Biobank attributes associated with higher patient participation: A randomized study

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 31-36

  Gayet Ageron, Angèle ^a   Rudaz, Sandrine ^a   Perneger, Thomas ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BIOBANK; BLOOD DONOR; CONFERENCE PAPER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FACTORIAL DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN DONOR; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VIGNETTE; DONOR; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT; PUBLIC OPINION; TRENDS;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENTS; PUBLIC OPINION; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 84990235700     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.132     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Khoury MJ, Millikan R, Little J, Gwinn M: The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age. Int J Epidemiol 2004; 33: 936-944
2. Ashburn TT, Wilson SK, Eisenstein BI: Human tissue research in the genomic era of medicine: balancing individual and societal interests. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 3377-3384
3. Hofmann B: Broadening consent-and diluting ethics? J Med Ethics 2009; 35: 125-129
4. Mooser V, Currat C: The Lausanne Institutional Biobank: a new resource to catalyse research in personalised medicine and pharmaceutical sciences. Swiss Med Wkly 2014; 144: w14033
5. Master Z, Claudio JO, Rachul C, Wang JC, Minden MD, Caulfield T: Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking. BMC Med Genomics 2013; 6: 8
6. Platt J, Bollinger J, Dvoskin R, Kardia SL, Kaufman D: Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research. Genet Med 2014; 16: 11-18
7. Ruiz-Canela M, Valle-Mansilla JI, Sulmasy DP: Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain. J Med Ethics 2009; 35: 251-257
8. Ahram M, Othman A, Shahrouri M, Mustafa E: Factors influencing public participation in biobanking. Eur J Hum Genet 2014; 22: 445-451
9. Kerath SM, Klein G, Kern M et al: Beliefs and attitudes towards participating in genetic research-A population based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 114
10. Rahm AK, Wrenn M, Carroll NM, Feigelson HS: Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding. J Community Genet 2013; 4: 445-450
11. Bryant RJ, Harrison RF, Start RD et al: Ownership and uses of human tissue: what are the opinions of surgical in-patients? J Clin Pathol 2008; 61: 322-326
12. Pillai U, Phillips K, Wilkins G et al: Factors that may influence the willingness of cancer patients to consent for biobanking. Biopreserv Biobank 2014; 12: 409-414
13. McVeigh TP, Sweeney KJ, Kerin MJ, Gallagher DJ: A qualitative analysis of the attitudes of Irish patients towards participation in genetic-based research. Ir J Med Sci 23, 2015
14. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG: Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Public Health 2006; 16: 433-440
15. Nilstun T, Hermeren G: Human tissue samples and ethics-attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research. Med Health Care Philos 2006; 9: 81-86
16. Wang SS, Fridinger F, Sheedy KM, Khoury MJ: Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research. Community Genet 2001; 4: 18-26
17. Wong ML, Chia KS, Yam WM, Teodoro GR, Lau KW: Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: a survey from a community in Singapore. Clin Gene 2004; 65: 45-51
18. Trauth JM, Musa D, Siminoff L, Jewell IK, Ricci E: Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies. J Health Soc Policy 2000; 12: 23-43
19. Klima J, Fitzgerald-Butt SM, Kelleher KJ et al: Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank. Genet Med 2014; 16: 141-148
20. McDonald JA, Vadaparampil S, Bowen D et al: Intentions to donate to a biobank in a national sample of African Americans. Public Health Genomics 2014; 17: 173-182
21. Bryant J, Sanson-Fisher R, Fradgley E, Regan T, Hobden B, Ackland SP: Oncology patients overwhelmingly support tissue banking. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 413
22. Johnsson L, Helgesson G, Rafnar T et al: Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research. Eur J Hum Genet 2010; 18: 1261-1264
23. Ormond KE, Cirino AL, Helenowski IB, Chisholm RL, Wolf WA: Assessing the understanding of biobank participants. Am J Med Genet 2009; 149: 188-198
24. Simon CM, L'Heureux J, Murray JC et al: Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models. Genet Med 2011; 13: 821-831
25. Ewing AT, Erby LA, Bollinger J, Tetteyfio E, Ricks-Santi LJ, Kaufman D: Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research. Biopreserv Biobank 2015; 13: 98-106
26. Tomlinson T, De Vries R, Ryan K, Kim HM, Lehpamer N, Kim SY: Moral concerns and the willingness to donate to a research biobank. JAMA 2015; 313: 417-419
27. Lee CI, Bassett LW, Leng M et al: Patients' willingness to participate in a breast cancer biobank at screening mammogram. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 136: 899-906
28. Ridgeway JL, Han LC, Olson JE et al: Potential bias in the bank: what distinguishes refusers, nonresponders and participants in a clinic-based biobank? Public Health Genomics 2013; 16: 118-126
29. Banks E, Herbert N, Mather T, Rogers K, Jorm L: Characteristics of Australian cohort study participants who do and do not take up an additional invitation to join a long-term biobank: The 45 and Up Study. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 655
30. Porteri C, Pasqualetti P, Togni E, Parker M: Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey. BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15: 81
31. Al-Jumah MA, Abolfotouh MA: Public perception and attitude of saudis toward organ and tissue donation. Biopreserv Biobank 2011; 9: 21-27
32. Rice MS, Custer BS, Hindes DA et al: Genetic research in the blood bank: acceptability to Northern California donors. Transfusion 2010; 50: 1951-1958
33. Bennette CS, Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM et al: Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: measuring what patients value-development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing (IMPRINT). Genet Med 2013; 15: 873-881
34. Meulenkamp TM, Gevers SK, Bovenberg JA, Koppelman GH, Hylckama Vlieg A, Smets EM: Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want? Am J Med Genet 2010; 152: 2482-2492
35. Bollinger JM, Scott J, Dvoskin R, Kaufman D: Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genet Med 2012; 14: 451-457
36. Carey DJ, Fetterolf SN, Davis FD et al: The Geisinger MyCode community health initiative: an electronic health record-linked biobank for precision medicine research. Genet Med 2016; 18: 906-913
37. Gaskell G, Gottweis H, Starkbaum J et al: Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation. Eur J Hum Genet 2013; 21: 14-20