Project Essay Grade: PEG

Automated Essay Scoring: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 39-50

  Page, Ellis Batten ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142547009     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410606860-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Ajay, H.B., Tillett, P., and Page, E.B (1973). Analysis of essays by computer (AEC-II). Final Report to the National Center for Educational Research and Development Washington, DC: Office of Education, Bureau of Research.
2. Applebee, A.N., Langer, J.A., Jenkins, L.B., Mullis, I.V.S., Foertsch, M.A (1990) Learning to write in our nation’s schools: Instruction and achievement in 1988 at grades 4, 8, and 12 (Rpt No 19-W-02), Washington, DC: National Assessment of Educational Progress.
3. Johnson, E., and Zwick, R. (1990) Focusing the new design: The NAEP technical report (Research Report 19-TR-20). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4. Lauer, J., and Asher, J.W. (1988) Composition research: Empirical design. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Page, E.B. (1966a). The imminence of grading essays by computer. Phi Delta Kappan, 48, 238-243.
6. Page, E.B. (1966b). Grading essays by computer Progress Report Invitational Conference on Testing Problems (pp. 86-100). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
7. Page, E.B. (1994). Computer grading of student prose, using modem concepts and software, Journal of Experimental Education, 62(2), 127-142.
8. Page, E.B., Fisher, G. A, and Fisher, M.A. (1968). Project essay grade: A FORTRAN program for statistical analysis of prose. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 21, 139.
9. Page, E.B., and Paulus, D.H. (1968). The analysis of essays by computer. Final Report to the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Washington, DC: Office of Education, Bureau of Research.
10. Page, E.B., and Petersen, N.S (1995) The Computer moves into essay grading: Updating the ancient test. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(6), 561-566.
11. Page, E.B., Poggio, J.P., and Keith, T.Z. (1997) Computer analysis of student essays: Finding trait differences in the student profile. Symposium given at American Educational Research Association meetings, Chicago.
12. Shermis, M.D., Rasmussen, J.L., Rajecki, D.W., Olsen, J., and Marsiglio, C. (2001). All prompts are created equal, but some prompts are more equal than other prompts. Journal of Applied Measurement, 2(2), 154-170.
13. Truman, D.L (1994). “Teacher’s Helper” and the high school classroom: Some promising early results. Symposium conducted at the annual meetings of the South Atlantic Modern Language Association, Baltimore.
14. Truman, D.L. (1995) “Teacher’s Helper”: Applying Project Essay Grade in English classes. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
15. Truman, D.L. (1996, April). Tracking progress in Student Writing: Repeated PEG Measures? Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the National Council of Measurement in Education. New York, N.Y.
16. Truman, D.L. (1997, March). How classroom teachers may track student progress in writing. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
17. Truman, D.L. (1998, April). Tracking student progress in essay writing. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego.
18. Wical, K., and Mugele, R (1993, January). Power Edit analysis of prose: How the system is designed and works Paper presented at the annual meetings of NCARE, Greensboro, NC.