A model of auditory-cognitive processing and relevance to clinical applicability

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 37, Issue , 2016, Pages 85S-91S

  Edwards, Brent ^a  

^a EarLens Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory models; Auditory scene analysis; Cognition; Cognitive models; Hearing AIDS; Hearing loss; Listening effort

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COGNITION; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84978289365     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: 15384667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000308     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (58)

1. Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., Picton, T. W. (2001). Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 27, 1072-1089.
2. Baldwin, C. L., & Ash, I. K. (2011). Impact of sensory acuity on auditory working memory span in young and older adults. Psychol Aging, 26, 85-91.
3. Best, V., Kalluri, S., McLachlan, S., et al. (2010). A comparison of CIC and BTE hearing aids for three-dimensional localization of speech. Int J Audiol, 49, 723-732.
4. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and Communication. London, United Kingdom: Pergamon Press.
6. Brungart, D. S., Cohen, J., Cord, M., et al. (2014). Assessment of auditory spatial awareness in complex listening environments. J Acoust Soc Am, 136, 1808-1820.
7. Carlile, S., & Corkhill, C. (2015). Selective spatial attention modulates bottom-up informational masking of speech. Sci Rep, 5, 8662.
8. Carlyon, R. P., Cusack, R., Foxton, J. M., et al. (2001). Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 27, 115-127.
9. Carlyon, R. P., Plack, C. J., Fantini, D. A., et al. (2003). Cross-modal and nonsensory influences on auditory streaming. Perception, 32, 1393-1402.
10. Dalton, D. S., Cruickshanks, K. J., Klein, B. E., et al. (2003). The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist, 43, 661-668.
11. Davis, H. (1964). Physiological and psychological functions in relation to anatomy and physiology. Int Audiol, 3, 209-215.
12. Desjardins, J. L., & Doherty, K. A. (2014). The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear, 35, 600-610.
13. Edwards, B. (2007). The future of hearing aid technology. Trends Amplif, 11, 31-45.
14. Einhorn, R. (2012). Observations from a musician with hearing loss. Trends Amplif, 16, 179-182.
15. Freyman, R. L., Balakrishnan, U., Helfer, K. S. (2001). Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 109(5 Pt 1), 2112-2122.
16. Frisina, D. R., Frisina, R. D., Snell, K. B., et al. (2001). Auditory temporal processing during aging. In P. R. Hof, C. V. Mobbs (Eds.), Functional Neurobiology of Aging (pp. 565-579). New York, NY: Academic Press.
17. Gatehouse, S., & Noble, W. (2004). The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85-99.
18. Gfeller, K., & Knutson, J. F. (2003). Music to the impaired or implanted ear. ASHA Lead, 8, 1-15.
19. Hornsby, B. W. (2013). The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Ear Hear, 34, 523-534.
20. Jepsen, M. L., Ewert, S. D., Dau, T. (2008). A computational model of human auditory signal processing and perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 422-438.
21. Karlsson Espmark, A. K., & Hansson Scherman, M. (2003). Hearing confirms existence and identity-Experiences from persons with presbyacusis. Int J Audiol, 42, 106-115.
22. Kirchberger, M. J., & Russo, F. A. (2015). Development of the adaptive music perception test. Ear Hear, 36, 217-228.
23. Kramer, S. E., Kapteyn, T. S., Houtgast, T. (2006). Occupational performance: Comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work. Int J Audiol, 45, 503-512.
24. Leek, M. R., Molis, M. R., Kubli, L. R., et al. (2008). Enjoyment of music by elderly hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 519-526.
25. Lin, F. R., & Ferrucci, L. (2012). Hearing loss and falls among older adults in the United States. Arch Intern Med, 172, 369-371.
26. Lunner, T. (2003). Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol, 42(Suppl 1), S49-S58.
27. Lunner, T., Rudner, M., Rönnberg, J. (2009). Cognition and hearing aids. Scand J Psychol, 50, 395-403.
28. Lunner, T., Rudner, M., Rosenbom, T., et al. (2016). Using speech recall in hearing aid fitting and outcome evaluation under ecological test conditions. Ear Hear, 37, 145S-154S.
29. Lunner, T., & Sundewall-Thorén, E. (2007). Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: Effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 604-617.
