Beliefs and attitudes towards participating in genetic research - A population based cross-sectional study

BMC Public Health

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Kerath, Samantha M ^b,d   Klein, Gila ^b   Kern, Marlena ^b   Shapira, Iuliana ^c   Witthuhn, Jennifer ^b   Norohna, Nicole ^b   Kline, Myriam ^b   Baksh, Farisha ^b   Gregersen, Peter ^b   Taioli, Emanuela ^a,d  

^a DONALD AND BARBARA ZUCKER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT HOFSTRA NORTHWELL   (United States)

^b FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^c North Shore Long Island Center for Advanced Medicine   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological specimen banks; Genetic research; Public opinion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; GENETICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GENETIC RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK CITY; PUBLIC OPINION; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873345553     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-114     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Pharmacogenetics and the concept of individualized medicine. Shastry BS, Pharmacogenomics Journal 2006 6 16 21 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500338 16302022
2. Population databases boom, from Iceland to the U.S. Kaiser J, Biobanks, Science 2002 298 1158 1161 10.1126/science.298.5596.1158 12424349
3. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Easton DF, Pooley KA, Dunning AM, Pharoah PD, Thompson D, Ballinger DG, Struewing JP, Morrison J, Field H, Luben R, Wareham N, Ahmed S, Healey CS, Bowman R, Meyer KB, Haiman CA, Kolonel LK, Henderson BE, Le Marchand L, Brennan P, Sangrajrang S, Gaborieau V, Odefrey F, Shen CY, Wu PE, Wang HC, Eccles D, Evans DG, Peto J, Fletcher O, et al. Nature 2007 447 1087 1093 10.1038/nature05887 17529967
4. Novel breast cancer susceptibility locus at 9q31.2: results of a genome-wide association study. Fletcher O, Johnson N, Orr N, Hosking FJ, Gibson LJ, Walker K, Zelenika D, Gut I, Heath S, Palles C, Coupland B, Broderick P, Schoemaker M, Jones M, Williamson J, Chilcott-Burns S, Tomczyk K, Simpson G, Jacobs KB, Chanock SJ, Hunter DJ, Tomlinson IP, Swerdlow A, Ashworth A, Ross G, dos Santos Silva I, Lathrop M, Houlston RS, Peto J, J Natl Cancer Inst 2011 103 425 435 10.1093/jnci/djq563 21263130
5. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are inherited from parents and they measure heritable events. Hemminki K, Forsti A, Lorenzo Bermejo J, J Carcinog 2005 4 2 10.1186/1477-3163-4-2 15652000
6. A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer. Hunter DJ, Kraft P, Jacobs KB, Cox DG, Yeager M, Hankinson SE, Wacholder S, Wang Z, Welch R, Hutchinson A, Wang J, Yu K, Chatterjee N, Orr N, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Ziegler RG, Berg CD, Buys SS, McCarty CA, Feigelson HS, Calle EE, Thun MJ, Hayes RB, Tucker M, Gerhard DS, Fraumeni JF Jr, Hoover RN, Thomas G, Chanock SJ, Nat Genet 2007 39 870 874 10.1038/ng2075 17529973
7. Risk of estrogen receptor-positive and -negative breast cancer and single-nucleotide polymorphism 2q35-rs13387042. Milne RL, Benitez J, Nevanlinna H, Heikkinen T, Aittomaki K, Blomqvist C, Arias JI, Zamora MP, Burwinkel B, Bartram CR, Meindl A, Schmutzler RK, Cox A, Brock I, Elliott G, Reed MW, Southey MC, Smith L, Spurdle AB, Hopper JL, Couch FJ, Olson JE, Wang X, Fredericksen Z, Schurmann P, Bremer M, Hillemanns P, Dork T, Devilee P, van Asperen CJ, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009 101 1012 1018 10.1093/jnci/djp167 19567422
8. Multiple loci identified in a genome-wide association study of prostate cancer. Thomas G, Jacobs KB, Yeager M, Kraft P, Wacholder S, Orr N, Yu K, Chatterjee N, Welch R, Hutchinson A, Crenshaw A, Cancel-Tassin G, Staats BJ, Wang Z, Gonzalez-Bosquet J, Fang J, Deng X, Berndt SI, Calle EE, Feigelson HS, Thun MJ, Rodriguez C, Albanes D, Virtamo J, Weinstein S, Schumacher FR, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Cussenot O, Valeri A, et al. Nat Genet 2008 40 310 315 10.1038/ng.91 18264096
9. Genome-wide association study identifies five new breast cancer susceptibility loci. Turnbull C, Ahmed S, Morrison J, Pernet D, Renwick A, Maranian M, Seal S, Ghoussaini M, Hines S, Healey CS, Hughes D, Warren-Perry M, Tapper W, Eccles D, Evans DG, Hooning M, Schutte M, van den Ouweland A, Houlston R, Ross G, Langford C, Pharoah PD, Stratton MR, Dunning AM, Rahman N, Easton DF, Nat Genet 2010 42 504 507 10.1038/ng.586 20453838
10. Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24. Yeager M, Orr N, Hayes RB, Jacobs KB, Kraft P, Wacholder S, Minichiello MJ, Fearnhead P, Yu K, Chatterjee N, Wang Z, Welch R, Staats BJ, Calle EE, Feigelson HS, Thun MJ, Rodriguez C, Albanes D, Virtamo J, Weinstein S, Schumacher FR, Giovannucci E, Willett WC, Cancel-Tassin G, Cussenot O, Valeri A, Andriole GL, Gelmann EP, Tucker M, Gerhard DS, et al. Nat Genet 2007 39 645 649 10.1038/ng2022 17401363
11. Genome-wide association study identifies five new susceptibility loci for prostate cancer in the Japanese population. Takata R, Akamatsu S, Kubo M, Takahashi A, Hosono N, Kawaguchi T, Tsunoda T, Inazawa J, Kamatani N, Ogawa O, Fujioka T, Nakamura Y, Nakagawa H, Nat Genet 2010 42 751 754 10.1038/ng.635 20676098
12. Genetics without borders. Nature 2009 461 697 19812627
13. Informed consent for genetic research. Botkin JR, Current Protocol in Human Genetics; Chapter 1:Unit 1, 16 23204224
14. Genetics. Genomic research and human subject privacy. Lin Z, Owen AB, Altman RB, Science 2004 305 183 10.1126/science.1095019 15247459
15. Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. Homer N, Szelinger S, Redman M, Duggan D, Tembe W, Muehling J, Pearson JV, Stephan DA, Nelson SF, Craig DW, PLoS Genetic 2008 4 1000167 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167
16. Department of Defense DNA registry raises legal, ethical issues. Mnookin S, GeneWatch 1996 10 1 11 11656662
17. Silent witness, articulate collective: DNA evidence and the inference of visible traits. M'Charek A, Bioethics 2008 22 519 528 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008. 00699.x 18959734
18. Public attitudes to the storage of blood left over from routine general practice tests and its use in research. Treweek S, Doney A, Leiman D, J Health Serv Res Pol 2009 14 13 19.26 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008016
19. Public perceptions of biomedical research: a survey of the general population in Ireland. Cousins G, McGee H, Ring L, Conroy R, Kay E, Croke D, Tomkin D, Health Serv Res Board Report 2005 1 76
20. Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns. Tupasela A, Sihvo S, Snell K, Jallinoja P, Aro AR, Hemminki E, Scand J Public Health 2010 38 1 46 52 10.1177/1403494809353824 19906772
21. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA): public policy and medical practice in the age of personalized medicine.[published on-line ahead of print on Feb. 12, 2012]. Feldman EA, J General Int Med 2012 2012 22 2012 Accessed April 22, 2012
22. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG, Eur J Public Health 2006 16 4 433 440 10.1093/eurpub/cki198 16207726
23. Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank. Brothers BB, Morrison DR, Clayton EW, Am J Med Genet 2011 Part A 155 2982 2990
24. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Kaufman D, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson K, Am J Hum Genet 2009 85 643 654 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.10.002 19878915
25. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Secko D, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess M, Soc Sci Med 2009 68 781 789 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.020 19095337
26. Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature. Sterling R, Henderson GE, Corbie-Smith G, Am J Public Health 2006 96 1971 1978 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069286 17018829
27. Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LrRoy L, Hudson K, Health Pol Ethics 2009 99 12 2128 2134
28. Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models. Simon CM, L'heureux J, Murray JC, Winokur P, Weiner G, Newbury E, Shikunas L, Zimmerman B, Genet Med 2011 13 9 821 831 10.1097/GIM. 0b013e31821d2f88 21555942
29. Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study. Bollinger JM, Scott J, Dvorskin R, Kaufman D, Genet Med 2012 14 4 451 457 10.1038/gim.2011.66 22402755
30. Human tissue samples and ethics-attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research. Nilstun T, Hermeren G, Med Health Care Philos 2006 9 1 81 86 10.1007/s11019-005-7984-4 16645800
31. The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic repository. Harris E, Ziniel S, Amatruda J, Clinton C, Savage S, Taylor P, Huntington N, Green R, Holm I, Genetics in Medicine 2012 14 3 330 337 10.1038/gim.2011.25 22241099
32. Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, http://www.census.gov