메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 2014, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL DRAINAGE; ASCITES; CANCER PREVENTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CYSTIC LYMPHANGIOMA; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT CANCER; FEVER; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE SOUND; LEG EDEMA; LENGTH OF STAY; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASE; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RETROPERITONEAL DRAINAGE; REVIEW; SHORT COURSE THERAPY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT DURATION; WOUND INFECTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPHOCELE; META ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; RETROPERITONEUM; SUCTION;

EID: 84921349987     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub3     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (15)

References (24)
  • 1
    • 0031172848 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage after lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies
    • Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Butillo G, D'Andrea G, di Palumbo VS, Conte M, et al.A randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage after lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Gynecologic Oncology 1997;65:478-82.
    • (1997) Gynecologic Oncology , vol.65 , pp. 478-482
    • Benedetti-Panici, P.1    Maneschi, F.2    Butillo, G.3    D'Andrea, G.4    di Palumbo, V.S.5    Conte, M.6
  • 2
    • 34248229696 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Randomised trial of drains versus no drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG) study in 234 patients
    • Franchi M, Trimbos J, Zanaboni F, van der Velden J, Reed N, Coens C, et al.Randomised trial of drains versus no drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG) study in 234 patients. European Journal of Cancer 2007;43:1265-8.
    • (2007) European Journal of Cancer , vol.43 , pp. 1265-1268
    • Franchi, M.1    Trimbos, J.2    Zanaboni, F.3    van der Velden, J.4    Reed, N.5    Coens, C.6
  • 3
    • 0029431180 scopus 로고
    • Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?
    • Lopes AB, Hall JR, Monaghan JM. Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: dogma or need?. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1995;86:960-3.
    • (1995) Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.86 , pp. 960-963
    • Lopes, A.B.1    Hall, J.R.2    Monaghan, J.M.3
  • 4
    • 0036592789 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer
    • Srisomboon J, Phongnarisorn C, Suprasert P, Cheewakriangkrai C, Siriaree S, Charoenkwan K. A prospective randomized study comparing retroperitoneal drainage with no drainage and no peritonization following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 2002;28(3):149-53.
    • (2002) Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research , vol.28 , Issue.3 , pp. 149-153
    • Srisomboon, J.1    Phongnarisorn, C.2    Suprasert, P.3    Cheewakriangkrai, C.4    Siriaree, S.5    Charoenkwan, K.6
  • 5
    • 0035028027 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Closed suction drainage versus no drainage following pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies
    • Bafna UD, Umadevi K, Savitha M. Closed suction drainage versus no drainage following pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecological malignancies. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer 2001;11:143-6.
    • (2001) International Journal of Gynecological Cancer , vol.11 , pp. 143-146
    • Bafna, U.D.1    Umadevi, K.2    Savitha, M.3
  • 6
    • 0030924147 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Nonclosure of peritoneum at radical abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection: a randomized study
    • Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Zanaboni F, Scarabelli C, Beretta P, Donadello N. Nonclosure of peritoneum at radical abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection: a randomized study. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;90(4):622-7.
    • (1997) Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.90 , Issue.4 , pp. 622-627
    • Franchi, M.1    Ghezzi, F.2    Zanaboni, F.3    Scarabelli, C.4    Beretta, P.5    Donadello, N.6
  • 7
    • 0027495133 scopus 로고
    • To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy
    • Jensen JK, Lucci JA 3rd, DiSaia PJ, Manetta A, Berman ML. To drain or not to drain: a retrospective study of closed-suction drainage following radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecologic Oncology 1993;51(1):46-9.
    • (1993) Gynecologic Oncology , vol.51 , Issue.1 , pp. 46-49
    • Jensen, J.K.1    Lucci, J.A.2    DiSaia, P.J.3    Manetta, A.4    Berman, M.L.5
  • 8
    • 0035153092 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Retroperitoneal drainage after complete paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer: a randomized trial
    • Morice P, Lassau N, Pautier P, Haie-Meder C, Lhomme C, Castaigne D. Retroperitoneal drainage after complete paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic cancer: a randomized trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;97(2):243-7.
