Chaperonin GroEL–GroES Functions as both Alternating and Non-Alternating Engines

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 428, Issue 15, 2016, Pages 3090-3101

  Yamamoto, Daisuke ^a,b,c   Ando, Toshio ^a,b  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c FUKUOKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

chaperonin; cooperativity; GroEL GroES interaction; high speed AFM

Indexed keywords

ALPHA LACTALBUMIN; CHAPERONIN; CHAPERONIN 60; DISULFIDE; EARLY PREGNANCY FACTOR; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; LACTALBUMIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; COMPLEX FORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN FOLDING;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CHAPERONIN 10; CHAPERONIN 60; CHAPERONINS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; LACTALBUMIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 84979901962     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: 10898638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. [1] Hartl, F.U., Bracher, A., Hayer-Hartl, M., Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475 (2011), 324–332.
2. [2] Hartl, F.U., Hayer-Hartl, M., Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295 (2002), 1852–1858.
3. [3] Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., Hegde, R., Boisvert, D.C., Joachimiak, A., Horwich, A.L., et al. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371 (1994), 578–586.
4. [4] Horwich, A.L., Fenton, W.A., Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding. Q. Rev. Biophys. 42 (2009), 83–116.
5. [5] Chaudhuri, T.K., Verma, V.K., Maheshwari, A., GroEL assisted folding of large polypeptide substrates in Escherichia coli: present scenario and assignments for the future. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 99 (2009), 42–50.
6. [6] Jewett, A.I., Shea, J.E., Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67 (2010), 255–276.
7. [7] Clare, D.K., Bakkes, P.J., van Heerikhuizen, H., van der Vies, S.M., Saibil, H.R., Chaperonin complex with a newly folded protein encapsulated in the folding chamber. Nature 457 (2009), 107–110.
8. [8] Weissman, J.S., Hohl, C.M., Kovalenko, O., Kashi, Y., Chen, S., Braig, K., et al. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83 (1995), 577–587.
9. [9] Mayhew, M., da Silva, A.C., Martin, J., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Hartl, F.U., Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex. Nature 379 (1996), 420–426.
10. [10] Yifrach, O., Horovitz, A., Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34 (1995), 5303–5308.
11. [11] Burston, S.G., Ranson, N.A., Clarke, A.R., The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 249 (1995), 138–152.
12. [12] Horovitz, A., Willison, K.R., Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15 (2005), 646–651.
13. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388 (1997), 741–750.
14. [14] Rye, H.S., Burston, S.G., Fenton, W.A., Beechem, J.M., Xu, Z., Sigler, P.B., et al. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 388 (1997), 792–798.
15. [15] Rye, H.S., Roseman, A.M., Chen, S., Furtak, K., Fenton, W.A., Saibil, H.R., et al. GroEL–GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. Cell 97 (1999), 325–338.
16. [16] Schmidt, M., Rutkat, K., Rachel, R., Pfeifer, G., Jaenicke, R., Viitanen, P., et al. Symmetric complexes of GroE chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. Science 265 (1994), 656–659.
17. 2 chaperonin hetero-oligomer. Science 265 (1994), 653–656.
18. [18] Sparrer, H., Rutkat, K., Buchner, J., Catalysis of protein folding by symmetric chaperone complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 (1997), 1096–1100.
19. [19] Koike-Takeshita, A., Yoshida, M., Taguchi, H., Revisiting the GroEL–GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008), 23,774–23,781.
20. [20] Sameshima, T., Ueno, T., Iizuka, R., Ishii, N., Terada, N., Okabe, K., et al. Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL–GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008), 23,765–23,773.
21. [21] Sameshima, T., Iizuka, R., Ueno, T., Wada, J., Aoki, M., Shimamoto, N., et al. Single-molecule study on the decay process of the football-shaped GroEL–GroES complex using zero-mode waveguides. J. Biol. Chem. 285 (2010), 23,159–23,164.
22. 2 complex. Biochem. J. 427 (2010), 247–254.
23. 2 complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 287 (2012), 41,118–41,125.
24. [24] Ye, X., Lorimer, G.H., Substrate protein switches GroE chaperonins from asymmetric to symmetric cycling by catalyzing nucleotide exchange. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), E4289–E4297.
