A systematic literature review of individuals' perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 663-671

  Garrison, Nanibaa A ^a   Sathe, Nila A ^a   Antommaria, Armand H Matheny ^b   Holm, Ingrid A ^c,d   Sanderson, Saskia C ^e   Smith, Maureen E ^f   McPheeters, Melissa L ^a   Clayton, Ellen W ^a,g  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^e MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

biobank; broad consent; data sharing; systematic review; tiered consent

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; DRUG INDUSTRY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; MEDLINE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PRIVACY; SCREENING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WEB OF SCIENCE; BIOBANK; GENETICS; GENOMICS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROCEDURES; UNITED STATES;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; GENETIC RESEARCH; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); UNITED STATES;

EID: 84977142902     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.138     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. HITECH Act amendments to the HIPAA Privacy Rule. 45 C.F.R. §164.508 (c) (2015)
2. Office of Human Research Protections. Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 76 Fed. Reg. 44512-31. 26 July 2011. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/ FR-2011-07-26/html/2011-18792.htm. Accessed 17 April, 2015
3. National Institutes of Health. Genomic Data Sharing Policy, 79 Fed. Reg. 51345-54. 28 August 2014. https://www.federalregister.gov/ articles/2014/08/28/2014-20385/final-nih-genomic-data-sharing-policy. Accessed 17 April, 2015
4. National Cancer Institute/National Action Plan on Breast Cancer. NCI/NAPBC Model Informed Consent Documents. http://oprs.usc.edu/files/2013/01/ modelconsenthandouts.pdf. Accessed 17 April 2015
5. Tomlinson T. Respecting donors to biobank research. Hastings Cent Rep 2013;43:41-47
6. Stein DT, Terry SF. Reforming biobank consent policy: a necessary move away from broad consent toward dynamic consent. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2013;17:855-856
7. Hofmann B. Broadening consent-and diluting ethics? J Med Ethics 2009;35:125-129
8. Williams H, Spencer K, Sanders C, et al. Dynamic consent: a possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research. JMIR Med Inform 2015;3:e3
9. National Institutes of Health. NIH, Lacks family reach understanding to share genomic data of HeLa cells. Press release, 7 August 2013. http://www.nih.gov/ news/health/aug2013/nih-07.htm. Accessed 17 April 2015
10. Pereira S, Gibbs RA, McGuire AL. Open access data sharing in genomic research. Genes (Basel) 2014;5:739-747
11. Master Z, Nelson E, Murdoch B, Caulfield T. Biobanks, consent and claims of consensus. Nat Methods 2012;9:885-888
12. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349-357
13. Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:261-266
14. Huston P. Reporting on surveys: information for authors and peer reviewers. CMAJ 1996;154:1695-1704
15. Schwartz MD, Rothenberg K, Joseph L, Benkendorf J, Lerman C. Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population. Am J Med Genet 2001;98:336-342
16. Wang SS, Fridinger F, Sheedy KM, Khoury MJ. Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research. Community Genet 2001;4:18-26
17. WWSendler D, Emanuel E. The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1457-1462
18. McQuillan GM, Porter KS, Agelli M, Kington R. Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience. Genet Med 2003;5:35-42
19. Fong M, Braun KL, Chang RM. Native Hawaiian preferences for informed consent and disclosure of results from research using stored biological specimens. Pac Health Dialog 2004;11:154-159
20. Chen DT, Rosenstein DL, Muthappan P, et al. Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want? Arch Intern Med 2005;165: 652-655
21. Fong M, Braun KL, Chang RM. Native Hawaiian preferences for informed consent and disclosure of results from genetic research. J Cancer Educ 2006;21(suppl 1):S47-S52
22. Kaphingst KA, Janoff JM, Harris LN, Emmons KM. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research. Clin Genet 2006;69:393-398
23. Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D. Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140:733-739
24. Helft PR, Champion VL, Eckles R, Johnson CS, Meslin EM. Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2007;2:15-22
25. Beskow LM, Dean E. Informed consent for biorepositories: assessing prospective participants' understanding and opinions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:1440-1451
26. Hull SC, Sharp RR, Botkin JR, et al. Patients' views on identifiability of samples and informed consent for genetic research. Am J Bioeth 2008;8:62-70
27. McGuire AL, Hamilton JA, Lunstroth R, McCullough LB, Goldman A. DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives. Genet Med 2008;10:46-53
28. Neidich AB, Joseph JW, Ober C, Ross LF. Empirical data about women's attitudes towards a hypothetical pediatric biobank. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146A:297-304
29. Pulley JM, Brace MM, Bernard GR, Masys DR. Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank. Cell Tissue Bank 2008;9:55-65
30. Goddard KA, Smith KS, Chen C, McMullen C, Johnson C. Biobank recruitment: motivations for nonparticipation. Biopreserv Biobank 2009;7:119-121
31. Goldenberg AJ, Hull SC, Botkin JR, Wilfond BS. Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. J Pediatr 2009;155:578-583
