Polypeptide in the chaperonin cage partly protrudes out and then folds inside or escapes outside

EMBO Journal

Volumn 29, Issue 23, 2010, Pages 4008-4019

  Motojima, Fumihiro ^a   Yoshida, Masasuke ^a  

^a KYOTO SANGYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

chaperonin; GroEL; molecular chaperone; protein folding

Indexed keywords

ANTIBODY; CHAPERONIN; NANOCAGE; THIOSULFATE SULFURTRANSFERASE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CHAPERONIN 10; CHAPERONIN 60; CHAPERONINS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MUTATION; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; RIBULOSE-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; TETRAHYDROFOLATE DEHYDROGENASE; THIOSULFATE SULFURTRANSFERASE;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 78649692077     PISSN: 02614189     EISSN: 14602075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2010.262     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahrweiler PM, Frieden C (1991) Effects of point mutations in a hinge region on the stability, folding, and enzymatic activity of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry 30: 7801-7809
2. Brinker A, Pfeifer G, Kerner MJ, Naylor DJ, Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M (2001) Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Cell 107 : 223-233
3. Chaudhry C, Farr GW, Todd MJ, Rye HS, Brunger AT, Adams PD, Horwich AL, Sigler PB (2003) Role of the gamma-phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL-GroES: function, structure and energetics. EMBO J 22: 4877-4887
4. Cliff MJ, Limpkin C, Cameron A, Burston SG, Clarke AR (2006) Elucidation of steps in the capture of a protein substrate for efficient encapsulation by GroE. J Biol Chem 281: 21266-21275
5. Farr GW, Furtak K, Rowland MB, Ranson NA, Saibil HR, Kirchhausen T, Horwich AL (2000) Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell 100: 561-573
6. Fenton WA, Horwich AL (2003) Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: fate of substrate polypeptide. Q Rev Biophys 36: 229-256
7. Fenton WA, Kashi Y, Furtak K, Horwich AL (1994) Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371: 614-619
8. Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M (2002) Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: from nascent chain to folded protein. Science 295: 1852-1858
9. Kawata Y, Kawagoe M, Hongo K, Miyazaki T, Higurashi T, Mizobata T, Nagai J (1999) Functional communications between the apical and equatorial domains of GroEL through the intermediate domain. Biochemistry 38: 15731-15740
10. Koike-Takeshita A, Yoshida M, Taguchi H (2008) Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant. J Biol Chem 283: 23774-23781
11. Lin Z, Rye HS (2004) Expansion and compression of a protein folding intermediate by GroEL. Mol Cell 16: 23-34
12. Madan D, Lin Z, Rye HS (2008) Triggering protein folding within the GroEL-GroES complex. J Biol Chem 283: 32003-32013
13. McLennan N, Masters M (1998) GroE is vital for cell-wall synthesis. Nature 392: 139
14. Miller-Martini DM, Chirgwin JM, Horowitz PM (1994) Mutations of noncatalytic sulfhydryl groups influence the stability, folding, and oxidative susceptibility of rhodanese. J Biol Chem 269: 3423-3428
15. Motojima F, Chaudhry C, Fenton WA, Farr GW, Horwich AL (2004) Substrate polypeptide presents a load on the apical domains of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 15005-15012
16. Motojima F, Makio T, Aoki K, Makino Y, Kuwajima K, Yoshida M (2000) Hydrophilic residues at the apical domain of GroEL contribute to GroES binding but attenuate polypeptide binding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 267: 842-849
17. Motojima F, Yoshida M (2003) Discrimination of ATP, ADP, and AMPPNP by chaperonin GroEL: hexokinase treatment revealed the exclusive role of ATP. J Biol Chem 278: 26648-26654
18. Murai N, Makino Y, Yoshida M (1996) GroEL locked in a closed conformation by an interdomain cross-link can bind ATP and polypeptide but cannot process further reaction steps. J Biol Chem 271: 28229-28234
19. Nojima T, Murayama S, Yoshida M, Motojima F (2008) Determination of the number of active GroES subunits in the fused heptamer GroES required for interactions with GroEL. J Biol Chem 283: 18385-18392
20. Pierce J, Reddy GS (1986) The sites for catalysis and activation of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase share a common domain. Arch Biochem Biophys 245: 483-493
21. Rye HS, Burston SG, Fenton WA, Beechem JM, Xu Z, Sigler PB, Horwich AL (1997) Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 388: 792-798
22. Sameshima T, Ueno T, Iizuka R, Ishii N, Terada N, Okabe K, Funatsu T (2008) Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle. J Biol Chem 283: 23765-23773
23. Sharma S, Chakraborty K, Muller BK, Astola N, Tang YC, Lamb DC, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU (2008) Monitoring protein conformation along the pathway of chaperonin-assisted folding. Cell 133: 142-153
24. Ueno T, Taguchi H, Tadakuma H, Yoshida M, Funatsu T (2004) GroEL mediates protein folding with a two successive timer mechanism. Mol Cell 14: 423-434
25. Weissman JS, Hohl CM, Kovalenko O, Kashi Y, Chen S, Braig K, Saibil HR, Fenton WA, Horwich AL (1995) Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83: 577-587
26. Weissman JS, Kashi Y, Fenton WA, Horwich AL (1994) GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell 78: 693-702
27. Weissman JS, Rye HS, Fenton WA, Beechem JM, Horwich AL (1996) Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 84: 481-490