Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: The framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL)

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 37, Issue , 2016, Pages 5S-27S

  Pichora Fuller, M Kathleen ^a   Kramer, Sophia E ^b   Eckert, Mark A ^c   Edwards, Brent ^d   Hornsby, Benjamin W Y ^e   Humes, Larry E ^f   Lemke, Ulrike ^g   Lunner, Thomas ^h,i   Matthen, Mohan ^a   Mackersie, Carol L ^j   Naylor, Graham ^k   Phillips, Natalie A ^l   Richter, Michael ^m   Rudner, Mary ^h   Sommers, Mitchell S ⁿ   Tremblay, Kelly L ^o   Wingfield, Arthur ^p  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d EarLens Corp   (United States)

^e VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g Phonak AG   (Switzerland)

^h LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

ⁱ OTICON A S   (Denmark)

^j SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k Scottish Section   (United Kingdom)

^l Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

^m LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

ⁿ WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^p BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Attention; Autonomic nervous system; Cognitive capacity; Cognitive energy; Effortful listening; Executive function; Fatigue; Hearing impairment; Listening effort; Motivation; Neuroeconomics; Stress; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84978216546     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: 15384667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (159)

1. Albers, M. W., Gilmore, G. C., Kaye, J., et al. (2015). At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement, 11, 70-98.
2. Anderson, S., Parbery-Clark, A., White-Schwoch, T., et al. (2012). Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. J Neurosci, 32, 14156-14164.
3. Anderson Gosselin, P., & Gagné, J. P. (2011). Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 944-958.
4. Andreassi, J. L. (2007). Psychophysiology: Human Behavior and Physiological Response (5th ed.). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Arehart, K. H., Souza, P., Baca, R., et al. (2013). Working memory, age, and hearing loss: Susceptibility to hearing aid distortion. Ear Hear, 34, 251-260.
6. Arlinger, S., Lunner, T., Lyxell, B., et al. (2009). The emergence of cognitive hearing science. Scand J Psychol, 50, 371-384.
7. Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu Rev Neurosci, 28, 403-450.
8. Baltes, P. B., & Lindenberger, U. (1997). Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging? Psychol Aging, 12, 12-21.
9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman.
10. Bertoli, S., & Bodmer, D. (2014). Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss. Clin Neurophysiol, 125, 1030-1041.
11. Bertoli, S., & Bodmer, D. (2016). Effects of age and task difficulty on ERP responses to novel sounds presented during a speech-perception-in-noise test. Clin Neurophysiol, 127, 360-368.
12. Besser, J., Koelewijn, T., Zekveld, A. A., et al. (2013). How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise-A review. Trends Amplif, 17, 75-93.
13. Boothroyd, A., & Schauer, A. (2015 October). Lowest acceptable performance level. Presented at the Meeting of the International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology, Berkeley, CA.
14. Borg, E., Bergkvist, C., Olsson, I. S., et al. (2008). Communication as an ecological system. Int J Audiol, 47(Suppl 2), S131-S138.
15. Boucsein, W. (2012). Electrodermal Activity (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
16. Bregman, A. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annu Rev Psychol, 40, 109-131.
18. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
19. Carpenter, P. A., Miyaki, A., Just, M. A. (1994). Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia, and aging. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 1075-1122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Carpenter, P. A., Miyake, A., Just, M. A. (1995). Language comprehension: Sentence and discourse processing. Annu Rev Psychol, 46, 91-120.
21. CHABA (Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics). (1988). Speech understanding and aging. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 859-895.
22. Chasteen, A., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Dupuis, K., et al. (2015). Do negative views of aging influence memory and auditory performance through self-perceived abilities? Psychol Aging, 30, 881-893.
23. Clinard, C. G., Tremblay, K. L., Krishnan, A. R. (2010). Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: Evidence from human frequency-following response recordings. Hear Res, 264, 48-55.
