Protein residue contacts and prediction methods

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1415, Issue , 2016, Pages 463-476

  Adhikari, Badri ^a   Cheng, Jianlin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Deep learning; Protein contact prediction methods

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; GLOBULAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COEVOLUTION; MACHINE LEARNING; PREDICTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE DATABASE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; WEB BROWSER;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MACHINE LEARNING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; WEB BROWSER;

EID: 84984984288     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3572-7_24     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28 (1): 235–242. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235
2. Rohl CA, Strauss CEM, Misura KMS, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. In: Ludwig B, Michael LJ (eds) Methods in enzymology, vol 383. Academic, Cambridge, MA, pp 66–93, http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0076-6879(04)83004-0
3. Kosciolek T, Jones DT (2014) De Novo Structure Prediction of Globular Proteins Aided by Sequence Variation-Derived Contacts. PLoS One 9 (3): e92197
4. Marks DS, Colwell LJ, Sheridan R, Hopf TA, Pagnani A, Zecchina R, Sander C (2011) Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS One 6 (12): e28766
5. Adhikari B, Bhattacharya D, Cao R, Cheng J (2015) CONFOLD: residue-residue contactguided ab initio protein folding. Protein Struct Funct Bioinform. doi: 10.1002/prot.24829
6. Vendruscolo M, Domany E (2000) Protein folding using contact maps. Vitam Horm 58: 171–212
7. Mirny L, Domany E (1996) Protein fold recognition and dynamics in the space of contact maps. Protein Struct Funct Bioinform 26 (4): 391–410. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199612)26:4<391::AID-PROT3>3.0.CO;2-F
8. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383: 66–93. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(04)83004-0
9. Jones DT (2001) Predicting novel protein folds by using FRAGFOLD. Proteins 5: 127–132
10. Kliger Y, Levy O, Oren A, Ashkenazy H, Tiran Z, Novik A, Rosenberg A, Amir A, Wool A, Toporik A, Schreiber E, Eshel D, Levine Z, Cohen Y, Nold-Petry C, Dinarello CA, Borukhov I (2009) Peptides modulating conformational changes in secreted chaperones: from in silico design to preclinical proof of concept. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106 (33): 13797–13801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906514106
11. Miller CS, Eisenberg D (2008) Using inferred residue contacts to distinguish between correct and incorrect protein models. Bioinformatics 24 (14): 1575–1582. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn248
12. Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J (2011) APOLLO: a quality assessment service for single and multiple protein models. Bioinformatics 27 (12): 1715–1716. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr268
13. Duarte JM, Sathyapriya R, Stehr H, Filippis I, Lappe M (2010) Optimal contact definition for reconstruction of contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 11 (1): 283
14. Jones DT, Buchan DW, Cozzetto D, Pontil M (2012) PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 28 (2): 184–190
15. Niggemann M, Steipe B (2000) Exploring local and non-local interactions for protein stability by structural motif engineering. J Mol Biol 296 (1): 181–195. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3385
16. Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A (2011) Evaluation of residue–residue contact predictions in CASP9. Protein Struct Funct Bioinform 79 (S10): 119–125
17. Monastyrskyy B, D’Andrea D, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A (2014) Evaluation of residue–residue contact prediction in CASP10. Protein Struct Funct Bioinform 82 (S2): 138–153
18. Eickholt J, Cheng J (2013) A study and benchmark of DNcon: a method for protein residueresidue contact prediction using deep networks. BMC Bioinformatics 14 (Suppl 14): S12
19. Sathyapriya R, Duarte JM, Stehr H, Filippis I, Lappe M (2009) Defining an essence of structure determining residue contacts in proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 5 (12): e1000584
20. Michel M, Hayat S, Skwark MJ, Sander C, Marks DS, Elofsson A (2014) PconsFold: improved contact predictions improve protein models. Bioinformatics 30 (17): i482–i488
21. Eickholt J, Cheng J (2012) Predicting protein residue–residue contacts using deep networks and boosting. Bioinformatics 28 (23): 3066–3072
22. Jones DT, Singh T, Kosciolek T, Tetchner S (2015) MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics 31 (7): 999–1006. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu791
23. Schneider M, Brock O (2014) Combining physicochemical and evolutionary information for protein contact prediction. PLoS One 9 (10): e108438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108438
24. Di Lena P, Nagata K, Baldi P (2012) Deep architectures for protein contact map prediction. Bioinformatics 28 (19): 2449–2457. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts475
25. Björkholm P, Daniluk P, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Andersson R, Hvidsten TR (2009) Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue–residue contacts. Bioinformatics 25 (10): 1264–1270. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp149
26. Skwark MJ, Raimondi D, Michel M, Elofsson A (2014) Improved contact predictions using the recognition of protein like contact patterns. PLoS Comput Biol 10 (11): e1003889
27. Jones DT, Singh T, Kosciolek T, Tetchner S (2014) MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins. Bioinformatics 31 (7): 999–1006, btu791
28. Tegge AN, Wang Z, Eickholt J, Cheng J (2009) NNcon: improved protein contact map prediction using 2D-recursive neural networks. Nucleic Acids Res 37 (suppl 2): W515–W518
