Mapping transiently formed and sparsely populated conformations on a complex energy landscape

eLife

Volumn 5, Issue AUGUST, 2016, Pages

  Wang, Yong ^a   Papaleo, Elena ^a   Lindorff Larsen, Kresten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYCLOPHILIN A; LIGAND; LYSOZYME;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; KINETICS; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MUTATION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; THERMODYNAMICS; CHEMISTRY; ENTEROBACTERIA PHAGE T4; ENZYMOLOGY;

BACTERIOPHAGE T4; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MURAMIDASE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 84990040717     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.17505     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Baldwin AJ, Kay LE. 2009. NMR spectroscopy brings invisible protein states into focus. Nature Chemical Biology 5:808–814. doi:10.1038/nchembio.238
2. Barducci A, Bussi G, Parrinello M. 2008. Well-tempered metadynamics: a smoothly converging and tunable free- energy method. Physical Review Letters 100:020603. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.020603
3. Barducci A, Pfaendtner J, Bonomi M. 2015. Tackling sampling challenges in biomolecular simulations. Molecular Modeling of Proteins. Springer. p151–171
4. Best RB, Hummer G. 2009. Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-Coil transition of polypeptides. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 113:9004–9015. doi:10.1021/jp901540t
5. Bonomi M, Branduardi D, Bussi G, Camilloni C, Provasi D, Raiteri P, Donadio D, Marinelli F, Pietrucci F, Broglia RA, Parrinello M. 2009. PLUMED: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics. Computer Physics Communications 180:1961–1972. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.01
6. Bonomi M, Parrinello M. 2010. Enhanced sampling in the well-tempered ensemble. Physical Review Letters 104: 190601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.190601
7. Boomsma W, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, Lindorff-Larsen K. 2014. Combining experiments and simulations using the maximum entropy principle. PLoS Computational Biology 10:e1003406. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003406
8. Bouvignies G, Vallurupalli P, Hansen DF, Correia BE, Lange O, Bah A, Vernon RM, Dahlquist FW, Baker D, Kay LE. 2011. Solution structure of a minor and transiently formed state of a T4 lysozyme mutant. Nature 477:111–114. doi:10.1038/nature10349
9. Branduardi D, Bussi G, Parrinello M. 2012. Metadynamics with adaptive gaussians. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 8:2247–2254. doi:10.1021/ct3002464
10. Branduardi D, Gervasio FL, Parrinello M. 2007. From A to B in free energy space. The Journal of Chemical Physics 126:054103. doi:10.1063/1.2432340
11. Bussi G, Donadio D, Parrinello M. 2007. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. The Journal of Chemical Physics 126:014101. doi:10.1063/1.2408420
12. Camilloni C, Cavalli A, Vendruscolo M. 2013. Replica-Averaged Metadynamics. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9:5610–5617. doi:10.1021/ct4006272
13. Cavalli A, Camilloni C, Vendruscolo M. 2013. Molecular dynamics simulations with replica-averaged structural restraints generate structural ensembles according to the maximum entropy principle. The Journal of Chemical Physics 138:094112. doi:10.1063/1.4793625
14. Chovancova E, Pavelka A, Benes P, Strnad O, Brezovsky J, Kozlikova B, Gora A, Sustr V, Klvana M, Medek P, Biedermannova L, Sochor J, Damborsky J. 2012. CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures. PLoS Computational Biology 8:e1002708. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002708
15. Czerminski R, Elber R. 1990. Self-avoiding walk between two fixed points as a tool to calculate reaction paths in large molecular systems. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 38:167–185. doi:10.1002/qua.560382419
16. Dama JF, Parrinello M, Voth GA. 2014. Well-tempered metadynamics converges asymptotically. Physical Review Letters 112:240602. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.240602
17. Eaton WA, Muñoz V. 2014. Impact of atomistic molecular dynamics simulations on understanding how proteins fold: an experimentalist’s perspective. Bioinformatics.
18. Elber R, Roitberg A, Simmerling C, Goldstein R, Li H, Verkhivker G, Keasar C, Zhang J, Ulitsky A. 1995. MOIL: A program for simulations of macromolecules. Computer Physics Communications 91:159–189. doi:10.1016/0010-4655(95)00047-J
19. Eriksson AE, Baase WA, Wozniak JA, Matthews BW. 1992. A cavity-containing mutant of T4 lysozyme is stabilized by buried benzene. Nature 355:371–373. doi:10.1038/355371a0
20. Eriksson A, Baase W, Zhang X, Heinz D, Blaber M, Baldwin E, Matthews B. 1992. Response of a protein structure to cavity-creating mutations and its relation to the hydrophobic effect. Science 255:178–183. doi:10.1126/science.1553543
21. Feher VA, Baldwin EP, Dahlquist FW. 1996. Access of ligands to cavities within the core of a protein is rapid. Nature Structural Biology 3:516–521. doi:10.1038/nsb0696-516
22. Fraser JS, Clarkson MW, Degnan SC, Erion R, Kern D, Alber T. 2009. Hidden alternative structures of proline isomerase essential for catalysis. Nature 462:669–673. doi:10.1038/nature08615
23. Fu B, Sahakyan AB, Camilloni C, Tartaglia GG, Paci E, Caflisch A, Vendruscolo M, Cavalli A. 2014. ALMOST: an all atom molecular simulation toolkit for protein structure determination. Journal of Computational Chemistry 35:1101–1105. doi:10.1002/jcc.2358
24. Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE. 2008. Using relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy to determine structures of excited, invisible protein states. Journal of Biomolecular NMR 41:113–120. doi:10.1007/s10858-008-9251-5
25. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. 2006. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 65:712–725. doi:10.1002/prot.21123
26. Karplus M, Lavery R. 2014. Significance of molecular dynamics simulations for life sciences. Israel Journal of Chemistry 54:1042–1051. doi:10.1002/ijch.201400074
27. Kohlhoff KJ, Robustelli P, Cavalli A, Salvatella X, Vendruscolo M. 2009. Fast and accurate predictions of protein NMR chemical shifts from interatomic distances. Journal of the American Chemical Society 131:13894–13895. doi:10.1021/ja903772t
28. Koshland DE. 1958. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. PNAS 44:98. doi:10.1073/pnas.44.2.98
29. Kozlikova B, Sebestova E, Sustr V, Brezovsky J, Strnad O, Daniel L, Bednar D, Pavelka A, Manak M, Bezdeka M, Benes P, Kotry M, Gora A, Damborsky J, Sochor J, Sochor J. 2014. CAVER Analyst 1.0: graphic tool for interactive visualization and analysis of tunnels and channels in protein structures. Bioinformatics 30:2684–2685. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu364
30. Laio A, Parrinello M. 2002. Escaping free-energy minima. PNAS 99:12562–12566. doi:10.1073/pnas.20242739
31. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, Dror RO, Shaw DE. 2010. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 78: 1950–1958. doi:10.1002/prot.2271
32. Liu L, Baase WA, Matthews BW. 2009. Halogenated benzenes bound within a non-polar cavity in T4 lysozyme provide examples of I…S and I…Se halogen-bonding. Journal of Molecular Biology 385:595–605. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2008.10.086
33. Lukin JA, Kontaxis G, Simplaceanu V, Yuan Y, Bax A, Ho C. 2003. Quaternary structure of hemoglobin in solution. PNAS 100:517–520. doi:10.1073/pnas.23271579
34. López CJ, Yang Z, Altenbach C, Hubbell WL. 2013. Conformational selection and adaptation to ligand binding in T4 lysozyme cavity mutants. PNAS 110:E4306–E4315. doi:10.1073/pnas.1318754110
35. Majek P, Elber R, Weinstein H. 2008. Pathways of conformational transitions in proteins. In: Voth G. A (Ed). Coarse-Graining of Condensed Phase and Biomolecular Systems. Boca Raton: FL: CRC Press. p. 185–203.
36. Marchi M, Ballone P. 1999. Adiabatic bias molecular dynamics: A method to navigate the conformational space of complex molecular systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics 110:3697–3702. doi:10.1063/1.478259
37. Merski M, Fischer M, Balius TE, Eidam O, Shoichet BK. 2015. Homologous ligands accommodated by discrete conformations of a buried cavity. PNAS 112:5039–5044. doi:10.1073/pnas.1500806112
38. Miao Y, Feher VA, McCammon JA. 2015. Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics: Unconstrained enhanced sampling and free energy calculation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 11:3584–3595. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00436
39. Mulder FA, Hon B, Mittermaier A, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE. 2002. Slow internal dynamics in proteins: application of NMR relaxation dispersion spectroscopy to methyl groups in a cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme. Journal of the American Chemical Society 124:1443–1451. doi:10.1021/ja0119806
40. Mulder FA, Hon B, Muhandiram DR, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE. 2000. Flexibility and ligand exchange in a buried cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme studied by multinuclear NMR. Biochemistry 39:12614–12622. doi:10.1021/bi001351t
41. Mulder FA, Mittermaier A, Hon B, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE. 2001. Studying excited states of proteins by NMR spectroscopy. Nature Structural Biology 8:932–935. doi:10.1038/nsb1101-932
42. Neal S, Nip AM, Zhang H, Wishart DS. 2003. Rapid and accurate calculation of protein 1H, 13C and 15N chemical shifts. Journal of Biomolecular NMR 26:215–240.