24. Cohen, G. (1987). Speech comprehension in the elderly: The effects of cognitive changes. Br J Audiol, 21, 221-226.
25. Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. Am Psychol, 59, 676-684.
26. Combs, L. A., & Polich, J. (2006). P3a from auditory white noise stimuli. Clin Neurophysiol, 117, 1106-1112.
27. Craik, F. I. M., Bialystok, E. (2008). Lifespan cognitive development. In F. I. M. Craik & T. Salthouse (Eds), The Handbook of Aging and Cognition, 3rd ed (pp. 557-601). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. J Verb Learn Verb Beh, 19, 450-466.
29. Danermark, B., Granberg, S., Kramer, S. E., et al. (2013). The creation of a comprehensive and a brief core set for hearing loss using the International Classification of Functioning. Am J Audiol, 22, 323-328.
30. Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev, 3, 422-433.
31. Davis, A. (2003). Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55-74-year-old first-time hearing aid users. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl 2), 2S39-2S52.
32. Deary, I. J. (1994). Intelligence and auditory discrimination: Separating processing speed and fidelity of stimulus representation. Intelligence, 18, 189-213.
33. Deary, I. J., Caryl, P. G., Egan, V. et al. (1989). Visual and auditory inspection time: Their interrelationship and correlations with IQ in high ability subjects. Pers Individ Dif, 10, 525-533.
34. Denes, P. B., & Pinson, E. N. (1963). The Speech Chain: The Physics and Biology of Spoken Language. Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Telephone Laboratories.
35. Dupuis, K., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Chasteen, A. L., et al. (2015). Effects of hearing and vision impairments on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, 22, 413-437.
36. Eckert, M. A., Teubner-Rhodes, S., Vaden, K. (2016). Neuroimaging of adaptive control during speech and language processing. Ear Hear, 37, 101S-110S.
37. Edwards, B. A. (2016). Model of auditory-cognitive processing and relevance to clinical applicability. Ear Hear, 37, 85S-91S.
38. Elliot, A. J. (Ed). (2013). Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation. New York, NY: Psychology Press; Taylor & Francis Group LLC.
39. Erber, N. P. (1988). Communication Therapy for Hearing-Impaired Adults. Abbotsford, Australia: Clavis.
40. Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2010). Behavioral studies with aging humans: Hearing sensitivity and psychoacoustics. In S. Gordon-Salant, R. D. Frisina, A. Popper, et al. (Eds.), The Aging Auditory System: Perceptual Characterization and Neural Bases of Presbycusis. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research (pp. 111-134). Berlin: Springer.
41. Foo, C., Rudner, M., Rönnberg, J., et al. (2007). Recognition of speech in noise with new hearing instrument compression release settings requires explicit cognitive storage and processing capacity. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 618-631.
42. Fraser, S., Gagné, J.-P., Alepins, M., et al. (2011). Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: The effects of providing visual speech cues. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 18-33.
43. Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., Elberling, C. (2003). Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. Int J Audiol, 42, 1S77-1S86.
44. Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., Elberling, C. (2006a). Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings-1. Patterns of benefit. Int J Audiol, 45, 130-152.
45. Gatehouse, S., Naylor, G., Elberling, C. (2006b). Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings-2. Patterns of candidature. Int J Audiol, 45, 153-171.
46. Gatehouse, S., & Noble, W. (2004). The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85-99.
47. Gergelyfi, M., Jacob, B., Olivier, E., et al. (2015). Dissociation between mental fatigue and motivational state during prolonged mental activity. Front Behav Neurosci, 9, 176.
48. Goy, H., Pelletier, M., Coletta, M., et al. (2013). The effects of semantic context and the type and amount of acoustic distortion on lexical decision by younger and older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 56, 1715-1732.
49. Grady, C. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nat Rev Neurosci, 13, 491-505.
50. Hällgren, M., Larsby, B., Lyxell, B., et al. (2001). Evaluation of a cognitive test battery in young and elderly normal-hearing and hearing-impaired persons. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 357-370.
