Biodiversity of autolytic ability in flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains suitable for traditional sparkling wine fermentation

Yeast

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 303-312

  Perpetuini, Giorgia ^a   Di Gianvito, Paola ^a   Arfelli, Giuseppe ^a   Schirone, Maria ^a   Corsetti, Aldo ^a   Tofalo, Rosanna ^a   Suzzi, Giovanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TERAMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

ATG genes; autolysis; flocculent S. cerevisiae; sparkling wine

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; NITROGEN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ATG1 GENE; ATG17 GENE; ATG29 GENE; AUTOLYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FLOCCULATION; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE EXPRESSION; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPARKLING WINE;

EID: 84978932838     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3151     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alexandre H, Guilloux-Benatier M. 2006. Yeast autolysis in sparkling wine – a review. Aust J Grape Wine Res 12: 119–127.
2. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. 2004. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription–PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64: 5245–5250.
3. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254.
4. Cao Y, Klionsky DJ. 2007. Atg26 is not involved in autophagy-related pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy 3: 17–20.
5. Cankorur-Cetinkaya A, Dereli E, Eraslan S, et al. 2012. A novel strategy for selection and validation of reference genes in dynamic multidimensional experimental design in yeast. PLoS One 7: e38351.
6. Cebollero E, Gonzalez R. 2007. Autophagy: from basic research to its application in food biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv 25: 396–409.
7. Cebollero E, Martinez-Rodriguez A, Carrascosa AV, Gonzalez R. 2005. Overexpression of csc1-1. A plausible strategy to obtain wine yeast strains undergoing accelerated autolysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 246: 1–9.
8. Charpentier C, Feuillat M. 1992. Yeast autolysis. In The Yeasts, vol. III, Rose AH, Harrison JS (eds). Academic Press: New York; 315–386.
9. Fleige S, Pfaffl MW. 2006. RNA integrity and the effect on the real-time qRT–PCR performance. Mol Aspects Med 27: 126–139.
10. Folkertsma B, Fox PF. 1992. Use of the Cd–ninhydrin reagent to assess proteolysis in cheese during ripening. J Diary Res 59: 217–224.
11. Gonzalez R, Martinez-Rodriguez AJ, Carrascosa AV. 2003. Yeast autolytic mutants potentially useful for sparkling wine production. Int J Food Microbiol 84: 21–26.
12. Kamada Y, Funakoshi T, Shintani T, et al. 2000. Tor-mediated induction of autophagy via an Apg1 protein kinase complex. J Cell Biol 150: 1507–1513.
13. Kawamata T, Kamada Y, Suzuki K, et al. 2005. Characterization of a novel autophagy specific gene, ATG29. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 338: 1884–1889.
14. Kemp B, Alexandre H, Robillard B, Marchal R. 2015. Effect of production phase on bottle-fermented sparkling wine quality. J Agric Food Chem 63: 19–38.
15. Liti G, Louis EJ. 2005. Yeast evolution and comparative genomics. Annu Rev Microbiol 59: 135–153.
16. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCt method. Methods 25: 402–408.
17. Mao K, Chew LH, Yip CK, Klionsky DJ. 2013a. The role of Atg29 phosphorylation in PAS assembly. Autophagy 9: 2178–2179.
18. Mao K, Chew LH, Inoue-Aono Y, et al. 2013b. Atg29 phosphorylation regulates coordination of the Atg17–Atg31–Atg29 complex with the Atg11 scaffold during autophagy initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: E2875–2884.
19. Martinez-Rodriguez AJ, Carrascosa AV, Martin-Alvarez PJ, et al. 2002. Influence of the yeast strain on the changes of the amino acids, peptides and proteins during sparkling wine production by the traditional method. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29: 314–322.
20. Matsuura A, Tsukada M, Wada Y, Ohsumi Y. 1997. Apg1p, a novel protein kinase required for the autophagic process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 97: 245–250.
21. Novo M, Bigey F, Beyne E, et al. 2009. Eukaryote-to eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 16333–16338.
22. Nunez YP, Carrascosa AV, Gonzalez R, et al. 2005. Effect of accelerated autolysis of yeast on the composition and foaming properties of sparkling wines elaborated by a champenoise method. J Agric Food Chem 53: 7232–7237.
23. Patrignani F, Ndagijimana M, Vernocchi P, et al. 2013. High-pressure homogenization to modify yeast performance for sparkling wine production according to traditional methods. Am J Enol Viticult 64: 258–267.
24. Pérez-Serradilla JA, Luque de Castro MD. 2008. Role of lees in wine production: a review. Food Chem 111: 447–456.
25. Perrot L, Charpentier M, Charpentier C, et al. 2002. Yeast adapted to wine: nitrogen compounds released during induced autolysis in a model wine. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29: 134–139.
26. Pretorius IS, Bauer FF. 2002. Meeting the consumer challenge through genetically customized wine-yeast strains. Trends Biotechnol 20: 426–432.
27. Smukalla S, Cladara M, Pochet N, et al. 2008. FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast. Cell 135: 726–737.
28. Soares EV. 2011. Flocculation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review. J Appl Microbiol 110: 1–18.
29. Stjepanovic G, Davies CW, Stanley RE, et al. 2014. Assembly and dynamics of the autophagy-initiating Atg1 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 12793–12798.
30. Suzzi G, Arfelli G, Schirone M, et al. 2012. Effect of grape indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains on Montepulciano d'Abruzzo red wine quality. Food Res Int 46: 22–29.
31. Suzzi G, Romano P. 1991. Flocculent phenotypes in wine yeasts. Lett Appl Microbiol 13: 7–10.
32. Suzzi G, Romano P, Zambonelli C. 1984. Flocculation of wine yeasts: frequency, differences, and stability of the character. Can J Microbiol 30: 36–39.
33. Thomas KC, Ingledew WM. 1990. Fuel alcohol production: effects of free amino nitrogen on fermentation of very-high-gravity wheat mashes. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 2046–2050.
34. Todd BEN, Fleet GH, Henscheke PA. 2000. Promotion of autolysis through the interaction of killer and sensitive yeasts: potential application in sparkling wine production. Am J Enol Viticult 51: 65–72.
35. Tofalo P, Perpetuini G, Di Gianvito P, et al. 2014. Genetic diversity of FLO1 and FLO5 genes in wine flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Int J Food Microbiol 191: 45–52.
36. Tofalo R, Perpetuini G, Di Gianvito P, et al. 2016. Characterization of specialized flocculent yeasts to improve sparkling wine fermentation. J Appl Microbiol. doi: 10.1111/jam.13113.
37. Tofalo R, Schirone M, Corsetti A, Suzzi G. 2012. Detection of Brettanomyces spp. in red wines using real-time PCR. J Food Sci 77: M545–M549.
38. Torresi S, Frangipane MT, Anelli G. 2011. Biotechnologies in sparkling wine production. Interesting approaches for quality improvement: a review. Food Chem 129: 1232–1241.