Analysis of the mouse gut microbiome using full-length 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Shin, Jongoh ^a   Lee, Sooin ^a   Go, Min Jeong ^b   Lee, Sang Yup ^a   Kim, Sun Chang ^a,c   Lee, Chul Ho ^b   Cho, Byung Kwan ^a,c  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^b Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB)   (South Korea)

^c Intelligent Synthetic Biology Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA 16S;

ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; C57BL MOUSE; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; INTESTINE FLORA; MALE; METAGENOME; MOUSE; NANOPORE; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MALE; METAGENOME; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; NANOPORES; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84978732502     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep29681     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ursell, L. K., Metcalf, J. L., Parfrey, L. W. & Knight, R. Defning the human microbiome. Nutr Rev 70 Suppl 1, S38-S44 (2012).
2. Kuczynski, J. et al. Experimental and analytical tools for studying the human microbiome. Nat Rev Genet 13, 47-58 (2011).
3. Perez-Lopez, A., Behnsen, J., Nuccio, S. P. & Rafatellu, M. Mucosal immunity to pathogenic intestinal bacteria. Nat Rev Immunol 16, 135-148, doi: 10.1038/nri.2015.17 (2016).
4. Qin, J. et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 490, 55-60 (2012).
5. Hsiao, E. Y. et al. Microbiota Modulate Behavioral and Physiological Abnormalities Associated with Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Cell 155, 1451-1463 (2013).
6. Zhang, C. et al. Interactions between gut microbiota, host genetics and diet relevant to development of metabolic syndromes in mice. ISME J 4, 232-241 (2010).
7. Consortium, H. M. P. In Nature 486 207-214 (2012).
8. Consortium, H. M. P. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207-214 (2012).
9. Schloss, P. D. The efects of alignment quality, distance calculation method, sequence fltering, and region on the analysis of 16S rRNA gene-based studies. PLoS Comput Biol 6, e1000844 (2010).
10. Branton, D. et al. The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 26, 1146-1153 (2008).
11. Goodwin, S. et al. Oxford Nanopore sequencing, hybrid error correction, and de novo assembly of a eukaryotic genome. Genome Res 25, 1750-1756 (2015).
12. Loman, N. J., Quick, J. & Simpson, J. T. A complete bacterial genome assembled de novo using only nanopore sequencing data. Nat Methods 12, 733-735 (2015).
13. Karlsson, E., Lärkeryd, A., Sjödin, A., Forsman, M. & Stenberg, P. Scafolding of a bacterial genome using MinION nanopore sequencing. Sci Rep 5, 11996 (2015).
14. Quick, J. et al. Rapid draf sequencing and real-time nanopore sequencing in a hospital outbreak of Salmonella. Genome Biol 16, 114 (2015).
15. Wang, J., Moore, N. E., Deng, Y.-M., Eccles, D. A. & Hall, R. J. MinION nanopore sequencing of an infuenza genome. Front Microbiol 6, 766 (2015).
16. Greninger, A. L. et al. Rapid metagenomic identifcation of viral pathogens in clinical samples by real-time nanopore sequencing analysis. Genome Med 7, 99 (2015).
17. Kilianski, A. et al. Bacterial and viral identifcation and diferentiation by amplicon sequencing on the MinION nanopore sequencer. GigaScience 4, 12 (2015).
18. Hargreaves, A. D. & Mulley, J. F. Assessing the utility of the Oxford Nanopore MinION for snake venom gland cDNA sequencing. Peer J 3, e1441 (2015).
19. Bolisetty, M. T., Rajadinakaran, G. & Graveley, B. R. Determining exon connectivity in complex mRNAs by nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol 16, 1-12 (2015).
20. Ashton, P. M. et al. MinION nanopore sequencing identifes the position and structure of a bacterial antibiotic resistance island. Nat Biotechnol 33, 296-300 (2014).
21. Benítez-Páez, A., Portune, K. J. & Sanz, Y. Species-level resolution of 16S rRNA gene amplicons sequenced through the MinIONTM portable nanopore sequencer. GigaScience 1-9 (2016).
22. Fadrosh, D. W. et al. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome 2, 6, doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-2-6 (2014).
23. Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7, 335-336, doi: 10.1038/ nmeth.f.303 (2010).
24. Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41, e1 (2013).
