Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 911-930

  Kriz, Sarah ^a   Hegarty, Mary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Animations; Interactivity; Learning; Mental Models

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

INTERACTIVE CONTROLS; INTERACTIVITY; MENTAL MODELS; SIGNALING DEVICES;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 34548420191     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ainsworth S., and Van Labeke N. Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction 14 (2004) 214-255
2. ChanLin L. Students' cognitive styles and the need of visual control in animation. Journal of Educational Computing Research 19 4 (1998) 353-385
3. Chi M. Self-explaining expository texts: the dual process of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In: Glaser R. (Ed). Advances in Instructional Psychology, vol 5: Educational Design and Cognitive Science (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 161-238
4. Chi M.T.H., de Leeuw N., Chiu M., and LaVancher C. Eliciting self-explanations improves learning. Cognitive Science 18 (1994) 439-478
5. Clement J. A conceptual model discussed by Galileo and used intuitively by physics students. In: Gentner D., and Stevens A. (Eds). Mental Models (1983), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 325-339
6. diSessa A. Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction 10 (1993) 105-225
7. Faraday P., and Sutcliffe A.G. An empirical study of attending and comprehending multimedia presentations. Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 96 Conference (1997) 265-275
8. Ferguson E.S. Engineering and the Mind's Eye (1992), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Gentner D., and Stevens A.L. Mental Models (1983), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
10. Graesser A.C., Singer M., and Trabasso T. Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 371-395
11. Grant E.R., and Spivey M.J. Eye movements and problem solving: guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science 14 5 (2003) 462-466
12. Hegarty M. Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions. Learning and Instruction 14 (2004) 343-351
13. Hegarty M. Multimedia learning about physical systems. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 447-465
14. Hegarty M., and Just M.A. Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993) 717-742
15. Hegarty M., Kriz S., and Cate C. The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction 21 4 (2003) 325-360
16. Kalyuga S., Chandler P., and Sweller J. Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors 40 1 (1998) 1-17
17. Kalyuga S., Ayres P., Chandler P., and Sweller J. The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist 38 (2003) 23-31
18. Kintsch W. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction integration model. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 163-182
19. Kozhevnikov M., and Hegarty M. Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 (2001) 439-453
20. Larkin J.H., and Simon H.A. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth 10,000 words. Cognitive Science 11 (1987) 65-99
21. Lowe R. Selectivity in diagrams: reading beyond the lines. Educational Psychology 14 4 (1994) 467-491
22. Lowe R.K. Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education 14 2 (1999) 225-244
23. Lowe R.K. Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction 13 (2003) 157-176
24. Lowe R.K. Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction 14 (2004) 257-274
25. Macaulay D. The New Way Things Work. CD-ROM (1998), DK Interactive Learning, New York, NY
26. Mayer R.E. Multimedia Learning (2001), Cambridge University Press, New York
27. Mayer R.E., and Anderson R.B. Animations need narrations: an experimental test of the dual-code hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (1991) 484-490
28. Mayer R.E., and Gallini J. When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?. Journal of Educational Psychology 83 (1990) 715-726
29. Mayer R.E., and Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (2003) 43-52
30. Mayer R.E., Hegarty M., Mayer S., and Campbell J. When static media promote active learning: diagrams versus animations in multimedia instruction. Journal of Experimental Psychology 11 (2005) 256-265
31. McCloskey M. Naïve theories of motion. In: Gentner D., and Stevens A. (Eds). Mental Models (1983), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 229-324
32. Miyake N. Constructive interaction and the iterative process of understanding. Cognitive Science 10 (1986) 151-177
33. Narayanan N.H., and Hegarty M. On designing comprehensible interactive hypermedia manuals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 48 (1998) 267-301
34. Narayanan N.H., and Hegarty M. Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57 (2002) 279-315
35. Oestermeier U., and Hesse F.W. Verbal and visual causal arguments. Cognition 75 (2000) 65-104
36. Pane J.F., Corbett A.T., and John B.E. Assessing dynamics in computer-based instruction. In: Tauber M.J. (Ed). Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1996), ACM, Vancouver 797-804
37. Rozenblit L.G., and Keil F.C. The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science 26 (2002) 521-562
38. Schwan S., and Riempp R. The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction 14 (2004) 293-305
39. Smallman H.S., and St. John M. Naïve realism: misplaced faith in realistic displays. Ergonomics in Design 13 (2005) 14-19
40. Tversky B., Morrison J.B., and Betrancourt M. Animation: can it facilitate?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57 (2002) 247-262
41. Vosniadou S. On the nature of naïve physics. In: Limon M., and Mason L. (Eds). Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice (2002), Kluwer, Dordrecht 61-76