25. 2 complexes are the protein-folding functional form of the chaperonin nanomachine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (2013), E4298–E4305.
26. 2 chaperonin footballs, the protein-folding functional form. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), 12,775–12,780.
27. 14 complex determined at 3.8 Å reveals rearrangement between two GroEL rings. J. Mol. Biol. 426 (2014), 3634–3641.
28. [28] Ando, T., Kodera, N., Takai, E., Maruyama, D., Saito, K., Toda, A., A high-speed atomic force microscope for studying biological macromolecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98 (2001), 12,468–12,472.
29. [29] Ando, T., Uchihashi, T., Fukuma, T., High-speed atomic force microscopy for nano-visualization of dynamic biomolecular processes. Prog. Surf. Sci. 83 (2008), 337–437.
30. [30] Kodera, N., Yamamoto, D., Ishikawa, R., Ando, T., Video imaging of walking myosin V by high-speed atomic force microscopy. Nature 468 (2010), 72–76.
31. 1-ATPase. Science 333 (2011), 755–758.
32. [32] Ando, T., Uchihashi, T., Scheuring, S., Filming biomolecular processes by high-speed atomic force microscopy. Chem. Rev. 114 (2014), 3120–3188.
33. [33] Viani, M.B., Pietrasanta, L.I., Thompson, J.B., Chand, A., Gebeshuber, I.C., Kindt, J.H., et al. Probing protein–protein interactions in real time. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7 (2000), 644–647.
34. [34] Yokokawa, M., Wada, C., Ando, T., Sakai, N., Yagi, A., Yoshimura, S.H., et al. Fast-scanning atomic force microscopy reveals the ATP/ADP-dependent conformational changes of GroEL. EMBO J. 25 (2006), 4567–4576.
35. [35] Yamamoto, D., Nagura, N., Omote, S., Taniguchi, M., Ando, T., Streptavidin 2D crystal substrates for visualizing biomolecular processes by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 97 (2009), 2358–2367.
36. [36] Taguchi, H., Ueno, T., Tadakuma, H., Yoshida, M., Funatsu, T., Single-molecule observation of protein–protein interactions in the chaperonin system. Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (2001), 861–865.
37. [37] Beiβinger, M., Rutkat, K., Buchner, J., Catalysis, commitment and encapsulation during GroE-mediated folding. J. Mol. Biol. 289 (1999), 1075–1092.
38. [38] Haldar, S., Gupta, A.J., Yan, X., Miličić, G., Hartl, F.U., Hayer-Hartl, M., Chaperonin-assisted protein folding: relative population of asymmetric and symmetric GroEL:GroES complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 427 (2015), 2244–2255.
39. [39] Ueno, T., Taguchi, H., Tadakuma, H., Yoshida, M., Funatsu, T., GroEL mediates protein folding with a two successive timer mechanism. Mol. Cell 14 (2004), 423–434.
40. [40] Motojima, F., Chaudhry, C., Fenton, W.A., Farr, G.W., Horwich, A.L., Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004), 15,005–15,012.
41. [41] Grason, J.P., Gresham, J.S., Lorimer, G.H., Setting the chaperonin timer: a two-stroke, two-speed, protein machine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008), 17,339–17,344.
42. + and substrate protein on ATP hydrolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008), 17,334–17,338.
43. [43] Madan, D., Lin, Z., Rye, H.S., Triggering protein folding within the GroEL–GroES complex. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008), 32,003–32,013.
44. [44] Purcell, T.J., Sweeney, H.L., Spudich, J.A., A force-dependent state controls the coordination of processive myosin V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102 (2005), 13,873–13,878.
45. [45] Suzuki, M., Ueno, T., Iizuka, R., Miura, T., Zako, T., Akahori, R., et al. Effect of the C-terminal truncation on the functional cycle of chaperonin GroEL: implication that the C-terminal region facilitates the transition from the folding-arrested to the folding-competent state. J. Biol. Chem. 283 (2008), 23,931–23,939.
46. [46] Motojima, F., Yoshida, M., Polypeptide in the chaperonin cage partly protrudes out and then folds inside or escapes outside. EMBO J. 29 (2010), 4008–4019.
47. [47] Todd, M.J., Lorimer, G.H., Thirumalai, D., Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93 (1996), 4030–4035.
48. [48] Taniguchi, M., Yoshimi, T., Hongo, K., Mizobata, T., Kawata, Y., Stopped-flow fluorescence analysis of the conformational changes in the GroEL apical domain. J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004), 16,368–16,376.
49. [49] Kunioka, Y., Ando, T., Innocuous labeling of the subfragment-2 region of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin with a fluorescent polyacrylamide nanobead and visualization of individual heavy meromyosin molecules. J. Biochem. 119 (1996), 1024–1032.