25. Jain, M. et al. Improved data analysis for the MinION nanopore sequencer. Nat Methods 12, 351-356 (2015).
26. Szalay, T. & Golovchenko, J. A. De novo sequencing and variant calling with nanopores using PoreSeq. Nat Biotechnol 33, 1087-1091 (2015).
27. Frith, M. C., Hamada, M. & Horton, P. Parameters for accurate genome alignment. BMC Bioinf 11, 80 (2010).
28. Mikheyev, A. S. & Tin, M. M. Y. A frst look at the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer. Mol Ecol Resour 14, 1097-1102 (2014).
29. DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 5069-5072 (2006).
30. Schloss, P. D. & Westcott, S. L. Assessing and Improving Methods Used in Operational Taxonomic Unit-Based Approaches for 16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77, 3219-3226 (2011).
31. Sul, W. J. et al. Bacterial community comparisons by taxonomy-supervised analysis independent of sequence alignment and clustering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 14637-14642 (2011).
32. Hildebrand, F. et al. Infammation-associated enterotypes, host genotype, cage and inter-individual efects drive gut microbiota variation in common laboratory mice. Genome Biol 14, R4 (2013).
33. Langille, M. G. et al. Microbial shifs in the aging mouse gut. Microbiome 2, 50 (2014).
34. Ravussin, Y. et al. Responses of gut microbiota to diet composition and weight loss in lean and obese mice. Obesity 20, 738-747 (2012).
35. Seekatz, A. M. et al. Recovery of the gut microbiome following fecal microbiota transplantation. mBio 5, e00893-00814 (2014).
36. Dao, M. C. et al. Akkermansia muciniphilaand improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut 65, 426-436 (2016).
37. Flint, H. J., Scott, K. P. , Duncan, S. H., Louis, P. & Forano, E. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes 3, 289-306 (2012).
38. Larsbrink, J. et al. A discrete genetic locus confers xyloglucan metabolism in select human gut Bacteroidetes. Nature 506, 498-502 (2014).
39. Oh, P. L. et al. Diversifcation of the gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri as a result of host-driven evolution. ISME J 4, 377-387 (2010).
40. Scher, J. U. et al. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. eLife 2, e01202 (2013).
41. Schwiertz, A., Le Blay, G. & Blaut, M. Quantifcation of Diferent Eubacteriumspp. in Human Fecal Samples with Species-Specifc 16S rRNA-Targeted Oligonucleotide Probes. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 375-382 (2000).
42. Turnbaugh, P. J. et al. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 457, 480-484 (2009).
43. Vasquez, N., Suau, A., Magne, F., Pochart, P. & Pélissier, M.-A. Diferential Efects of Bifdobacterium pseudolongum Strain Patronus and Metronidazole in the Rat Gut. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 381-386 (2009).
44. Million, M. et al. Obesity-associated gut microbiota is enriched in Lactobacillus reuteri and depleted in Bifdobacterium animalis and Methanobrevibacter smithii. Int J Obes 36, 817-825 (2012).
45. Larkin, M. A. et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23, 2947-2948 (2007).
46. Franzosa, E. A. et al. Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, E2329-E2338, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319284111 (2014).
47. Cao, H. X. et al. Metatranscriptome analysis reveals host-microbiome interactions in traps of carnivorous Genlisea species. Front Microbiol 6, 526, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00526 (2015).
48. Fichot, E. B. & Norman, R. S. Microbial phylogenetic profling with the Pacifc Biosciences sequencing platform. Microbiome 1, 10, doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-10 (2013).
49. Turroni, F. et al. Bifdobacterium bifdum as an example of a specialized human gut commensal. Front Microbiol 5, 437 (2014).
50. Bahl, M. I., Bergström, A. & Licht, T. R. Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction afects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 329, 193-197 (2012).
51. Goyal, P. et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into the bacterial amyloid secretion channel CsgG. Nature 516, 250-253 (2014).
52. Deamer, D., Akeson, M. & Branton, D. Tree decades of nanopore sequencing. Nat Biotechnol 34, 518-524 (2016).
53. Loman, N. J. & Quinlan, A. R. Poretools: a toolkit for analyzing nanopore sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 3399-3401 (2014).
54. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078-2079 (2009).
55. Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. & Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30, 2725-2729 (2013).