Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: interpretive structural modeling approach

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 15-34

  Govindan, K ^a   Azevedo, S G ^b   Carvalho, H ^c   Cruz Machado, V ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BEIRA INTERIOR   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Automotive supply chain; Green; Interpretive structural modeling; Lean; Resilient; Supply chain performance

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY CHAINS; GREEN; INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING; LEAN; RESILIENT; SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE;

CHAINS;

AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84983508844     PISSN: 17351472     EISSN: 17352630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-013-0409-7     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. AICEP—Portugal Global (2013) Portuguese automotive world. http://www.portugalglobal.pt/EN/InvestInPortugal/ProminentSectors/Sectors/Pages/Portugueseautomotiveworld.aspx. Accessed at July 2013
2. Anand G, Kodali R (2008) A conceptual framework for lean supply chain and its implementation. Int J Value Chain Manage 2:313–357
3. Anantatmula V, Kanungo S (2005) Establishing and structuring criteria for measuring knowledge management efforts. In: Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, p 8
4. Andersson P, Aronsson H, Storhagen NG (1989) Measuring Logistics Performance. Eng Costs Prod Econ 17:253–262
5. Azevedo S, Machado V, Barroso A, Cruz-Machado V (2008) Supply chain vulnerability: environment changes and dependencies. Int J Logist Trans 1(2):41–55
6. Azevedo S, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V, Grilo F (2010) The influence of agile and resilient practices on supply chain performance: an innovative conceptual model proposal. In: Innovative process optimization methods in logistics: emerging trends, concepts and technologies. Erich Schmidt Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg, Germany, pp 265–281
7. Azevedo S, Carvalho H, Machado V-C (2011) The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: a case study approach. Trans Res Part E Logist Trans Rev 47(6):850–871
8. Azevedo S, Kannan G, Carvalho H, Cruz-Machado V (2013a) Ecosilient index to assess the greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. J Clean Prod 56(1):131–146
9. Azevedo S, Carvalho HV, Cruz-Machado V (2013b) Using interpretive structural modelling to identify and rank performance measures: an application in the automotive supply chain. Baltic J Manage 8(2):208–230
10. Barany M, Bertok B, Kovacks Z, Friedler F, Fan L (2011) Solving vehicle assignment problems by process-network synthesis to minimize cost and environmental impact of transportation. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13(4):637–642
11. Beamon BM (1999) Measuring supply chain performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage 19(3):275–292
12. Biggart T, Gargeya V (2002) Impact of JIT on inventory to sales ratios. Ind Manage Data Syst 102(3/4):197–202
13. Bolaños R, Fontela E, Nenclares A, Pastor P (2005) Using interpretive structural modelling in strategic decision-making groups. Manage Decis 43(6):877–895
14. Bowen F, Cousins P, Lamming R, Faruk A (2002) Horses for courses: explaining the gap between the theory and practice of green supply. Greener Manage Int 35:41–59
15. Brito M, Carbone V, Blanquart C (2008) Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: organisation and performance. Int J Prod Econ 114(2):534–553
16. Cabral I, Grilo A, Cruz-Machado V (2012) A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green supply chain management. Int J Prod Res 50(17):4830–4845
17. Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp 07–017
18. Carvalho H, Azevedo S, Cruz-Machado V (2014) Trade-offs among lean, agile, resilient and green paradigms in supply chain management: a case study approach. In: Xu J, Fry JA, Lev B, Hajiyev A (eds) Proceedings of the seventh international conference on management science and engineering management. Springer Berlin, pp 953–968
19. Carvalho H, Azevedo S, Cruz-Machado V (2010) Supply chain performance management: lean and green paradigms. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 2(3/4):151–179
20. Carvalho H, Duarte S, Cruz-Machado V (2011) Lean, agile, resilient and green: divergencies and synergies. Int J Lean Six Sigma 2(2):151–179
21. Carvalho H, Maleki M, Cruz-Machado V (2012) The links between supply chain disturbances and resilience strategies. Int J Agile Syst Manage 5(3):203–234
22. Charan P, Shankar R, Baisya R (2008) Analysis of interactions among the variables of supply chain performance measurement system implementation. Bus Process Manage J 14(4):512–529
23. Christiansen T, Berry E, Bruun P, Ward P (2003) A mapping of competitive priorities, manufacturing practices, and operational performance in groups of Danish manufacturing companies. Int J Oper Prod Manage 23(10):1163–1183
24. Christmann P (1998) Environmental strategies of multinational chemical companies: global integration or national responsiveness?. The Anderson School at UCLA, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
25. Christmann P, Taylor G (2001) Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China. J Int Bus Stud 32(3):439–458
26. Christopher M, Peck H (2004) Building the resilient supply chain. Int J Logist Manage 15(2):1–14
27. Cooney R (2002) Is “lean” a universal production system? Batch production in the automotive industry. Int J Operat Prod Manage 22(9/10):1130–1147
28. Duperrin J-C (1973) Méthode de hiérarchisation des éléments d’un système
