Characteristics of Australian cohort study participants who do and do not take up an additional invitation to join a long-term biobank: The 45 and Up Study

BMC Research Notes

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Banks, Emily ^a,b   Herbert, Nicol ^b   Mather, Tanya ^a   Rogers, Kris ^b   Jorm, Louisa ^b,c  

^a The Australian National University   (Australia)

^b SAX INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; COHORT ANALYSIS; DONOR; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH STATUS; HEART RATE; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHLEBOTOMY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BLOOD PRESSURE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART RATE; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW SOUTH WALES; PHLEBOTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TISSUE DONORS; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84869880549     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-655     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: empirical data from a Swedish population-based study. Melas PA, Sjöholm LK, Forsner T, Edhborg M, Juth N, Forsell Y, Lavebratt C, J Med Ethics 2010 36 2 93 98 10.1136/jme.2009.032367 20133403
2. Informed consent, participation in, and withdrawal from a population based cohort study involving genetic analysis. Matsui K, Kita Y, Ueshima H, J Med Ethics 2005 31 7 385 392 10.1136/jme.2004.009530 15994356 (Pubitemid 40945964)
3. Factors influencing patient willingness to participate in genetic research after a myocardial infection. Lanfear DE, Jones PG, Cresci S, Tang F, Rathore SS, Spertus JA, Genome Med 2011 3 6 1 8 21255381
4. Consent for genetic research in the Framingham heart study. Levy D, Splansky GL, Strand NK, Atwood LD, Benjamin EJ, Blease S, Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB, Fox CS, Kelly-Hayes M, et al. Am J Med Genet A 2010 152A 5 1250 1256 10.1002/ajmg.a.33377 20425830
5. Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research. Ford BM, Evans JS, Stoffel EM, Balmaña J, Regan MM, Syngal S, Canc Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006 15 7 1355 1359 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0816 (Pubitemid 44125294)
6. Personal characteristics of older primary care patients who provide a buccal swab for apolipoprotein E testing and banking of genetic material: the spectrum study. Bogner HR, Wittink MN, Merz JF, Straton JB, Cronholm PF, Rabins PV, Gallo JJ, Publ Health Genom 2004 7 4 202 210 (Pubitemid 40278686)
7. Willingness of ischemic stroke patients to donate DNA for genetic research: a systematic review. Meschia JF, Merino JG, J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2003 12 5 228 231 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2003.09.004 17903932 (Pubitemid 37532151)
8. UK Biobank Coordinating Centre, UK biobank: report of the integrated pilot phase Cheshire 2006 http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ Pilot-report.pdf?phpMyAdmin=trmKQlYdjjnQIgJ%2CfAzikMhEnx6
9. Cohort profile: the 45 and Up study. Banks E, Redman S, Jorm L, Armstrong B, Bauman A, Beard J, Beral V, Byles J, Corbett S, Cumming R, Int J Epidemiol 2008 37 5 941 947 17881411
10. Investigation of relative risk estimates from studies of the same population with contrasting response rates and designs. Mealing NM, Banks E, Jorm LR, Steel DG, Clements MS, Rogers KD, BMC Med Res Methodol 2010 10 26 10.1186/1471-2288-10-26 20356408
11. Randomised trial investigating the relationship of response rate for blood sample donation to site of biospecimen collection, fasting status and reminder letter: the 45 and Up study. Banks E, Herbert N, Rogers K, Mather T, Jorm L, BMC Med Res Methodol 2012 12 147 10.1186/1471-2288-12-147 23006657
12. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study. Hays RD, Liu H, Spritzer K, Cella D, Med Care 2007 45 5 32 S38 17443117
13. World Health Organization, Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic Geneva: World Health Organization 1998
14. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG, Eur J Publ Health 2006 16 4 433 440 10.1093/eurpub/cki198 (Pubitemid 44310264)
15. Biobank recruitment: motivations for nonparticipation. Goddard KAB, Smith S, Chen C, McMullen C, Johnson C, Biopreservation Biobanking 2009 7 2 119 121 10.1089/bio.2009.0006
16. Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Hoeyer K, Olofsson B-O, Mjörndal T, Lynöe N, Scand J Publ Health 2004 32 3 224 229 10.1080/14034940310019506
17. Willingness to donate blood samples for genetic research: a survey from a community in Singapore. Wong ML, Chia KS, Yam WM, Teodoro GR, Lau KW, Clin Genet 2004 65 1 45 51 15032974 (Pubitemid 38111402)
18. The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research. Bussey-Jones J, Garrett J, Henderson G, Moloney M, Blumenthal C, Corbie-Smith C, Genet Med 2010 12 2 116 121 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181cd6689 20098329
19. Factors that influence characteristics of genetic biobanks. Sanner JE, Frazier L, J Nurs Scholarsh 2007 39 1 25 29 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00139.x 17393962
20. Research design and subject characteristics predicting nonparticipation in a panel survey of older families with cancer. Neumark DE, Stommel M, Given CW, Given BA, Nurs Res 2001 50 6 363 368 10.1097/00006199-200111000-00006 11725938 (Pubitemid 33610166)
21. Consent for future genetic research: the NHANES experience in 2007-2008. McQuillan GM, Porter KS, IRB 2011 33 1 9 14 21314035
22. Socioeconomic, demographic, occupational, and health factors associated with participation in a long-term epidemiologic survey: a prospective study of the French GAZEL cohort and its target population. Goldberg M, Chastang JF, Leclerc A, Zins M, Bonenfant S, Bugel I, Kaniewski N, Schmaus A, Niedhammer I, Piciotti M, et al. Am J Epidemiol 2001 154 4 373 384 10.1093/aje/154.4.373 11495861 (Pubitemid 32756634)
23. Healthy volunteer effect in a cohort study: temporal resolution in the Adventist health study. Lindsted KD, Fraser GE, Steinkohl M, Beeson WL, J Clin Epidemiol 1996 49 7 783 790 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00009-1 8691229 (Pubitemid 26280730)
24. The shanghai Women's health study: rationale, study design, and baseline characteristics. Zheng W, Chow W-H, Yang G, Jin F, Rothman N, Blair A, Li H-L, Wen W, Ji B-T, Li Q, et al. Am J Epidemiol 2005 162 11 1123 1131 10.1093/aje/kwi322 16236996 (Pubitemid 41746625)
25. Enhancing the feasibility of large cohort studies. Manolio TA, Collins R, JAMA 2010 304 20 2290 2291 10.1001/jama.2010.1686 21098774
26. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I, BMJ 2004 328 7455 1519 10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE 15213107
27. Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53 297 with breast cancer and 100 239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, Lancet 1996 347 1713 1727 8656904