Tool condition monitoring and remaining useful life prognostic based on awireless sensor in dry milling operations

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2016, Pages

  Zhang, Cunji ^a,b   Yao, Xifan ^a   Zhang, Jianming ^a   Jin, Hong ^c  

^a SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Guangxi Research Institute of Electric Power   (China)

^c SOUTH CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Neuro fuzzy network (NFN); Remaining useful life (RUL); Tool condition monitoring (TCM); Wavelet analysis; Wavelet packet transform (WPT); Wireless sensor

Indexed keywords

BACKPROPAGATION; CUTTING TOOLS; FUZZY INFERENCE; FUZZY LOGIC; FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS; MILLING (MACHINING); RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS; SIGNAL DENOISING; VIBRATION ANALYSIS; WAVELET ANALYSIS; WEAR OF MATERIALS; WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

NEURO-FUZZY NETWORK; REMAINING USEFUL LIVES; TOOL CONDITION MONITORING; WAVELET PACKET TRANSFORM (WPT); WIRELESS SENSOR;

CONDITION MONITORING;

EID: 84971635842     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s16060795     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Rehorn, A.G.; Jiang, J.; Orban, P.E. State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: A review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2005, 26, 693–710.
2. Zhu, K.; San Wong, Y.; Hong, G.S. Wavelet analysis of sensor signals for tool condition monitoring: A review and some new results. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2009, 49, 537–553.
3. Kurada, S.; Bradley, C. A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring. Comput. Ind. 1997, 34, 55–72.
4. Cho, S.; Binsaeid, S.; Asfour, S. Design of multisensor fusion-based tool condition monitoring system in end milling. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 46, 681–694.
5. Siddhpura, A.; Paurobally, R. A review of flank wear prediction methods for tool condition monitoring in a turning process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 65, 371–393.
6. Wu, Y.; Du, R. Feature extraction and assessment using wavelet packets for monitoring of machining processes. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 1996, 10, 29–53.
7. Lei, Y.; Zuo, M.J.; He, Z.; Zi, Y. A multidimensional hybrid intelligent method for gear fault diagnosis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37, 1419–1430.
8. Zhu, K.; Hong, G.S.; Wong, Y.S.; Wang, W. Cutting force denoising in micro-milling tool condition monitoring. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2008, 46, 4391–4408.
9. Wang, G.; Yang, Y.; Guo, Z. Hybrid learning based gaussian artmap network for tool condition monitoring using selected force harmonic features. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2013, 203, 394–404.
10. Saglam, H.; Unuvar, A. Tool condition monitoring in milling based on cutting forces by a neural network. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2003, 41, 1519–1532.
11. Bhattacharyya, P.; Sengupta, D.; Mukhopadhyay, S. Cutting force-based real-time estimation of tool wear in face milling using a combination of signal processing techniques. Mech. Syst. Signal Proc. 2007, 21, 2665–2683.
12. Jemielniak, K. Laboratory versus industrial cutting force sensor in tool condition monitoring. J. Manuf. Sci. Prod. 2000, 3, 41–47.
13. Choudhury, S.K.; Rath, S. In-process tool wear estimation in milling using cutting force model. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2000, 99, 113–119.
14. Gao, D.; Liao, Z.; Lv, Z.; Lu, Y. Multi-scale statistical signal processing of cutting force in cutting tool condition monitoring. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 80, 1843–1853.
15. Freyer, B.H.; Heyns, P.S.; Theron, N.J. Comparing orthogonal force and unidirectional strain component processing for tool condition monitoring. J. Intell. Manuf. 2014, 25, 473–487.
16. Kaya, B.; Oysu, C.; Ertunc, H.M. Force-torque based on-line tool wear estimation system for CNC milling of inconel 718 using neural networks. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2011, 42, 76–84.