29. Faisal M, Banwet D, Shankar R (2006) Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers. Bus Process Manage J 12(4):535–552
30. Faria J, Matos M, Nunes E (2006) Optimal design of work-in-process buffers. Int J Prod Econ 99(1/2):144–155
31. Ghalayini A, Noble J (1996) The changing basis of performance measurement. Int J Operat Prod Manage 16(8):63–80
32. Glickman T, White S (2006) Security, visibility and resilience: the keys to mitigating supply chain vulnerabilities. Int J Logist Syst Manage 2:107–119
33. Gunasekaran A, Patel C, Tirtiroglu E (2001) Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int J Operat Prod Manage 21(1/2):71–87
34. Haimes Y (2006) On the definition of vulnerabilities in measuring risks to infrastructures. Risk Anal Off Publ Soc Risk Anal 26(2):293–296
35. Hanson J, Melnyk S, Calantone R (2004) Core values and environmental management: a strong inference approach. Greener Manage Int 46:29–40
36. Hawthorne R, Sage A (1975) On applications of interpretive structural modeling to higher education program planning. Socio Econ Plann Sci 9(1):31–43
37. Holweg M, Pil F (2004) The second century: reconnecting customer and value chain through build-to-order: moving beyond mass and lean production in the auto industry. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
38. Hong P, Kwon H-B, Roh J (2009) Implementation of strategic green orientation in supply chain: An empirical study of manufacturing firms. Eur J Innov Manage 12(4):512–532
39. Huang Y, Matthews H (2008) Seeking opportunities to reduce life cycle impacts of consumer goods-An economy-wide assessment. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 2008, pp 1–6
40. Iakovou E, Vlachos D, Xanthopoulos A (2007) An analytical methodological framework for the optimal design of resilient supply chains. Int J Logist Econ Glob 1(1):1–20
41. Jedlicka A, Mayer R (1980) Interpretive structural modeling cross cultural uses. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 10(1):49–51
42. Jeffery M, Butler R, Malone L (2008) Determining a cost-effective customer service level. Supply Chain Manage Int J 13(3):225–232
43. Jharkharia S, Shankar R (2004) IT enablement of supply chains: modeling the enablers. Int J Prod Perform Manage 53(8):700–712
44. Kainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101(1):99–108
45. Kannan G, Haq A (2007) Analysis of interactions of criteria and sub-criteria for the selection of supplier in the built-in-order supply chain environment. Int J Prod Res 45(17):3831–3852
46. Kannan V, Tan K (2005) Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance. Omega 33(2):153–162
47. Kannan G, Haq A, Sasikumar P, Arunachalam S (2008) Analysis and selection of green suppliers using interpretative structural modelling and analytic hierarchy process. Int J Manage Decis Mak 9(2):163–182
48. Kannan G, Kannan D, Haq A (2010) Analyzing supplier development criteria for an automobile industry. Ind Manage Data Syst 110(1):43–62
49. Kannan G, Murugesan P, Zhu Q, Devika K (2012) Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):204–211
50. Kanungo S, Duda S, Srinivas Y (1999) A structured model for evaluating information systems effectiveness. Syst Res Behav Sci 16(6):495–518
51. King A, Lenox MJ (2001) Lean and green? An empirical examination of the relationship between lean production and environmental performance. Prod Oper Manage 10(3):244–256
52. Klein K, Kozlowski S (2000) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions, 1st ed. Pfeiffer
53. Koplin J, Seuring S, Mesterharm M (2007) Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry—the case of the Volkswagen AG. J Clean Prod 15(11/12):1053–1062
54. Linton J, Klassen R, Jayaraman V (2007) Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J Oper Manage 25(6):1075–1082
55. Mandal A, Deshmukh S (1994) Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM). Int J Oper Prod Manage 14(6):52–59
56. Manoharan T, Muralidharan C, Deshmukh S (2010) Analyzing the interaction of performance appraisal factors using interpretive structural modeling. Perform Improv 49(6):25–32
57. Mathison S (1988) Why triangulate? Educational Res 17(2):13–17
58. Mathiyazhagan K, Kannan G, Noorul Haq A, Yong G (2013) An ISM approach for the analysis of barriers in implementing green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 47:283–297
59. Matson JE, Matson JO (2007) Just-in-time implementation issues among automotive suppliers in the southern USA. Supply Chain Manage Int J 12(6):432–443
60. Miles M, Russell G (1997) ISO 14000 total quality environmental management: the integration of environmental marketing, total quality management, and corporate environmental policy. J Qual Manage 2(1):151–168
61. Morlok E, Chang D (2004) Measuring capacity flexibility of a transportation system. Transp Res Part A 38(6):405–420
62. Nair S, Menon C (2008) An environmental marketing system—a proposed model based on Indian experience. Bus Strate Environ 17(8):467–479
63. Nawrocka D, Brorson T, Lindhqvist T (2009) ISO 14001 in environmental supply chain practices. J Clean Prod 17(16):1435–1443
64. Naylor B, Naim M, Berry D (1999) Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 62(1–2):107–118
65. Nunes B, Bennett D (2010) Green operations initiatives in the automotive industry: An environmental reports analysis and benchmarking study. Benchmark Int J 17(3):396–420
66. Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production, 1st ed. Productivity Press, Oregon
67. Pandey V, Garg S (2009) Analysis of interaction among the enablers of agility in supply chain. J Adv Manage Res 6(1):99–114
68. Pettersen J (2009) Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. TQM J 21(2):127–142
