Tool condition monitoring in milling based on cutting forces by a neural network

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 41, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1519-1532

  Saglam, H ^a   Unuvar, A ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CUTTING TOOLS; INTELLIGENT CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MILLING (MACHINING); MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; WEAR OF MATERIALS;

TOOL CONDITION MONITORING (TCM);

CONDITION MONITORING;

EID: 0242269838     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0020754031000073017     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. AZOUZI, R. and GUILLOT, M., 1997, On-line prediction of surface finish and dimensional deviation in turning using neural network based sensor fusion. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 37, 1201-1217.
2. BOX, G. E. P., HUNTER, W. G. and HUNTER, J. S., 1978, Statistics for experimenters. In An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis and Model Building (New York: Wiley).
3. BURKE, L. I., 1989, Automated identification of tool wear states in machining processes: an application of self-organising neural network. PhD thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
4. CHRYSSOLOURIS, G. and DOMROESE, M., 1988, Sensor integration for tool wear estimation in machining. In Proceedings of the Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME, Symposium on Sensors and Controls for Manufacturing, pp. 115-123.
5. DICKINSON, G. R., 1967, Survey of factor affecting surface finish. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 182-135.
6. DIMLA, JR, D. A., LISTER, P. M. and LEIGHTON, N. J., 1997, Neural network solutions to the tool condition monitoring problem in metal cutting - a critical review of methods. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 37, 1219-1241.
7. DORNFELD, D. A., 1986, Acoustic emission monitoring for untended manufacturing. In Japan USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, JAACE, Osaka, Japan.
8. DORNFELD, D. A., 1990, Neural network sensor fusion for tool condition monitoring. Annals of CIRP, 39, 101.
9. ELBESTAWI, M. A., MARKS, J. and PAPAZAFIRIOU, T., 1989, Process monitoring in milling by pattern recognition. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 3, 305-315.
10. EPSTEIN, H. A. and WRIGHT, P. K., 1991, Intelligent machine tools: an application of neural networks to the control of cutting tool performance. In 6th International Conference on the Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, Oxford, UK, pp. 597-610.
11. HONG, G. S., RAHMAN, M. and ZHOU, Q., 1996, Using neural networks for tool condition monitoring based on wavelet decomposition. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 36, 55.
12. KO, T. J. and CHO, D. W., 1994, Cutting state monitoring in milling by a neural network. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 34, 659-676.
13. LIPPMANN, R. P., 1987, An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Magazine, 4 April.
14. LISTER, P. M., 1994, On-line measurement of tool wear. PhD thesis, Manufacturing and Machine Tool Division, Department of Mechanical Engineering, UMIST, Manchester.
15. LIU, T. I. and KO, E. J., 1990, On-line recognition of drill wear via artificial neural networks. In Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME, Monitoring and Control for Manufacturing Processes, PED, 44, Dallas, TX, p. 101.
16. ORABY, S. E. and HAYHURST, D. R., 1991, Development of models for tool wear force relationships in metal cutting. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 33, 125-138.
17. ÖZTEMEL, E. and AYDIN, M. E., 1996, Experimental design method based on artificial neural network and an industrial application. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Science, 73-78.
18. PURUSHOTHAMAN, S. and SRINIVASA, Y. G., 1994, A back-propagation algorithm applied to tool wear monitoring. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 34, 625-631.
19. RANGWALA, S., 1988, Machining process characterisation and intelligent tool condition monitoring using acoustic emission signal analysis. PhD thesis, Mechanical Engineering Department, University of California at Berkeley, CA.
20. RANGWALA, S. and DORNFELD, D., 1987, Integration of sensors via neural networks for detection of tool wear states. In Proceedings of the Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME, PED, 25, pp. 109-120.
21. RANGWALA, S. and DORNFELD, D., 1990, Sensor integration using neural networks for intelligent tool condition monitoring. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry, 112, 219-228.
22. Ross, P. J., 1989, Taguchi Techniques for Quality Engineering (New York: McGraw-Hill).
23. RUMELHART, D. and MCCLELLAND, J., 1987, Parallel Distributed Processing (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
24. TAGUCHI, G. and CLAUSING, D., 1990, Robus quality. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 65-75.
25. TANSEL, I. N. and MCLAUGHLIN, C., 1991, On-line monitoring of tool breakage with unsupervised neural network, Transactions of the NAMRI/SME, 19, 364.
26. TANSEL, I. N. and MCLAUGHLIN, C., 1993, Detection of tool breakage in milling operations - II. The neural network approach. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 33, 545.
27. TANSEL, I. N., WAGIMAN, A. and TZIRANIS, A., 1991, Recognition of chatter with neural networks. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing, 31, 539.
28. WATANABE, T. and IWAI, S., 1983, A control system to improve the accuracy of finished surfaces in milling. Transactions of the ASME, 105-192.
29. ZHOU, Q., HONG, G. S. and RAHMAN, M., 1995, A new tool wear criterion for tool condition monitoring using neural network. Engineering and Application of Artificial Intelligence, 8, 579.