Model depicting aspects of audit and feedback that impact physicians' acceptance of clinical performance feedback

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Payne, Velma L ^a,b   Hysong, Sylvia J ^a,b  

^a MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Audit and feedback; Feedback acceptance; Performance improvement

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; COMPETITION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GROUNDED THEORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JUSTICE; MODEL; PATIENT CARE; PUNISHMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RECIPIENT; SECONDARY ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; CLINICAL AUDIT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INTERVIEW; PEER REVIEW; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MEDICAL AUDIT; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, PRIMARY CARE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 84979655987     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1486-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:81-112.
2. Hysong SJ. Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care. 2009;47:356-63.
3. Hysong SJ, Best RG, Pugh JA. Audit and feedback and clinical practice guideline adherence: making feedback actionable. Implement Sci. 2006;1:9.
4. Hysong SJ, Teal CR, Khan MJ, Haidet P. Improving quality of care through improved audit and feedback. Implement Sci. 2012;7:45.
5. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, O'Brien MA, Johansen M, Grimshaw J, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD000259.
6. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;19:CD000259.
7. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on peformance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254-84.
8. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;78:153-89.
9. Veloski J, Boex JR, Grasberger MJ, Evans A, Wolfson DB. Systematic review of the literature on assessment, feedback and physicians' clinical performance: BEME Guide No. 7. Med Teach. 2006;28:117-28.
10. Kluger AN, Van DD. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ. 2010;44:1166-74.
11. Morgan RT CR, Reddy SG, Ford ME, Ashton CM. Measurement in Veterans Affairs Health Services Research: Veterans as a Special Population. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1573-83.
12. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008.
13. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Vol. 3rd. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2001.
14. Friese S. Qualitative Data Analysis with ATLAS.ti. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2014.
15. Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1994.
16. Lefcourt HM. Locus of Control. In: Robinson JP, Shaver PR, Wrightsman LS, editors. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic; 1991. p. 413-99.
17. Anseel F, Lievens F. The mediating role of feedback acceptance in the relationship between feedback and attitudinal and performance outcomes. Int J Sel Assess. 2009;17:362-76.
18. Ashford SJ. The role of feedback seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Acad Manage J. 1986;29:465-87.
19. Brett JF, Atwater LE. 360 degree feedback: Accuracy, reaction and perceptions of usefulness. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:930-42.
20. Stone EF, Stone DL. The effect of multiple sources of performance feedback and feedback favorability on self-perceived task competence and perceived feedback accuracy. J Manage. 1984;10:371-78.
21. Ryan AM, Brutus S, Greguars GJ, Hakel MD. Receptivity to assessment-based feedback for management development. J Manage Dev. 2000;19:252-76.
22. Bing-You RG, Paterson J, Levine MA. Feedback falling on deaf ears: residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teach. 1997;19:40-4.
23. Boehler ML, Rogers DA, Schwind CJ, Mayforth R, Quin J, Williams RG, Dunnington G. An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 2006;40:746-49.
24. Sternthal B, Dholakia R, Leavitt C. The persuasive effect of source credibility: tests of cognitive response. J Consum Res. 1978;4:252-60.
25. Stull MK. Staff nurse performance. Effects of goal-setting and performance feedback. J Nurs Adm. 1986;16:26-30.
26. Stull MK. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility. J Nurs Adm. 1986;16:17-39.
27. Vancouver JB, Tischner EC. The effect of feedback sign on task performance depends on self-concept discrepancies. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89:1092-98.
28. Yi S, Wray NP, Jones SL, Bass BL, Nishioka J, Brann S, Ashton CM. Surgeon-Specific Performance Reports in General Surgery: An Observational Study of Initial Implementation and Adoption. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:636-47.
29. Lefcourt HM. Internal versus external control of reinforcement: a review. Psychol Bull. 1966;65:206-20.
30. Lefcourt HM. Locus of Control: Current trends in theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1976.
31. Rotter JB. Social learning and clinical psychology. NY: Prentice-Hall; 1954.
32. Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr. 1966;80:1-28.
33. Rotter JB. Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external control of reinforcement. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975;43:56-67.
34. Rotter JB. Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. Am Psychol. 1990;45:489-93.
35. Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornam T, Eva K, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, van der Vleuten C. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: A conceptual model. Acad Med. 2010;85:1212-20.
36. Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Directed self-assessment: Practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:47-54.
37. Byrne MM, Daw CN HA, Urech TH, Pietz K, Petersen LA. Method to develop health care peer groups for quality and financial comparisons across hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:577-92.