MetLab: An in silico experimental design, simulation and analysis tool for viral metagenomics studies

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2016, Pages

  Norling, Martin ^a   Karlsson Lindsjö, Oskar E ^b,c   Gourlé, Hadrien ^b   Bongcam Rudloff, Erik ^b   Hayer, Juliette ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c The OIE Collaborating Centre for the Biotechnology based Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases in Veterinary Medicine   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HUMAN; METAGENOME; METAGENOMICS; PIPELINE; PROBABILITY; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIST; SPECIES; VELOCITY; VIRUS; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE;

BACTERIA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, GENETIC; INTERNET; METAGENOMICS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOFTWARE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIRUSES;

EID: 84982162808     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160334     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. Metagenomics. Nature. 2008; 455: 481-483. doi: 10.1038/455481a PMID: 18818648
2. Delwart EL. Viral metagenomics. Rev Med Virol. 2007; 17: 115-131. doi: 10.1002/rmv.532 PMID: 17295196
3. Chen K, Pachter L. Bioinformatics for whole-genome shotgun sequencing of microbial communities. PLOS Comput Biol. 2005; 1: 106-12. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010024 PMID: 16110337
4. Kunin V, Copeland A, Lapidus A, Mavromatis K, Hugenholtz P. A bioinformatician's guide to metagenomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008; 72: 557-578. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00009-08 PMID: 19052320
5. Thomas T, Gilbert J, Meyer F. Metagenomics - a guide from sampling to data analysis. Microbial Informatics and Experimentation. 2012. p. 3. doi: 10.1186/2042-5783-2-3 PMID: 22587947
6. Mokili JL, Rohwer F, Dutilh BE. Metagenomics and future perspectives in virus discovery. Current Opinion in Virology. 2012. pp. 63-77. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2011.12.004 PMID: 22440968
7. Belák S, Karlsson OE, Blomström A-LL, Berg M, Granberg F, Belk S, et al. New viruses in veterinary medicine, detected by metagenomic approaches. Vet Microbiol. 2013; 165: 95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.01.022 PMID: 23428379
8. Temmam S, Davoust B, Berenger J-M, Raoult D, Desnues C. Viral metagenomics on animals as a tool for the detection of zoonoses prior to human infection? Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15: 10377-97. doi: 10.3390/ijms150610377 PMID: 24918293
9. Karlsson OE, Hansen T, Knutsson R, Löfström C, Granberg F, Berg M. Metagenomic detection methods in biopreparedness outbreak scenarios. Biosecur Bioterror. 2013; 11 Suppl 1: S146-57. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2012.0077 PMID: 23971800
10. Edwards RA, Rohwer F. Opinion: Viral metagenomics. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005; 3: 504-510.
11. Rosseel T, Van Borm S, Vandenbussche F, Hoffmann B, van den Berg T, Beer M, et al. The Origin of Biased Sequence Depth in Sequence-Independent Nucleic Acid Amplification and Optimization for Efficient Massive Parallel Sequencing. PLOS One. 2013; 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076144
12. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Estimating coverage in metagenomic data sets and why it matters. ISME J. Nature Publishing Group; 2014; 1-3. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.76
13. Stanhope S. Occupancy modeling, maximum contig size probabilities and designing metagenomics experiments. PLOS One. 2010; 5: e11652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011652 PMID: 20686599
14. Wendl MC, Kota K, Weinstock GM, Mitreva M. Coverage theories for metagenomic DNA sequencing based on a generalization of Stevens' theorem. J Math Biol. 2013; 67: 1141-61. doi: 10.1007/s00285-012-0586-x PMID: 22965653
15. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Nonpareil: a redundancy-based approach to assess the level of coverage in metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: 629-35. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt584 PMID: 24123672
16. Gomez-Alvarez V, Teal TK, Schmidt TM. Systematic artifacts in metagenomes from complex microbial communities. ISME J. Nature Publishing Group; 2009; 3: 1314-7. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.72
17. Hoff KJ. The effect of sequencing errors on metagenomic gene prediction. BMC Genomics. 2009; 10: 520. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-520 PMID: 19909532
18. Nakamura K, Oshima T, Morimoto T, Ikeda S, Yoshikawa H, Shiwa Y, et al. Sequence-specific error profile of Illumina sequencers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr344
