Formation and structures of GroEL:GroES2 chaperonin footballs, the protein-folding functional form

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 111, Issue 35, 2014, Pages 12775-12780

  Fei, Xue ^a   Ye, Xiang ^a,b   LaRonde, Nicole A ^a,b   Lorimer, George H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b University of Maryland   (United States)

Author keywords

Crystal structure; Encapsulation; Order of ligand addition; Symmetric

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN;

ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATIC ELECTRICITY;

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENCAPSULATION; ORDER-OF-LIGAND-ADDITION; SYMMETRIC;

CHAPERONIN 10; CHAPERONIN 60; CHAPERONINS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, CHEMICAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THERMUS THERMOPHILUS;

EID: 84907228012     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412922111     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Thirumalai D, Lorimer GH (2001) Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 30:245-269. (Pubitemid 32566164)
2. Horovitz A, Willison KR (2005) Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15(6):646-651. (Pubitemid 41668520)
3. Lin Z, Rye HS (2006) GroEL-mediated protein folding: Making the impossible, possible. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 41(4):211-239. (Pubitemid 44100582)
4. 2 complex. Biochem J 427(2):247-254.
5. Ye X, Lorimer GH (2013) Substrate protein switches GroE chaperonins from asymmetric to symmetric cycling by catalyzing nucleotide exchange. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(46):E4289-E4297.
6. 7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388(6644):741-750.
7. Shimamura T, et al. (2004) Crystal structure of the native chaperonin complex from Thermus thermophilus revealed unexpected asymmetry at the cis-cavity. Structure 12(8):1471-1480. (Pubitemid 39092091)
8. Horwich AL (2011) Protein folding in the cell: An inside story. Nat Med 17(10):1211-1216.
9. Hayer-Hartl MK, Ewalt KL, Hartl FU (1999) On the role of symmetrical and asymmetrical chaperonin complexes in assisted protein folding. Biol Chem 380(5):531-540. (Pubitemid 29248441)
10. Schmidt M, et al. (1994) Symmetric complexes of GroE chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. Science 265(5172):656-659. (Pubitemid 24268275)
11. 2 heterooligomer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(26):12021-12025.
12. Llorca O, Marco S, Carrascosa JL, Valpuesta JM (1997) Symmetric GroEL-GroES complexes can contain substrate simultaneously in both GroEL rings. FEBS Lett 405(2):195-199. (Pubitemid 27136510)
13. Sparrer H, Rutkat K, Buchner J (1997) Catalysis of protein folding by symmetric chaperone complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(4):1096-1100. (Pubitemid 27087810)
14. Taguchi H, Tsukuda K, Motojima F, Koike-Takeshita A, Yoshida M (2004) BeF(x) stops the chaperonin cycle of GroEL-GroES and generates a complex with double folding chambers. J Biol Chem 279(44):45737-45743. (Pubitemid 39491564)
15. Sameshima T, et al. (2008) Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle. J Biol Chem 283(35):23765-23773.
16. Takei Y, Iizuka R, Ueno T, Funatsu T (2012) Single-molecule observation of protein folding in symmetric GroEL-(GroES)2 complexes. J Biol Chem 287(49):41118-41125.
17. 2 complexes are the proteinfolding functional form of the chaperonin nanomachine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(46):E4298-E4305.
18. 2 complexes in molecular chaperone activity. Fold Des 1(4):265-273.
19. Fei X, Yang D, LaRonde-LeBlanc N, Lorimer GH (2013) Crystal structure of a GroELADP complex in the relaxed allosteric state at 2.7 Å resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(32):E2958-E2966.
20. Tyagi NK, Fenton WA, Horwich AL (2009) GroEL/GroES cycling: ATP binds to an open ring before substrate protein favoring protein binding and production of the native state. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(48):20264-20269.
21. Rivenzon-Segal D, Wolf SG, Shimon L, Willison KR, Horovitz A (2005) Sequential ATPinduced allosteric transitions of the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1 revealed by EM analysis. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12(3):233-237. (Pubitemid 43079364)
22. Nojima T, Ikegami T, Taguchi H, Yoshida M (2012) Flexibility of GroES mobile loop is required for efficient chaperonin function. J Mol Biol 422(2):291-299.
23. Hunt JF, Weaver AJ, Landry SJ, Gierasch L, Deisenhofer J (1996) The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 379(6560):37-45.
24. Todd MJ, Viitanen PV, Lorimer GH (1994) Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: Implications for facilitated protein folding. Science 265(5172):659-666. (Pubitemid 24268276)
25. Horwich AL, Burston SG, Rye HS, Weissman JS, Fenton WA (1998) Construction of single-ring and two-ring hybrid versions of bacterial chaperonin GroEL. Methods Enzymol 290:141-146. (Pubitemid 28157745)
26. + and substrate protein on ATP hydrolysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(45):17334-17338.
27. Adams PD, et al. (2010) PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66(Pt 2):213-221.
28. Krissinel E, Henrick K (2007) Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J Mol Biol 372(3):774-797. (Pubitemid 47321791)