Modelling and predicting hearing aid outcome

Trends in Amplification

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2003, Pages

  Humes, Larry E ^b   Ricketts, Todd A ^a  

^a Dan Maddox Hearing Aid Res Lab   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY CANAL; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; ELDERLY CARE; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; PUBLICATION; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; REVIEW; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042804801     PISSN: 10847138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. American National Standards Institute Specifications for audiometers, ANSI S3.6-1996. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, 1996.
2. Arbuckle JL, Wothke W. AMOS 4.0 User's Guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation, 1999.
3. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psych Bull 107:238-246, 1990.
4. Bentler R, Niebuhr D, Getta J, Anderson C. Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. J Speech Hear Res 36:820-831, 1993.
5. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
6. Byrne D, Parkinson A, Newall P. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing impaired. Ear Hear 11:40-49, 1990.
7. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gilmore CG, Pusakulich KM. Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 9:198-207, 1988.
8. Cox RM, Gilmore C. Development of the profile of hearing aid performance (PHAP). J Speech Hear Res 33:343-357, 1990.
9. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gray G. Personality and the subjective assessment of hearing aids. J Amer Acad Audiol 10:1-13, 1999.
10. Demorest M, Erdman S. Development of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired. J Speech Hear Disord 52:129-143, 1987.
11. Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. The Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Amer Acad Audiol 8:27-43, 1997.
12. Flamme GA. Examination of the validity of auditory traits and tests. Trends Amplif 5:111-138, 2001.
13. Gatehouse S. Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and validation of a client-centered outcome measure for hearing aid services. J Amer Acad Audiol 10:80-103, 1999.
14. Gorsuch RL. Factor Analysis, 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
15. Guadagnoli E, Velicer WF. Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull 103:265-275, 1988.
16. Hendrickson AE, White PO. Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. Brit J Stat Psychol 17(1):65-70, 1964.
17. Hu L-T, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6:1-55, 1999.
18. Humes LE. Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. J Amer Acad Audiol 10:26-39, 1999.
19. Humes LE. Issues in evaluating the effectiveness of hearing aids in the elderly: What to measure and when. Seminars in Hearing 22(3):303-314, 2001.
20. Humes LE. Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers. J Acoust Soc Amer 112:1112-1132, 2002.
21. Humes LE, Garner CB, Wilson DL, Barlow NN. Hearing-aid outcome measures following one month of hearing aid use by elderly participants. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44:469-486, 2001.
22. Humes LE, Watson BU, Christensen LA, Cokely CG, Halling DC, Lee L. Factors associated with individual differences in clinical measures of speech recognition among the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 37:465-474, 1994.
23. Humes LE, Wilson DL, Barlow NN, Garner CB. Measures of hearing-aid benefit following one or two years of hearing aid use by the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:772-782, 2002(a).
24. Humes LE, Wilson DL, Barlow NN, Garner CB, Amos N. Longitudinal changes in hearing-aid satisfaction and usage in the elderly over a period of one or two years following hearing aid delivery. Ear Hear 23:428-438, 2002(b).
25. Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 23(3):187-200, 1958.
26. Killion MC, Fikret-Pasa S. The 3 types of sensorineural hearing loss: Loudness and intelligibility considerations. The Hear J 46(11):31-36, 1993.
27. Kochkin S. Subjective measures of satisfaction and benefit: Establishing norms. Seminars in Hearing 18(1):37-48, 1997.
28. Kochkin S. On the issue of value: Hearing aid benefit, price, satisfaction and brand repurchase rates. Hearing Rev 10(2):12-26, 2003.
29. Krantz DS, Baum A, Wideman MV. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Personality Soc Psychol 39:977-990, 1980.
30. Larson VD, Williams DW, Henderson WG, Luethke LE, Beck LD, et al. Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. JAMA 284:1806-1813, 2000.
31. Levitt H, Resnick SB. Speech reception by the hearing impaired: Methods of testing and development of materials. Scand Audiol Suppl 6:107-129, 1978.
32. MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Meth 4:84-99, 1999.
33. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G. Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 5(1):24-38, 1985.
34. Narendran MM, Humes LE. Evaluations of judgements of sound quality in elderly hearing-aid wearers: Reliability and validity of measurements. Ear Hear (in press).
35. Thurstone LL. Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.
36. Ventry I, Weinstein B. The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly: A new tool. Ear Hear 3:128-134, 1982.
37. Walden BE. Validating measures of hearing aid success. In Studebaker GA, Bess FA, eds: The Vanderbilt Hearing Aid Report. Upper Darby, Pennsylvania: Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, pp.188-192, 1982.
38. Walden BE. Toward a model clinical-trials protocol for substantiating hearing aid user-benefit claims. Amer J Audiol 6:13-24, 1997.
39. Walden BE, Demorest ME, Hepler EL. Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Hear Res 27:49-56, 1984.
40. Wallston BS, Wallston KA, Kaplan GO, Maides SA. Development and validation of the health locus of control (HLC) scale. J Cons Clin Psychol 44:580-585, 1976.
41. Wechsler D. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1981.