In hot pursuit: Fluctuating mating system and sexual selection in sand lizards

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 574-583

  Olsson, Mats ^a,b   Wapstra, Erik ^c   Schwartz, Tonia ^d   Madsen, Thomas ^a,e   Ujvari, Beata ^a   Uller, Tobias ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^d IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Climate change; Mating system; Multiple paternity; Operational sex ratio; Temperature

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; BREEDING SEASON; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECTOTHERMY; FITNESS; LIZARD; REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL SELECTION; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; CLIMATE; CLUTCH SIZE; FEMALE; GENETICS; LIZARD; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; CLIMATE; CLUTCH SIZE; FEMALE; LIZARDS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; REPRODUCTION; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

LACERTA AGILIS; SQUAMATA;

EID: 79251503601     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01152.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press. Chicago, IL.
2. Birkhead, T., and A. Møller, eds. 1998. Sexual selection and sperm competition, Academic Press, UK.
3. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38:720-734.
4. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
5. Bohme, M. U., T. U. Berendonk, and M. Schlegel 2005. Isolation of new microsatellite loci from the Green Lizard (Lacerta viridis viridis). Mol. Ecol. Notes 5:45-47.
6. Boudjemadi, K., O. Martin, J. C. Simon, and A. Estoup 1999. Development and cross-species comparison of microsatellite markers in two lizard species, Lacerta vivipara and Podarcis muralis. Mol. Ecol. 8:518-520.
7. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and A. C. J. Vincent 1991. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rate of males and females. Nature 351:58-60.
8. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and G. A. Parker 1992. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 67:437-456.
9. Cornwallis, C. K., and T. Uller 2010. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:145-152.
10. Deutsch, C. A., J. J. Tewksbury, R. B. Huey, K. S. Sheldon, C. K. Ghalambor, D. C. Haak, and P. R. Martin 2008. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:6668-6672.
11. Emlen, S. T., and L. W. Oring 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-233.
12. Gullberg, A., H. Tegelström, and M. Olsson 1997. Microsatellites in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis): description, variation, inheritance, and applicability. Biochem. Gen. 35:281-295.
13. Gosden, T., and E. Svensson 2008. Spatial and temporal dynamics in a sexual selection mosaic. Evolution 62:845-856.
14. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75:21-64.
15. Jennions, M. D., J. M. Drayton, R. Brooks, and J. Hunt 2007. Do female black field crickets Teleogryllus commodus benefit from polyandry? J. Evol. Biol. 20:1469-1477.
16. Kearney, M., R. Shine, and W. P. Porter 2009. The potential for behavioral thermoregulation to buffer 'cold-blooded' animals against climate warning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:3835-3840.
17. Kalinowski, S. T., M. L. Taper, and T. C. Marshall 2007. Revising how the computer program Cervus accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16:1099-1106.
18. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. N. Vignieri, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert, and P. Beerli 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
19. Klug, H., J. Heuschele, M. D. Jennions, and H. Kokko 2010. The mismeasurement of sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23:447-462.
20. Kvarnemo, C., and I. Ahnesjö 1996. The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 11:404-408.
21. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
22. Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, and R. D. Wolfinger 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
23. Madsen, T. 2008. Female nonavian reptiles benefit from multiple matings. Mol. Ecol. 17:3753.
24. Madsen, T., and R. Shine 1993. Temporal variability in sexual selection acting on reproductive tactics and body size in male snakes. Am. Nat. 141:167-171.
25. Olsson, M. 1986. Spatial distribution and home range size in the Swedish sand lizard, Lacerta agilis during the mating season. Pp. 597-600 in Z. Ro'cek, ed. Studies in herpetology. Charles University, Prague, Czechoslovakia.
26. Olsson, M. 1993. Male preference for large females and assortative mating for body size in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:337-341.
27. Olsson, M. 1994. Nuptial coloration in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis: an intrasexually selected cue to fighting ability. Anim. Behav. 48:607-613.
28. Olsson, M., and R. Shine 1996. Does reproductive success increase with age or with size in species with indeterminate growth? A case study using sand lizards (Lacerta agilis)? Oecologia 105:175-178.
29. Olsson, M., and T. Madsen 2001. Promiscuity in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) and adder snakes (Vipera berus): causes and consequences. J. Hered. 92:190-197.
30. Olsson, M., and T. Uller 2009. On parsimonious paternity and scientific rigor: a reply to Madsen. Mol. Ecol. 18:25-27.
31. Olsson, M., A. Gullberg, H. Tegelström, T. Madsen, and R. Shine 1994a. Rewards of 'promiscuity'. Nature 372:230.
32. Olsson, M., A. Gullberg, H. Tegelström, T. Madsen, and R. Shine 1994b. Promiscuous lizard females have more viable young (under subheading: can female adders multiply?). Nature 369:528.
33. Olsson, M., A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelström 1994c. Sperm competition in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis. Anim. Behav. 48:193-200.
34. Olsson, M., R. Shine, T. Madsen, A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelström 1996a. Sperm selection by females. Nature 383:585.
35. Olsson, M., A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelström 1996b. Malformed offspring, sibling matings, and selection against inbreeding in the sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). J. Evol. Biol. 9:229-242.
36. Olsson, M., A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelström 1996c. Mate guarding in male sand lizards, Lacerta agilis. Behaviour 133:367-386.
37. Olsson, M., R. Shine, T. Madsen, A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelström 1997. Sperm choice by females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:445-446.
38. Olsson, M., E. Wapstra, T. Madsen, and B. Silverin 2000. Testosterone, ticks, and travels: a test of the immunocompetence-handicap hypothesis in free-ranging lizards. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267:1-5.
39. Olsson, M., T. Madsen, B. Ujvari, and E. Wapstra 2004. Fecundity and MHC affects ejaculation tactics and paternity bias in sand lizards. Evolution 58:906-909.
40. Olsson, M., T. Madsen, T. Uller, E. Wapstra, and B. Ujvari 2005a. The role of Haldane's rule in sex allocation. Evolution 59:221-225.
41. Olsson, M., T. Madsen, E. Wapstra, B. Silverin, B. Ujvari, and H. Wittzell 2005b. MHC, health, color, and reproductive success in sand lizards. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58:289-294.
42. Qvarnström, A., J. E. Brommer, and L. Gustafsson 2006. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441:84-86.
43. Schwartz, T., and M. Olsson 2008. Microsatellite markers developed for a Swedish population of sand lizard (Lacerta agilis). Conserv. Genet. 9:719-721.
44. Schuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton U.P., NJ.
45. Sinervo, B., F. Mendéz-de-la-Cruz, D. B. Miles, B. Heulin, E. Bastiaans, M. Villagrán-Santa Cruz, R. Lara-Resindiz, N. Martínez-Méndez, M. L. Calderón-Espinosa, R. N. Meza-Lázaro, et al. 2010. Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science 328:894-899.
46. Thuman, K. A., and S. C. Griffith 2005. Genetic similarity and the nonrandom distribution of paternity in a genetically highly polyandrous shorebird. Anim. Behav. 69:765-770.
47. Treganza, T., and N. Wedell 2002. Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding. Nature 415:71-73.
48. Uller, T., and M. Olsson 2008. Multiple paternity in reptiles: pattern and processes. Mol. Ecol. 17:2566-2580.
49. Wigley, T. M. L., and S. C. B. Raper 2001. Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. Science 293:451-454.