Phylogeny of cirsium spp. In north america: Host specificity does not follow phylogeny

Plants

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 61-73

  Bodo Slotta, Tracey A ^a   Horvath, David P ^b   Foley, Michael E ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological control; Canada thistle; Cirsium; Cirsium arvense; Phylogeny; Thistles; Weed

Indexed keywords

EID: 84984665923     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22237747     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/plants1020061     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Sakai, A.K.; Allendorf, F.W.; Holt, J.S.; Lodge, D.M.; Molofsky, J.; With, K.A.; Baughman, S.; Cabin, R.J.; Cohen, J.E.; Elstrand, N.C.; et al. The population biology of invasive species. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2001, 32, 305–332.
2. Simberloff, D. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17, 83–92.
3. Louda, S.M.; Rand, T.A.; Russell, F.L.; Arnett, A.E. Assessment of ecological risks in weed biocontrol: Input from retrospective ecological analyses. Biol. Control 2005, 35, 253–264.
4. Hodgson, J.M. The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4-D, amitrole, and intensive cultivation. Weed Sci. 1970, 18, 253–254.
5. Donald, W.W. Management and control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Rev. Weed Sci. 1990, 5, 193–250.
6. Nissen, S.J.; Masters, R.A.; Lee, D.J.; Rowe, M.L. DNA-based markers systems to determine genetic diversity of weedy species and their application to biocontrol. Weed Sci. 1995, 44, 504–513.
7. Lavergne, S.; Molofsky, J. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 3883–3888.
8. McClay, A.S. Canada thistle. In Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States; van Driesche, R., Blossey, B., Hoddle, M., Lyon, S., Reardon, R., Eds.; USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04: USDA Forest Service, Morgantown, WV., USA, 2002; pp. 217–228.
9. Tiley, G.E.D. Biological flora of the British Isles: Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. J. Ecol. 2010, 98, 938–983.
10. Guggisberg, A.; Welk, E.; Sforza, R.; Horvath, D.P.; Anderson, J.V.; Foley, M.E.; Rieseberg, L.H. Invasion history of North American Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39, 1919–1931.
11. Voss, E.G. Michigan Flora: Part III Dicots (Pyrolaceae to Compositae); Cranbrook Institute: Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA, 1996; pp. 510–524.
12. Invaders Database System. Available online: http://invader.dbs.umt.edu/noxious_weeds/noxlist.asp/(accessed on 18 July 2012).
13. Lym, R.G.; Duncan, C.L. Canada thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. In Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and Their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts; Duncan, C.L., Clark, J.K., Eds.; Weed Science Society of America: Lawrence, KS, USA, 2005; pp. 69–83.
14. Hoeft, E.V.; Jordan, N.; Zhang, J.; Wyse, D.L. Integrated cultural and biological control of Canada thistle in conservation tillage soybean. Weed Sci. 2001, 49, 642–646.
15. Tichich, R.P.; Doll, J.D. Field-based evaluation of a novel approach for infecting Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tagetis. Weed Sci. 2006, 54, 166–171.
16. Cripps, M.G.; Gassmann, A.; Fowler, S.V.; Bourdôt, G.W.; McClay, A.S.; Edwards, G.R. Classical biological control of Cirsium arvense: Lessons from the past. Biol. Control 2011, 57, 165–174.
17. Louda, S.M.; O’Brien, C.W. Unexpected ecological effects of distributing the exotic weevil, Larinus planus (F), for the biological control of Canada thistle. Conserv. Biol. 2002, 16, 717–727.
18. Louda, S.M.; Pemberton, R.W.; Johnson, M.T.; Follett, P.A. Nontarget effects—The Achilles’ Heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2003, 48, 365–396.
19. Rand, T.A.; Louda, S.M. Exotic weed invasion increases the susceptibility of native plants to attack by a biocontrol herbivore. Ecology 2004, 85, 1548–1554.
20. Kelch, D.G.; Baldwin, B.G. Phylogeny and ecological radiation of New World thistles (Cirsium, Cardueae-Compositae) based on ITS and ETS rDNA sequence data. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12, 141–151.
21. Slotta, T.A.B.; Rothhouse, J.; Horvath, D.P.; Foley, M.E. Genetic Diversity of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in North Dakota. Weed Sci. 2006, 54, 1080–1085.
