Site-specific recombinatorics: In situ cellular barcoding with the Cre Lox system

BMC Systems Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Weber, Tom S ^a   Dukes, Mark ^b   Miles, Denise C ^c   Glaser, Stefan P ^c   Naik, Shalin H ^c   Duffy, Ken R ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cell fate tracking; Cellular barcoding; Combinatorial explosion; Cre lox system; DNA stochastic programme

Indexed keywords

CRE RECOMBINASE; INTEGRASE;

ANIMAL; CD8+ T LYMPHOCYTE; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; INVERTED REPEAT; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; CD8-POSITIVE T-LYMPHOCYTES; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC VARIATION; INTEGRASES; INVERTED REPEAT SEQUENCES; MICE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84976878537     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17520509     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12918-016-0290-3     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Buchholz VR, Flossdorf M, Hensel I, Kretschmer L, Weissbrich B, Gräf P, Verschoor A, Schiemann M, Höfer T, Busch DH. Disparate individual fates compose robust CD8+ T cell immunity. Science. 2013; 340(6132):630-5.
2. Gerlach C, van Heijst JWJ, Swart E, Sie D, Armstrong N, Kerkhoven RM, Zehn D, Bevan MJ, Schepers K, Schumacher TNM. One naive T cell, multiple fates in CD8+ T cell differentiation. J Exp Med. 2010; 207(6):1235-46. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091175.
3. Verovskaya E, Broekhuis MJ, Zwart E, Ritsema M, van Os R, de Haan G, Bystrykh LV. Heterogeneity of young and aged murine hematopoietic stem cells revealed by quantitative clonal analysis using cellular barcoding. Blood. 2013; 122(4):523-32.
4. Ema H, Morita Y, Suda T. Heterogeneity and hierarchy of hematopoietic stem cells. Exp Hematol. 2014; 42(2):74-82.
5. Johnson MB, Wang PP, Atabay KD, Murphy EA, Doan RN, Hecht JL, Walsh CA. Single-cell analysis reveals transcriptional heterogeneity of neural progenitors in human cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18(5):637-46. doi: 10.1038/nn.3980.
6. Yagi T. Genetic basis of neuronal individuality in the mammalian brain,. J Neurogenet. 2013; 27(3):97-105. doi: 10.3109/01677063.2013.801969.
7. Zeisel A, Muñoz-Manchado AB, Codeluppi S, Lönnerberg P, La Manno G, Juréus A, Marques S, Munguba H, He L, Betsholtz C, Rolny C, Castelo-Branco G, Hjerling-Leffler J, Linnarsson S. Cell types in the mouse cortex and hippocampus revealed by single-cell RNA-seq. Science. 2015; 347(6226):1138-42.
8. Nolan-Stevaux O, Tedesco D, Ragan S, Makhanov M, Chenchik A, Ruefli-Brasse A, Quon K, Kassner PD. Measurement of cancer cell growth heterogeneity through lentiviral barcoding identifies clonal dominance as a characteristic of in vivo ttmor engraftment. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(6):67316.
9. Bhang H-EC, Ruddy DA, Krishnamurthy Radhakrishna V, Caushi JX, Zhao R, Hims MM, Singh AP, Kao I, Rakiec D, Shaw P, Balak M, Raza A, Ackley E, Keen N, Schlabach MR, Palmer M, Leary RJ, Chiang DY, Sellers WR, Michor F, Cooke VG, Korn JM, Stegmeier F. Studying clonal dynamics in response to cancer therapy using high-complexity barcoding. Nat Med. 2015; 21(5):440-8. doi: 10.1038/nm.3841.
10. Klauke K, Broekhuis MJC, Weersing E, Dethmers-Ausema A, Ritsema M, González MV, Zwart E, Bystrykh LV, de Haan G. Tracing dynamics and clonal heterogeneity of cbx7-induced leukemic stem cells by cellular barcoding. Stem Cell Rep. 2015; 4(1):74-89. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.10.012.
11. Rohr JC, Gerlach C, Kok L, Schumacher TN. Single cell behavior in t cell differentiation. Trends Immunol. 2014; 35(4):170-7.
12. Reiner SL, Adams WC. Lymphocyte fate specification as a deterministic but highly plastic process. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014; 14(10):699-704.
13. Duffy KR, Hodgkin PD. Intracellular competition for fates in the immune system. Trends Cell Biol. 2012; 22(9):457-64. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.05.004.
