Genome size variation in Central European species of Cirsium (Compositae) and their natural hybrids

Annals of Botany

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 353-363

  Bureš, Petr ^a   Wang, Yi Feng ^b   Horová, Lucie ^a   Suda, Jan ^c,d  

^a MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b NORTHWEST NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Asteraceae; AT frequency; Base composition; C value; DAPI; DNA content; Ellenberg's indicator values; Flow cytometry; Genome size; Interspecific hybrids; Propidium iodide; Thistle

Indexed keywords

POPULATION GENETICS;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; WORLD;

ASTERACEAE; CIRSIUM; CIRSIUM ACAULE; CIRSIUM ARVENSE; CIRSIUM ERIOPHORUM; CIRSIUM VULGARE;

PLANT DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; CIRSIUM; DIPLOIDY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENETICS; GENOME; HYBRIDIZATION; PLANT CHROMOSOME; POLYPLOIDY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CIRSIUM; DIPLOIDY; DNA, PLANT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENOME, PLANT; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; POLYPLOIDY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 16544390056     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch151     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Arano H. 1957. The karyotype analysis and its karyotaxonomic consideration in some genera of subtribe Carduinae. Japanese Journal of Genetics 32: 323-332.
2. Bakšay L. 1956. Cytotaxonomical studies on the flora of Hungary. Annales Historico-Naturali Musei Nationalis Hungarici, Series Nova 7: 321-334.
3. Baranyi M, Greilhuber J. 1999. Genome size in Allium: in quest of reproducible data. Annals of Botany 83: 687-695.
4. Bare P, Layssac M, D'Hont A, Louarn J, Charrier A, Hamon S, Noirot M. 1998. Relationship between parental chromosomic contribution and nuclear DNA content in the coffee interspecific hybrid C. pseudozanguebariae x C. liberica var. 'dewevrei'. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96: 301-305.
5. Barow M, Meister A. 2002. Lack of correlation between AT frequency and genome size in higher plants and the effect of nonrandomness of base sequences on dye binding. Cytometry 47: 1-7.
6. Bennett MD. 1972. Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Ser. B 181: 109-135.
7. Bennett MD. 1976. DNA amount, latitude and crop plant distribution. Environmental and Experimental Botany 16: 93-108.
8. Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. 2003. Angiosperm DNA C-values database (release 4.0, Jan. 2003) http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/cval/homepage.html
9. Bottini MCJ, Greizerstein EJ, Aulicino MB, Poggio L. 2000. Relationships among genome size, environmental conditions and geographical distribution in natural populations of NW Patagonian species of Berberis L. (Berberidaceae). Annals of Botany 86: 565-573.
10. Buitendijk JH, Boon EJ, Ramanna MS. 1997. Nuclear DNA Content in Twelve Species of Alstroemeria L. and some of their hybrids. Annals of Botany 79: 343-353.
11. Bureš P. 2004. Cirsium Mill. - pcháč. In: Slavík B, ed. Květena České republiky [Flora of the Czech Republic], Vol. 7/1. Praha: Academia (in press).
12. Buttler KP. 1989. Chromosomenzahlen von Gefässpflanzen aus Hessen 4. Folge. Hessische Floristische Briefe 38: 11-14.
13. Cerbah M, Couland J, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1999. Evolutionary DNA variation in the genus Hypochaeris. Heredity 82: 261-266.
14. Czapik R. 1958. Karyological studies in species of Cirsium Mill. em. Scop. occurring in Poland. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 27: 483-489.
15. Dobeš C, Hahn B, Morawetz W. 1997. Chromosomenzahlen zur Gefässpflanzen-Flora Österreichs Linzer Biologische Beiträge 29: 5-43.
16. Dobeš C, Kiehn M, Vitek E. 1996. Beiträge zur Gegässpflanzen-Flora von Österreich: Chromosomenzählungen III. Verhandlungen des Zoologisch-botanischen Geselschaft Österreich 133: 301-318.
17. Dobeš C, Vitek E. 2000. Documented chromosome number checklist of Austrian vascular plants. Verl. Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien.
