1552–1559.
124. 124 Smoot, J.D., Bergese, S.D., Onel, E., et al. The efficacy and safety of DepoFoam bupivacaine in patients undergoing bilateral, cosmetic, submuscular augmentation mammaplasty: a randomized, double-blind, active-control study. Aesthet Surg J 32 (2012), 69–76.
125. 125 Perniola, A., Gupta, A., Crafoord, K., et al. Intraabdominal local anaesthetics for postoperative pain relief following abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind, dose-finding study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 26 (2009), 421–429.
126. 126 Gupta, A., Perniola, A., Axelsson, K., et al. Postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy: a double-blind comparison between placebo and local anesthetic infused intraperitoneally. Anesth Analg 99 (2004), 1173–1179.
127. 127 Royal College of Physicians. Intravenous fluid therapy: intravenous fluid therapy in adults in hospital. 2013, National Clinical Guideline Centre, London.
128. 128 Dudley, H.F., Boling, E.A., Lequesne, L.P., et al. Studies on antidiuresis in surgery: effects of anesthesia, surgery and posterior pituitary antidiuretic hormone on water metabolism in man. Ann Surg 140 (1954), 354–367.
129. 129 Srinivasa, S., Hill, A.G., Perioperative fluid administration: historical highlights and implications for practice. Ann Surg 256 (2012), 1113–1118.
130. 130 Wilkes, N.J., Woolf, R., Mutch, M., et al. The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg 93 (2001), 811–816.
131. 131 Fanning, J., Yu-Brekke, S., Prospective trial of aggressive postoperative bowel stimulation following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 73 (1999), 412–414.
132. 132 Kraus, K., Fanning, J., Prospective trial of early feeding and bowel stimulation after radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182 (2000), 996–998.
133. 133 Hansen, C.T., Sorensen, M., Moller, C., et al. Effect of laxatives on gastrointestinal functional recovery in fast-track hysterectomy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196 (2007), 311.e1–311.e7.
134. 134 Ertas, I.E., Gungorduk, K., Ozdemir, A., et al. Influence of gum chewing on postoperative bowel activity after complete staging surgery for gynecological malignancies: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol 131 (2013), 118–122.
135. 135 Herzog, T.J., Coleman, R.L., Guerrieri, J.P. Jr., et al. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study of the safety of alvimopan in patients who undergo simple total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195 (2006), 445–453.
136. 136 Traut, U., Brugger, L., Kunz, R., et al. Systemic prokinetic pharmacologic treatment for postoperative adynamic ileus following abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev(1), 2008 CD004930.
137. 137 Miller, E.C., McIsaac, D.I., Chaput, A., et al. Increased postoperative day one discharges after implementation of a hysterectomy enhanced recovery pathway: a retrospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth 62 (2015), 451–460.
138. 138 Wijk, L., Franzen, K., Ljungqvist, O., et al. Implementing a structured Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol reduces length of stay after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93 (2014), 749–756.
139. 139 Narang, L., Mitchelmore, S., Byrne, H., Cost reduction and enhanced patient experience following the introduction of enhanced recovery programme in gynaecological surgery. BJOG, 120, 2013, 439.
140. 140 Torbe, E., Louden, K., An enhanced recovery programme for women undergoing hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 119, 2012, S690.
141. 141 Sjetne, I.S., Krogstad, U., Odegard, S., et al. Improving quality by introducing enhanced recovery after surgery in a gynaecological department: consequences for ward nursing practice. Qual Saf Health Care 18 (2009), 236–240.
142. 142 Carter, J., Fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: a review of a rolling clinical audit. ISRN Surg, 2012, 2012, 368014.
143. 143 Carter, J., Szabo, R., Sim, W.W., et al. Fast track surgery: a clinical audit. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 50 (2010), 159–163.
144. 144 Moller, C., Kehlet, H., Friland, S.G., et al. Fast track hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 98 (2001), 18–22.
145. 145 Chowdhury, P., Kadry, M., Raslan, F., Audit of the enhanced recovery programme for hysterectomy at West Middlesex University Hospital. BJOG, 119, 2012, 230.
146. 146 Yoong, W., Sivashanmugarajan, V., Relph, S., et al. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21 (2014), 83–89.
147. 147 Ulrich, D., Bjelic-Radisic, V., Bader, A., et al. Fast-track hysterectomy: a pilot study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282 (2010), S122–S123.
148. 148 Smith Walker, T., Hindley, J., Stocker, M., Introducing enhanced recovery into gynaecological surgery at a district general hospital. Gynecol Surg, 8, 2011, S204.
149. 149 Ottesen, M., Sorensen, M., Rasmussen, Y., et al. Fast track vaginal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81 (2002), 138–146.
150. 150 Mistrangelo, E., Deltetto, F., Febo, G., Fast track surgery in urogynecology. Neurourol Urodyn 30 (2011), 7–8.
151. 151 Perron-Burdick, M., Yamamoto, M., Zaritsky, E., Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 117 (2011), 1136–1141.
152. 152 Schiavone, M.B., Herzog, T.J., Ananth, C.V., et al. Feasibility and economic impact of same-day discharge for women who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207 (2012), 382.e1–382.e9.
153. 153 Lassen, P.D., Moeller-Larsen, H., P DEN, Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 91 (2012), 1339–1341.
154. 154 Minig, L., Chuang, L., Patrono, M.G., et al. Clinical outcomes after fast-track care in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 131 (2015), 301–304.
155. 155 Johnston, C., Crawford, N., Ahmed, I., et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: evaluating and improving service through the enhanced recovery pathway. Gynecol Surg, 12(Suppl 1), 2015, S200.
156. 156 Ali, O., Moukarram, H., Pathway of enhanced recovery for total laparoscopic hysterectomy, pilot study of 50 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 22(6), 2015, S216.
157. 157 Kent, A., Waters, N., Mitchell, W., Laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and enhanced recovery pathway (ERP). Gynecol Surg(Suppl 1), 2012, S10.
158. 158 Lemanu, D.P., Singh, P.P., Stowers, M.D., et al. A systematic review to assess cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16 (2014), 338–346.
159. 159 Anderson, B., Lutgendorf, S., Quality of life in gynecologic cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 47 (1997), 218–225.
160. 160 Cull, A., Cowie, V.J., Farquharson, D.I., et al. Early stage cervical cancer: psychosocial and sexual outcomes of treatment. Br J Cancer 68 (1993), 1216–1220.
161. 161 Auchincloss, S.S., After treatment. Psychosocial issues in gynecologic cancer survivorship. Cancer 76 (1995), 2117–2124.
162. 162 de Groot, J.J.A., van Es, L.E.J.M., Maessen, J.M.C., et al. Diffusion of enhanced recovery principles in gynecologic oncology surgery: is active implementation still necessary?. Gynecol Oncol 134 (2014), 570–575.
163. 163 Meyer, L., Nick, A., Shi, Q., et al. Comparison of patient reported symptom burden pre- and postimplementation of an enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) for gynecologic surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 25(Suppl 2), 2015, 40.