Dynamic diagrams: A composition alternative

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 7352 LNAI, Issue , 2012, Pages 233-240

  Lowe, Richard ^a   Boucheix, Jean Michel ^b  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

composition; comprehension; decomposition; dynamic diagrams

Indexed keywords

ANIMATED DIAGRAMS; COMPREHENSION; DESIGN APPROACHES; EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS; HIGH QUALITY; INTERNAL COMPOSITION; MENTAL MODEL; MENTAL MODEL CONSTRUCTION; PRIME-FOCUS;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; DECOMPOSITION;

GRAPHIC METHODS;

EID: 84863617027     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W., Rasch, T.: Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 452-459 (2010)
2. Hegarty, M.: The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1-29 (2011)
3. Schnotz, W., Lowe, R.K.: A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In: Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W. (eds.) Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, pp. 304-356. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)
4. de Koning, B.B., Tabbers, H.K., Rikers, R.M.J.P., Paas, F.: Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review 21, 113-140 (2009)
5. Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.-M.: Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction 21, 650-663 (2011)
6. Kriz, S., Hegarty, M.: Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 65, 911-930 (2007)
7. Amadieu, F., Mariné, C., Laimay, C.: The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 36-40 (2011)
8. Mayer, R.E., Mathais, A., Wetzell, K.: Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8, 147-154 (2002)
9. Lowe, R., Boucheix, J.-M.: Learning from Animated Diagrams: How Are Mental Models Built? In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 266-281. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
10. Mayer, R.E.: Research-Based Principles for Learning with Animation. In: Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W. (eds.) Learning with Animation. Research Implications for Design, pp. 30-48. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)
11. Johnson-Laird, P.N.: How We Reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
12. Jahn, G., Knauff, M., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations. Memory & Cognition 35, 2075-2086 (2007)
13. Hyönä, J.: The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 20, 172-176 (2010)
14. Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Van Gog, T.: In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction 20, 146-154 (2010)
15. Kurby, A., Zacks, J.: Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Science 12, 72-79 (2007)
16. Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.M.: Unfair Competition: Static. Cues in Animated Graphics. Poster presented at the Comprehension of Text and Graphic, SIG 2 Meeting, Tubingen, Germany (2010)
17. Khooshabeh, P., Hegarty, M.: Inferring Cross-Sections: When Internal Visualizations Are More Important Than Properties of External Visualizations. Human Computer Interaction 25(2), 119-147 (2010)
18. Lowe, R., Boucheix, J.-M.: Supporting Relational Processing in Complex Animated Diagrams. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 391-394. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)