18. Doležel J, Göhde W. 1995. Sex determination in dioecious plants Melandrium album and M. rubrum using high-resolution flow cytometry. Cytometry 19: 103-106.
19. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulissen D. 1992. Indicator values of plants in Central Europe. Scripta Geobotanica 18: 1-258.
20. Ellstrand NC, Whitkus R, Riesenberg L. 1996. Distribution of spontaneous plant hybrids. Proceedings of National Academy of America 93: 5090-5093.
21. Falinska K. 1997. Life history variation in Cirsium palustre and its consequences for the population demography in vegetation succession. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 66: 207-220.
22. Fedorov AA, red. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants. Leningrad: Nauka.
23. Feldman M, Liu B, Segal G, Abbo S, Levy AA, Vega JM. 1997. Rapid elimination of low-copy DNA sequences in polyploid wheat: a possible mechanism for differentiation of homeologous chromosomes. Genetics 147: 1381-1387.
24. Godelle B, Cartier D, Marie D, Brown SC, Siljak-Yakovlev S. 1993. Heterochromatin study demonstrating the non-linearity of fluorimetry useful for calculating genomic base composition. Cytometry 14: 618-626.
25. Goldblatt P, ed. 1981, 1984, 1985, 1988. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1975-1978 (1981), 1979-1981 (1984), 1982-1983 (1985), 1984-1985 (1988). Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St Louis.
26. Goldblatt P, Johnson DE, eds. 1990, 1991, 1994, 1996, 1998. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1986-1987 (1990), 1988-1989 (1991), 1990-1991 (1994), 1992-1993 (1996), 1994-1995 (1998). Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St Louis.
27. Grime JP, Mowforth MA. 1982. Variation in genome size - an ecological interpretation. Nature 299: 151-153.
28. Hall SE, Dvorak WS, Johnston JS, Price HJ, Williams CG. 2000. Flow cytometric analysis of DNA content for tropical and temperate new world pines. Annals of Botany 86: 1081-1086.
29. Hiremath SC, Salimath SS. 1991. Quantitative nuclear DNA changes in Eleusine (Gramineae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 178: 225-233.
30. Jäger EJ. 1977. Wuchsform und Verbreitung der Cirsium acaule-Verwandtschaft in Eurasien. Flora 166: 75-92.
31. Jones RN, Brown LM. 1976. Chromosome evolution and DNA variation in Crepis. Heredity 36: 91-104.
32. Keller ERJ, Schubert I, Fuchs J, Meister A. 1996. Interspecific crosses of onion with distant Allium species and characterization of the presumed hybrids by means of flow cytometry, karyotype analysis and genomic in situ hybridization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 417-424.
33. Kiehn M, Vitek E, Hellmayr E, Walter J, Tschenett J, Justin C, Mann M. 1991. Beiträge zur Flora von Österreich: Chromosomenzählungen. Verhandlungen der Zoologisch-botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 128: 19-39.
34. Knight CA, Ackerly DD. 2002. Variation in nuclear DNA content across environmental gradients: a quantile regression analysis. Ecology Letters 5: 66-76.
35. Kuzmanov BA, Georgieva SB, Nikolova VT. 1991. Karyological study of Bulgarian plants from the family Compositae. IV. Tribus Carduae Cass. Fitologiya 39: 3-22.
36. Larsen K. 1954. Chromosome numbers of some European Flowering Plants. Botanisk Tidsskrift 50: 161-174.
37. Lavrenko AN, Serditov NP, Ulle ZG. 1991. Chromosome numbers in some species of vascular plants from the Pechoro-Ilychsky Reservation (Komi ASSR). Botanitcheskyi Zhurnal 76: 473-476.
38. Levin DA, Funderburg SW. 1979. Genome size in angiosperms; temperate versus tropical species. American Naturalist 114: 784-795.
39. Liu B, Vega JM, Feldman M. 1998a. Rapid genomic changes in newly synthesized amphiploids of Triticum and Aegilops. II. Changes in low-copy coding DNA sequences. Genome 41: 535-542.
40. Liu B, Vega JM, Segal G, Abbo S, Rodova M, Feldman M. 1998b. Rapid genomic changes in newly synthesized amphiploids of Triticum and Aegilops. I. Changes in low-copy non-coding DNA sequences. Genome 41: 272-277.
41. MacGillivray CW, Grime JP. 1995. Genome size predicts frost resistance in British herbaceous plants: implications for rates of vegetation response to global warming. Functional Ecology 9: 320-325.
