Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Cigarette Design Feature Influence on ISO TNCO Yields

Chemical Research in Toxicology

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1051-1063

  Agnew Heard, Kimberly A ^a   Lancaster, Vicki A ^a   Bravo, Roberto ^b   Watson, Clifford ^b   Walters, Matthew J ^a   Holman, Matthew R ^a  

^a CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON MONOXIDE; NICOTINE; TAR; SMOKE; TOBACCO TAR;

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FILTER; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PAPER; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; POROSITY; PRESSURE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SMOKING; STANDARDIZATION; TOBACCO; UNITED STATES; WEIGHT; ANALYSIS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; SMOKE; STANDARD; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CARBON MONOXIDE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NICOTINE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; SMOKE; TARS; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 84975466941     PISSN: 0893228X     EISSN: 15205010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00096     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Federal Trade Commission (1967) Cigarettes: Testing for Tar and Nicotine Content, Federal Register, Vol. 32, No. 147, p 11178, Office of the Federal Register of the National Archives and Records Administration and the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
2. Federal Trade Commission (1980) Cigaretttes and Related Matters: Carbon Monoxide, Tar and Nicotine Content of Cigarettte Smoke; Description of New Machine and Methods to be Used in Testing, Federal Register, Vol. 45, No. 134, pp 46483-46487, Office of the Federal Register of the National Archives and Records Administration and the U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
3. Commonwealth of Massachusetts (1997) 105 CMR 660.000: Cigarette and Smokeless Tobacco Products: Reports of Added Constituents and Nicotine Ratings. http://www.mass.gov/eohhs/docs/dph/regs/105cmr660.pdf (accessed May 2016).
4. Commission of the European Communities (2007) Cigarette Yield Measurement and Some Basic Steps for Laboratory Approval-Practical Guide Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph-determinants/life-style/Tobacco/Documents/best-practices-en.pdf (accessed May 2016).
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2010) How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General, pp 13-22, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health (US), Washington, D.C.. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53013/ (accessed May 2016).
6. Hoffmann, D. and Hoffmann, I. (2001) The Changing Cigarette: Chemical Studies and Bioassays, in Tobacco Monograph 13: Risks Associated with Smoking Cigarettes with Low Machine-Measured Yield of Tar and Nicotine, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Bethesda, MD. http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/tcrb/monographs/13/m13-5.pdf (accessed May 2016).
7. Kozlowski, L. T. and O'Connor, R. J. (2002) Cigarette Filter Ventilation is a Defective Design because of Misleading Taste, Bigger Puffs, and Blocked Vents Tob. Control 11 (Suppl 1) I40-I50 10.1136/tc.11.suppl-1.i40
8. Food and Drug Administration (2009) Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, In Public Law 111-31, Rockville, MD. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ31/pdf/PLAW-111publ31.pdf (accessed May 2016).
9. Food and Drug Administration (2012) Reporting Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in Tobacco Products and Tobacco Smoke under Section 904(a)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, Rockville, MD. http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ucm297752.htm (accessed May 2016).
10. Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA) (2007) Resolution-RDC No. 90, Brasilia, Brasil. http://www.tobaccocontrollaws.org/files/live/Brazil/Brazil%20-%20RDC%20No.%2090.pdf (accessed May 2016).
11. Australian Government Department of Health (2001) Cigarette Emissions Data, Emissions Data for Selected Australian Cigarette Brand Variants, Canberra, Australia. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/tobacco-emis (accessed May 2016).
12. Taiwan Department of Health (2015) Regulations Governing Reporting of Tobacco Product Information under the Tobacco Hazards Prevention & Control Act (THPCA), Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei City, Taiwan. http://www.hpa.gov.tw/English/ClassShow.aspx?No=200907130001 (accessed May 2016).