17. Garshelis, I.J.; Kari, R.J.; Tollens, S.P.L.; Cuseo, J.M. Monitoring cutting tool operation and condition with a magnetoelastic rate of change of torque sensor. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 07E908.
18. Teti, R.; Jemielniak, K.; O’Donnell, G.; Dornfeld, D. Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2010, 59, 717–739.
19. Yen, G.G.; Lin, K.C. Wavelet packet feature extraction for vibration monitoring. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2000, 47, 650–667.
20. Patra, K.; Pal, S.K.; Bhattacharyya, K. Fuzzy Radial Basis Function (FRBF) network based tool condition monitoring system using vibration signals. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2010, 14, 280–300.
21. Yesilyurt, I.; Ozturk, H. Tool condition monitoring in milling using vibration analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 1013–1028.
22. Xu, C.; Liu, Z.; Luo, W. A frequency band energy analysis of vibration signals for tool condition monitoring. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Zhangjiajie, China, 11–12 April 2009.
23. Wang, G.F.; Yang, Y.W.; Zhang, Y.C.; Xie, Q.L. Vibration sensor based tool condition monitoring using v support vector machine and locality preserving projection. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2014, 209, 24–32.
24. Rao, K.V.; Murthy, B.S.N.; Rao, N.M. Cutting tool condition monitoring by analyzing surface roughness, work piece vibration and volume of metal removed for AISI 1040 steel in boring. Measurement 2013, 46, 4075–4084.
25. Zhang, J.Z.; Chen, J.C. Tool condition monitoring in an end-milling operation based on the vibration signal collected through a microcontroller-based data acquisition system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2008, 39, 118–128.
26. Sun, J.; Hong, G.S.; Rahman, M.; Wong, Y.S. Identification of feature set for effective tool condition monitoring by acoustic emission sensing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2004, 42, 901–918.
27. Ren, Q.; Balazinski, M.; Baron, L.; Jemielniak, K.; Botez, R.; Achiche, S. Type-2 fuzzy tool condition monitoring system based on acoustic emission in micromilling. Inf. Sci. 2014, 255, 121–134.
28. Chen, X.; Li, B. Acoustic emission method for tool condition monitoring based on wavelet analysis. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2007, 33, 968–976.
29. Tansel, I.; Trujillo, M.; Nedbouyan, A.; Velez, C.; Bao, W.Y.; Arkan, T.T.; Tansel, B. Micro-end-milling-III. Wear estimation and tool breakage detection using acoustic emission signals. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 1998, 38, 1449–1466.
30. Prakash, M.; Kanthababu, M. In-process tool condition monitoring using acoustic emission sensor in microendmilling. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2013, 17, 209–227.
31. Pai, S.; Nagabhushana, T.N.; Rao, R.B.K.N. Tool condition monitoring using acoustic emission, surface roughness and growing cell structures neural network. Mach. Sci. Technol. 2012, 16, 653–676.
32. Jemielniak, K.; Urbánski, T.; Kossakowska, J.; Bombiński, S. Tool condition monitoring based on numerous signal features. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2012, 59, 73–81.
33. Bhattacharyya, P.; Sengupta, D.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Chattopadhyay, A.B. On-line tool condition monitoring in face milling using current and power signals. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2008, 46, 1187–1201.
34. Kuo, H.-Y.; Meyer, K.; Lindle, R.; Ni, J. Estimation of milling tool temperature considering coolant and wear. J. Manuf. Sci. 2012, 134, 1–8.
35. Li, X.L.; Li, H.X.; Guan, X.P.; Du, R. Fuzzy estimation of feed-cutting force from current measurement—A case study on intelligent tool wear condition monitoring. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. C Appl. Rev. 2004, 34, 506–512.
36. Martins, C.H.; Aguiar, P.R.; Frech, A.; Bianchi, E.C. Tool condition monitoring of single-point dresser using acoustic emission and neural networks models. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2014, 63, 667–679.