14. Smith JA, Martin L. Do cells cycle? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973; 70(4):1263-7.
15. Hawkins ED, Markham JF, McGuinness LP, Hodgkin PD. A single-cell pedigree analysis of alternative stochastic lymphocyte fates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(32):13457-62.
16. Markham JF, Wellard CJ, Hawkins ED, Duffy KR, Hodgkin PD. A minimum of two distinct heritable factors are required to explain correlation structures in proliferating lymphocytes. J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7(48):1049-59.
17. Rieger MA, Hoppe PS, Smejkal BM, Eitelhuber AC, Schroeder T. Hematopoietic cytokines can instruct lineage choice. Science. 2009; 325(5937):217-8.
18. Gomes FL, Zhang G, Carbonell F, Correa JA, Harris WA, Simons BD, Cayouette M. Reconstruction of rat retinal progenitor cell lineages in vitro reveals a surprising degree of stochasticity in cell fate decisions. Development. 2011; 138(2):227-35.
19. Giurumescu CA, Kang S, Planchon TA, Betzig E, Bloomekatz J, Yelon D, Cosman P, Chisholm AD. Quantitative semi-automated analysis of morphogenesis with single-cell resolution in complex embryos. Development. 2012; 139(22):4271-9.
20. Richards JL, Zacharias AL, Walton T, Burdick JT, Murray JI. A quantitative model of normal caenorhabditis elegans embryogenesis and its disruption after stress. Dev Biol. 2013; 374(1):12-23.
21. Duffy KR, Wellard CJ, Markham JF, Zhou JHS, Holmberg R, Hawkins ED, Hasbold J, Dowling MR, Hodgkin PD. Activation-induced B cell fates are selected by intracellular stochastic competition. Science. 2012; 335(6066):338-41.
22. Etzrodt M, Endele M, Schroeder T. Quantitative single-cell approaches to stem cell research. Cell Stem Cell. 2014; 15(5):546-58.
23. Cohen AR. Extracting meaning from biological imaging data. Mol Biol Cell. 2014; 25(22):3470-3.
24. Gerrits A, Dykstra B, Kalmykowa OJ, Klauke K, Verovskaya E, Broekhuis MJC, de Haan G, Bystrykh LV. Cellular barcoding tool for clonal analysis in the hematopoietic system. Blood. 2010; 115(13):2610-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-229757.
25. Lu R, Neff NF, Quake SR, Weissman IL. Tracking single hematopoietic stem cells in vivo using high-throughput sequencing in conjunction with viral genetic barcoding. Nat Biotech. 2011; 29(10):928-33. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1977.
26. Naik SH, Schumacher TN, Perié L. Cellular barcoding: a technical appraisal. Exp Hematol. 2014; 42(8):598-608. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2014.05.003.
27. Schepers K, Swart E, van Heijst JW, Gerlach C, Castrucci M, Sie D, Heimerikx M, Velds A, Kerkhoven RM, Arens R, Schumacher TN. Dissecting T cell lineage relationships by cellular barcoding. J Exp Med. 2008; 205(10):2309-18. doi: 10.1084/jem.20072462.
28. Capel B, Hawley R, Covarrubias L, Hawley T, Mintz B. Clonal contributions of small numbers of retrovirally marked hematopoietic stem cells engrafted in unirradiated neonatal W/Wv mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989; 86(12):4564-8.
29. Naik SH, Perié L, Swart E, Gerlach C, van Rooij N, de Boer RJ, Schumacher TN. Diverse and heritable lineage imprinting of early haematopoietic progenitors. Nature. 2013; 496(7444):229-32. doi: 10.1038/nature12013.
30. Perié L, Hodgkin PD, Naik SH, Schumacher TN, de Boer RJ, Duffy KR. Determining lineage pathways from cellular barcoding experiments. Cell Rep. 2014; 6(4):617-24.
31. Perié L, Duffy KR, Kok L, de Boer RJ, Schmacher TN. The branching point in erythro-myeloid differentiation. Cell. 2015; 163(7):1655-62.
32. Sun J, Ramos A, Chapman B, Johnnidis JB, Le L, Ho YJ, Klein A, Hofmann O, Camargo FD. Clonal dynamics of native haematopoiesis. Nature. 2014; 514(7522):322-7. doi: 10.1038/nature13824.
33. Zador AM, Dubnau J, Oyibo HK, Zhan H, Cao G, Peikon ID. Sequencing the Connectome. PLoS Biol. 2012; 10(10):1001411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001411.
34. Wei Y, Koulakov AA. An exactly solvable model of random site-specific recombinations. Bull Math Biol. 2012; 74(12):2897-916.
