The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers' productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 931-951

  Dabrowska, Ewa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dative case; Neighbourhood density; Polish; Productivity; Type frequency; Usage based models

Indexed keywords

EID: 41149130071     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Albright A. Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian. Language 78 (2002) 684-709
2. Albright A., and Hayes B. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 90 (2003) 119-161
3. Baayen H., Dijkstra T., and Schreuder R. Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language 37 (1997) 94-117
4. Bańko M. Inny słownik je{ogonek}zyka polskiego PWN (2000), PWN, Warszawa
5. Bańko M. Wykłady z polskiej fleksji (2002), PWN, Warszawa
6. Bielec D. Polish: An essential grammar (1998), Routledge, London
7. Bod, R. (2001). Sentence memory: Storage vs. computation of frequent sentences. Retrieved 19 October 2003. Available from http://turing.wins.uva.nl/~rens/cuny2001.pdf.
8. Buttler D., Kurkowska H., and Satkiewicz H. Kultura je{ogonek}zyka polskiego (1973), PWN, Warszawa
9. Bybee J. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10 (1995) 425-455
10. Bybee J. Diagrammatic iconicity in stem-inflection relations. In: Haiman J. (Ed). Iconicity in syntax (1985), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 11-44
11. Bybee J. Phonology and language use (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
12. Bybee J. Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2002) 215-221
13. Bybee, J. (2005). The impact of use on representation: Grammar is usage and usage is grammar. In 79th Annual Meeting, Linguistic Society of America: Oakland.
14. Chipere N. Understanding complex sentences: Native speaker variations in syntactic competence (2003), Palgrave, Basingstoke
15. Chomsky N. Aspects of the theory of syntax (1965), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
16. Chomsky N. Some observations on economy in generative grammar. In: Barbosa P., Fox D., Hagstrom P., McGinnis M., and Pesetsky D. (Eds). Is the best good enough? optimality and competition in syntax (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Croft W. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford
18. Da{ogonek}browska E. From formula to schema: The acquisition of English questions. Cognitive Linguistics 11 (2000) 83-102
19. Da{ogonek}browska E. Rules or schemas? Evidence from Polish. Language and Cognitive Processes 19 (2004) 225-271
20. Da{ogonek}browska E. Language, mind and brain. Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar (2004), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
21. Da{ogonek}browska E. Low-level schemas or general rules? The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Polish case inflections. Language Sciences 28 (2006) 120-135
22. Da{ogonek}browska E., and Szczerbiński M. Polish children's productivity with case marking: The role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological coherence. Journal of Child Language 33 (2006) 559-597
23. Daelemans W. A comparison of analogical modeling of language to memory-based language processing. In: Skousen R., Lonsdale D., and Parkinson D.B. (Eds). Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language (2002), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 157-179
24. Diessel H., and Tomasello M. Why complement clauses do not include a that complementizer in early child language. Berkeley Linguistics Society 25 (1999) 86-97
25. Eddington D. Spanish stress assignment within the Analogical Modeling of Language. Language 76 (2000) 92-109
26. Eddington D. Spanish diminutive formation without rules or constraints. Linguistics 40 (2002) 395-419
27. Elman J.L., Bates E., Johnson M.H., Karmiloff-Smith A., Parisi D., and Plunkett K. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
28. Feldstein R., and Franks S. Polish (2002), Lincom Europa, Muenchen
29. Gross M. On the failure of generative grammar. Language 55 (1979) 859-885
30. Gross M. Lexicon grammar: Application to French. In: Asher R.E., and Simpson J.M.Y. (Eds). Encyclopedia of language and linguisitics (1994), Pergamon Press, Oxford 2195-2205
31. Halle M. Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18 (1962) 54-72
32. Hoffmann S., and Lehmann H.M. Collocational evidence from the British National Corpus. In: Kirk J.M. (Ed). Corpora Galore. Analyses and techniques in describing English (2000), Rodopi, Amsterdam 17-32
33. Jadacka H. Kultura je{ogonek}zyka polskiego. Fleksja, słowotworstwo, składnia (2005), PWN, Warszawa
34. Joseph B.D. How general are our generalizations? What speakers actually know and what they actually do. In: Green A.D., Motopanyane V., et al. (Eds). ESCOL '96. Proceedings of the thirteenth eastern states conference on linguistics (1997), Cascadilla Press, Ithaca 148-160
35. Kaufer D.S. The competence/performance distinction in linguistic theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (1979) 257-275
36. Kiparsky P. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In: Bach E., and Harms R.T. (Eds). Universals in linguistic theory (1968), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 170-202