19. Meacham F, Boffelli D, Dhahbi J, Martin DI, Singer M, Pachter L. Identification and correction of systematic error in high-throughput sequence data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011. p. 451. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-451 PMID: 22099972
20. Schmieder R, Edwards R. Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets. PLOS One. 2011; 6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017288
21. Andrews S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. In: babraham bioinformatics. 2010 p. 1. Available: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
22. Patel RK, Jain M. NGS QC toolkit: A toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLOS One. 2012; 7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030619
23. Pop M. Genome assembly reborn: Recent computational challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2009; 10: 354-366. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbp026 PMID: 19482960
24. Pignatelli M, Moya A. Evaluating the fidelity of De Novo short read metagenomic assembly using simulated data. PLOS One. 2011; 6: e19984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019984 PMID: 21625384
25. Charuvaka A, Rangwala H. Evaluation of short read metagenomic assembly. Proceedings - 2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2010. 2010. pp. 171-178. doi: 10.1109/BIBM.2010.5706558
26. Mende DR, Waller AS, Sunagawa S, Järvelin AI, Chan MM, Arumugam M, et al. Assessment of metagenomic assembly using simulated next generation sequencing data. PLOS One. 2012; 7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031386
27. Kostic AD, Ojesina AI, Pedamallu CS, Jung J, Verhaak RGW, Getz G, et al. PathSeq: software to identify or discover microbes by deep sequencing of human tissue. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29: 393-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1868 PMID: 21552235
28. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and Its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012; 19: 455-477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 PMID: 22506599
29. Boisvert S, Raymond F, Godzaridis É, Godzaridis E, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling. Genome Biol. 2012; 13: R122. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-12-r122 PMID: 23259615
30. Tsai IJ, Otto TD, Berriman M. Improving draft assemblies by iterative mapping and assembly of short reads to eliminate gaps. Genome Biol. 2010; 11: R41. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-4-r41 PMID: 20388197
31. Zhang W, Chen J, Yang Y, Tang Y, Shang J, Shen B. A practical comparison of De Novo genome assembly software tools for next-generation sequencing technologies. PLOS One. 2011; 6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017915
32. Li Z, Chen Y, Mu D, Yuan J, Shi Y, Zhang H, et al. Comparison of the two major classes of assembly algorithms: overlap-layout-consensus and de-bruijn-graph. Brief Funct Genomics. 2012; 11: 25-37. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elr035 PMID: 22184334
33. Miller JR, Koren S, Sutton G. Assembly algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Genomics. 2010. pp. 315-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2010.03.001
34. Namiki T, Hachiya T, Tanaka H, Sakakibara Y. MetaVelvet: An extension of Velvet assembler to de novo metagenome assembly from short sequence reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks678
35. Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. Meta-IDBA: A de Novo assembler for metagenomic data. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr216
36. Wooley JC, Godzik A, Friedberg I. A primer on metagenomics. PLOS Comput Biol. 2010; 6: e1000667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000667 PMID: 20195499
37. Mande SS, Mohammed MH, Ghosh TS. Classification of metagenomic sequences: Methods and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2012; 13: 669-681. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs054 PMID: 22962338
38. Bazinet AL, Cummings MP. A comparative evaluation of sequence classification programs. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012. p. 92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-92 PMID: 22574964
39. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997. pp. 3389-3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 PMID: 9254694
40. Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, Schuster SC. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res. 2007; 17: 377-86. doi: 10.1101/gr.5969107 PMID: 17255551
41. Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2014; 12: 59-60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176 PMID: 25402007
42. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014; 15: R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 PMID: 24580807
43. Vouzis PD, Sahinidis NV. GPU-BLAST: using graphics processors to accelerate protein sequence alignment. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 182-188. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq644 PMID: 21088027
44. Suzuki S, Ishida T, Kurokawa K, Akiyama Y. GHOSTM: A GPU-accelerated homology search tool for metagenomics. PLOS One. 2012; 7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036060
45. Mra J, Mrázek J. Phylogenetic signals in DNA composition: Limitations and prospects. Mol Biol Evol. 2009; 26: 1163-1169. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp032 PMID: 19233962
46. Brady A, Salzberg SL. Phymm and PhymmBL: metagenomic phylogenetic classification with interpolated Markov models. Nat Methods. Nature Publishing Group; 2009; 6: 673-6. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1358
47. Ghosh TS, Mohammed MH, Komanduri D, Mande SS. ProViDE: A software tool for accurate estimation of viral diversity in metagenomic samples. Bioinformation. 2011; 6: 91-94. doi: 10.6026/97320630006091 PMID: 21544173
48. Bokulich NA, Mills DA. Improved selection of internal transcribed spacer-specific primers enables quantitative, ultra-high-throughput profiling of fungal communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79: 2519-2526. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03870-12 PMID: 23377949
49. Fousse L, Hanrot G, Lefèvre V, Pélissier P, Zimmermann P. {MPFR}: A Multiple-Precision Binary Floating-Point Library with Correct Rounding. ACM Trans Math Softw. 2007; 33: 13:1-13:15.
50. Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011; 27: 863-864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 PMID: 21278185
51. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods. 2012. pp. 357-359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 PMID: 22388286
52. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25: 2078-2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 PMID: 19505943
53. Parks DH, MacDonald NJ, Beiko RG. Classifying short genomic fragments from novel lineages using composition and homology. BMC Bioinformatics. BioMed Central Ltd; 2011; 12: 328. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-328
54. Nalbantoglu OU, Way SF, Hinrichs SH, Sayood K. RAIphy: phylogenetic classification of metagenomics samples using iterative refinement of relative abundance index profiles. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12: 41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-41 PMID: 21281493
55. Rosen GL, Reichenberger ER, Rosenfeld AM. NBC: the Naïve Bayes Classification tool webserver for taxonomic classification of metagenomic reads. Bioinformatics. Oxford University Press; 2011; 27: 127-129. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq619
56. Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011; 12: 385. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-385 PMID: 21961884
57. Rho M, Tang H, Ye Y. FragGeneScan: Predicting genes in short and error-prone reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38: 1-12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq747
58. Skewes-Cox P, Sharpton TJ, Pollard KS, DeRisi JL. Profile hidden Markov models for the detection of viruses within metagenomic sequence data. PLOS One. 2014; 9: e105067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105067 PMID: 25140992
59. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLOS Comput Biol. 2011; 7: e1002195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 PMID: 22039361
60. Byrd AL, Perez-Rogers JF, Manimaran S, Castro-Nallar E, Toma I, McCaffrey T, et al. Clinical Patho- Scope: rapid alignment and filtration for accurate pathogen identification in clinical samples using unassembled sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014; 15: 262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-262 PMID: 25091138
61. Granberg F, Vicente-Rubiano M, Rubio-Guerri C, Karlsson OE, Kukielka D, Belák S, et al. Metagenomic Detection of Viral Pathogens in Spanish Honeybees: Co-Infection by Aphid Lethal Paralysis, Israel Acute Paralysis and Lake Sinai Viruses. PLOS One. 2013; 8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057459
62. Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011. p. 385. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-385 PMID: 21961884
63. Karlsson OE, Larsson J, Hayer J, Berg M, Jacobson M. The Intestinal Eukaryotic Virome in Healthy and Diarrhoeic Neonatal Piglets. PLOS One. Public Library of Science; 2016; 11: e0151481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151481