29. Xue B, Faraggi E, Zhou Y (2009) Predicting residue–residue contact maps by a two-layer, integrated neural-network method. Protein Struct Funct Bioinform 76 (1): 176–183. doi: 10.1002/prot.22329
30. Shackelford G, Karplus K (2007) Contact prediction using mutual information and neural nets. Protein Struct Funct Bioinform 69 (S8): 159–164. doi: 10.1002/prot.21791
31. Fariselli P, Casadio R (1999) A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Eng 12 (1): 15–21. doi: 10.1093/protein/12.1.15
32. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R (2001) Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins 5: 157–162
33. MacCallum RM (2004) Striped sheets and protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 20 (Suppl 1): i224–i231. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth913
34. Chen P, Li J (2010) Prediction of protein long-range contacts using an ensemble of genetic algorithm classifiers with sequence profile centers. BMC Struct Biol 10 (Suppl 1): S2
35. Li Y, Fang Y, Fang J (2011) Predicting residue–residue contacts using random forest models. Bioinformatics 27 (24): 3379–3384. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr579
36. Lippi M, Frasconi P (2009) Prediction of protein ß-residue contacts by Markov logic networks with grounding-specific weights. Bioinformatics 25 (18): 2326–2333. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp421
37. Cheng J, Baldi P (2007) Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics 8 (1): 113
38. Wu S, Zhang Y (2008) A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and templatebased methods for protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 24 (7): 924–931. doi: 10.1093/ bioinformatics/btn069
39. Shindyalov IN, Kolchanov NA, Sander C (1994) Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations? Protein Eng 7 (3): 349–358
40. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 18 (4): 309–317. doi: 10.1002/prot.340180402
41. Olmea O, Valencia A (1997) Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Folding Des 2 (Suppl 1): S25–S32. doi: 10.1016/S1359-0278(97)00060-6, http://dx.doi.org/
42. Lapedes AS, Giraud B, Liu L, Stormo GD (1999) Correlated mutations in models of protein sequences: phylogenetic and structural effects. In: Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F (ed) Statistics in molecular biology and genetics, vol 33, Lecture Notes--Monograph Series. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA, pp 236–256. doi: 10.1214/lnms/1215455556
43. Weigt M, White RA, Szurmant H, Hoch JA, Hwa T (2009) Identification of direct residue contacts in protein–protein interaction by message passing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106 (1): 67–72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805923106
44. Tetchner S, Kosciolek T, Jones DT (2014) Opportunities and limitations in applying coevolution-derived contacts to protein structure prediction. Bio Algorithm Med Syst 10 (4): 243–254
45. Morcos F, Pagnani A, Lunt B, Bertolino A, Marks DS, Sander C, Zecchina R, Onuchic JN, Hwa T, Weigt M (2011) Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108 (49): E1293–E1301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111471108
46. Ekeberg M, Lövkvist C, Lan Y, Weigt M, Aurell E (2013) Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. Phys Rev E 87 (1): 012707
47. Ekeberg M, Hartonen T, Aurell E (2014) Fast pseudolikelihood maximization for directcoupling analysis of protein structure from many homologous amino-acid sequences. J Comput Phys 276: 341–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.024, http://dx.doi.org/
48. Feinauer C, Skwark MJ, Pagnani A, Aurell E (2014) Improving contact prediction along three dimensions. PLoS Comput Biol 10 (10): e1003847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003847
49. Kamisetty H, Ovchinnikov S, Baker D (2013) Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue–residue contact predictions in a sequenceand structure-rich era. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110 (39): 15674–15679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314045110
50. Clark GW, Ackerman SH, Tillier ER, Gatti DL (2014) Multidimensional mutual information methods for the analysis of covariation in multiple sequence alignments. BMC Bioinformatics 15 (1): 157
51. Misura KM, Chivian D, Rohl CA, Kim DE, Baker D (2006) Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (14): 5361–5366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509355103
52. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25 (13): 1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
53. Bacardit J, Widera P, Márquez-Chamorro A, Divina F, Aguilar-Ruiz JS, Krasnogor N (2012) Contact map prediction using a largescale ensemble of rule sets and the fusion of multiple predicted structural features. Bioinformatics. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts472
54. Vullo A, Walsh I, Pollastri G (2006) A twostage approach for improved prediction of residue contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 180. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-180
55. Seemayer S, Gruber M, Söding J (2014) CCMpred—fast and precise prediction of protein residue–residue contacts from correlated mutations. Bioinformatics 30 (21): 3128–3130
56. Kaján L, Hopf TA, Marks DS, Rost B (2014) FreeContact: fast and free software for protein contact prediction from residue co-evolution. BMC Bioinformatics 15 (1): 85
57. Jeong CS, Kim D (2012) Reliable and robust detection of coevolving protein residues. Protein Eng Des Sel 25 (11): 705–713. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzs081
58. Buslje CM, Santos J, Delfino JM, Nielsen M (2009) Correction for phylogeny, small number of observations and data redundancy improves the identification of coevolving amino acid pairs using mutual information. Bioinformatics 25 (9): 1125–1131. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp135