Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 486-495

  Trinidad, Susan Brown ^a   Fullerton, Stephanie M ^a   Bares, Julie M ^a   Jarvik, Gail P ^a   Larson, Eric B ^b   Burke, Wylie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

data sharing; electronic medical records; genetics; participant perspectives; privacy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHENOTYPE;

ADULT; FOCUS GROUPS; GENOMICS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC OPINION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS;

EID: 77955662068     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e38f9e     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Chasman DI, Pare G, Mora S, et al. Forty-three loci associated with plasma lipoprotein size, concentration, and cholesterol content in genome-wide analysis. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000730.
2. Ganesh SK, Zakai NA, van Rooij FJ, et al. Multiple loci influence erythro-cyte phenotypes in the CHARGE Consortium. Nat Genet 2009;41:1191-1198.
3. Final NIH statement on sharing research data. 2003. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-03-032.html. Accessed December 22, 2009.
4. Policy for sharing of data obtained in NIH supported or conducted Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS). 2007. Available at: http://grants.nih. gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-07-088.html. Accessed December 22, 2009.
5. Bathe OF, McGuire AL. The ethical use of existing samples for genome research. Genet Med 2009;11:712-715.
6. P3G Consortium; Church G, Heeney C, Hawkins N, et al. Public access to genome-wide data: five views on balancing research with privacy and protection. PLoS Genet 2009;5:e1000665.
7. Kaye J, Heeney C, Hawkins N, de Vries J, Boddington P. Data sharing in genomics-re-shaping scientific practice. Nat Rev Genet 2009;10:331-335.
8. Ashburn TT, Wilson SK, Eisenstein BI. Human tissue research in the genomic era of medicine\balancing individual and societal interests. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:3377-3384.
9. Eriksson S, Helgesson G. Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to biobank research. Eur J Hum Genet 2005;13:1071-1076.
10. McGuire AL, Gibbs RA. No longer de-identified. Science 2006;312:370-371.
11. Lin Z, Altman RB, Owen AB. Confidentiality in genome research. Science 2006;313:441-442.
12. Homer N, Szelinger S, Redman M, et al. Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet 2008;4:e1000167.
13. Malin BA. An evaluation of the current state of genomic data privacy protection technology and a roadmap for the future. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:28-34.
14. Karp DR, Carlin S, Cook-Deegan R, et al. Ethical and practical issues associated with aggregating databases. PLoS Med 2008;5:e190.
15. Greely HT. The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2007;8:343-364.
16. Caulfield T, McGuire AL, Cho M, et al. Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e73.
17. Aagaard-Tillery K, Sibai B, Spong CY, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Sample bias among women with retained DNA samples for future genetic studies. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:1115-1120.
18. Bhatti P, Sigurdson AJ, Wang SS, et al. Genetic variation and willingness to participate in epidemiologic research: data from three studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2449-2453.
19. Chen DT, Rosenstein DL, Muthappan P, et al. Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want? Arch Intern Medi 2005; 165:652-655.
20. Hoeyer K, Olofsson BO, Mjorndal T, Lynoe N. Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scand J Public Health 2004;32:224-229.
21. Kaphingst KA, Janoff JM, Harris LN, Emmons KM. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research. Clin Genet 2006;69:393-398.
22. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Public Health 2006;16:433-440.
23. McCarty CA, Nair A, Austin DM, Giarnpietro PF. Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project. Community Genet 2007;10:2-9.
24. McQuillan GM, Pan QY, Porter KS. Consent for genetic research in a general population: an update on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey experience. Genet Med 2006;8:354-360.
25. Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D. Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet A 2006;140:733-739.
26. Pulley JM, Brace MM, Bernard GR, Masys DR. Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank. Cell Tissue Bank 2008;9:55-65.
27. Schwartz MD, Rothenberg K, Joseph L, Benkendorf J, Lerman C. Consent to the use of stored DNA for genetics research: a survey of attitudes in the Jewish population. Am J Med Genet 2001;98:336-342.
28. Stegmayr B, Asplund K. Informed consent for genetic research on blood stored for more than a decade: a population based study. BMJ 2002;325: 634-635.