37. Kreja B. Je{ogonek}zykowe i pozaje{ogonek}zykowe przyczyny nieodmiennosci polskich nazwisk. Je{ogonek}zyk Polski LXXV 1 (1995) 12-22
38. Kucała M. Odmiana rzeczowników w dialektach. In: Urbańczyk S., and Kucała M. (Eds). Encyklopedia je{ogonek}zyka polskiego. 3rd ed. (1999), Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław 261
39. Langacker R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical prerequisites Vol. 1 (1987), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
40. Langacker R.W. A usage-based model. In: Rudzka-Ostyn B. (Ed). Topics in cognitive linguistics (1988), John Benjamins, Amsterdam 127-161
41. Langacker R.W. The rule controversy: A cognitive grammar perspective. Centre for Research in Language Newsletter (University of California, San Diego) 4 3 (1990) 4-15
42. Langacker R.W. A dynamic usage-based model. In: Barlow M., and Kemmer S. (Eds). Usage-based models of language (2000), CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA 1-63
43. Lehrer A. Evaluating grammars: What counts as data?. Lingua 29 (1972) 201-208
44. Lieven E.V., Behrens H., Speares J., and Tomasello M. Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language 30 (2003) 333-370
45. Lieven E.V., Pine J.M., and Baldwin G. Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language 24 (1997) 187-219
46. MacWhinney B. The acquisition of morphophonology. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (1978) 43
47. Maratsos M. Some current issues in the study of the acquisition of grammar. In: Mussen P.H. (Ed). Handbook of child psychology. Cognitive development Vol. 3 (1983), Wiley, New York 707-786
48. Marcus G.F., Brinkmann U., Clahsen H., Wiese R., and Pinker S. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29 (1995) 189-256
49. In: Markowski A. (Ed). Nowy słownik poprawnej polszczyzny PWN. Electronic ed. (2004), PWN, Warszawa
50. 3owotwórstwem) (1998), PWN, Warszawa
51. Orzechowska, A. (1998). Rzeczownik (2nd ed.). In R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski, & H. Wróbel (Eds.). Gramatyka współczesnego je{ogonek}zyka polskiego:Morfologia (Vol. 1, pp. 270-332). Warszawa: PWN.
52. Ostaszewska D., and Tambor J. Fonetyka i fonologia współczesnego je{ogonek}zyka polskiego (2001), PWN, Warszawa
53. Pinker S. Words and rules. the ingredients of language (1999), Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London
54. In: Podracki J. (Ed). Szkolny słownik je{ogonek}zyka polskiego (1998), Medium, Warszawa
55. Richards B.J. Language development and individual differences: A study of auxiliary verb learning (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
56. Rocławski B. Poradnik fonetyczny dla nauczycieli. 2nd ed. (1986), Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa
57. Rothstein R.A. Polish. In: Comrie B., and Corbett G.G. (Eds). The Slavonic languages (1993), Routledge, London 686-758
58. Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In: Rumelhart D.E., and McClelland J.L. (Eds). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Psychological and biological models Vol. 2 (1986), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 216-271
59. Schreuder R., de Jong N., Krott A., and Baayen H. Rules and rote: Beyond the linguistic either-or fallacy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1999) 1038-1039
60. Sereno J.A., and Jongman A. Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition 25 (1997) 425-437
61. Skousen R. Analogical modeling of language (1989), Kluwer, Dordrecht
62. Skousen R. Analogy and structure (1992), Kluwer, Dordrecht
63. Skousen R. Analogical modeling: Exemplars, rules, and quantum computing. Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting 29 (2003) 425-439
64. Slobin D.I. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In: Ferguson C.A., and Slobin D.I. (Eds). Studies in child language development (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 175-208
65. Smoczyńska M. The acquisition of Polish. In: Slobin D.I. (Ed). The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. The data Vol. 1 (1985), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 595-683
66. Sonnenstuhl I., and Huth A. Processing and representation of German -n plurals: A dual mechanism approach. Brain and Language 81 (2002) 276-290
67. Stemberger J.P., and MacWhinney B. Are lexical forms stored in the lexicon?. In: Hammond M., and Noonan M. (Eds). Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics (1988), Academic Press, London 101-116
68. In: Szymczak M. (Ed). Słownik je{ogonek}zyka polskiego PWN. Electronic ed. (2004), PWN, Warszawa
69. Tokarski J. Fleksja polska (2001), PWN, Warszawa
70. Tomasello M. Do young children have adult syntactic competence?. Cognition 74 (2000) 209-253
71. Tomasello M. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of child language acquisition (2003), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
72. Urbańczyk S. Zarys dialektologii polskiej (1976), PWN, Warszawa
73. Wolff R.A. German past participles and the simplicity metric. Linguistics 19 (1981) 3-13