If I choose when to switch: Heavy multitaskers remember online content better than light multitaskers when they have the freedom to multitask

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 65, Issue , 2016, Pages 567-575

  Kononova, Anastasia ^a   Joo, Eunsin ^a   Yuan, Shupei ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Facebook; Limited capacity; Media multitasking; Online task switching; Recognition memory; Signal detection theory

Indexed keywords

MULTITASKING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

FACEBOOK; LIMITED CAPACITY; RECOGNITION MEMORY; SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY; TASK SWITCHING;

SIGNAL DETECTION;

CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; RECOGNITION; SIGNAL DETECTION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 84989846741     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Armstrong, G.B., Boriarsky, G.A., Mares, M., Background television and reading performance. Communication Monographs 58:3 (1991), 235–253.
2. Armstrong, G.B., Chung, L., Background television and reading memory in context: Assessing TV interference and facilitative context effects on encoding versus retrieval processes. Communication Research 27:3 (2000), 327–352.
3. Armstrong, G.B., Sopory, P., Effects of background television on phonological and visuo-spatial working memory. Communication Research 24:5 (1997), 459–480.
4. Baddeley, A.D., Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Neuroscience 4 (2003), 829–839.
5. Baddeley, A.D., Working memory: An overview. Pickering, S.J., (eds.) Working memory and education, 2006, Academic Press, New York, NY, 1–31.
6. Bluedorn, A.C., Kaufman, C.F., Lane, P.M., How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time. The Executive 6:4 (1992), 17–26.
7. Bowman, L.L., Levine, L.E., Waite, B.M., Gendron, M., Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading. Computers & Education 54:4 (2010), 927–931.
8. Brasel, S.A., Gips, J., Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14:9 (2011), 527–534.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n.d.). Key facts about seasonal flu. www.cdc.gov. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/keyfacts.htm#vaccination-benefits.
10. Cronbach, L.J., Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:3 (1951), 297–334.
11. Duggan, M., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Social media update 2014. 2015, Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC.
12. Eysenck, M.W., Principles of cognitive psychology. 1993, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
13. Foehr, U.G., Media multitasking among American youth: Prevalence, predictors and pairings. Kaiser Family Foundation Report, 2006, Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA.
14. Fox, J., A signal detection analysis of audio/video redundancy effects in television news video. Communication Research 31:5 (2004), 524–536.
15. Fox, J.R., Park, B., Lang, A., When available resources become negative resources: The effects of cognitive overload on memory sensitivity and criterion bias. Communication Research 34 (2007), 277–296.
16. Fried, C.B., In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education 50:3 (2008), 906–914.
17. Fulton, S., Schweitzer, D., Scharff, L., Boleng, J., Demonstrating the impact of multitasking in the classroom. (2011, October) Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2011, IEEE (pp. F2J-1).
18. Furnham, A., Bradley, A., Music while you work: The differential distraction of background music on the cognitive test performance of introverts and extroverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology 11 (1997), 445–455.
19. Furnham, A., Gunter, B., Peterson, E., Television distraction and the performance of introverts and extroverts. Applied Cognitive Psychology 8 (1994), 705–711.
20. Hayes, A.F., Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2013, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
21. Hembrooke, H., Gay, G., The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of computing in higher education 15:1 (2003), 46–64.
22. Internet World Stats, Internet usage statistics: The Internet big picture. Retrieved from, 2015 http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
23. Jeong, S.H., Hwang, Y., Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing. Journal of Communication 62:4 (2012), 571–587.
24. Jeong, S.-H., Hwang, Y., Finshbein, M., Effects of exposure to sexual content in the media on adolescent sexual behaviors: The moderation role of multitasking with media. Media Psychology 13 (2010), 222–242.
25. John, O.P., Naumann, L.P., Soto, C.J., Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. John, O.P., Robins, R.W., Pervin, L.A., (eds.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and research, 2008, Guilford, New York, NY, 114.
26. Jones, S., Madden, M., The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology. 2002, Diane Publishing Co, Collingdale, PA.
27. Judd, T., Making sense of multitasking: The role of Facebook. Computers & Education 70 (2014), 194–202.
28. Junco, R., Cotten, S.R., Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education 56:2 (2011), 370–378.
29. Kahneman, D., Attention and effort. 1973, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
30. Klatzky, R.L., Erdelyi, M.H., The response criterion problem in tests of hypnosis and memory. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 33:3 (1985), 246–257.
31. Kononova, A.G., Yuan, S., Take a break examining college students' media multitasking activities and motivations during study-or work-related tasks. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 2016, 10.1177/1077695816649474.
32. Kononova, A., Zasorina, T., Diveeva, N., Kokoeva, A., Chelokyan, A., Multitasking goes global: Multitasking with traditional and new electronic media and attention to media messages among college students in Kuwait, Russia, and the USA. International Communication Gazette 76:8 (2014), 617–640.