37. Bhattacharyya, P.; Sengupta, D. Estimation of tool wear based on adaptive sensor fusion of force and power in face milling. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2009, 47, 817–833.
38. Huang, P.; Li, J.; Sun, J.; Ge, M. Milling force vibration analysis in high-speed-milling titanium alloy using variable pitch angle mill. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2012, 58, 153–160.
39. Dimla, D.E.; Lister, P.M. On-line metal cutting tool condition monitoring. I: Force and vibration analyses. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2000, 40, 739–768.
40. Jemielniak, K.; Kossakowska, J.; Urbanski, T. Application of wavelet transform of acoustic emission and cutting force signals for tool condition monitoring in rough turning of Inconel 625. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. B J. Eng. Manuf. 2011, 225, 123–129.
41. Akyildiz, I.F.; Su, W.; Sankarasubramaniam, Y.; Cayirci, E. Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. 2002, 38, 393–422.
42. Low, K.S.; Win, W.N.N.; Er, M.J. Wireless sensor networks for industrial environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC‘06), Vienna, Austria, 28–30 November 2005.
43. Åkerberg, J.; Gidlund, M.; Björkman, M. Future research challenges in wireless sensor and actuator networks targeting industrial automation. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Lisbon, Portugal, 26–29 July 2011.
44. Gungor, V.C.; Hancke, G.P. Industrial wireless sensor networks: Challenges, design principles, and technical approaches. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2009, 56, 4258–4265.
45. Rumelhart, D.E.; Hinton, G.E.; Williams, R.J. Learning Internal Representations by Error Propagation. Available online: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA164453 (accessed on 23 March 2016).
46. Kruse, R. Fuzzy Neural Network. Available online: http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Fuzzy_neural_network (accessed on 8 April 2016).
47. Guoyong, L. Intelligent Prediction Control and Matlab Realization; Publishing House of Electronics Industry: Beijing, China, 2010.
48. Zha, X.F. Soft computing in engineering design: A fuzzy neural network for virtual product design. In Applied Soft Computing Technologies: The Challenge of Complexity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; Volume 34, pp. 775–784.
49. Liu, D.; Li, X.; Lu, S.; Ding, D.; Chen, X. Application of fuzzy neural network in burden surface clustering. In Proceedings of the 24th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Taiyuan, China, 23–25May 2012.
50. Zhang, X.Y. A novel greenhouse control system based on fuzzy neural network. In Applied Mechanics and Materials; Trans Tech Publications Inc.: Pfaffikon, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 668–669, pp. 415–418.
51. AnytySEE-Mac-Manual. Available online: http://www.3r.com.cn/smsxz/&downloadcategoryid=12&isMode=false.html (accessed on 8 April 2016).
52. Donoho, D.L. De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1995, 41, 613–627.
53. Wavelet Packet Analysis. Available online: http://cn.mathworks.com/help/wavelet/gs/wavelet-packetanalysis.html?searchHighlight=wavelet%20packet (accessed on 8 April 2016).
54. Li, X.; Lim, B.; Zhou, J.; Huang, S.; Phua, S.; Shaw, K.; Er, M. Fuzzy Neural Network Modelling for Tool Wear Estimation in Dry Milling Operation. Available online: http://www.phmsociety.org/sites/phmsociety.org/files/phm_submission/2009/phmc_09_68.pdf (accessed on 23 March 2016).
55. PHM Society Conference Data Challenge. Available online: https://www.phmsociety.org/competition/ phm/10 (accessed on 23 March 2016).
56. Li, X.; Er, M.J.; Lim, B.; Zhou, J.; Gan, O.; Rutkowski, L. Fuzzy regression modeling for tool performance prediction and degradation detection. Int. J. Neural Syst. 2010, 20, 405–419
57. Zhang, C.; Yao, X.; Zhang, J. Abnormal condition monitoring of workpieces based on RFID for wisdom manufacturing workshops. Sensors 2015, 15, 30165–30186.