Dynamic visualizations: A two-edged sword?

Handbook of Human Centric Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 581-604

  Lowe, Richard K ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIONICS; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS; COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY; CONSTRUCTION PROCESS; DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATIONS; DYNAMIC INFORMATION; DYNAMIC VISUALIZATION; HUMAN INFORMATION PROCESSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84979627550     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_23     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. R. Lowe and J-M. Boucheix. Learning from animated diagrams: How are mental models built? In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, pp. 266-281, Springer, 2008.
2. W. Schnotz and R. Lowe. A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, chapter 14, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
3. M. Hegarty. Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. In Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, volume 18, pp. 1084-1102. 1992.
4. M. Hegarty, S. Kriz and C. Cate. The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. In Cognition and Instruction, volume 21, pp. 209-249. 2003.
5. K. Van der Waarde and P. Westendorp. The functions of arrows in user instructions. Proceedings of lllD Expert Forum on Manual Design (Eskilstuna, Sweden, November, 2000), pp. 1-7, 2000.
6. J. Heiser and B. Tversky. Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams. In Cognitive Science, volume 30, pp. 581-592. 2006.
7. M. Nienhaus and J. Dollner. Depicting dynamics using principles of visual art and narrations. In IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, volume 25, pp. 40-51, 2005.
8. M. Betrancourt, S. Ainsworth, E. de Vries, J-M. Boucheix and R.K. Lowe. Graphicacy: Do readers of science textbooks need it? Proceedings of the Text and Graphics Comprehension Conference (Grenoble, France, August 29-31, 2012), In Press.
9. N. H. Narayanan and M. Hegarty. Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. In International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, volume 57, pp. 279-315. 2002
10. B. Tversky, J.B. Morrison and M. Betrancourt, M. Animation: Can it facilitate? In International Journal ofHuman-Computer Studies, volume 57, pp. 247-262. 2002.
11. T. N. Hoffler and D. Leutner. Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. In Learning and Instruction, volume 17, pp. 722-738. 2007.
12. R. K. Lowe, T. Rasch and W. Schnotz. Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. In Applied Cognitive Psychology, volume 25, pp. 452-459. 2010.
13. R. K. Lowe. Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. In Learning and Instruction, volume 13, pp. 157-176. 2003.
14. R. K. Lowe. Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. In European Journal ofPsychology ofEducation, volume14, pp. 225-244. 1999.
15. P.N. Johnson-Laird. Mental Models, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
16. J-M. Boucheix, R.K. Lowe and A. Soirat, A. (2006, September). One line processing of a complex technical animation: Eye tracking investigation during verbal description. Proceedings of the Text and Graphics Comprehension Conference, (Nottingham, UK, September, 2006), pp. 14-17. 2006.
17. R. K. Lowe. Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. In Learning and Instruction, volume 14, pp. 257-274. 2004.
18. R. K. Lowe. Learning from animation: Where to look, when to look. In Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, chapter 3, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
19. R. Lowe. Perceptual and cognitive challenges to learning with dynamic visualizations. Proceedings of International Workshop on Dynamic Visualizations and Learning (Tubingen, Germany, July 17-18, 2002), 2002.
20. W. Winn. Perception principles. In Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioural and Cognitive sciences, pp. 55-126, Educational Technology Publications, 1993.
21. J.M. Wolfe and T.S. Horowitz. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? In Nature Reviews Neuroscience, volume 5, pp. 1-7. 2004.
22. B.B de Koning, H.K. Tabbers, R. M. J. P. Rikers and F. Paas. Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. In Educational Psychology Review, volume 21, pp. 113-140. 2009.
23. R. E. Mayer. Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. 2001.
24. R. E. Mayer and R.B. Anderson. The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. In Journal of Educational Psychology, volume 84, pp. 444-452. 1992.
25. M. Betrancourt. The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In The Cambridge Handbook ofMultimedia Learning, chapter 18, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
26. R. E. Mayer. Research-based principles for learning with animation. In Learning with Animation. Research Implications for Design, chapter 2, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
27. R.K. Lowe. Multimedia learning of meteorology. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, chapter 27, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
28. S. Kriz and M. Hegarty. Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. In International Journal of Human Computer Studies, volume 65, pp. 911-930. 2007.
29. J-M. Boucheix and R.K. Lowe. An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animation. In Learning and Instruction, volume 20, pp. 123-135. 2010.
30. R. K. Lowe and J-M. Boucheix. Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? In Learning and Instruction, volume 21, pp. 650-663. 2011.
31. J-M. Boucheix and R.K. Lowe. Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. In press.
32. J.L. Plass, B.D. Horner, and E.O. Hayward. Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, volume 21, 31-61. 2009.
33. H.S. Smallman and M. St. John. Naive realism: Misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design, volume 13, pp. 6-13. 2005.
34. H.S. Smallman, & M. Cook. Naive realism: Fallacies in the design and use of visual displays. In Topics in Cognitive Science, volume 3, pp. 579-608. 2011.
35. S. Fischer, R.K. Lowe and S. Schwan. Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system. In Applied Cognitive Psychology, volume 22, pp. 1126-1141. 2008.
36. B. Tversky, J. Heiser, S. Lozano, R. MacKenzie and J. Morrison. Enriching animations. In Learning with animation: Research and design implications, chapter 12, Cambridge University Press. 2008.
37. R. Ploetzner, and R. Lowe. A systematic characterisation of expository animations. In Computers in Human Behavior, volume 28, pp. 781-794. 2012.
38. R.K. Lowe and J-M. Boucheix. Dynamic diagrams: A composition alternative. In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, pp. 233-240, Springer. 2012.
39. R.K. Lowe. Changing perceptions of animated diagrams. In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, pp. 168-172, Springer. 2006.