Deep architectures for protein contact map prediction

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 19, 2012, Pages 2449-2457

  Di lena, Pietro ^a,b   Nagata, Ken ^a,b   Baldi, Pierre ^a,b  

^a Irvine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 84867316765     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts475     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403-410.
2. Altschul, S.F. et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389-3402.
3. Baldi, P. and Pollastri, G. (2003) The Principled Design of Large-Scale Recursive Neural Network Architectures-DAG-RNNs and the Protein Structure Prediction Problem. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 4, 575-602.
4. Bjö rkholm, P. et al. (2009) Using multi-data hidden Markov models trained on local neighborhoods of protein structure to predict residue-residue contacts. Bioinformatics, 25, 1264-1270.
5. Burger, L. and van Nimwegen, E. (2010) Disentangling direct from indirect co-evolution of residues in protein alignments. PLoS Comput. Biol., 6, e1000633.
6. Chandonia, J.M. et al. (2004) The ASTRAL Compendium in 2004. Nucl. Acids Res., 32 (suppl 1), D189-D192.
7. Cheng, J. et al. (2005) SCRATCH: a protein structure and structural feature prediction server. Nucl. Acids Res, 33 (suppl 2), W72-W76.
8. Cheng, J. and Baldi, P. (2007) Improved residue contact prediction using support vector machines and a large feature set. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 113.
9. Dunn, S.D. et al. (2008) Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction. Bioinformatics, 24, 333-340.
10. Ezkurdia, I. et al. (2009) Assessment of domain boundary predictions and the prediction of intramolecular contacts in CASP8. Proteins, 77 (suppl 9), 196-209.
11. Fariselli, P. et al. (2001) Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins, 5, 157-162.
12. Fariselli, P. et al. (2008) Improving the prediction of helix-residue contacts in all-alpha proteins. In Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Neural Networks, World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS) Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, 89-94.
13. Gö bel, U. et al. (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins, 8, 309-317.
14. Larochelle, H. et al. (2009) Exploring strategies for training deep neural networks. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 10, 1-40.
15. Jones, D.T. et al. (2012) PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 28, 184-190.
16. Kryshtafovych, A. et al. (2011) CASP9 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins, 79, 196-207.
17. Misura, K.M. et al. (2006) Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 203, 5361-5366.
18. Monastyrskyy, B. et al. (2011) Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9. Proteins, 79, 119-125.
19. Murzin, A.G. et al. (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
20. Nagata, K. et al. (2011) SIDEpro: a novel machine learning approach for the fast and accurate prediction of side-chain conformations. Proteins, 80, 142-153.
21. Olmea, O. and Valencia, A. (1997) Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des., 2, 25-32.
22. Pollastri, G. et al. (2002a) Improving the prediction of protein secondary structure in three and eight classes using recurrent neural networks and profiles. Proteins, 47, 228-235.
23. Pollastri, G. et al. (2002b) Prediction of coordination number and relative solvent accessibility in proteins. Proteins, 47, 142-153.
24. Pollastri, G. et al. (2006) Modular DAG-RNN architectures for assembling coarse protein structures. J. Comput. Biol., 13, 631-650.
25. Punta, M. and Rost, B. (2005) PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics, 21, 2960-2968.
26. Shackelford, G. and Karplus, K. (2007) Contact prediction using mutual information and neural nets. Proteins, 69, 159-164.
27. Skolnick, J. et al. (2004) Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR_3 threading algorithm. Proteins, 56, 502-518.
28. Taylor, W.R. et al. (2012) Protein topology from predicted residue contacts. Protein Sci., 21, 299-305.
29. Tress, M.L. and Valencia, A. (2010) Predicted residue-residue contacts can help the scoring of 3D models. Proteins, 78, 1980-1991.
30. Vullo, A. and Frasconi, P. (2003) Prediction of protein coarse contact maps. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol., 1, 411-431.
31. Vullo, A. et al. (2006) A two-stage approach for improved prediction of residue contact maps. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 180.
32. Wang, Z. et al. (2010) MULTICOM: a multi-level combination approach to protein structure prediction and its assessments in CASP8. Bioinformatics, 26 (7), 882-888.