Locating binding poses in protein-ligand systems using reconnaissance metadynamics

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 5170-5175

  Söderhjelm, Pär ^a   Tribello, Gareth A ^a   Parrinello, Michele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENZAMIDINE; LIGAND; PROTEIN; TRYPSIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ENERGY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALGORITHMS; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84859448304     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201940109     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Gilson MK, Zhou HX (2007) Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 36:21-42. (Pubitemid 46998108)
2. Singh N, Warshel A (2010) Absolute binding free energy calculations: On the accuracy of computational scoring of protein-ligand interactions. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 78:1705-1723.
3. Essex JW, Severance DL, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL (1997) Monte Carlo simulations for proteins: Binding affinities for trypsin-benzamidine complexes via free-energy perturbations. J Phys Chem B 101:9663-9669. (Pubitemid 127581283)
4. Tribello G, Ceriotti M, Parrinello M (2010) A self-learning algorithm for biased molecular dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:17509-17514.
5. Hetenyi C, van der Spoel D (2011) Toward prediction of functional protein pockets using blind docking and pocket search algorithms. Protein Science 20:880-893.
6. Huang S, Zou X (2010) Advances and challenges in protein-ligand docking. Int J Mol Sci 11:3016-3034.
7. Ferrara P, Gohlke H, Price D, Klebe G, Brooks C (2004) Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. J Med Chem 47:3032-3047. (Pubitemid 38702700)
8. Warren G, et al. (2006) A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J Med Chem 49:5912-5931. (Pubitemid 44484938)
9. Huang S, Grinter S, Zou X (2010) Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: Recent advances and future directions. Phys Chem Chem Phys 12:12899-12908.
10. Miranker A, Karplus M (1995) An automated method for dynamic ligand design. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 23:472-490. (Pubitemid 26009888)
11. Carlson H, et al. (2000) Developing a dynamic pharmacophore model for HIV-1 integrase. J Med Chem 43:2100-2114. (Pubitemid 30354535)
12. Buch I, Giorgino T, De Fabritiis G (2011) Complete reconstruction of an enzymeinhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:10184-10189.
13. Dror R, et al. (2011) Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13118-13123.
14. Shan Y, et al. (2011) How does a drug molecule find its target binding site? J Am Chem Soc 133:9181-9183.
15. Gallicchio E, Levy R (2011) Advances in all atom sampling methods for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities. Curr Opin Struct Biol 21:161-166.
16. Woods C, Jonathan W, King M (2003) Enhanced configurational sampling in binding free-energy calculations. J Phys Chem B 107:13711-13718.
17. Knight J, Brooks C, III (2009) λ-dynamics free energy simulation methods. J Comput Chem 30:1692-1700.
18. Nakajima N, Higo J, Kidera A, Nakamura H (1997) Flexible docking of a ligand peptide to a receptor protein by multicanonical molecular dynamics simulation. Chem Phys Lett 278:297-301. (Pubitemid 127167026)
19. Higo J, Nishimura Y, Nakamura H (2011) A free-energy landscape for coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein in explicit solvent from detailed all-atom computations. J Am Chem Soc 133:10448-10458.
20. Torrie GM, Valleau JP (1977) Nonphysical sampling distributions in Monte Carlo freeenergy estimation: Umbrella sampling. J Chem Phys 23:187-199.
21. Hendrix D, Jarzynski C (2001) A "fast growth" method of computing free energy differences. J Chem Phys 114:5974-5981. (Pubitemid 32419574)
22. Darve E, Pohorille A (2001) Calculating free energies using average force. J Chem Phys 115:9169-9183. (Pubitemid 33128021)
23. Laio A, Parrinello M (2002) Escaping free-energy minima. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12562-12566.
24. Woo HJ, Roux B (2005) Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6825-6830.
25. Jensen M, Park S, Tajkhorshid E, Schulten K (2002) Energetics of glycerol conduction through aquaglyceroporin GlpF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6731-6736. (Pubitemid 34527148)
26. Cai W, Sun T, Liu P, Chipot C, Shao X (2009) Inclusion mechanism of steroid drugs into β- cyclodextrins. Insights from free energy calculations. J Phys Chem B 113:7836-7843.
27. Gervasio F, Laio A, Parrinello M (2005) Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics. J Am Chem Soc 127:2600-2607. (Pubitemid 40327822)
28. Kokubo H, Tanaka T, Okamoto Y (2011) Ab initio prediction of protein-ligand binding structures by replica-exchange umbrella sampling simulations. J Comput Chem 32:2810-2821.
