A FRET-based study reveals site-specific regulation of spindle position checkpoint proteins at yeast centrosomes

eLife

Volumn 5, Issue MAY2016, 2016, Pages

  Gryaznova, Yuliya ^a   Caydasi, Aysekoca ^a,b   Malengo, Gabriele ^a,c   Sourjik, Victor ^a,c   Pereira, Gislene ^a,b  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR TERRESTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BFA1 PROTEIN; BUB2 PROTEIN; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE ACTIVATING PROTEIN; NUD1 PROTEIN; REGULATOR PROTEIN; SPC72 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CENTROSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; IMMUNOBLOTTING; IMMUNOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; METAPHASE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; SPINDLE POLE BODY; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; YEAST; METABOLISM; MITOSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MITOSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SPINDLE POLE BODIES;

EID: 84971623029     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.14029     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Adames NR, Oberle JR, Cooper JA. 2001. The surveillance mechanism of the spindle position checkpoint in yeast. The Journal of Cell Biology 153:159-168. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.1.159
2. Archambault V, Glover DM. 2008. Yeast polo-like kinase substrates are nailed with the right tools. Genome Biology 9. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-203
3. Arquint C, Gabryjonczyk AM, Nigg EA. 2014. Centrosomes as signalling centres. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0464
4. Bardin AJ, Amon A. 2001. Men and sin: What’s the difference? Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 2:815-826. doi: 10.1038/35099020
5. Bardin AJ, Visintin R, Amon A. 2000. A mechanism for coupling exit from mitosis to partitioning of the nucleus. Cell 102:21-31. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00007-6
6. Baudin-Baillieu A, Guillemet E, Cullin C, Lacroute F. 1997. Construction of a yeast strain deleted for the TRP1 promoter and coding region that enhances the efficiency of the polymerase chain reaction-disruption method. Yeast 13:353-356. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19970330)13:4<353::AID-YEA86>3.0.CO;2-P
7. Bertazzi DT, Kurtulmus B, Pereira G. 2011. The cortical protein Lte1 promotes mitotic exit by inhibiting the spindle position checkpoint kinase Kin4. The Journal of Cell Biology 193:1033-1048. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201101056
8. Bloecher A, Venturi GM, Tatchell K, Tatchell K. 2000. Anaphase spindle position is monitored by the BUB2 checkpoint. Nature Cell Biology 2:556-558. doi: 10.1038/35019601
9. Brachat A, Kilmartin JV, Wach A, Philippsen P. 1998. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells with defective spindle pole body outer plaques accomplish nuclear migration via half-bridge-organized microtubules. Molecular Biology of the Cell 9:977-991. doi: 10.1091/mbc.9.5.977
10. Byers B, Goetsch L. 1974. Duplication of spindle plaques and integration of the yeast cell cycle. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 38:123-131. doi: 10.1101/SQB.1974.038.01.016
11. Caydasi AK, Kurtulmus B, Orrico MI, Hofmann A, Ibrahim B, Pereira G. 2010. Elm1 kinase activates the spindle position checkpoint kinase Kin4. The Journal of Cell Biology 190:975-989. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006151
12. Caydasi AK, Lohel M, Grünert G, Dittrich P, Pereira G, Ibrahim B. 2012. A dynamical model of the spindle position checkpoint. Molecular Systems Biology 8. doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.15
13. Caydasi AK, Micoogullari Y, Kurtulmus B, Palani S, Pereira G. 2014. The 14-3-3 protein bmh1 functions in the spindle position checkpoint by breaking Bfa1 asymmetry at yeast centrosomes. Molecular Biology of the Cell 25:2143-2151. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-04-0890
14. Caydasi AK, Pereira G. 2009. Spindle alignment regulates the dynamic association of checkpoint proteins with yeast spindle pole bodies. Developmental Cell 16:146-156. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.10.013
15. D’Aquino KE, Monje-Casas F, Paulson J, Reiser V, Charles GM, Lai L, Shokat KM, Amon A. 2005. The protein kinase kin4 inhibits exit from mitosis in response to spindle position defects. Molecular Cell 19:223-234. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.005
16. del Campo A, Giménez-Martín G, López-Sáez JF, de la Torre C. 1997. Frailty of two cell cycle checkpoints which prevent entry into mitosis and progression through early mitotic stages in higher plant cells. European Journal of Cell Biology 74:289-293.
17. Elliott S, Knop M, Schlenstedt G, Schiebel E. 1999. Spc29p is a component of the Spc110p subcomplex and is essential for spindle pole body duplication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the Unitede States of America 96:6205-6210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6205
18. Erlemann S, Neuner A, Gombos L, Gibeaux R, Antony C, Schiebel E. 2012. An extended g-tubulin ring functions as a stable platform in microtubule nucleation. The Journal of Cell Biology 197:59-74. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201111123