51. Handel, S. (1989). Listening: An Introduction to the Perception of Auditory Events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Hick, C. B., & Tharpe, A. M. (2002). Listening effort and fatigue in schoolage children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 573-584.
53. Hockey, R. (2013). The Psychology of Fatigue: Work, Effort and Control. Cambridge: University Press.
54. Hornsby, B. W. Y., Naylor, G., Bess, F. H. (2016). A taxonomy of fatigue concepts and their relation to hearing loss. Ear Hear, 37, 136S-144S.
55. Humes, L. E. (2003). Modeling and predicting hearing aid outcome. Trends Amplif, 7, 41-75.
56. Humes, L. E. (2007). The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 590-603.
57. Humes, L. E., & Bess, F. H. (2013). Audiology and Communication Disorders: An Overview (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
58. Humes, L. E., Busey, T. A., Craig, J., et al. (2013). Are age-related changes in cognitive function driven by age-related changes in sensory processing? Atten Percept Psychophys, 75, 508-524.
59. Humes, L. E., & Floyd, S. S. (2005). Measures of working memory, sequence learning, and speech recognition in the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 48, 224-235.
60. Humes, L. E., Kidd, G. R., Lentz, J. J. (2013). Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults. Front Syst Neurosci, 7, 55.
61. Humes, L. E., & Wilson, D. L. (2003). An examination of changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a 3-year period of hearing-aid use. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 46, 137-145.
62. Humes, L. E., & Young, L. A. (2016). Sensory-cognitive interactions in older adults. Ear Hear, 37, 52S-61S.
63. ICF Research Branch. (2013). ICF Core Set for Hearing Loss. Available at: https://www.icf-research-branch.org/icf-core-sets-projects2/otherhealth-conditions/icf-core-set-for-hearing-loss retrieved May 4, 2016.
64. Jahncke, H., & Halin, N. (2012). Performance, fatigue and stress in openplan offices: The effects of noise and restoration on hearing impaired and normal hearing individuals. Noise Health, 14, 260-272.
65. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychol Rev, 99, 122-149.
66. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
67. Kail, R., & Salthouse, T. A. (1994). Processing speed as a mental capacity. Acta Psychol (Amst), 86, 199-225.
68. Kiessling, J., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Gatehouse, S., et al. (2003). Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: Special needs of older people. Int J Audiol, 42, S92-S101.
69. Koelewijn, T., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Zekveld, A. A., et al. (2014). The pupil response is sensitive to divided attention during speech processing. Hear Res, 312, 114-120.
70. Koelewijn, T., Zekveld, A. A., Festen, J. M., et al. (2012). Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Ear Hear, 33, 291-300.
71. Kramer, A. F., & Madden, D. J. (2008). Attention. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of Aging and Cognition (3rd ed., pp. 189-249). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
72. Kramer, S. E., Lorens, A., Coninx, F., et al. (2013). Processing load during listening: The influence of task characteristic on the pupil response. J Lang Cogn Process, 28, 426-442.
73. Kramer, S. E., Teunissen, C., Zekveld, A. A. (2016). Cortisol, chromogranin A, and pupillary responses evoked by speech recognition tasks in normally hearing and hard-of-hearing listeners: a pilot study. Ear Hear, 37, 126S-135S.
74. Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
75. Lane, M., & Mackersie, C. L. (2015 Mar). Sound tolerance domains: Effects of noise type. Presented at the American Auditory Society, Scottsdale, AZ.
76. Lee, D., Seo, H., Jung, M. W. (2012). Neural basis of reinforcement learning and decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci, 35, 287-308.
77. Lemke, U., & Besser, J. (2016). Cognitive load and listening effort: a working model and its application in old age. Ear Hear, 37, 77S-84S.
78. Li, K. Z. H., Krampe, R. Th., & Bondar, A. (2005). An ecological approach to studying aging and dual-task performance. In R. W. Engle, G. Sedek, U. von Hecker, et al. (Eds.), Cognitive Limitations in Aging and Psychopathology (pp. 190-218). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79. Liao, H. I., Kidani, S., Yoneya, M., et al. (2015). Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness. Psychon Bull Rev, 23, 412-425.
80. Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1994). Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection. Psychol Aging, 9, 339-355.
81. Lopez-Poveda, E. A. (2014). Why do I hear but not understand? Stochastic undersampling as a model of degraded neural encoding of speech. Front Neurosci, 8, 348.
82. Lunner, T. (2003). Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol, 42 (Suppl 1), S49-S58.
83. Lunner, T., & Sundewall-Thorén, E. (2007). Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: Effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 604-617.
84. Lunner, T., Rudner, M., Rosenbom, T., et al. (2016). Using speech recall in hearing aid fitting and outcome evaluation under ecological test conditions. Ear Hear, 37, 145S-154S.
85. Mackersie, C. L., Baxter, S., Lane, M. (2014 August). Domains of soundtolerance underlying Acceptable Noise Level. Presented at the International Hearing Aid Research Conference (IHCON), Lake Tahoe, CA.
86. Mackersie, C. L., & Calderon-Moultrie, N. (2016). Autonomic nervous system reactivity during speech recognition tasks: Heart-rate variability and skin conductance. Ear Hear, 37, 118S-125S.
87. Matthen, M. (2016). Effort and displeasure in people who are hard of hearing. Ear Hear, 37, 28S-34S.
88. Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., et al. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Lang Cogn Process, 27, 953-978.
89. McAdams, S., & Bigand, E. (1993). Thinking in Sound: The Cognitive Psychology of Human Audition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
90. McGarrigle, R., Munro, K. J., Dawes, P., et al. (2014). Listening effort and fatigue: What exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group 'white paper'. Int J Audiol, 53, 433-440.
91. Nachtegaal, J., Kuik, D. J., Anema, J. R., et al. (2009). Hearing status, need for recovery after work, and psychosocial work characteristics: Results from an internet-based national survey on hearing. Int J Audiol, 48, 684-691.
92. Neher, T. (2014). Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality. Front Neurosci, 8, 391.
93. Neuhoff, J. G. (Ed.). (2004). Ecological Psychoacoustics. New York, NY: Academic Press.
94. Ng, E. H., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., et al. (2013). Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol, 52, 433-441.
95. Ng, E. H., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., et al. (2015). Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language speech. Ear Hear, 36, 82-91.
96. Obleser, J., Wöstmann, M., Hellbernd, N., et al. (2012). Adverse listening conditions and memory load drive a common α oscillatory network. J Neurosci, 32, 12376-12383.
97. Ohlenforst, B., Souza, P. E., MacDonald, E. N. (2016). Exploring the relationship between working memory, compressor speed, and background noise characteristics. Ear Hear, 37, 137-143.
98. Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu Rev Psychol, 60, 173-196.
99. Petersen, E. B., Wöstmann, M., Obleser, J., et al. (2015). Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions. Front Psychol, 6, 177.
100. Phillips, N. (2016). The implications of cognitive aging for listening and the FUEL model. Ear Hear, 37, 44S-51S.
101. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003). Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl 2), 2S26-2S32.
102. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2006). Perceptual effort and apparent cognitive decline: Implications for audiologic rehabilitation. Semin Hear, 27, 284-293.
103. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2007). Audition and cognition: What audiologists need to know about listening. In C. Palmer, & R. Seewald (Eds.). Hearing Care for Adults (pp. 71-85). Stäfa, Switzerland: Phonak.
104. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2010). Using the brain when the ears are challenged helps healthy older listeners compensate and preserve communication function. In L. Hickson (Ed.). Hearing Care for Adults (pp. 53-65). Stäfa, Switzerland: Phonak.
105. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2013). Auditory and cognitive processing in audiologic rehabilitation. In J. Spitzer & J. Montano (Eds.), Adult Audiologic Rehabilitation: Advanced Practices (2nd ed., pp. 519-536). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
106. Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2016). How social factors may modulate auditory and cognitive functioning during listening. Ear Hear, 37, 92S-100S.
107. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Dupuis, K., Reed, M., et al. (2013). Helping older people with cognitive decline communicate: Hearing aids as part of a broader rehabilitation approach. Semin Hearing, 34, 307-329.
108. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Johnson, C. E., Roodenburg, K. E. J. (1998). The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly: Balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. J Applied Comm Res, 26, 99-119.
109. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Mick, P. T., Reed, M. (2015). Hearing, cognition, and healthy aging: Social and public health implications of the links between age-related declines in hearing and cognition. Semin Hearing, 36, 122-139.
110. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 593-608.
111. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Singh, G. (2006). Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends Amplif, 10, 29-59.
112. Picou, E. M., Ricketts, T. A., Hornsby, B. W. (2011). Visual cues and listening effort: Individual variability. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 1416-1430.
113. Piquado, T., Isaacowitz, D., Wingfield, A. (2010). Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology, 47, 560-569.
114. Polich, J. (2003). Overview of P3a and P3b. In J. Polich (Ed.), Detection of Change: Event-Related Potential and fMRI Findings (pp. 83-98). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
115. Postle, B. R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23-38.
116. Rabbitt, P. M. (1968). Channel-capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory. Q J Exp Psychol, 20, 241-248.
117. Rabbitt, P. M. (1990). Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 476, 167-175; discussion 176.
118. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (2000). Conation: A neglected aspect of neuropsychological functioning. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 15, 443-453.
119. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Cappell, K. A. (2008). Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 17, 177-182.
120. Richter, M. (2016). The moderating impact of success importance on the relationship between listening demand and listening effort. Ear Hear, 37, 111S-117S.
121. Robertson, L., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Jennings, M.-B., et al. (1997). The effect of an aural rehabilitation program on responses to scenarios depicting communication breakdown. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol, 21, 187-198.
122. Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A. A., et al. (2013). The ease of language understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical and clinical advances. Front Syst Neurosci, 13, 7-31.
123. Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C., et al. (2008). Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). Int J Audiol, 47(Suppl 2), S99-S105.
124. Rönnlund, M., Nyberg, L., Bäckman, L., et al. (2005). Stability, growth, and decline in adult life span development of declarative memory: Crosssectional and longitudinal data from a population-based study. Psychol Aging, 20, 3-18.
125. Rudner, M. (2016). Cognitive spare capacity as an index of listening effort. Ear Hear, 37, 69S-76S.
126. Rudner, M., Foo, C., Rönnberg, J., et al. (2009). Cognition and aided speech recognition in noise: Specific role for cognitive factors following nineweek experience with adjusted compression settings in hearing aids. Scand J Psychol, 50, 405-418.
127. Rudner, M., Foo, C., Sundewall Thorén, E., et al. (2008). Phonological mismatch and explicit cognitive processing in a sample of 102 hearing aid users. Int J Audiol, 47, S163-S170.
128. Rudner, M., Lunner, T., Behrens, T., et al. (2012). Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 577-589.
129. Rudner, M., Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T. (2011). Working memory supports listening in noise for persons with hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 156-167.
130. Rudner, M., Toscano, E., Holmer, E. (2015). Load and distinctness interact in working memory for lexical manual gestures. Front Psychol, 6, 1147.
131. Ryan, E. B., Giles, H., Bartolucci, G., et al. (1986). Psycholinguistic and social psychological components of communication by and with the elderly. Lang Commun, 6, 1-24.
132. Ryan, E. B., Meredith, S. D., MacLean, M. J., et al. (1995). Changing the way we talk with elders: Promoting health using the communication enhancement model. Int J Aging Hum Dev, 41, 89-107.
133. Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., et al. (2000). Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
134. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev, 103, 403-428.