29. Sterling R, Henderson GE, Corbie-Smith G. Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature. Am J Public Health 2006;96:1971-1978.
30. Treloar SA, Morley KI, Taylor SD, Hall WD. Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis. Community Genet 2007;10: 61-71.
31. Treweek S, Doney A, Leiman D. Public attitudes to the storage of blood left over from routine general practice tests and its use in research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2009;14:13-19.
32. Wang SS, Fridinger F, Sheedy KM, Khoury MJ. Public attitudes regarding the donation and storage of blood specimens for genetic research. Community Genet 2001;4:18-26.
33. Wendler D, Emanuel E. The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think? Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1457-1462. (Pubitemid 34747478)
34. Damschroder LJ, Pritts JL, Neblo MA, Kalarickal RJ, Creswell JW, Hay-ward RA. Patients, privacy and trust: patients' willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. Soc Sci Med 2007;64:223-235.
35. Robling MR, Hood K, Houston H, Pill R, Fay J, Evans HM. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics 2004;30:104-109.
36. Kass NE, Natowicz MR, Hull SC, et al. The use of medical records in research: what do patients want? J Law Med Ethics 2003;31:429-433.
37. Purdy S, Finkelstein JA, Fletcher R, Christiansen C, Inui TS. Patient participation in research in the managed care environment: key perceptions of members in an HMO. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:492-495.
38. Whiddett R, Hunter I, Engelbrecht J, Handy J. Patients' attitudes towards sharing their health information. Int J Med Inform 2006;75:530-541.
39. Willison DJ, Keshavjee K, Nair K, et al. Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data. BMJ2003;326:373.
40. McGuire AL, Hamilton JA, Lunstroth R, McCullough LB, Goldman A. DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives. Genet Med 2008;10:46-53.
41. Kaufman DJ, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson KL. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am J Hum Genet 2009;85: 643-654.
42. Kaufman D, Murphy J, Scott J, Hudson K. Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet Med 2008;10:831-839.
43. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing [published online ahead of print January 15, 2010]. Public Health Genomics doi: 10.1159/000276767.
44. Kukull WA, Higdon R, Bowen JD, et al. Dementia and Alzheimer disease incidence: a prospective cohort study. Arch Neurol 2002;59:1737-1746.
45. Sonnen JA, Larson EB, BrickellK, etal. Different patterns of cerebral injury in dementia with or without diabetes. Arch Neurol 2009;66:315-322.
46. Li G, Shofer JB, Kukull WA, et al. Serum cholesterol and risk of Alzheimer disease: a community-based cohort study. Neurology 2005;65:1045-1050.
47. Kornblum J. Online privacy? For young people, that's old-school. USA Today October 27, 2007.
48. Kirkpatrick M. Facebook's Zuckerberg says the age of privacy is over. In: MacManus R, editor. ReadWriteWeb. Available at: http://www.readwriteweb. com/archives/facebooks-zuckerberg-says-the-age-of-privacy-is-ov.php? utm-source=feedburner&utm-medium=feed&utm-campaign=Feed%3A+ readwriteweb+%28ReadWriteWeb%29&utm-content=Twitter. Accessed March 10,2010.
49. Kahan J. Focus groups as a tool for policy analysis. Anal Soc Iss Public Policy 2001;1:129-146.
50. Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 1996;8:499-504.
51. Morgan DL. The focus group guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998.
52. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311: 299-302.
53. Fern EF. Advanced focus group research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001.
54. Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN, Rook DW. Focus groups: theory and practice, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.
55. Morse JM, Barrett M, Mayan M, Olson K, Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. Int J Qual Methods 2002;1:1-19.
56. Montgomery P, Bailey PH. Field notes and theoretical memos in grounded theory. West J Nurs Res 2007;29:65-79.
57. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2008.
58. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-1288.
59. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2000;23:334-340.
60. Code of Federal Regulations. Protection of human subjects. Vol 45 CFR 46.102(i)2005.
61. Gerring J. Case study research: principles and practices. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
62. McDonald M, Townsend A, Cox SM, Paterson ND, Lafreniere D. Trust in health research relationships: accounts of human subjects. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2008;3:35-47.
63. Yarborough M, Fryer-Edwards K, Geller G, Sharp RR. Transforming the culture of biomedical research from compliance to trustworthiness: insights from nonmedical sectors. Acad Med 2009;84:472-477.