Representing genetic variation with synthetic DNA standards

Nature Methods

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 784-791

  Deveson, Ira W ^a,b   Chen, Wendy Y ^a,b   Wong, Ted ^a   Hardwick, Simon A ^a,b   Andersen, Stacey B ^c   Nielsen, Lars K ^c   Mattick, John S ^a,b   Mercer, Tim R ^a,b  

^a GARVAN INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; SYNTHETIC DNA; DNA;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DIPLOIDY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNA LIBRARY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE DOSAGE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CHROMOSOME; HUMAN GENOME; INDEL MUTATION; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOMATIC MUTATION; TRANSPOSON; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; PROCEDURES; STANDARD; STANDARDS; SYNTHESIS;

CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL; DNA; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMICS; HUMANS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84981252375     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3957     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Goldstein, D.B. et al. Sequencing studies in human genetics: design and interpretation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 460-470 (2013).
2. Mwenifumbo, J.C. & Marra, M.A. Cancer genome-sequencing study design. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 321-332 (2013).
3. Gundry, M. & Vijg, J. Direct mutation analysis by high-throughput sequencing: from germline to low-abundant, somatic variants. Mutat. Res. 729, 1-15 (2012).
4. Katsanis, S.H. & Katsanis, N. Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 415-426 (2013).
5. Nielsen, R., Paul, J.S., Albrechtsen, A. & Song, Y.S. Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 443-451 (2011).
6. Sims, D., Sudbery, I., Ilott, N.E., Heger, A. & Ponting, C.P. Sequencing depth and coverage: key considerations in genomic analyses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 121-132 (2014).
7. Rosenbloom, K.R. et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2015 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D670-D681 (2015).
8. Sherry, S.T. et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 308-311 (2001).
9. Satya, R.V. & DiCarlo, J. Edge effects in calling variants from targeted amplicon sequencing. BMC Genomics 15, 1073-1080 (2014).
10. Huang, W., Li, L., Myers, J.R. & Marth, G.T. ART: a next-generation sequencing read simulator. Bioinformatics 28, 593-594 (2012).
11. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009).
12. Zook, J.M. et al. Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 246-251 (2014).
13. Van der Auwera, G.A. et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 43, 1-33 (2013).
14. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297-1303 (2010).
15. DePristo, M.A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491-498 (2011).
16. De Sousa E Melo, F., Vermeulen, L., Fessler, E. & Medema, J.P. Cancer heterogeneity-a multifaceted view. EMBO Rep. 14, 686-695 (2013).
17. Meacham, C.E. & Morrison, S.J. Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature 501, 328-337 (2013).
18. Greaves, M. & Maley, C.C. Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature 481, 306-313 (2012).
19. Griffith, M. et al. Optimizing cancer genome sequencing and analysis. Cell Syst. 1, 210-223 (2015).
20. Carter, S.L. et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 413-421 (2012).
21. Aran, D., Sirota, M. & Butte, A.J. Systematic pan-cancer analysis of tumour purity. Nat. Commun. 6, 8971 (2015).
22. Koboldt, D.C. et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 568-576 (2012).
23. Alkan, C., Coe, B.P. & Eichler, E.E. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 363-376 (2011).
24. Weckselblatt, B. & Rudd, M.K. Human structural variation: mechanisms of chromosome rearrangements. Trends Genet. 31, 587-599 (2015).
25. Abel, H.J., Duncavage, E.J. & Duncavage, E.J. Detection of structural DNA variation from next generation sequencing data: a review of informatic approaches. Cancer Genet. 206, 432-440 (2013).
26. Pirooznia, M., Goes, F.S. & Zandi, P.P. Whole-genome CNV analysis: advances in computational approaches. Front. Genet. 6, 138 (2015).
27. MacDonald, J.R., Ziman, R., Yuen, R.K.C., Feuk, L. & Scherer, S.W. The Database of Genomic Variants: a curated collection of structural variation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D986-D992 (2014).
28. Layer, R.M., Chiang, C., Quinlan, A.R. & Hall, I.M. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol. 15, R84 (2014).
29. Cordaux, R. & Batzer, M.A. The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 691-703 (2009).
30. Zarrei, M., MacDonald, J.R., Merico, D. & Scherer, S.W. A copy number variation map of the human genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 172-183 (2015).
31. Wineinger, N.E. et al. Statistical issues in the analysis of DNA copy number variations. Int. J. Comput. Biol. Drug Des. 1, 368-395 (2008).
32. Parekh, S., Ziegenhain, C., Vieth, B., Enard, W. & Hellmann, I. The impact of amplification on differential expression analyses by RNA-seq. Preprint at bioRxiv http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/035493 (2015).
33. Armbruster, D.A. & Pry, T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 29 (Suppl. 1), S49-S52 (2008).
34. Gibbons, J.G., Branco, A.T., Yu, S. & Lemos, B. Ribosomal DNA copy number is coupled with gene expression variation and mitochondrial abundance in humans. Nat. Commun. 5, 4850 (2014).
35. Lei, H. et al. Identification and characterization of EBV genomes in spontaneously immortalized human peripheral blood B lymphocytes by NGS technology. BMC Genomics 14, 804 (2013).
36. Schaap, M. et al. Genome-wide analysis of macrosatellite repeat copy number variation in worldwide populations: evidence for differences and commonalities in size distributions and size restrictions. BMC Genomics 14, 143 (2013).
37. Risso, D., Ngai, J., Speed, T.P. & Dudoit, S. Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 896-902 (2014).
38. Frampton, G.M. et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1023-1031 (2013).
39. Hardwick, S.A. et al. Spliced synthetic genes as internal controls in RNA sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3958 (2016).
40. Lih, C.J. et al. Analytical validation and application of a targeted next-generation sequencing mutation-detection assay for use in treatment assignment in the NCI-MPACT trial. J. Mol. Diagn. 18, 51-67 (2016).
41. Jiang, L. et al. Synthetic spike-in standards for RNA-seq experiments. Genome Res. 21, 1543-1551 (2011).
42. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W. & Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
43. Quinlan, A.R. & Hall, I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841-842 (2010).
44. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
45. Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N. & Lengauer, T. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21, 3940-3941 (2005).
46. Abyzov, A., Urban, A.E., Snyder, M. & Gerstein, M. CNVnator: an approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res. 21, 974-984 (2011).