An up to 3-year controlled clinical trial comparing the outcome of glass fiber posts and composite cores with gold alloy-based posts and cores for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 363-372

  Zicari, Francesca ^a,b   Van Meerbeek, Bart ^a   Debels, Elke ^a   Lesaffre, Emmanuel ^c,d   Naert, Ignace ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c KU LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOLD ALLOY;

DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

CROWNS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 84979833357     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Freedman GA. Esthetic post-and-core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001; 45: 103-116.
2. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985; 1: 108-111.
3. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 780-784.
4. Torbjörner A, Fransson B. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 135-141.
5. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 34-39.
6. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 529-536.
7. Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 558-567.
8. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-278.
9. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 599-609.
10. Maccari PC, Cosme DC, Oshima HM, Burnett LH Jr, Shinkai RS. Fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with flared root canals and restored with different post systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 30-36.
11. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 262-269.
12. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept the reconstruction corono-radiculaire: Le Compsipost (1). Chir Dent Fr 1990; 60: 131-141.
13. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept the reconstruction corono-radiculaire: Le Compsipost (2). Chir Dent Fr 1990; 60: 69-77.
14. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Intérêt des matériaux à structure unidirectionnelle dans les reconstructions corono-radiculaires. J Biomat Dent 1992:7:45-47.
15. Deutsch AS, Musikant BL, Cavallari J, Lepley JB. Prefabricated dowels: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 498-503.
16. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 412-417.
17. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Newman I, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 520-525.
18. Hagge MS, Wong RD, Lindemuth JS. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation. J Prosthodont 2002; 11: 168-175.
19. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 280-301.
20. O’Keefe KL, Miller BH, Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of adhesive cements to new post materials. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13: 47-51.
21. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2667-2682.
22. Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 380-386.
23. Bolla M, Muller-Bolla M, Borg C, Lupi-Pegurier L, Laplanche O, Leforestier E. Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(1):CD004623.
24. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Dietrich T. Survival of glass fibre reinforced composite post restorations after 2 years-An observational clinical study. J Dent 2005; 33: 305-312.
25. Fredriksson M, Astbäck J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiberreinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 151-157.
26. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, et al. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2007; 20: 287-291.
27. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 729-734.
28. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000; 13(spec no):9B-13B.
29. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 39-44.
30. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiberreinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000;13(spec no):15B-18B.
31. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fibre posts-A prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 613-618.
32. King PA, Setchell DJ, Rees JS. Clinical evaluation of a carbon fibre reinforced carbon endodontic post. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 785-789.
33. Naumann M, Blankenstein F, Kiessling S, Dietrich T. Risk factors for failure of glass fiber-reinforced composite post restorations: A prospective observational clinical study. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113: 519-524.
34. Naumann M, Sterzenbac G, Alexandra F, Dietrich T. Randomized controlled clinical pilot trial of titanium vs. glass fiber prefabricated posts: Preliminary results after up to 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20: 499-503.
35. Torbjörner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 369-376.
36. Bell AM, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Bonding of fibrereinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dent 2005; 33: 533-539.
37. Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 29-36.
38. Le Bell AM, Tanner J, Lassila LV, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu P. Bonding of composite resin luting cement to fiber-reinforced composite root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 319-325.
39. Cagidiaco MC, García-Godoy F, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. Am J Dent 2008; 21: 179-184.
40. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-235.
41. Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B. Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 941-944.
42. Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, et al. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2005;84: 1160-1164.
43. Caplan DJ, Kolker J, Rivera EM, Walton RE. Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 193-199.