69. Pochampally K, Gupta S, Govindan K (2009) Metrics for performance measurement of a reverse/closed-loop supply chain. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 1(1):8–32
70. Ponomarov SY, Holcomb MC (2009) Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. Int J Logist Manage 20(1):124–143
71. Rao P, Holt D (2005) Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? Int J Oper Prod Manage 25(9):898–916
72. Ravi V, Shankar R (2004) Analysis of interactions among the barriers of reverse logistics. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 72(8):1011–1029
73. Ravi V, Shankar R, Tiwari M (2005) Productivity improvement of a computer hardware supply chain. Int J Prod Perform Manage 54(4):239–255
74. Reichhart A, Holweg M (2007) Lean distribution: concepts, contributions, conflicts. Int J Prod Res 45:3699–3722
75. Rondinelli D, Berry M (2000) Environmental citizenship in multinational corporations: social responsibility and sustainable development. Eur Manage J 18(1):70–84
76. Rosič H, Bauer G, Jammernegg W (2009) A framework for economic and environmental sustainability and resilience of supply chains. In: Rapid modelling for increasing competitiveness, pp 91–104
77. Sage A (1977) Interpretive structural modeling: methodology for large scale systems. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 91–164
78. Sahney S, Banwet D, Karunes S (2006) An integrated framework for quality in education: application of quality function deployment, interpretive structural modelling and path analysis. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 17(2):265–285
79. Saxena J, Sushil P, Vrat S (1992) Scenario building: a critical study of energy conservation in the Indian cement industry. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 41(2):121–146
80. Singh B, Garg SK, Sharma SK (2010) Development of index for measuring leanness: study of an Indian auto component industry. Meas Bus Excell 14(2):46–53
81. Singleton RA, Straits BC (1999) Approaches to social research. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
82. Srivastava S (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manage Rev 9(1):53–80
83. Svensson G (2000) A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains. Int J Phys Dist Logist Manage 30(9):731–750
84. Talib F, Rahman Z, Qureshi M (2011) Analysis of interaction among the barriers to total quality management implementation using interpretive structural modeling approach. Benchmarking Int J 18(4):563–587
85. Tang C (2006) Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. Int J Logist Res Appl 9(1):33–45
86. Thakkar J, Deshmukh G, Gupta A, Shankar R (2007) Development of a balanced scorecard: an integrated approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). Int J Prod Perform Manage 56(1):25–59
87. Thakkar J, Kanda A, Deshmukh G (2008) Evaluation of buyer-supplier relationships using an integrated mathematical approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and graph theoretic matrix: the case study of Indian automotive SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manage 19(1):92–124
88. Thun J-H, Müller A (2010) An empirical analysis of green supply chain management in the German automotive industry. Bus Strategy Environ 19(2):119–132
89. Thun J-H, Marble R, Silveira-Camargos V (2007) A conceptual framework and empirical results of the risk and potential of just in sequence: a study of the German automotive industry. J Oper Logist 1(2):1–13
90. Tice J, Ahouse L, Larson T (2005) Lean production and EMSs: aligning environmental management with business priorities. Environ Qual Manage 15(2):1–12
91. Tsai W, Hung S (2009) A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation. Int J Prod Res 47(18):4991–5017
92. Tsiakouri M (2008) Managing disruptions proactively in the supply chain: the approach in an auto-manufacturing production line in proceedings of the POMS 19 Conference, May, 9–12. California, USA
93. Vonderembse MA, Uppal M, Huang SH, Dismukes JP (2006) Designing supply chains: towards theory development. Int J Prod Econ 100(2):223–238
94. Voss C, Tsikriktsis N, Frohlich M (2002) Case research in operations management. Int J Oper Product Manage 22(2):195–219
95. Walker H, Di Sisto L, McBain D (2008) Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors. J Purch Supply Manage 14(1):69–85
96. Warfield J (1974a) Developing interconnected matrices in Structural modeling. IEEE Trans Syst Men Cybern 4(1):51–81
97. Warfield J (1974b) Developing subsystem matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 4(1):74–80
98. Warfield J (1976) Societal systems: planning, policy and complexity. Wiley, New York
99. Yin R (2002) Case study research: design and methods, applied social research methods series, vol 5. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
100. Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2004) Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J Oper Manage 22:265–289
101. Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Cordeiro J, Lai K-H (2008a) Firm-level correlates of emergent green supply chain management practices in the Chinese context. Omega 36(4):577–591
102. Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y (2005) Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage 25(5):449–468
103. Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai H-K, Geng Y (2008b) The role of organizational size in the adoption of green supply chain management practices in China. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 15(6):322–337
104. Zobel C (2011) Representing perceived tradeoffs in defining disaster resilience. Decis Support Syst 50(2):394–403
105. Zsidisin G, Ragatz G, Melnyk S (2005) The dark side of supply chain management. Supply Chain Manage Rev 9(2):46–52