32. Hoop JG, Roberts LW, Hammond KA. Genetic testing of stored biological samples: views of 570 U.S. workers. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2009;13:331-337
33. Kaufman D, Murphy J, Erby L, Hudson K, Scott J. Veterans' attitudes regarding a database for genomic research. Genet Med 2009;11:329-337
34. Kaufman DJ, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson KL. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am J Hum Genet 2009;85:643-654
35. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K. Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. Am J Public Health 2009;99:2128-2134
36. Kern MH. Clinician attitudes and intentions toward participation in a DNA biobank. Thesis, Case Western Reserve University, 2010
37. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics 2010;13:368-377
38. Ludman EJ, Fullerton SM, Spangler L, et al. Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010;5:9-16
39. Scott EA, Schlumpf KS, Mathew SM, et al. Biospecimen repositories: are blood donors willing to participate? Transfusion 2010;50(9):1943-1950
40. Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM, Bares JM, Jarvik GP, Larson EB, Burke W. Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants. Genet Med 2010;12:486-495
41. Valle-Mansilla JI, Ruiz-Canela M, Sulmasy DP. Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples. Cancer Invest 2010;28:726-734
42. Brothers KB, Morrison DR, Clayton EW. Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt-out biobank. Am J Med Genet A 2011;155A:2982-2990
43. Haga SB, O'Daniel J. Public perspectives regarding data-sharing practices in genomics research. Public Health Genomics 2011;14:319-324
44. McCarty CA, Garber A, Reeser JC, Fost NC; Personalized Medicine Research Project Community Advisory Group and Ethics and Security Advisory Board. Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:737-741
45. Simon CM, L'heureux J, Murray JC, et al. Active choice but not too active: public perspectives on biobank consent models. Genet Med 2011;13:821-831
46. Conley JM, Mitchell R, Cadigan RJ, Davis AM, Dobson AW, Gladden RQ. A trade secret model for genomic biobanking. J Law Med Ethics 2012;40:612-629
47. Duquette D, Langbo C, Bach J, Kleyn M. Michigan BioTrust for Health: public support for using residual dried blood spot samples for health research. Public Health Genomics 2012;15:146-155
48. Hiratsuka V, Brown J, Dillard D. Views of biobanking research among Alaska native people: the role of community context. Prog Community Health Partnersh 2012;6:131-139
49. Hiratsuka VY, Brown JK, Hoeft TJ, Dillard DA. Alaska native people's perceptions, understandings, and expectations for research involving biological specimens. Int J Circumpolar Health 2012;71:18642
50. Kaufman D, Bollinger J, Dvoskin R, Scott J. Preferences for opt-in and optout enrollment and consent models in biobank research: a national survey of veterans administration patients. Genet Med 2012;14:787-794
51. Lemke AA, Halverson C, Ross LF. Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158A:1029-1037
52. Luque JS, Quinn GP, Montel-Ishino FA, et al.; Tampa Bay Community Cancer Network Partners. Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think. J Cancer Educ 2012;27:91-99
53. Brothers KB, Westbrook MJ, Wright MF, et al. Patient awareness and approval for an opt-out genomic biorepository. Per Med 2013;10. doi:10.2217/ pme.13.34
54. Rahm AK, Wrenn M, Carroll NM, Feigelson HS. Biobanking for research: a survey of patient population attitudes and understanding. J Community Genet 2013;4:445-450
55. Ridgeway JL, Han LC, Olson JE, et al. Potential bias in the bank: what distinguishes refusers, nonresponders and participants in a clinic-based biobank? Public Health Genomics 2013;16:118-126
56. Thiel DB, Platt T, Platt J, King SB, Kardia SL. Community perspectives on public health biobanking: an analysis of community meetings on the Michigan BioTrust for Health. J Community Genet 2014;5:125-138
57. Braun KL, Tsark JU, Powers A, et al. Cancer patient perceptions about biobanking and preferred timing of consent. Biopreserv Biobank 2014;12: 106-112
58. Gornick MC, Ryan KA, Kim SY. Impact of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate to biobanks: an experimental survey. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2014;9:22-33
59. Platt J, Bollinger J, Dvoskin R, Kardia SL, Kaufman D. Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research. Genet Med 2014;16:11-18
60. Platt T, Platt J, Thiel DB, Fisher N, Kardia SL. 'Cool! and creepy': engaging with college student stakeholders in Michigan's biobank. J Community Genet 2014;5:349-362
61. Rogith D, Yusuf RA, Hovick SR, et al. Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21(e2):e320-e325
62. Storr CL, Or F, Eaton WW, Ialongo N. Genetic research participation in a young adult community sample. J Community Genet 2014;5:363-375
63. Tauali i M, Davis EL, Braun KL, et al. Native Hawaiian views on biobanking. J Cancer Educ 2014;29:570-576
64. Long MD, Cadigan RJ, Cook SF, et al. Perceptions of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases on biobanking. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2015;21:132-138
65. Tomlinson T, De Vries R, Ryan K, Kim HM, Lehpamer N, Kim SY. Moral concerns and the willingness to donate to a research biobank. JAMA 2015;313:417-419
66. Grady C, Eckstein L, Berkman B, et al. Broad consent for research with biological samples: workshop conclusions. Am J Bioeth 2015;15:34-42
67. Truven Health Analytics. Health Poll: Data Privacy. Ann Arbor, MI. November 2014.