35. Peikon ID, Gizatullina DI, Zador AM. In vivo generation of DNA sequence diversity for cellular barcoding. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(16):127. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku604.
36. Livet J, Weissman TA, Kang H, Draft RW, Lu J, Bennis RA, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW. Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system. Nature. 2007; 450(7166):56-62.
37. Cai D, Cohen KB, Luo T, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Improved tools for the Brainbow toolbox. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(6):540-7. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2450.
38. Hoess R, Wierzbicki A, Abremski K. Formation of small circular DNA molecules via an in vitro site-specific recombination system. Gene. 1985; 40(2-3):325-9.
39. Ringrose L, Chabanis S, Angrand PO, Woodroofe C, Stewart AF. Quantitative comparison of DNA looping in vitro and in vivo: chromatin increases effective DNA flexibility at short distances. EMBO J. 1999; 18(23):6630-41.
40. Pinkney JN, Zawadzki P, Mazuryk J, Arciszewska LK, Sherratt DJ, Kapanidis AN. Capturing reaction paths and intermediates in Cre-loxP recombination using single-molecule fluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(51):20871-6.
41. Parrish M, Unruh J, Krumlauf R. BAC modification through serial or simultaneous use of CRE/Lox technology. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011; 2011:1-12. doi: 10.1155/2011/924068.
42. Nagy A. Cre recombinase: the universal reagent for genome tailoring. Genesis. 2000; 26:99-109.
43. Blattman JN, Antia R, Sourdive DJD, Wang X, Kaech SM, Murali-Krishna K, Altman JD, Ahmed R. Estimating the precursor frequency of naive antigen-specific CD8 T cells. J Exp Med. 2002; 195(5):657-64.
44. Sternberg N, Hamilton D, Hoess R. Bacteriophage P1 site-specific recombination. II. Recombination between loxP and the bacterial chromosome. J Mol Biol. 1981; 150(4):487-507.
45. Hamilton DL, Abremski K. Site-specific recombination by the bacteriophage P1 lox-Cre system. Cre-mediated synapsis of two lox sites. J Mol Biol. 1984; 178(2):481-6.
46. Guo F, Gopaul DN, Van Duyne GD. Structure of Cre recombinase complexed with DNA in a site-specific recombination synapse. Nature. 1997; 389(6646):40-6. doi: 10.1038/37925.
47. Oberdoerffer P, Otipoby KL, Maruyama M, Rajewsky K. Unidirectional Cre-mediated genetic inversion in mice using the mutant loxP pair lox66/lox71. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003; 31(22):e140.
48. Colvin GA, Lambert JF, Abedi M, Hsieh CC, Carlson JE, Stewart FM, Quesenberry PJ. Murine marrow cellularity and the concept of stem cell competition: geographic and quantitative determinants in stem cell biology. Leukemia. 2004; 18(3):575-83. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403268.
49. Bystrykh LV, Verovskaya E, Zwart E, Broekhuis M, de Haan G. Counting stem cells: methodological constraints. Nat Meth. 2012; 9(6):567-74. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2043.
50. Cover TM, Thomas JA. Elements of information theory. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1991.
51. Li H, Ruan J, Durbin R. Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores. Genome Res. 2008; 18(11):1851-8. doi: 10.1101/gr.078212.108.
52. Ross MG, Russ C, Costello M, Hollinger A, Lennon NJ, Hegarty R, Nusbaum C, Jaffe DB. Characterizing and measuring bias in sequence data. Genome Biol. 2013; 14(5):51. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r51.
53. Grosselin J, Sii-Felice K, Payen E, Chretien S, Roux DT, Leboulch P. Arrayed lentiviral barcoding for quantification analysis of hematopoietic dynamics. Stem Cells. 2013; 31(10):2162-71. doi: 10.1002/stem.1383.
54. Koot MR, Mandjes M. The analysis of singletons in generalized birthday problems. Probab Eng Inform Sc. 2012; 26(2):245-62. doi: 10.1017/s0269964811000350.
55. Grinstead CM, Snell JL. Introduction to Probability, 2 revised edn. Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A: American Mathematical Society; 1997.
56. Kretzschmar K, Watt FM. Lineage Tracing. Cell. 2012; 148(1-2):33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.002.
57. Reinert RB, Kantz J, Misfeldt AA, Poffenberger G, Gannon M, Brissova M, Powers AC. Tamoxifen-induced Cre-loxP recombination is prolonged in pancreatic islets of adult mice. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(3):33529.
58. Inferring the in vivo looping properties of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(49):17642-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505693102.