Intentions to donate to a biobank in a national sample of African Americans

Public Health Genomics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 173-182

  Mcdonald, Jasmine A ^a   Vadaparampil, Susan ^b   Bowen, Deborah ^c   Magwood, Gayenell ^d   Obeid, Jihad S ^d,e   Jefferson, Melanie ^d,e   Drake, Richard ^d,e   Gebregziabher, Mulugeta ^e   Halbert, Chanita Hughes ^d,e  

^a Department of Epidemiology Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^e MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

African Americans; Attitudes; Biobanking

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BLOOD BANK; CANCER GENETICS; DONOR; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADULT; AGE; BEHAVIOR; ETHNOLOGY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MINORITY GROUP; MOTIVATION; NEOPLASM; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRUST; BIOBANK; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC SCREENING; HEALTH INSURANCE; INTENTION TO DONATE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGE FACTORS; BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GENETIC RESEARCH; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTENTION; MALE; MINORITY GROUPS; MOTIVATION; NEOPLASMS; TISSUE DONORS; TRUST;

EID: 84902302488     PISSN: 16624246     EISSN: 16628063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000360472     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Bowen D, Finkelstein D, Griffin C, Hanson J, Isaacs C, Kasten-Sportes C, Mineau G, Nadkarni P, Rimer B, Schildkraut J, Strong L, Weber B, Winn D, Hiatt R, Nayfield S: The Cancer Genetics Network: Recruitment results and pilot studies. Community Genet 2003; 6: 171-177 (Pubitemid 38916116)
2. Austin MA, Harding S, McElroy C: Genebanks: A comparison of eight proposed international genetic databases. Community Genet 2003; 6: 37-45 (Pubitemid 36693837)
3. Kaiser J: Genomic medicine. African-American population biobank proposed. Science 2003; 300: 1485 (Pubitemid 36682848)
4. Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, Kimura M, Tryka K, Bagoutdinov R, Hao L, Kiang A, Paschall J, Phan L, Popova N, Pretel S, Ziyabari L, Lee M, Shao Y, Wang ZY, Sirotkin K, Ward M, Kholodov M, Zbicz K, Beck J, Kimelman M, Shevelev S, Preuss D, Yaschenko E, Graeff A, Ostell J, Sherry ST: The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat Genet 2007; 39: 1181-1186 (Pubitemid 47482671)
5. Massett HA, Atkinson NL, Weber D, Myles R, Ryan C, Grady M, Compton C: Assessing the need for a standardized cancer HUman Biobank (caHUB): Findings from a national survey with cancer researchers. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2011; 8-15
6. Shaw PM, Patterson SD: The value of banked samples for oncology drug discovery and development. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2011; 46-49
7. Vaught J, Rogers J, Myers K, Lim MD, Lockhart N, Moore H, Sawyer S, Furman JL, Compton C: An NCI perspective on creating sustainable biospecimen resources. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2011; 1-7
8. National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, vol 1. Rockville, National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 1999
9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. 2003. www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/summary/index. html
10. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME: Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 368-377
11. McQuillan GM, Pan Q, Porter KS: Consent for genetic research in a general population: An update on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey experience. Genet Med 2006; 8: 354-360 (Pubitemid 44297306)
12. Bussey-Jones J, Garrett J, Henderson G, Moloney M, Blumenthal C, Corbie-Smith G: The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research. Genet Med 2010; 12: 116-121
13. Kaufman DJ, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson KL: Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am J Hum Genet 2009; 85: 643-654
14. Haga SB: Impact of limited population diversity of genome-wide association studies. Genet Med 2010; 12: 81-84
15. Halverson CM, Ross LF: Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobankbased research. Genet Med 2012; 14: 611-615
16. Montano DE, Kasprzyk D: Theory of reasonsed action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model; in Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K (eds): Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, John Wiley & Sons, 2008, pp 67-96
17. McDonald JA, Barg FK, Weathers B, Guerra CE, Troxel AB, Domchek S, Bowen D, Shea JA, Halbert CH: Understanding participation by African Americans in cancer genetics research. J Natl Med Assoc 2012; 104: 324-330
18. Hughes C, Gomez-Caminero A, Benkendorf J, Kerner J, Isaacs C, Barter J, Lerman C: Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk. Patient Educ Couns 1997; 32: 51-62 (Pubitemid 27395979)
19. Kessler L, Collier A, Brewster K, Smith C, Weathers B, Wileyto EP, Halbert CH: Attitudes about genetic testing and genetic testing intentions in African American women at increased risk for hereditary breast cancer. Genet Med 2005; 7: 230-238 (Pubitemid 40638068)
20. Kessler L, Collier A, Halbert CH: Knowledge about genetics among African Americans. J Genet Couns 2007; 16: 191-200 (Pubitemid 46355035)
21. Halbert CH, Armstrong K, Gandy OH Jr, Shaker L: Racial differences in trust in health care providers. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 896-901
22. McDonald JA, Weathers B, Barg FK, Troxel AB, Shea JA, Bowen D, Guerra CE, Halbert CH: Donation intentions for cancer genetics research among African Americans. Genet Test Mole Biomarkers 2012; 16: 252-258
23. Lemke AA, Halverson C, Ross LF: Biobank participation and returning research results: Perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Am J Med Genet 2012; 158A: 1029-1037
24. Pew Research Institute: Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys. 2012. http: //www.people-press.org/2012/05/15/assessing-The- representativeness-of-publicopinion-surveys/.
25. Halbert CH, Kessler L, Stopfer JE, Domchek S, Wileyto EP: Low rates of acceptance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 test results among African American women at increased risk for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. Genet Med 2006; 8: 576-582 (Pubitemid 44402035)
26. McQuillan GM, Porter KS, Agelli M, Kington R: Consent for genetic research in a general population: The NHANES experience. Genet Med 2003; 5: 35-42
27. Moorman PG, Skinner CS, Evans JP, Newman B, Sorenson JR, Calingaert B, Susswein L, Crankshaw TS, Hoyo C, Schildkraut JM: Racial differences in enrolment in a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 2004; 13: 1349-1354 (Pubitemid 39071560)
28. Hughes C, Peterson SK, Ramirez A, Gallion KJ, McDonald PG, Skinner CS, Bowen D: Minority recruitment in hereditary breast cancer research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarker Prev 2004; 13: 1146-1155 (Pubitemid 38917903)
29. National Institutes of Health: NIH Guideline on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. http: //grants. nih.gov/grants/funding/women-min/guidelines- update.htm
30. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Questions and Answers on Inclusion of Minorities and Women in Study Populations. http: //www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/policies/ nhlbigui.htm.