29. Gallicchio E, Lapelosa M, Levy R (2010) Binding energy distribution analysis method (BEDAM) for estimation of protein-ligand binding affinities. J Chem Theory Comput 6:2961-2977.
30. Park I, Li C (2010) Dynamic ligand-induced-fit simulation via enhanced conformational samplings and ensemble dockings: A survivin example. J Phys Chem B 114:5144-5153.
31. Provasi D, Bortolato A, Filizola M (2009) Exploring molecular mechanisms of ligand recognition by opioid receptors with metadynamics. Biochemistry 48:10020-10029.
32. Limongelli V, et al. (2010) Molecular basis of cyclooxygenase enzymes (COXs) selective inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5411-5416.
33. Fidelak J, Juraszek J, Branduardi D, Bianciotto M, Gervasio F (2010) Free-energy-based methods for binding profile determination in a congeneric series of CDK2 inhibitors. J Phys Chem B 114:9516-9524.
34. Masetti M, Cavalli A, RecanatiniM, Gervasio F (2009) Exploring complex protein-ligand recognition mechanisms with coarse metadynamics. J Phys Chem B 113:4807-4816.
35. Tribello G, Cuny J, Eshet H, Parrinello M (2011) Exploring the free energy surfaces of clusters using reconnaissance metadynamics. J Chem Phys 135:114109.
36. Wales DJ (2003) Energy Landscapes (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
37. Wong C, McCammon J (1986) Dynamics and design of enzymes and inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc 108:3830-3832.
38. Guvench O, Price D, Brooks C, III (2005) Receptor rigidity and ligand mobility in trypsinligand complexes. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 58:407-417. (Pubitemid 40076054)
39. Hetényi C, van der Spoel D (2002) Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site. Protein Sci 11:1729-1737. (Pubitemid 34663553)
40. Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O (2011) Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock DSS. J Comput Chem 32:2149-2159.
41. Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O (2009) Blind docking of 260 protein-ligand complexes with EADock 2.0. J Comput Chem 30:2021-2030.
42. Daura X, et al. (1999) Peptide folding: When simulation meets experiment. Angew Chem Int Ed 38:236-240. (Pubitemid 29051239)
43. He G, et al. (2011) Rank-ordering the binding affinity for FKBP12 and HLN1 neuraminidase inhibitors in the combination of a protein model with density functional theory. J Theor Comput Chem 10:541-565.
44. Oliveira M, et al. (1993) Tyrosine 151 is part of the substrate activation binding site of bovine trypsin identification by covalent labeling with p-diazoniumbenzamidine and kinetic characterization of tyr-151-(p- benzamidino)-azo-beta-trypsin. J Biol Chem 268:26893-26903. (Pubitemid 24006396)
45. Das P, Moll M, Stamati H, Kavraki L, Clementi C (2006) Low-dimensional, free-energy landscapes of protein-folding reactions by nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9885-9890. (Pubitemid 43993592)
46. Ferguson A, Panagiotopoulos A, Debenedetti P, Kevrekidis I (2010) Systematic determination of order parameters for chain dynamics using diffusion maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:13597-13602.
47. Cox T, Cox M (1994) Multidimensional Scaling (Chapman & Hall, London).
48. Ceriotti M, Tribello G, Parrinello M (2011) Simplifying the representation of complex free-energy landscapes using sketch-map. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13023-13028.
49. Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) Gromacs 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:435-447.
50. Bonomi M, et al. (2009) Plumed: A portable plug in for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics. Comput Phys Commun 180:1961-1972.
51. Wang J, Cieplak P, Kollman P (2000) How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules? J Comput Chem 21:1049-1074.
52. Bayly CI, Cieplak P, Cornell WD, Kollman PA (1993) A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for determining atom-centered charges: The RESP model. J Phys Chem 97:10269-10280.
53. Bussi G, Donadio D, ParrinelloM(2007) Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J Chem Phys 126:014101.
54. Cuesta-Seijo JA, García-Granda S (2002) La tripsina como modelo de difracción de rayos x a alta resolución en proteínas. Bol R Soc Esp Hist Nat Secc Geol 97:123-129.
55. Balaji S, Swaminathan V, Kannan K (2010) A simple algorithm to optimize maximum independent set. Advanced Modeling and Optimization 12:107-118.
56. Grosdidier A, Zoete V, Michielin O (2011) Swissdock, a protein-small molecule docking web service based on EADock DSS. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W270-W277.