Erratum: Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation (European Journal of Human Genetics (2012) DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.104);Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 14-20

  Gaskell, George ^a   Gottweis, Herbert ^b,h   Starkbaum, Johannes ^b   Gerber, Monica M ^a   Broerse, Jacqueline ^c   Gottweis, Ursula ^b   Hobbs, Abbi ^d   Helén, Ilpo ^e   Paschou, Maria ^f   Snell, Karoliina ^e   Soulier, Alexandra ^g  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

^g INSERM   (France)

^h Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

biobanks; public attitudes; public opinion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOBANK; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPUTER SECURITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; EUROPE; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOMICS; HEALTH SURVEY; HEREDITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; POLITICAL SYSTEM; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SOCIETY;

EID: 84871195411     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.236     Document Type: Erratum

References (30)

1. HUGO Ethics Committee: Statement on Human Genomic Databases. Human Genome Organizations. December 2002. http://www.hugo-international.org/img/genomic- 2002.pdf.
2. Knoppers BM: Consent revisited: points to consider. Health Law Rev 2005; 13: 33-38.
3. Caulfield T, Kaye J: Broad consent in biobanking: reflections on seemingly insurmountable dilemmas. Med Law Int 2009; 10: 85-100.
4. Gottweis H, Chen H, Starkbaum J: Biobanks and the phantom public. Hum Genet 2011; 130: 433-440.
5. Lipworth W, Forsyth R, Kerridge I: Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies. Sociol Health Illness 2011; 33: 792-811.
6. Kaufman D, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson K: Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am J Hum Genet 2009; 85: 643-654.
7. Lemke A, Wolf W, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith M: Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010; 13: 368-377.
8. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG: Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: A population-based study. Scand J Public Health 2007; 35: 148-156.
9. Tupasela A, Sihvo S, Karoliina S, Jallinoja PA, Aro AR, Hemminki E: Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns. Scand J Public Health 2010; 38: 45-52.
10. Hallowell N, Cooke S, Crawford G, Lucassen A, Parker M, Snowdon C: An investigation of patients' motivations for their participation in genetics-related research. J Med Ethics 2010; 36: 37-45.
11. Chadwick R, Berg K: Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2: 318-321.
12. Knoppers B: Consent to 'personal' genomics and privacy. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests and population genome research challenge traditional notions of privacy and consent. Eur Mol Biol Organ 2010; 11: 416-419.
13. Roche PA, Annas GJ: Protecting genetic privacy. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2: 392-396.
14. Hobbes A, Starkbaum J, Gottweis U, Wichmann H, Gottweis H: The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing german with UK strategies. Public Health Genomics, in press.
15. Nilstun T, Hermerén G: Human tissue samples and ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2006; 9: 81-86.
16. Snell K, Starkbaum J, Lauss G, Vermeer A, Hélen I: Reassessing privacy in biobanking. The significance of control within the digital information flows. Public Health Genomics, in press.
17. Knoppers BM: Consent revisited: points to consider. Health Law Rev 2005; 13: 33-38.
18. Hoeyer K: The ethics of research biobanking: a critical review of the literature. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 2008; 25: 429-452.
19. Tupasela A, Sihvo S, Karoliina S, Jallinoja PA, Aro AR, Hemminki E: Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns. Scand J Public Health 2010; 38: 45-52.
20. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG: Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: A population-based study. Scand J Public Health 2007; 35: 148-156.
21. Goodson ML, Vernon BG: A study of public opinion on the use of tissue samples from living subjects for clinical research. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57: 135-138.
22. Hoeyer K, Olofsson BO, Mjörndal T, Lynöe N: The ethics of research using biobanks: reason to question the importance attributed to informed consent. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 97-100.
23. Hemminki E, Tupasela A, Jallinoja P, Aro AR, Snell K, Sihvo S: Finnish people's attitudes towards biomedical research and its sponsorship. Genomics Soc Policy 2009; 5: 67-79.
24. Spencer B, Koutaissoff D, Lehr HA: Informed consent: biobank donors should have a say. Nature 2012; 481: 443-443.
25. Von Schomberg R: Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation; in Dusseldorp M, Beecroft R (eds): Technikfolgen Absch Tzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplin Rer Methoden. Vs Verlag: Wiesbaden, 2012, pp 39-61.
26. Gaskell G, Stares S, Allansdottir A et al: Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010: Winds of Change, European Commission, Eurobarometer, EUR 24537, Luxembourg: Publications of the European Union, 2010.
27. Barber B: The Logic and Limits of Trust. Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ, 1983.
28. Bauer M, Gaskell G (eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. Sage: London, 2000.
29. Cambon-Thomsen A, Rial-Sebbag E, Knoppers BM: Trends in ethical and legal frameworks for the use of human biobanks. Eur Respir J 2007; 30: 373-382.
30. Krippendorff K: Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology. Los Angeles: Sage, 2004.