Open access data sharing in genomic research

Genes

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 739-747

  Pereira, Stacey ^a   Gibbs, Richard A ^a   McGuire, Amy L ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Data sharing; Genetic discrimination; Genomics; Open access database; Privacy

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; AWARENESS; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME PROJECT; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NOTE; PATIENT AUTONOMY;

EID: 84923375535     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/genes5030739     Document Type: Note

References (43)

1. Lander, E.S.; Linton, L.M.; Birren, B.; Nusbaum, C.; Zody, M.C.; Baldwin, J.; Devon, K.; Dewar, K.; Doyle, M.; FitzHugh, W.; et al.Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 2001, 409, 860–921.
2. Wellcome trust sanger institude. The human genome project. Available online: https://www.sanger.ac.uk/about/history/hgp/ (accessed on 15 July 2014).
3. National Institutes of Health, Department of Energy. NIH-DOE guidelines for access to mapping and sequencing data and material resources. Available online: http://www.genome.gov/10000925 (accessed on 15 July 2014).
4. National human genome research institute. Reaffirmation and extension of NHGRI rapid data release policies: Large-scale sequencing and other community resource projects. Available online: http://www.genome.gov/10506537 (accessed on 3 July 2014).
5. National human genome research institute. NHGRI policy on release of human genomic sequence data. Available online: http://www.genome.gov/10000910 (accessed on 3 July 2014).
6. Wellcome trust sanger institude. Summary of principles agreed upon at the international strategy meeting on human genome sequencing, bermuda. Available online: http://www.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/research/bermuda.shtml#1 (accessed on July 2014).
7. Wellcome Trust. Sharing Data from Large-Scale Biological Research Projects: A System of Tripartite Responsibility, Fort Lauderdale. Available online: http://www.genome.gov/Pages/Research/WellcomeReport0303.pdf (accessed on 3 July 2014).
8. Lin, Z.; Owen, A.B.; Altman, R.B. Genomic research and human subject privacy. Science2004, 305, 183.
9. McGuire, A.L.; Gibbs, R.A. No longer de-identified. Science 2006, 312, 370–371.
10. Mailman, M.D.; Feolo, M.; Jin, Y.; Kimura, M.; Tryka, K.; Bagoutdinov, R.; Hao, L.; Kiang, A.; Paschall, J.; Phan, L.; et al.The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 1181–1186.
11. Homer, N.; Szelinger, S.; Redman, M.; Duggan, D.; Tembe, W.; Muehling, J.; Pearson, J.V.; Stephan, D.A.; Nelson, S.F.; Craig, D.W.; et al.Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4, e1000167.
12. Gilbert, N. Researchers criticize genetic data restrictions. Available online: http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080904/full/news.2008.1083.html (accessed on 3 July 2014).
13. Gymrek, M.; McGuire, A.L.; Golan, D.; Halperin, E.; Erlich, Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science2013, 339, 321–324.
14. Rodriguez, L.L.; Brooks, L.D.; Greenberg, J.H.; Green, E.D. The Complexities of genomic identifiability. Science2013, 339, 275–276.
15. National human genome research institute. Establishing a central resource of data from genome sequencing projects. Available online: http://www.genome.gov/27549169 (accessed on 15 July 2014).
16. Presidential commission for the study of bioethical issues. Privacy and progress in whole genome sequencing. Available online: http://bioethics.gov/node/764 (accessed on 15 July 2014).
17. Kohane, I.S.; Altman, R.B. Health-information altruists—A potentially critical resource. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 2074–2077.
18. Oliver, J.M.; Slashinski, M.J.; Wang, T.; Kelly, P.A.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; McGuire, A.L. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: Genome research participants’ perspectives. Publ. Health Genet. 2012, 15, 106–114.
19. Williams, S.; Scott, J.; Murphy, J.; Kaufman, D.; Borchelt, R.; Hudson, K. The genetic town hall: Public opinion about research on genes, environment, and health. Available online: http://www.dnapolicy.org/pub.reports.php?action=detail&report_id=27 (accessed on 1 July 2014).
20. Kaufman, D.; Murphy, J.; Scott, J.; Hudson, K. Subjects matter: A survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study. Genet. Med. 2008, 10, 831–839.
21. McGuire, A.L.; Oliver, J.M.; Slashinski, M.J.; Graves, J.L.; Wang, T.; Kelly, P.A.; Fisher, W.; Lau, C.C.; Goss, J.; Okcu, M.; et al.To share or not to share: A randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research. Genet. Med. 2011, 13, 948–955.
22. Bergler, J.H.; Pennington, A.C.; Metcalfe, M.; Freis, E.D. Informed consent: How much does the patient understand? Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1980, 27, 435–440.
23. Joffe, S.; Cook, E.F.; Cleary, P.D.; Clark, J.W.; Weeks, J.C. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2001, 358, 1772–1777.
24. Robinson, J.O.; Slashinski, M.J.; Wang, T.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; McGuire, A.L. Participants’ recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing. J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics 2013, 8, 42–52.
25. Flory, J.; Emanuel, E. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. JAMA 2004, 292, 1593–1601.
26. Tamariz, L.; Palacio, A.; Robert, M.; Marcus, E.N. Improving the informed consent process for research subjects with low literacy: A systematic review. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2013, 28, 121–126.
27. Ball, M.P.; Bobe, J.R.; Chou, M.F.; Clegg, T.; Estep, P.W.; Lunshof, J.E.; Vandewege, W.; Zaranek, A.; Church, G.M. Harvard personal genome project: Lessons from participatory public research. Genome Med. 2014, 6, 10.
28. O’Connor, A.M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med. Decis. Mak. 1995, 15, 25–30.
29. Joffe, S.; Cook, E.F.; Cleary, P.D.; Clark, J.W.; Weeks, J.C. Quality of informed consent: A new measure of understanding among research subjects. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 139–147.
30. Beskow, L.M.; Friedman, J.Y.; Hardy, N.C.; Lin, L.; Weinfurt, K.P. Developing a simplified consent form for biobanking. PLoS One2010, 5, e13302.
31. Lemke, A.A.; Wolf, W.A.; Hebert-Beirne, J.; Smith, M.E. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Publ. Health Genet. 2010, 13, 368–377.
32. Trinidad, S.B.; Fullerton, S.M.; Bares, J.M.; Jarvik, G.P.; Larson, E.B.; Burke, W. Genomic research and wide data sharing: Views of prospective participants. Genet. Med. 2010, 12, 486–495.
33. Harding, A.; Harper, B.; Stone, D.; O’Neill, C.; Berger, P.; Harris, S.; Donatuto, J. Conducting research with tribal communities: Sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 6–10.
34. Hart, S.; Muenke, M. Genetics and genomic medicine around the world. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 2014, 2, 1–2.
35. Meyer, M.N. Regulating the production of knowledge: Research risk-benefit analysis and the heterogeneity problem. Adm. Law Rev. 2013, 65, 237–298.
36. Mnookin, S. One of a kind. Available online: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/07/21/one-of-a-kind-2 (accessed on 29 July 2014).
37. Nyholt, D.R.; Yu, C.E.; Visscher, P.M. On Jim Watson’s APOE status: Genetic information is hard to hide. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 17, 147–149.
38. Reg4ALLBeta. Learn more. Available online: https://www.reg4all.org/more.php (accessed on 29 July 2014).
39. Kaye, J.; Whitley, E.A.; Lund, D.; Morrison, M.; Teare, H.; Melham, K. Dynamic consent: A patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.71.
40. National conference of state legislatures. Genetics and health insurance state anti-discrimination laws. Available online: http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/genetic-nondiscrimination-in-health-insurance-laws.aspx (accessed on 15 July 2014).
41. Genetic information nondiscrimination act. Available online: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr493/text# (accessed on 15 July 2014).
42. Peikoff, K. Fearing punishment for bad genes. Available online: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/08/science/fearing-punishment-for-bad-genes.html?hp?smid=fbnytimes&WT.z_sma=SC_FPF_20140408&bicmp=AD&bicmlukp=WT.mc_id&bicmst=1388552400000&bicmet=1420088 400000&_r=4 (accessed on 8 July 2014).
43. Human Tissue Act 2004. Available online: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/contents (accessed on 15 July 2014).