Erratum: Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech- understanding among older adults (Front.Syst.Neurosci., (2013) 7(55), 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00055);Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Volumn 7, Issue OCT, 2013, Pages

  Humes, Larry E ^a   Kidd, Gary R ^a   Lentz, Jennifer J ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Amplification; Presbycusis; Psychoacoustics; Speech recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT TERM MEMORY; SOUND DETECTION; SPATIAL MEMORY; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH SPATIAL AND QUALITIES OF HEARING SCALE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 84887061378     PISSN: 16625137     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00091     Document Type: Erratum

References (57)

1. Akeroyd, M. (2008). Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability. A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int. J. Audiol. 47(Suppl. 2), S53-S71. doi: 10.1080/14992020802301142
2. ANSI. (1999). S3.1-1999, Maximum Permissible Ambient Levels for Audiometric Test RoomsNew York, NY: American National Standards Institute.
3. ANSI. (2004). S3.6-2004, Specification for Audiometers. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute.
4. Azen, R., and Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychol. Methods 8, 129-148. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129
5. Bacon, S. P., and Viemeister, N. F. (1985). Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Audiology 24, 117-134. doi: 10.3109/00206098509081545
6. Banh, J., Singh, G., and Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2012). Age effects responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal hearing loss. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 23, 81-91.
7. Bilger, R. C., Nuetzel, J. M., Rabinowitz, W. M., and Rzeczkowski, C. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J. Speech Hear. Res. 27, 32-48. doi: 10.1121/1.2017541
8. Bolia, R. S., Nelson, W. T., Ericson, M. A., and Simpson, B. D. (2000). A speech corpus for multitalker communications research. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1065-1066. doi: 10.1121/1.428288
9. Bregman, A. S., and Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. J. Exp. Psychol. 89, 244-249. doi: 10.1037/h0031163
10. Budescu, D. V., and Azen, R. (2004). Beyond global measures of relative importance: some insights from dominance analysis. Organ. Res. Methods 7, 341-350. doi: 10.1177/1094428104267049
11. Christopherson, L. A., and Humes, L. E. (1992). Some psychometric properties of the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC). J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 929-935.
12. Cokely, C. G., and Humes, L. E. (1992). Reliability of two measures of speech recognition in elderly people. J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 654-660.
13. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics and Biomechanics (CHABA). (1988). Speech understanding and aging. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 859-895. doi: 10.1121/1.395965
14. Cruickshanks, K. J. (2010). "Epidemiology of age-related hearing impairment, " in The Aging Auditory System, eds S. Gordon-Salant, R. D. Frisina, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (New York, NY: Springer), 259-274. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0993-0_9
15. Dubno, J. R., and Dirks, D. D. (1983). Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 48, 98-103.
16. Dubno, J. R., Horwitz, A. R., and Ahlstrom, J. B. (2005a). Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 914-922. doi: 10.1121/1.1953107
17. Dubno, J. R., Horwitz, A. R., and Ahlstrom, J. B. (2005b). Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 923-933. doi: 10.1121/1.1953127
18. Fitzgibbons, P. J., and Gordon-Salant, S. (2010). "Behavioral studies with aging humans-hearing sensitivity and psychoacoustics, " in The Aging Auditory System: Perceptual Characterization and Neural Bases of Presbycusis, eds S. Gordon-Salant and R. Frisina (New York, NY: Springer), 111-134.
19. Fogerty, D., Humes, L. E., and Kewley-Port, D. (2010). Auditory temporal-order processing of vowel sequences by young and older adults. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127, 2509-2520. doi: 10.1121/1.3316291
20. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., and McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189-198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
21. Gatehouse, S., and Noble, W. (2004). The speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int. J. Audiol. 43, 85-99. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050014
22. Gordon-Salant, S., and Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1993). Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. J. Speech Hear. Res. 36, 1276-1285.
23. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis, 2nd Edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_6
24. Hirsh, I. J. (1948). The influence of interaural phase on interaural summation and inhibition.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 20, 536-544. doi: 10.1121/1.1906407
25. Houtgast, T., and Festen, J. (2008). On the auditory and cognitive functions that may explain an individual's elevation of the speech reception threshold in noise. Int. J. Audiol. 47, 287-295. doi: 10.1080/14992020802127109
26. Humes, L. E. (1996). Speech understanding in the elderly. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 7, 161-167.
27. Humes, L. E. (2002). Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 1112-1132. doi: 10.1121/1.1499132
28. Humes, L. E. (2007). The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 18, 590-603. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.6