22. Slotta, T.A.B.; Foley, M.E.; Chao, S.; Hufbauer, R.A.; Horvath, D.P. Assessing genetic diversity of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in North America with microsatellites. Weed Sci. 2010, 58, 387–394.
23. Garcia-Jacas, N.; Garnatje, T.; Susanna, A.; Vilatersana, R. Tribal and subtribal delimitation and phylogeny of the Cardueae (Asteraceae): A combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002, 22, 51–64.
24. Bruckart, W.L.; Poltis, D.J.; DeFago, G.; Rosenthal, S.S.; Supkoff, D.M. Susceptibility of Carduus, Cirsium and Cynara scolymus species artificially inoculated with Puccinia carduorum from musk thistle. Biol. Control 1996, 6, 215–221.
25. Kissinger, D.G. Curculionidae of America North of Mexico, A Key to the Genera; Taxonomic Publications: South Lancaster, MA, USA, 1964; p. 143.
26. Moore, R.J.; Frankton, C. Cytotaxonomy of Cirsium species of the Eastern United States, with a key to the eastern species. Can. J. Bot. 1969, 47, 1257–1275.
27. Lym, R.G.; Christianson, K.M. The Thistles of North Dakota, North Dakota State University Extension Service Bulletin; W-1120; North Dakota State University: Fargo, ND, USA, 1996.
28. Kartesz, J.T. The Biota of North America Program (BONAP). North American Plant Atlas. Available online: http://www.bonap.org/MapSwitchboard.html/(accessed on 17 July 2012).
29. Zwölfer, H. Evolutionary and ecological relationships of the insect fauna of thistles. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 1988, 33, 103–122.
30. Volovnik, S.V. Distribution and ecology of some species of Cleoninae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). III. Genus Larinus Germ. Entomol. Rev. 1996, 75, 10–19.
31. Zwölfer, H.; Harris, P. Biology and host specificity of Rhinocyllus conicus (Froel.) (Col., Curculionidae), a successful agent for biocontrol of the thistle, Carduus nutans L. Z. Angew. Entomol. 1984, 97, 36–62.
32. Arnett, A.; Louda, S. Re-test of Rhinocyllus conicus host specificity and the prediction of ecological risk in biological control. Biol. Conserv. 2002, 106, 251–257.
33. Rees, N.E. Impact of Rhinocyllus conicus on thistles in southwestern Montana. Environ. Entomol. 1977, 6, 839–842.
34. Louda, S.M.; Kendall, D.; Connor, J.; Simberloff, D. Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 1997, 277, 1088–1090.
35. Ward, R.H.; Pienkowski, R.L.; Kok, L.T. Host specificity of the first-instar of Ceuthorhynchidius horridus, a weevil for biological control of thistle. J. Econ. Entomol. 1974, 67, 735–737.
36. Wiggins, G.J.; Grant, J.F.; Lambdin, P.L.; Ranney, J.W.; Wilkerson, J.B.; van Manen, F.T. Spatial prediction of habitat overlap of introduced and native thistles to identify potential areas of nontarget activity of biological control agents. Environ. Entomol. 2010, 39, 1866–1877.
37. Anderson, R.S. Weevils and plants: Phylogenetic versus ecological mediation of evolution of host plant associations in Curculioninae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 1993, 165, 197–232.
38. Russell, F.L.; Louda, S.M. Indirect interaction between two native thistles mediated by an invasive exotic floral herbivore. Oecologia 2005, 146, 373–384.
39. Barton, J. Predictability of pathogen host range in classical biological control of weeds: An update. BioControl 2012, 57, 289–305.
40. Bruckart, W.L., III. Supplemental risk evaluations and status of Puccinia carduorum for biological control of musk thistle. Biol. Control 2005, 32, 348–355.
41. Berner, D.K.; Bruckart, W.L. Comparing predictions from mixed model equations with host range determinations from historical disease evaluation data of two previously released weed biological control pathogens. Biol. Control 2012, 60, 207–215.
42. Bureš, P.; Wang, Y.-F.; Horová, L.; Suda, J. Genome size variation in central European species of Cirsium (Compositae) and their natural hybrids. Ann. Bot. 2004, 94, 353–363.
43. Gaskin, J.F.; Bon, M.C.; Cock, M.J.W.; Cristofaro, M.; Biase, A.D.; de Clerck-Floate, R.; Ellison, C.A.; Hinz, H.L.; Hufbauer, R.A.; Julien, M.H.; et al. Applying molecular-based approaches to classical biological control of weeds. Biol. Control 2011, 58, 1–21.
44. Wapshere, A.J. Host specificity of phytophagous organisms and the evolutionary centres of plant genera or sub-genera. Entomophaga 1974, 19, 301–309.
45. Thompson, J.D.; Gibson, T.J.; Plewniak, F.; Jeanmougin, F.; Higgins, D.G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4882.
46. Swofford, D.L. PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony, ver. 4.0b10; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2001.