42. Marie D, Brown SC. 1993. A cytometric exercise in plant DNA histograms, with 2C values for seventy species. Biology of the Cell 78: 41-51.
43. Májovský J. et al. 1970. Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora, Part 2. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 18: 45-60.
44. Májovský J. et al. 1974a. Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora, Part 3. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 22: 1-20.
45. Májovský J. et al. 1974b. Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora, Part 4. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 23: 1-23.
46. Májovský J. et al. 1976. Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora, Part 5. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 25: 1-18.
47. Májovský J. et al. 1978. Index of chromosome numbers of Slovakian flora, Part 6. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 26: 1-42.
48. Martel E, DeNay D, Siljak-Yakovlev S, Brown S. Sarr A. 1997. Genome size variation and basic chromosome number in pearl millet and fourteen related Pennisetum species. Journal of Heredity 88: 139-143.
49. Měsíček J, Javůrková- Jarolímová V. 1992. List of chromosome numbers of the Czech vascular plants. Academia, Praha.
50. Meusel H, Jäger E. 1992. Vergleichende Chorologie der Zentraleuropäischen Flora. Band III. Karten. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena.
51. Moore RJ, ed. 1973, 1974, 1977. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1967-1971 (1973) Oosthoek's Uitgeversmaatschappij, Utrecht, 1972 (1974), 1973/74 (1977). Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.
52. Moore RJ, Frankton C. 1962. Cytotaxonomic studies in the tribe Cynareae (Compositae). Canadian Journal of Botany 40: 281-292.
53. Morgan ER, Burge GK, Seelye JF, Hopping ME, Grant JE. 1998. Production of inter-specific hybrids Limonium perezii (Stapf) Hubb. and Limonium sinuatum (L.) Mill. Euphytica 102: 109-115.
54. Murín A, Májovský Z. 1983. Karyological study of the Slovak flora IV. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 30: 1-16.
55. Murín A, Svobodová Z. 1992. Karyological study of the Slovak flora XXVI. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, Botanica 39: 59-65.
56. Nagl W, Ehrendorfer F. 1974. DNA content, heterochromatin, mitotic index, and growth in perennial and annual Anthemideae (Asteraceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 123: 737-740.
57. Nandini AV, Murray BG, O'Brien IEW, Hammett KRW. 1997. Intra-and interspecific variation in genome size in Lathyrus (Leguminosae). Botanical Journal of Linnean Society 125: 359-366.
58. Naranjo CA, Ferrari MR, Palermo AM, Poggio L. 1998. Karyotype, DNA content and meiotic behaviour in five South American species of Vicia (Fabaceae). Annals of Botany 82: 757-764.
59. Ohri D. 1998. Genome size variation and plant systematics. Annals of Botany, Suppl. A 82: 75-83.
60. Ohri D, Khoshoo TN. 1986. Genome size in gymnosperms. Plant Systematics and Evolution 153: 119-132.
61. Otto F. 1990. DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. In: Crissman HA, Darzynkiewicz Z, eds. Methods in cell biology. Vol. 33. New York: Academic Press, 105-110.
62. Ozkan H, Levy AA, Feldman M. 2001. Allopolyploidy-induced rapid genome evolution in the wheat (Aegilops-Triticum) group. Plant Cell 13: 1735-1747.
63. Pikaard CS, Chen ZJ. 1998. Nucleolar dominance. In: Paule RM. ed., RNA polymerase I: Transcription of eukaryotic ribosomal RNA. Austin, TX: R.G. Landes, 275-293.
64. Poggio L, Burghardt AD, Hunziker JH. 1989. Nuclear DNA variation in diploid and polyploid taxa of Larrea (Zygophyllaceae). Heredity 63: 321-328.
65. Poggio L, Rosato M, Chiavarino AM, Narajano CA. 1998. Genome size and environmental correlations in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays, Poaceae). Annals of Botany Suppl. A, 82: 107-115.
66. Pólya L. 1949. Chromosome numbers of Hungarian plants. Acta Geobotanica Hungarica 6: 124-137.
67. Pólya L. 1950. Magyarországi növényfajok kromoszómaszámai. II. Annales Biologicae Universitatis Debreceniensis 1: 46-56.
68. Price JH, Bachmann K. 1975. DNA content evolution in the Microseridinae. American Journal of Botany 62: 262-267.