33. Kupor, D.M., Tormala, Z.L., Persuasion, interrupted: The effect of momentary interruptions on message processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 42:2 (2015), 300–315.
34. Lang, A., The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication 50 (2000), 46–70.
35. Lang, A., Motivated cognition (LC4MP): The influence of appetitive and aversive activation on processing of video games. Messaris, P., Humphreys, L., (eds.) Digital media: Transformations in human communication, 2006, Peter Lang, New York, NY, 237–256.
36. Lang, A., Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication 56 (2006), S57–S80.
37. Levine, L.E., Waite, B.M., Bowman, L.L., Electronic media use, reading, and academic distractibility in college youth. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10:4 (2007), 560–566.
38. Lieberman, M.D., Rosenthal, R., Why introverts can't always tell who likes them: Multitasking and nonverbal decoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 2001, 294.
39. Lindquist, J.D., Kaufman-Scarborough, C., The polychronic—monochronic tendency model PMTS scale development and validation. Time & Society 16:2–3 (2007), 253–285.
40. Lin, L., Robertson, T., Lee, J., Reading performances between novices and experts in different media multitasking environments. Computers in the Schools 26:3 (2009), 169–186.
41. Macmillan, N.A., Creelman, C.D., Detection theory: A User's guide. 1991, Cambridge UP, Cambridge.
42. Morpace Marketing & Consulting, Morpace Omnibus Report: Frequent consumer usage of Facebook provides a marketing opportunity for retailers. Retrieved from, 2010 http://files.justmigrate.com/host-for-posterous/mschrotter.posterous.com/mnt/space-1139045-mschrotter-9ab4497954069103cb1a0e1e82da42e2/file/2010/07/3397408-Morpace%20Omnibus%20Report-Facebook.pdf.
43. Nosko, A., Wood, E., Molema, S., All about me: Disclosure in online social networking profiles: The case of FACEBOOK. Computers in Human Behavior 26:3 (2010), 406–418.
44. Ophir, E., Nass, C., Wagner, A.D., Cognitive control in media multitaskers. PNAS 106:37 (2009), 15583–15587.
45. Perrin, A., Social media usage: 2005–2015. 2015, Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC.
46. Pool, M.M., Koolstra, C.M., van der Voort, T.H.A., Background media and homework performance. Journal of Communication 53 (2003), 74–87.
47. Pool, M.M., van der Voort, T.H.A., Bentjes, J.W.J., Koolstra, C.M., Background television as an inhibitor of performance on easy and difficult homework assignments. Communication Research 27 (2000), 293–326.
48. Poposki, E.M., Oswald, F.L., The multitasking preference Inventory: Toward an improved measure of individual differences in polychronicity. Human Performance 23:3 (2010), 247–264, 10.1080/08959285.2010.487843.
49. Poposki, E.M., Oswald, F.L., Brou, R., Development of a new measure of polychronicity. Technical report for Navy Personnel Research, Studies, and Technology (NPRST-TN-09–5). Millington, TN, 2009.
50. Salvucci, D.D., Taatgen, N.A., The multitasking mind. 2011, Oxford University Press, Inc, New York.
51. Sana, F., Weston, T., Cepeda, N., Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education 62 (2012), 24–31.
52. Sanderson, K.R., Bruk-Lee, V., Viswesvaran, C., Gutierrez, S., Kantrowitz, T., Multitasking: Do preference and ability interact to predict performance at work?. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 86:4 (2013), 556–563.
53. Schneider, W., Chein, J.M., Controlled & automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science 27 (2003), 525–559.
54. Shapiro, M., Signal detection measures of recognition memory. Lang, A., (eds.) Measuring psychological responses to media messages, 1994, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, 133–148.
55. Shapiro, M.A., Fox, J.R., The role of typical and atypical events in story memory. Human Communication Research 28:1 (2002), 109–135.
56. Stanislaw, H., Todorov, N., Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31:1 (1999), 137–149.
57. Statista, Facebook: Figures of monthly active users 2014. Retrieved from, 2015 http://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/.
58. Vega, V., McCracken, K., Nass, C., Labs, L., Multitasking effects on visual working memory, working memory and executive control. (The annual International Communication Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada), 2008.
59. Wang, Z., David, P., Srivastava, J., Powers, S., Brady, C., D'Angelo, J., et al. Behavioral performance and visual attention in communication multitasking: A comparison between instant messaging and online voice chat. Computers in Human Behavior 28:3 (2012), 968–975.
60. Wang, Z., Irwin, M., Cooper, C., Srivastava, J., Multidimensions of media multitasking and adaptive media selection. Human Communication Research 41:1 (2015), 102–127.
61. Wang, Z., Tchernev, J.M., The “myth” of media multitasking: Reciprocal dynamics of media multitasking, personal needs, and gratifications. Journal of Communication 62:3 (2012), 493–513.
62. Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., Nosko, A., Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education 58:1 (2012), 365–374.
63. Yeykelis, L., Cummings, J.J., Reeves, B., Multitasking on a single device: Arousal and the frequency, anticipation, and prediction of switching between media content on a computer. Journal of Communication 64:1 (2014), 167–192.
64. Zhang, Y., Goonetilleke, R.S., Plocher, T., Liang, S.F.M., Time-related behaviour in multitasking situations. International Journal of Human-computer Studies 62:4 (2005), 425–455.
65. Zhang, W., Jeong, S.H., Fishbein, M., Situational factors competing for attention: The interaction effect of multitasking and sexually explicit content on TV recognition. Journal of Media Psychology 22:1 (2010), 2–13.