135. Salthouse, T. A., & Madden, D. J. (2008). Information processing speed and aging. In J. DeLuca & J. Kalmar (Eds.), Information Processing Speed in Clinical Populations (pp. 221-241). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
136. Schneider, B. A., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2000). Implications of perceptual processing for cognitive aging research. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The Handbook of Aging and Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 155-219). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
137. Schneider, B. A., Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Daneman, M. (2010). The effects of senescent changes in audition and cognition on spoken language comprehension. In S. Gordon-Salant, R. D. Frisina, A. Popper, et al. (Eds.), The Aging Auditory System: Perceptual Characterization and Neural Bases of Presbycusis. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research (pp. 167-210). Berlin: Springer.
138. Seidler, R. D., Bernard, J. A., Burutolu, T. B., et al. (2010). Motor control and aging: Links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 34, 721-733.
139. Smith, S., Pichora-Fuller, M.K., Wilson, R., et al. (in press). Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure (WARRM): A working memory test for use in rehabilitative audiology. Ear Hear.
140. Sommers, M. S., & Phelps, D. (2016). The effects of adding visual speech information on measures of perceptual effort in young and older listeners. Ear Hear, 37, 62S-68S.
141. Souza, P. E., Arehart, K. H., Shen, J., et al. (2015). Working memory and intelligibility of hearing-aid processed speech. Front Psychol, 6, 526.
142. Surprenant, A. M. (2007). Effects of noise on identification and serial recall of nonsense syllables in older and younger adults. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, 14, 126-143.
143. Titchener, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention. New York, NY: Macmillan.
144. Tremblay, K., & Backer, K. (2016). Listening and learning: Implications for the rehabilitation of adults with and without hearing loss. Ear Hear, 37, 155S-162S.
145. Vaden, K. I. Jr, Kuchinsky, S. E., Ahlstrom, J. B., et al. (2015). Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when. J Neurosci, 35, 3929-3937.
146. Vaden, K. I. Jr, Kuchinsky, S. E., Cute, S. L., et al. (2013). The cinguloopercular network provides word-recognition benefit. J Neurosci, 33, 18979-18986.
147. Valente, M., Abrams, H., Benson, D., et al. (2006). Guidelines for the Audiologic Management of Adult Hearing Impairment, Task Force Report for the American Academy of Audiology. Retrieved from http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/guideline-for-audiologic-managementadult-966. Retrieved on May 4, 2016.
148. Varazzani, C., San-Galli, A., Gilardeau, S., et al. (2015). Noradrenaline and dopamine neurons in the reward/effort trade-off: A direct electrophysiological comparison in behaving monkeys. J Neurosci, 35, 7866-7877.
149. Weisz, N., Hartmann, T., Müller, N., et al. (2011). Alpha rhythms in audition: Cognitive and clinical perspectives. Front Psychol, 2, 73.
150. Wingfield, A. (2016). The evolution of models of working memory and cognitive resources. Ear Hear, 37, 35S-43S.
151. Wingfield, A., McCoy, S. L., Peelle, J. E., et al. (2006). Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 487-497.
152. Wingfield, A., & Tun, P. A. (2001). Spoken language comprehension in older adults: Interactions between sensory and cognitive change in normal aging. Semin Hearing, 22, 287-301.
153. Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., & McCoy, S. L. (2005). Hearing loss in older adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 14, 144-148.
154. Winn, M. B., Edwards, J. R., Litovsky, R. Y. (2015). The impact of auditory spectral resolution on listening effort revealed by pupil dilation. Ear Hear, 36, e153-e165.
155. World Health Organization (WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health 2001 Geneva: World Health Organization
156. Wright, R. A. (1996). Brehm's theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior (pp. 424-453). New York, NY: Guilford.
157. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482.
158. Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., Festen, J. M. (2010). Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: The influence of sentence intelligibility. Ear Hear, 31, 480-490.
159. Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., Festen, J. M. (2011). Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: The influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Ear Hear, 32, 498-510.