30. Mackersie, C. L., & Cones, H. (2011). Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 113-122.
31. McCoy, S. L., Tun, P. A., Cox, L. C., et al. (2005). Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech. Q J Exp Psychol A, 58, 22-33.
32. McGarrigle, R., Munro, K. J., Dawes, P., et al. (2014). Listening effort and fatigue: What exactly are we measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group "white paper." Int J Audiol, 53, 433-440.
33. Moore, B. C. J. (1995). Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34. Ng, E. H., Classon, E., Larsby, B., et al. (2014). Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use. Trends Hear, 18, 1-10.
35. Ng, E. H., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., et al. (2013). Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol, 52, 433-441.
36. Noble, W. (1983). Hearing, hearing impairment, and the audible world: A theoretical essay. Audiology, 22, 325-338.
37. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Johnson, C. E., Roodenburg, K. E. J. (1998). The discrepancy between hearing impairment and handicap in the elderly: Balancing transaction and interaction in conversation. J Applied Comm Res, 26, 99-119.
38. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Kramer, S. E., Mark, E. (2016). Hearing impairment and cognitive energy: A framework for understanding effortful listening (FUEL). Ear Hear, 37, 5S-S27.
39. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., Daneman, M. (1995). How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 593-608.
40. Pichora-Fuller, M. K., & Singh, G. (2006). Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: Implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation. Trends Amplif, 10, 29-59.
41. Robinson, J. D., Baer, T., Moore, B. C. (2007). Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 46, 293-308.
42. Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., et al. (2013). The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front Syst Neurosci, 7, 31.
43. Rönnberg, J., Rudner, M., Foo, C., et al. (2008). Cognition counts: A working memory system for ease of language understanding (ELU). Int J Audiol, 47(Suppl 2), S99-S105.
44. Rudner, M. (2016). Cognitive spare capacity as an index of listening effort. Ear Hear, 37, 69S-76S.
45. Sarampalis, A., Kalluri, S., Edwards, B., et al. (2009). Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 1230-1240.
46. Schneider, B. A., & Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2000). Implications of perceptual processing for cognitive aging research. In F. I. M. C. T. A. Salthouse (Ed.), The Handbook of Aging and Cognition (2nd ed., pp. 155-219). New York, NY: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Schulkin, J., & Raglan, G. B. (2014). The evolution of music and human social capability. Front Neurosci, 8, 292.
48. Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., Micheyl, C. (2011). Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends Neurosci, 34, 114-123.
49. Snyder, J. S., Alain, C., Picton, T. W. (2006). Effects of attention on neuroelectric correlates of auditory stream segregation. J Cogn Neurosci, 18, 1-13.
50. Souza, P., Arehart, K. H., Shen, J., et al. (2015). Working memory and intelligibility of hearing-aid processed speech. Front Psychol, 6.
51. Souza, P. E., & Sirow, L. (2014). Relating working memory to compression parameters in clinically fit hearing AIDS. Am J Audiol, 23, 394-401.
52. Stenfelt, S., & Rönnberg, J. (2009). The signal-cognition interface: Interactions between degraded auditory signals and cognitive processes. Scand J Psychol, 50, 385-393.
53. Wessel, D., Fitz, K., Battenberg, E., et al. (2007). Optimizing hearing aids for music listening. In 19th International Congress on Acoustics.
54. Wingfield, A. (2016). The evolution of models of working memory and cognitive resources. Ear Hear, 37, 35S-43S.
55. Wingfield, A., & Tun, P. A. (2007). Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 548-558.
56. Xia, J., Kalluri, S., Edwards, B., et al. (2014). Cognitive effort and listening in everyday life. ENT Audiol News, 23, 88-89.
57. Xia, J., Nooraei, N., Kalluri, S., et al. (2015). Spatial release of cognitive load measured in a dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing and hearingimpaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 137, 1888-1898.
58. Zhang, X., Heinz, M. G., Bruce, I. C., et al. (2001). A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 648-670.