Students' experiences with an automated essay scorer

Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-44

  Scharber, Cassandra ^a   Dexter, Sara ^b   Riedel, Eric ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^c WALDEN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51549107542     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15402525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3), 271-311.
2. Black, P., & William, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
3. Black, P. Sc William, D. (1998b, October). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
4. Burstein, J. (2003). The e-rater scoring engine: Automated essay scoring with natural language processing. In M. D. Shermis & J. Burstein (Eds.), Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective (chap. 7) (pp. 113-121). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
5. th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
7. Dexter, S. (2002). ETIPS-Educational technology integration and implementation principles. In P. Rodgers (Ed.), Designing Instruction for Technology-Enhanced Learning (pp. 56-70). New York: Idea Group Publishing.
8. Dikli, S. (2006). An overview of automated scoring of essays. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 5(1). Retrieved August 18, 2006 from http://www.jtla.org.
9. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
10. Grimes, D. & Warschauer, M. (2006). Automated essay scoring in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
11. Marzano, R.J. & Pickering, D.J. (1997). Dimensions of learning: Teacher's manual. Colarado: McREL.
12. Page, E.B. (1966). The imminence of grading essays by computer. Phi Delta Kappan, 48, 238-243.
13. Page, E.B. (1994). Computer grading of student prose, using modern concepts and software. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 127-142.
14. Page, E.B., & Peterson, N.S. (1995). The computer moves into essay grading: Updating the ancient test. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 561-565.
15. Peat, M. & Franklin, S. (2002). Supporting student learning: The use of computer-based formative assessment modules. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 515-523.
16. Pelligrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
17. Riedel, E., Dexter, S., Scharber, C., & Doering, A. (2006). Experimental evidence on the effectiveness of automated essay scoring in teacher education cases. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 35(3), 267-287.
18. Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
19. Scharber, C., Dexter, S., & Riedel, E. (2005, April). Formative feedback via an automated essay scorer: Its impact on learners. Paper session for the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
20. Shermis, M.D., & Burnstein, J.C. (2002). Automated essay scoring, a cross-disciplinary perspective. New-Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Valenti, S., Nedri, F., & Cucchiarelli, A. (2003). An overview of current research on automated essay grading. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 319-330.
22. Warschauer, M., & Ware, P. (2006). Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research 10(2), 1-24.