Polish children's productivity with case marking: The role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological diversity

Journal of Child Language

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 559-597

  Da̧browska, Ewa ^a   Szczerbiński, Marcin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHILD LANGUAGE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33749364125     PISSN: 03050009     EISSN: 14697602     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0305000906007471     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Buńko, M. (2000). Inny slownik jȩzyka polskiego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
2. Bodnarowska, J. (1962). Problematyka doboru końcówek -a/-u w dopełniaczu 1.p. rzeczowników mȩskich. Jȩzyk Polski 42, 29-49.
3. Bybee, J. L. & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58, 265-89.
4. Bybee, J. L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10, 425-55.
5. Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 991-1060.
6. Clahsen, H., Aveledo, F. & Roca, I. (2002). The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language 29, 591-622.
7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112, 155-9.
8. Da̧browska, E. (2001). Learning a morphological system without a default: the Polish genitive. Journal of Child Language 28, 545-74.
9. Da̧browska, E. (2004). Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish. Language and Cognitive Processes 19, 123-71.
10. Da̧browska, E. (2005). Productivity and beyond: mastering the Polish genitive inflection. Journal of Child Language 32, 191-205.
11. Da̧browska, E. (2006). Low-level schemas or general rules? The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish case inflections. Language Sciences 28, 120-35.
12. Elman, J. L., Bates, E., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D. & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: a connectionist perspective on development, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Köpeke, K.-M. (1998). The acquisition of plural marking in English and German revisited: schemata versus rules. Journal of Child Language 25, 293-319.
14. Kottum, S. E. (1981). The genitive singular form of masculine nouns in Polish. Scando-Slavica 27, 179-86.
15. Langacker, R. W. (1991). Concept, image and symbol : the cognitive basis of grammar, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (eds), Usage-based models of language, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
17. Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R. & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29, 189-256.
18. Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T. J. & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57 (Serial number 228), 1-180.
19. Mills, A. (1985). The acquisition of German. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume 1 : The data. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
20. Pinker, S. (1998). Words and rules. Lingua 106, 219-42.
21. Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules. the ingredients of language, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
22. Plunkett, K. & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition 48, 21-69.
23. Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (eds), Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2 : Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume 2: Theoretical Issues. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
25. Smoczyńska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In D. I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume I : The data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Smoczyńska, M. (1998). Krakowskic danc jȩzykowe dzieci w systemic CHILDES. In M. Smoczyhska (ed.), Studio z psychologii rozwojowej i psycholingwistyki. Krakow: Universitas.
27. Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Tokarski, J. (2001). Fleksja polska. Warszawa: PWN.
29. Westfal, S. (1956). A study in Polish morphology. The genitive singular masculine. The Hague : Mouton.
30. Wittek, A. & Tomasello, M. (2005). German-speaking children's productivity with syntactic constructions and case morphology: local cues act locally. First Language 25, 103-25.