13. Health Canada (2005) Tobacco Reporting Regulations (TTR) (2000) and Its Amendments (2005), Health Canada. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hc-ps/tobac-tabac/legislation/reg/indust/index-eng.php (accessed May 2016).
14. Scherer, G. (1999) Smoking Behaviour and Compensation: a Review of the Literature Psychopharmacology (Heidelberg, Ger.) 145, 1-20 10.1007/s002130051027
15. Counts, M. E., Hsu, F. S., Laffoon, S. W., Dwyer, R. W., and Cox, R. H. (2004) Mainstream Smoke Constituent Yields and Predicting Relationships from a Worldwide Market Sample of Cigarette Brands: ISO Smoking Conditions Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 39, 111-134 10.1016/j.yrtph.2003.12.005
16. Calafat, A. M., Polzin, G. M., Saylor, J., Richter, P., Ashley, D. L., and Watson, C. H. (2004) Determination of Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide Yields in the Mainstream Smoke of Selected International Cigarettes Tob. Control 13, 45-51 10.1136/tc.2003.003673
17. Borgerding, M. F., Bodnar, J. A., and Wingate, D. E. (2000) The 1999 Massachusetts Benchmark Study-Final Report: Presented to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/yek21c00 (accessed May 2016).
18. Chepiga, T. A., Morton, M. J., Murphy, P. A., Avalos, J. T., Bombick, B. R., Doolittle, D. J., Borgerding, M. F., and Swauger, J. E. (2000) A Comparison of the Mainstream Smoke Chemistry and Mutagenicity of a Representative Sample of the US Cigarette Market with Two Kentucky Reference Cigarettes (K1R4F and K1R5F) Food Chem. Toxicol. 38, 949-962 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00086-7
19. Swauger, J. E., Steichen, T. J., Murphy, P. A., and Kinsler, S. (2002) An Analysis of the Mainstream Smoke Chemistry of Samples of the U.S. Cigarette Market Acquired between 1995 and 2000 Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 35, 142-156 10.1006/rtph.2001.1521
20. Bodnar, J. A., Morgan, W. T., Murphy, P. A., and Ogden, M. W. (2012) Mainstream Smoke Chemistry Analysis of Samples from the 2009 US Cigarette Market Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64, 35-42 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.05.011
21. Adam, T., McAughey, J., Mocker, C., McGrath, C., and Zimmermann, R. (2010) Influence of Filter Ventilation on the Chemical Composition of Cigarette Mainstream Smoke Anal. Chim. Acta 657, 36-44 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.015
22. O'Connor, R. J., Hammond, D., McNeill, A., King, B., Kozlowski, L. T., Giovino, G. A., and Cummings, K. M. (2008) How do Different Cigarette Design Features Influence the Standard Tar Yields of Popular Cigarette Brands Sold in Different Countries? Tob. Control 17 (Suppl 1) i1-i5 10.1136/tc.2006.019166
23. Connolly, G. N., Alpert, H. R., Wayne, G. F., and Koh, H. (2007) Trends in Nicotine Yield in Smoke and Its Relationship with Design Characteristics among Popular US Cigarette Brands, 1997-2005 Tob. Control 16, e5 10.1136/tc.2006.019695
24. Maxwell, J. C. (2008) The Maxwell Report: Year End & Fourth Quarter 2007 Sales Estimates for the Cigarette Industry, John C. Maxwell, Jr., Richmond, VA.
25. International Organization for Standardization (1999) ISO 3402:1999 Tobacco and Tobacco Products-Atmosphere for Conditioning and Testing, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
26. International Organization for Standardization (2000) ISO 3308:2000 Routine Analytical Cigarette-Smoking Machine-Definitions and Standard Conditions, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
27. International Organization for Standardization (2009) ISO 8454:2009 Cigarettes-Determination of Carbon Monoxide in the Vapour Phase of Cigarette Smoke-NDIR Method, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
28. International Organization for Standardization (2000) ISO 10315:2000 Cigarettes-Determination of Nicotine in Smoke Condensates-Gas Chomatographic Method, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
29. International Organization for Standardization (1999) ISO 10362-1:1999 Cigarettes-Determination of Water in Smoke Condensates-Part 1: Gas Chomatographic Method, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
30. International Organization for Standardization (2008) I SO 4387:2008 Cigarettes-Determination of Total and Nicotine-Free Dry Particulate Matter Using a Routine Analytical Smoking Machine, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
31. International Organization for Standardization (2013) ISO 6565:2011 Tobacco and Tobacco Products: Draw Resistance of Cigarettes and Pressure Drop of Filter Rods: Standard Conditions and Measurement, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