    • (2001) Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.97 , Issue.2 , pp. 243-247
    • Morice, P.1    Lassau, N.2    Pautier, P.3    Haie-Meder, C.4    Lhomme, C.5    Castaigne, D.6
  • 10
    • 0029003907 scopus 로고
    • Closed-suction drainage versus no drainage following radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB cervical cancer
    • Patsner B. Closed-suction drainage versus no drainage following radical abdominal hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 1995;57:232-4.
    • (1995) Gynecologic Oncology , vol.57 , pp. 232-234
    • Patsner, B.1
  • 11
    • 0033060665 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Routine retroperitoneal drainage is not required for uncomplicated pelvic lymphadenectomy for uterine cancer
    • Patsner B. Routine retroperitoneal drainage is not required for uncomplicated pelvic lymphadenectomy for uterine cancer. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 1999;20(2):87-9.
    • (1999) European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology , vol.20 , Issue.2 , pp. 87-89
    • Patsner, B.1
  • 13
    • 0025364892 scopus 로고
    • Pelvic lymphocele following radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: incidence rate and percutaneous management
    • Conte M, Benedetti-Panici P, Guariglia L, Scambia G, Greggi S, Mancuso S. Pelvic lymphocele following radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: incidence rate and percutaneous management. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1990;76:268-71.
    • (1990) Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.76 , pp. 268-271
    • Conte, M.1    Benedetti-Panici, P.2    Guariglia, L.3    Scambia, G.4    Greggi, S.5    Mancuso, S.6
  • 14
    • 84890783342 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses
    • Version 5.0.0 [updated September 2008]. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). The Cochrane Collaboration
    • Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated September 2008]. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
    • (2008) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    • Deeks, J.J.1    Higgins, J.P.T.2    Altman, D.G.3
  • 15
    • 84887346660 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    • Version 5.0.1 [Updated September 2008]
    • Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [Updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
    • (2008) The Cochrane Collaboration
    • Higgins, J.P.T.1    Green, S.2
  • 16
  • 17
    • 0018949093 scopus 로고
    • Large lymphoceles resulting from retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy
    • Livingston W, Confer D, Smith R. Large lymphoceles resulting from retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Journal of Urology 1980;124:543-6.
    • (1980) Journal of Urology , vol.124 , pp. 543-546
    • Livingston, W.1    Confer, D.2    Smith, R.3
  • 20
    • 79960705415 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Review Manager (RevMan)
    • 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration,
    • The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
    • (2012)
  • 21
    • 0002602967 scopus 로고
    • Prevention of fistulas and lymphocysts in radical hysterectomy. Preliminary report of a new technique
    • Symmond R, Pratt J. Prevention of fistulas and lymphocysts in radical hysterectomy. Preliminary report of a new technique. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1961;17:57-64.
    • (1961) Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.17 , pp. 57-64
    • Symmond, R.1    Pratt, J.2
  • 22
    • 0013886934 scopus 로고
    • Morbidity and complications of radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection
    • Symmond R. Morbidity and complications of radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1966;94:663-78.
    • (1966) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.94 , pp. 663-678
    • Symmond, R.1
  • 23
    • 0017205066 scopus 로고
    • Surgical adjuncts in radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
    • Van Nagell J, Schweitz D. Surgical adjuncts in radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics 1976;143:735-7.
    • (1976) Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics , vol.143 , pp. 735-737
    • Van Nagell, J.1    Schweitz, D.2
  • 24
    • 84921349987 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies
    • Charoenkwan K, Kietpeerakool C. Retroperitoneal drainage versus no drainage after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the prevention of lymphocyst formation in patients with gynaecological malignancies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007387.pub2]
    • (2010) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , Issue.1
    • Charoenkwan, K.1    Kietpeerakool, C.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.