Molecular characterization, expression pattern and function analysis of the OsHSP90 family in rice

Biotechnology and Biotechnological Equipment

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 669-676

  Zhang, Hai ^a   Li, Lihua ^a   Ye, Taozhi ^a   Chen, Rongjun ^a   Gao, Xiaoling ^a   Xu, Zhengjun ^a  

^a SICHUAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

expression; gene family; Rice; stress

Indexed keywords

DROUGHT; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENES; HEAT RESISTANCE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEINS; STRESSES;

DAYS AFTER FLOWERING; DROUGHT STRESS CONDITIONS; EXPRESSION; GENE FAMILIES; MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION; PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTIONS; RICE;

GENE EXPRESSION;

EID: 84978538399     PISSN: 13102818     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2016.1184588     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. J.Frydman. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:603–647.
2. J.C.Young, I.Moarefi, F.U.Hartl. Hsp90: a specialized but essential protein-folding tool. J Cell Biol. 2001;154:267–273.
3. D.Picard. Heat-shock protein 90, a chaperone for folding and regulation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002;59:1640–1648.
4. H.Wegele, L.Muller, J.Buchner. Hsp70 and Hsp90–a relay team for protein folding. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;151:1–44.
5. W.E.Balch, R.I.Morimoto, A.Dillin, Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science. 2008;319:916–919.
6. F.U.Hartl, M.Hayer-Hartl. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:574–581.
7. S.M.Doyle, J.Shorter, M.Zolkiewski, Asymmol/letric deceleration of ClpB or Hsp104 ATPase activity unleashes protein-remodeling activity. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2007;14:114–122.
8. L.H.Pearl, C.Prodromou. Structure and mechanism of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone machinery. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006;75:271–294.
9. M.Taipale, D.F.Jarosz, S.Lindquist. HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:515–528.
10. W.B.Pratt, Y.Morishima, Y.Osawa. The Hsp90 chaperone machinery regulates signaling by modulating ligand binding clefts. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:22885–22889.
11. D.L.Riggs, M.B.Cox, J.Cheung-Flynn, Functional specificity of co-chaperone interactions with Hsp90 client proteins. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;39:279–295.
12. S.K.Wandinger, K.Richter, J.Buchner. The Hsp90 chaperone machinery. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:18473–18477.
13. K.Richter, J.Buchner. Hsp90: chaperoning signal transduction. J Cell Physiol. 2001;188:281–290.
14. W.B.Pratt, P.Krishna, L.J.Olsen. Hsp90-binding immunophilins in plants: the protein movers. Trends Plant Sci. 2001;6:54–58.
15. P.Krishna, G.Gloor. The Hsp90 family of proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2001;6:238–246.
16. D.Milioni, P.Hatzopoulos. Genomic organization of hsp90 gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 1997;35:955–961.
17. S.K.Mishra, J.Tripp, S.Winkelhaus, In the complex family of heat stress transcription factors, HsfA1 has a unique role as master regulator of thermotolerance in tomato. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1555–1567.
18. S.Kotak, M.Port, A.Ganguli, Characterization of C-terminal domains of Arabidopsis heat stress transcription factors (Hsfs) and identification of a new signature combination of plant class A Hsfs with AHA and NES motifs essential for activator function and intracellular localization. Plant J. 2004;39:98–112.
19. L.Nover, K.Bharti, P.Doring, Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: how many heat stress transcription factors do we need? Cell Stress Chaperones. 2001;6:177–189.
20. S.K.Baniwal, K.Bharti, K.Y.Chan, Heat stress response in plants: a complex game with chaperones and more than twenty heat stress transcription factors. J Biosci. 2004;29:471–487.
21. A.Hahn, D.Bublak, E.Schleiff, Crosstalk between Hsp90 and Hsp70 chaperones and heat stress transcription factors in tomato. Plant Cell. 2011;23:741–755.
22. A.Takahashi, C.Casais, K.Ichimura, HSP90 interacts with RAR1 and SGT1 and is essential for RPS2-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:11777–11782.
23. D.A.Hubert, P.Tornero, Y.Belkhadir, Cytosolic HSP90 associates with and modulates the Arabidopsis RPM1 disease resistance protein. EMBO J. 2003;22:5679–5689.
24. Y.Liu, T.Burch-Smith, M.Schiff, Molecular chaperone Hsp90 associates with resistance protein N and its signaling proteins SGT1 and Rar1 to modulate an innate immune response in plants. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:2101–2108.
25. T.A.Sangster, C.Queitsch. The HSP90 chaperone complex, an emerging force in plant development and phenotypic plasticity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005;8:86–92.
26. K.Kitagawa, D.Skowyra, S.J.Elledge, SGT1 encodes an essential component of the yeast kinetochore assembly pathway and a novel subunit of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell. 1999;4:21–33.
27. S.L.Rutherford, S.Lindquist. Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature. 1998;396:336–342.
28. C.Queitsch, T.A.Sangster, S.Lindquist. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature. 2002;417:618–624.
29. W.Wang, B.Vinocur, O.Shoseyov, Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9:244–252.
30. A.M.Skantar, L.K.Carta. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic evaluation of the hsp90 gene from selected nematodes. J Nematol. 2004;36:466–480.
31. B.Chen, W.H.Piel, L.Gui, The HSP90 family of genes in the human genome: insights into their divergence and evolution. Genomics. 2005;86:627–637.
32. G.F.Wang, X.Wei, R.Fan, Molecular analysis of common wheat genes encoding three types of cytosolic heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90): functional involvement of cytosolic Hsp90s in the control of wheat seedling growth and disease resistance. New Phytol. 2011;191:418–431.
33. J.D.Thompson, T.J.Gibson, F.Plewniak, The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882.
34. K.Tamura, J.Dudley, M.Nei, MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599.
35. S.Yoshida, D.A.Forno, J.H.Cook, Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. Manila: International Rice Research Institute; 1976. pp. 61–67.
36. K.J.Livak, T.D.Schmittgen. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) ethod. Methods. 2001;25:402–408.
37. E.R.LaVallie, E.A.DiBlasio, S.Kovacic, A thioredoxin gene fusion expression system that circumvents inclusion body formation in the E. coli cytoplasm. Biotechnology (N Y). 1993;11:187–193.
38. X.Wang, X.Shi, B.Hao, Duplication and DNA segmental loss in the rice genome: implications for diploidization. New Phytol. 2005;165:937–946.
39. H.Kong, L.L.Landherr, M.W.Frohlich, Patterns of gene duplication in the plant SKP1 gene family in angiosperms: evidence for multiple mechanisms of rapid gene birth. Plant J. 2007;50:873–885.
40. M.E.Feder, G.E.Hofmann. Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999;61:243–282.
41. E.Cabiscol, E.Piulats, P.Echave, Oxidative stress promotes specific protein damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:27393–27398.
42. M.A.Kohanski, D.J.Dwyer, B.Hayete, A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell. 2007;130:797–810.