32. International Organization for Standardization (2013) ISO 2971:2013 Cigarettes and Filter Rods: Determination of Nominal Diameter: Method Using a Non-Contact Optical Measuring Apparatus, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
33. CORESTA. ((1994) CORESTA Recommended Method No 40: Determination of Air Permeability of Materials Used as Cigarette Papers, Filter Plug Wrap and Filter Joining Paper Including Materials Having an Oriented Permeability Zone, Paris, France. https://www.coresta.org/determination-air-permeability-materials-used-cigarette-papers-filter-plug-wrap-and-filter-joining (accessed May 2016).
34. International Organization for Standardization (2009) I SO 2965:2009 Materials Used as Cigarette Papers, Filter Plug Wrap and Filter Joining Paper, Including Materials Having a Discrete or Oriented Permeable Zone and Materials with Bands of Differing Permeability: Determination of Air Permeability, International Organization for Standardization, London, U.K.
35. Purkis, S. W., Meger, M., and Wuttke, R. (2012) A Review of Current Smoke Constituent Measurement Activities and Aspects of Yield Variability Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 62, 202-213 10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.10.006
36. King, B., Borland, R., Abdul-Salaam, S., Polzin, G., Ashley, D., Watson, C., and O'Connor, R. J. (2010) Divergence between Strength Indicators in Packaging and Cigarette Engineering: a Case Study of Marlboro Varieties in Australia and the USA Tob. Control 19, 398-402 10.1136/tc.2009.033217
37. Stephens, W. E. (2007) Dependence of Tar, Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide Yields on Physical Parameters: Implications for Exposure, Emissions Control and Monitoring Tob. Control 16, 170-176 10.1136/tc.2006.017491
38. Perez-Bernal, J. L., Amigo, J. M., Fernandez-Torres, R., Bello, M. A., and Callejon-Mochon, M. (2011) Trace-Metal Distribution of Cigarette Ashes as Marker of Tobacco Brands Forensic Sci. Int. 204, 119-125 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.05.014
39. Marcilla, A., Martinez, I., Berenguer, D., Gomez-Siurana, A., and Beltran, M. I. (2012) Comparative Study of the Main Characteristics and Composition of the Mainstream Smoke of Ten Cgarette Brands Sold in Spain Food Chem. Toxicol. 50, 1317-1333 10.1016/j.fct.2012.01.046
40. Piadé, J.-J., Wajrock, S., Jaccard, G., and Janeke, G. (2013) Formation of Mainstream Cigarette Smoke Constituents Prioritized by the World Health Organization - Yield Patterns Observed in Market Surveys, Clustering and Inverse Correlations Food Chem. Toxicol. 55, 329-347 10.1016/j.fct.2013.01.016
41. Wold, S., Sjöström, M., and Eriksson, L. (2001) PLS-Regression: a Basic Tool of Chemometrics Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 58, 109-130 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155-1
42. Baker, R. R. (2006) Smoke Generation Inside a Burning Cigarette: Modifying Combustion to Develop Cigarettes that May Be Less Hazardous to Health Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 32, 373-385 10.1016/j.pecs.2006.01.001
43. Sweeney, C. T., Kozlowski, L. T., and Parsa, P. (1999) Effect of Filter Vent Blocking on Carbon Monoxide Exposure from Selected Lower Tar Cigarette Brands Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav. 63, 167-173 10.1016/S0091-3057(98)00250-0
44. Sweeney, C. T. and Kozlowski, L. T. (1998) Blocking Filter Vents Increases Carbon Monoxide Levels from Ultralight, but not Light Cigarettes Pharmacol., Biochem. Behav. 59, 767-773 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00567-4
45. Ding, Y. S., Zhang, L., Jain, R. B., Wang, R. Y., Ashley, D. L., and Watson, C. H. (2008) Levels of Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Mainstream Smoke from Different Tobacco Varieties Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev. 17, 3366-3371 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0320
46. Pappas, R. S., Fresquez, M. R., Martone, N., and Watson, C. H. (2014) Toxic Metal Concentrations in Mainstream Smoke from Cigarettes Available in the USA J. Anal. Toxicol. 38, 204-211 10.1093/jat/bku013
47. Pazo, D. Y., Moliere, F., Sampson, M. M., Reese, C. M., Agnew-Heard, K. A., Walters, M. J., Holman, M. R., Blount, B. C., Watson, C., and Chambers, D. M. (2016) Mainstream Smoke Levels of Volatile Organic Compounds in 50 US Domestic Cigarette Brands Smoked with the ISO and Canadian Intense Protocols Nicotine Tob. Res. 10.1093/ntr/ntw118