|
Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 949-962
|
A comparison of the mainstream smoke chemistry and mutagenicity of a representative sample of the US cigarette market with two Kentucky reference cigarettes (K1R4F and K1R5F)
a a a a a a a a |
Author keywords
Cigarette smoke; Cigarette smoke condensate; Cigarette smoke condensate mutagenicity; Kentucky reference cigarettes; Mainstream smoke chemistry
|
Indexed keywords
ACETALDEHYDE;
ACETONE;
ACROLEIN;
AMMONIA;
BENZO[A]PYRENE;
CARBON MONOXIDE;
CATECHOL;
CIGARETTE SMOKE;
FORMALDEHYDE;
HYDROGEN CYANIDE;
HYDROQUINONE;
META CRESOL;
NICOTINE;
NITROGEN OXIDE;
PARA CRESOL;
PHENOL;
TAR;
AMES TEST;
ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DATA ANALYSIS;
MARKETING;
MUTAGENICITY;
QUANTITATIVE ASSAY;
SAMPLE;
UNITED STATES;
ANIMALS;
MUTAGENICITY TESTS;
MUTAGENS;
PLANTS, TOXIC;
RATS;
REFERENCE STANDARDS;
SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM;
SMOKE;
TARS;
TOBACCO;
NICOTIANA TABACUM;
SALMONELLA;
|
EID: 0034433874
PISSN: 02786915
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00086-7 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (129)
|
References (28)
|