69. Price JH, Chambers KL, Bachmann K, Riggs J. 1985. Inheritance of nuclear 2C DNA content in a cross between Microseris douglasii and M. bigelovii (Asteraceae). Biologisches Zentralblatt 104: 269-276.
70. Rayburn AL, Biradar DP, Bullock DG, McMurphy LM. 1993. Nuclear DNA content in F1 hybrids of maize. Heredity 70: 294-300.
71. Rees H, Hazarika MH. 1969. Chromosome evolution in Lathyrus. Chromosomes Today 2: 158-165.
72. Resslar PM, Stucky JM, Miksche JP. 1981. Cytophotometric determination of the amount of DNA in Arachis L. sect. Arachis (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany 68: 149-153.
73. Rieseberg LH, Van Fossen C, Desrochers AM. 1995. Hybrid speciation accompanied by genomic reorganization in wild sunflowers. Nature 375: 313-316.
74. Rosato M, Chiavarino AM, Naranjo CA, Hernandez JC, Poggio L. 1998. Genome size and numerical polymorphism for the B chromosome in races of maize (Zea mays ssp. mays, Poaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 168-174.
75. Rotreklová O, Bureš P, Grulich V. 2004. Chromosome numbers for some species of vascular plants from Europe. Biologia (in press).
76. Schmid M, Ziegler CG, Steinlein C, Nanda I, Haaf T. 2002. Chromosome banding in Amphibia XXIV. The B chromosomes of Gastrotheca espeletia (Anura, Hylidae). Cytogenetic and Genome Research 97: 205-218.
77. Skalińska M, Malecka J, Izmailow R. et al. 1974. Further studies in chromosome numbers of Polish angiosperms. X. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica 17: 133-164.
78. Soó R. 1970. A Magyar flóra és vegetá ció rendszertani növényföldrajzi kézikönyve. Budapest: Akadémiai Kaidó.
79. Srivastava S, Lavania UC. 1991. Evolutionary DNA variation in Papaver. Genome 34: 763-768.
80. Šiško M, Ivanič A, Bohanec B. 2003. Genome size analysis in the genus Cucurbita and its use for determination of interspecific hybrids obtained using the embryo-rescue technique. Plant Science 165: 663-669.
81. Talavera S. 1974. Contribución al estudio cariológico del género Cirsium en la Península Ibérica. Lagascalia 4: 285-296.
82. Thalmann C, Guadagnuolo R, Felber F. 2000. Search for spontaneous hybridization between oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) in agricultural zones and evaluation of the genetic diversity of the wild species. Botanica Helvetica 111: 107-119.
83. Thibault J. 1998. Nuclear DNA amount in pure species and hybrid willows (Salix): a flow cytometric investigation. Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 157-165.
84. Tischler G. 1934. Die Bedeutungen der Polyploidie für die Verbreitung der Angiospermen, erläutert an den Arten Schleswig-Holsteins, mit Ausblicken auf andere Florengebiete. Botanischer Jahresbericht 67: 1-36.
85. Tofts R. 1999. Biological flora of the British Isles. Cirsium eriophorum (L.) Scop. Journal of Ecology 87: 529-542.
86. Torrell M, Vallès J. 2001. Genome size in 21 Artemisia L. species (Asteraceae, Anthemideae): systematic, evolutionary, and ecological implications. Genome 44: 231-238.
87. Wagenitz G. 1987. Cirsium Mill. em. Scop. In: Hegi G, Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, 2nd edn. Vol. 6/4. Berlin et Hamburg: Paul Parey Verlag, 866-916.
88. Wakamiya I, Newton RJ, Johnston JS, Price HJ. 1993. Genome size and environmental factors in the genus Pinus. American Journal of Botany 80: 1235-1241.
89. Watanabe K, Yahara T, Denda T, Kosuge K. 1999. Chromosomal evolution in the genus Brachyscome (Asteraceae, Astereae); statistical tests regarding correlation between changes in karyotype and habit using phylogenetic information. Journal of Plant Research 112: 145-161.
90. Werner K. 1976. Cirsium Miller. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, eds. Flora Europaea, Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 232-242.
91. Wulff HD. 1937. Chromosomenstudien an der schleswig-holsteinischen Angiosperm-Flora. I. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 55: 262-269.
92. Zonneveld BJM. 2001. Nuclear DNA content of all species of Helleborus (Ranunculaceae) discriminate between species and sectional divisions. Plant Systematics and Evolution 229: 125-130.