29. Humes, L. E., and Dubno, J. R. (2010). "Factors affecting speech understanding in older adults, " in The Aging Auditory System, eds S. Gordon-Salant, R. D. Frisina, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (New York, NY: Springer), 211-258. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0993-0_8
30. Humes, L. E., Coughlin, M., and Talley, L. (1996). Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 7, 419-427.
31. Humes, L. E., Burk, M. H., Coughlin, M. P., Busey, T. A., and Strauser, L. E. (2007). Auditory speech recognition and visual text recognition in younger and older adults: similarities and differences between modalities and the effects of presentation rate. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 50, 283-303. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/021)
32. Humes, L. E., Watson, B. U., Christensen, L. A., Cokely, C. A., Halling, D. A., and Lee, L. (1994). Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J. Speech Hear. Res. 37, 465-474.
33. Jerger, J., Jerger, S., Oliver, T., and Pirozzolo, F. (1989). Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear. 10, 79-89. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198904000-00001
34. Jerger, J., Jerger, S., and Pirozzolo, F. (1991). Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age and cognitive abilities in the elderly. Ear Hear. 12, 103-109. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199104000-00004
35. Kalikow, D. N., Stevens, K. N., and Elliott, L. L. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1337-1351. doi: 10.1121/1.381436
36. Kawahara, H., Masuda-Katsuse, I., and de Cheveigne, A. (1999). Restructuring speech representations using a pitch-adaptive time-frequency smoothing and an instantaneous-frequency-based F0 extraction: possible role of a repetitive structure in sounds. Speech Commun. 27, 187-207. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00085-5
37. Kidd, G. Jr., Mason, C. R., Deliwala, P. S., Woods, W. S., and Colburn, H. S. (1994). Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3475-3480. doi: 10.1121/1.410023
38. Kidd, G. R., and Humes, L. E. (2012). Effects of age and hearing loss on the recognition of interrupted words in isolation and in sentences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 1434-1448. doi: 10.1121/1.3675975
39. Kidd, G. R., Watson, C. S., and Gygi, B. (2007). Individual differences in auditory abilities. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 418-435. doi: 10.1121/1.2743154
40. Lee, J. H., and Humes, L. E. (2012). Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing talker background. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, 1700-1717. doi: 10.1121/1.4740482
41. Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467-477. doi: 10.1121/1.1912375
42. Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., Yang, L.-X., and Ecker, U. K. H. (2010). A working memory test battery for MATLAB. Behav. Res. Methods 42, 571-585. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.571
43. Moore, B. C., Peters, R. W., and Glasberg, B. R. (1985). Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1861-1867. doi: 10.1121/1.391937
44. Pearsons, K. S., Bennett, R. L., and Fidell, S. (1977). Speech Levels in Various Noise Environments, Report No. EPA-600/1-77-025. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
45. Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Major Issues in Cognitive Aging. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
46. Singh, G., and Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2010). Older adults' performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods. Int. J. Audiol. 49, 733-740. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.491097
47. Studebaker, G. A., Sherbecoe, R. L., McDaniel, D. M., and Gwaltney, C. A. (1999). Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2431-2444. doi: 10.1121/1.426848
48. van Noorden, L. P. A. S. (1977). Minimum differences of level and frequency for perceptualssion of tone sequences. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1041-1045. doi: 10.1121/1.381388
49. van Rooij, J. C. G. M., and Plomp, R. (1990). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II. multivariate analyses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 2611-2624. doi: 10.1121/1.399981
50. van Rooij, J. C. G. M., and Plomp, R. (1992). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. additional data and final discussion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 1028-1033. doi: 10.1121/1.402628
51. van Rooij, J. C. G. M., Plomp, R., and Orlebeke, J. F. (1989). Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I. development of test battery. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 1294-1309. doi: 10.1121/1.398744
52. Viemeister, N. F. (1979). Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1364-1380. doi: 10.1121/1.383531
53. Wang, X., and Humes, L. E. (2010). Factors influencing the recognition of interrupted speech.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 128, 2100-2111. doi: 10.1121/1.3483733
54. Watson, C. S. (1987). "Uncertainty, informational masking, and the capacity of immediate auditory memory, " in Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds, eds W. A. Yost and C. S. Watson (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 267-277.
55. Wiig, E. H., Nielsen, N. P., Minthon, L., and Warkentin, S. (2002). A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed (AQT). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
56. Yost, W. A., Sheft, S., and Opic, J. (1989). Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86, 2138-2147. doi: 10.1121/1.398474
57. Zekveld, A. A., George, E. L., Kramer, S. E., Goverts, S. T., and Houtgast, T. (2007). The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue to the speech reception threshold test. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 50, 576-584. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/040)