43. Onuchic JN, Luthey-Schulten Z, Wolynes PG. 1997. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 48:545–600. doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.48.1.545
44. Paci E, Karplus M. 1999. Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: an analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Molecular Biology 288:441–459. doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2670
45. Papaleo E, Sutto L, Gervasio FL, Lindorff-Larsen K. 2014. Conformational changes and free energies in a proline isomerase. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10:4169–4174. doi:10.1021/ct500536r
46. Piana S, Lindorff-Larsen K, Shaw DE. 2011. How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization? Biophysical Journal 100:L47–L49. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.051
47. Pitera JW, Chodera JD. 2012. On the use of experimental observations to bias simulated ensembles. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 8:3445–3451. doi:10.1021/ct300112v
48. Pronk S, Páll S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, Apostolov R, Shirts MR, Smith JC, Kasson PM, van der Spoel D, Hess B, Lindahl E. 2013. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29:845–854. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt05
49. Robustelli P, Kohlhoff K, Cavalli A, Vendruscolo M. 2010. Using NMR chemical shifts as structural restraints in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. Structure 18:923–933. doi:10.1016/j.str.2010.04.016
50. Roux B, Weare J. 2013. On the statistical equivalence of restrained-ensemble simulations with the maximum entropy method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 138:084107. doi:10.1063/1.4792208
51. Saladino G, Gauthier L, Bianciotto M, Gervasio FL. 2012. Assessing the Performance of Metadynamics and Path Variables in Predicting the Binding Free Energies of p38 Inhibitors. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 8:1165–1170. doi:10.1021/ct300137
52. Salvalaglio M, Tiwary P, Parrinello M. 2014. Assessing the Reliability of the Dynamics Reconstructed from Metadynamics. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10:1420–1425. doi:10.1021/ct500040r
53. Sekhar A, Kay LE. 2013. NMR paves the way for atomic level descriptions of sparsely populated, transiently formed biomolecular conformers. PNAS 110:12867–12874. doi:10.1073/pnas.1305688110
54. Shen Y, Bax A. 2010. SPARTA+: a modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by means of an artificial neural network. Journal of Biomolecular NMR 48:13–22. doi:10.1007/s10858-010-9433-9
55. Söderhjelm P, Tribello GA, Parrinello M. 2012. Locating binding poses in protein-ligand systems using reconnaissance metadynamics. PNAS 109:5170–5175. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201940109
56. Sutto L, Gervasio FL. 2013. Effects of oncogenic mutations on the conformational free-energy landscape of EGFR kinase. PNAS 110:10616–10621. doi:10.1073/pnas.1221953110
57. Tang C, Schwieters CD, Clore GM. 2007. Open-to-closed transition in apo maltose-binding protein observed by paramagnetic NMR. Nature 449:1078–1082. doi:10.1038/nature06232
58. Tiwary P, Limongelli V, Salvalaglio M, Parrinello M. 2015. Kinetics of protein–ligand unbinding: Predicting pathways, rates, and rate-limiting steps. PNAS 112:E386–E391. doi:10.1073/pnas.1424461112
59. Tiwary P, Mondal J, Morrone JA, Berne BJ. 2015. Role of water and steric constraints in the kinetics of cavity–ligand unbinding. PNAS 112:12015–12019. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516652112
60. Tiwary P, Parrinello M. 2013. From metadynamics to dynamics. Physical Review Letters 111:230602. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.230602
61. Tribello GA, Bonomi M, Branduardi D, Camilloni C, Bussi G. 2014. PLUMED 2: New feathers for an old bird. Computer Physics Communications 185:604–613. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018
62. Tribello GA, Ceriotti M, Parrinello M. 2010. A self-learning algorithm for biased molecular dynamics. PNAS 107: 17509–17514. doi:10.1073/pnas.1011511107
63. Tribello GA, Cuny J, Eshet H, Parrinello M. 2011. Exploring the free energy surfaces of clusters using reconnaissance metadynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics 135:114109. doi:10.1063/1.3628676
64. Ulrich EL, Akutsu H, Doreleijers JF, Harano Y, Ioannidis YE, Lin J, Livny M, Mading S, Maziuk D, Miller Z, Nakatani E, Schulte CF, Tolmie DE, Kent Wenger R, Yao H, Markley JL. 2008. BioMagResBank. Nucleic Acids Research 36:D402–D408. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm957
65. Vallurupalli P, Bouvignies G, Kay LE. 2012. Studying "invisible" excited protein states in slow exchange with a major state conformation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 134:8148–8161. doi:10.1021/ja3001419
66. Vallurupalli P, Chakrabarti N, Pomès R, Kay LE. 2016. Atomistic picture of conformational exchange in a T4 lysozyme cavity mutant: an experiment-guided molecular dynamics study. Chemical Science 7:3602–3613. doi:10.1039/C5SC03886C
67. Wang J, Wang Y, Chu X, Hagen SJ, Han W, Wang E. 2011. Multi-scaled explorations of binding-induced folding of intrinsically disordered protein inhibitor IA3 to its target enzyme. PLoS Computational Biology 7:e1001118. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001118
68. Wang Y, Tang C, Wang E, Wang J. 2012. Exploration of multi-state conformational dynamics and underlying global functional landscape of maltose binding protein. PLoS Computational Biology 8:e1002471. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002471
69. Zhuravlev PI, Papoian GA. 2010. Protein functional landscapes, dynamics, allostery: a tortuous path towards a universal theoretical framework. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics 43:295–332. doi:10.1017/S0033583510000119