19. Eshel D, Urrestarazu LA, Vissers S, Jauniaux JC, van Vliet-Reedijk JC, Planta RJ, Gibbons IR. 1993. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for normal nuclear segregation in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90:11172-11176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11172
20. Falk JE, Chan LY, Amon A. 2011. Lte1 promotes mitotic exit by controlling the localization of the spindle position checkpoint kinase kin4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108:12584-12590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107784108
21. Falk JE, Tsuchiya D, Verdaasdonk J, Lacefield S, Bloom K, Amon A. 2016. Spatial signals link exit from mitosis to spindle position. eLife 5: e14036. doi: 10.7554/eLife.14036
22. Fraschini R, D’Ambrosio C, Venturetti M, Lucchini G, Piatti S. 2006. Disappearance of the budding yeast bub2-bfa1 complex from the mother-bound spindle pole contributes to mitotic exit. The Journal of Cell Biology 172: 335-346. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200507162
23. Fu J, Hagan IM, Glover DM. 2015. The centrosome and its duplication cycle. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7:a015800. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015800
24. Geymonat M, Spanos A, Smith SJ, Wheatley E, Rittinger K, Johnston LH, Sedgwick SG. 2002. Control of mitotic exit in budding yeast. In vitro regulation of Tem1 GTPase by Bub2 and Bfa1. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277:28439-28445. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M202540200
25. Geymonat M, Spanos A, de Bettignies G, Sedgwick SG. 2009. Lte1 contributes to bfa1 localization rather than stimulating nucleotide exchange by tem1. The Journal of Cell Biology 187:497-511. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200905114
26. Geymonat M, Spanos A, Walker PA, Johnston LH, Sedgwick SG. 2003. In vitro regulation of budding yeast bfa1/bub2 GAP activity by cdc5. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 278:14591-14594. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300059200
27. Giménez-Abián JF, Clarke DJ, Giménez-Abián MI, de la Torre C, Giménez-Martín G. 2001. Synchronous nuclear-envelope breakdown and anaphase onset in plant multinucleate cells. Protoplasma 218:192-202. doi: 10.1007/BF01306608
28. Goedhart J, van Weeren L, Hink MA, Vischer NO, Jalink K, Gadella TW. 2010. Bright cyan fluorescent protein variants identified by fluorescence lifetime screening. Nature Methods 7:137-139. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1415
29. Grava S, Schaerer F, Faty M, Philippsen P, Barral Y. 2006. Asymmetric recruitment of dynein to spindle poles and microtubules promotes proper spindle orientation in yeast. Developmental Cell 10:425-439. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.018
30. Gruneberg U, Campbell K, Simpson C, Grindlay J, Schiebel E. 2000. Nud1p links astral microtubule organization and the control of exit from mitosis. The EMBO Journal 19:6475-6488. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.23.6475
31. Hoepfner D, Schaerer F, Brachat A, Wach A, Philippsen P. 2002. Reorientation of mispositioned spindles in short astral microtubule mutant spc72delta is dependent on spindle pole body outer plaque and kar3 motor protein. Molecular Biology of the Cell 13:1366-1380. doi: 10.1091/mbc.01-07-0338
32. Höfken T, Schiebel E. 2004. Novel regulation of mitotic exit by the Cdc42 effectors Gic1 and Gic2. The Journal of Cell Biology 164:219-231. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200309080
33. Höfken T, Schiebel E. 2002. A role for cell polarity proteins in mitotic exit. The EMBO Journal 21:4851-4862. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf481
34. Hu F, Elledge SJ. 2002. Bub2 is a cell cycle regulated phospho-protein controlled by multiple checkpoints. Cell Cycle 1:351-355. doi: 10.4161/cc.1.5.154
35. Hu F, Wang Y, Liu D, Li Y, Qin J, Elledge S.JSJ. 2001. Regulation of the Bub2bub2/bfa1 GAP complex by cdc5 and cell cycle checkpoints. Cell 107:655-665. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00580-3
36. Janke C, Magiera, MM, Rathfelder N, Taxis, C, Reber S, Maekawa H, Moreno-Borchart A, Doenges G, Schwob E, Schiebel E, Knop M. 2004. A versatile toolbox for pcr-based tagging of yeast genes: New fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21:947-962. doi: 10.1002/yea.1142
37. Jaspersen S.LSL, Winey, M. 2004. The budding yeast spindle pole body: Structure, duplication, and function. Annual reviewReview of Cell and Developmental Biology 20:1-28. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.022003.114106
38. Juanes MA, Twyman H, Tunnacliffe E, Guo Z, ten Hoopen R, Segal M. 2013. Spindle pole body history intrinsically links pole identity with asymmetric fate in budding yeast. Current Biology 23:1310-1319. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.057
39. Karpova TS, Baumann CT, He L, Wu X, Grammer A, Lipsky P, Hager GL, McNally JG. 2003. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer from cyan to yellow fluorescent protein detected by acceptor photobleaching using confocal microscopy and a single laser. Journal of Microscopy 209:56-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2003.01100.x
40. Keng T, Clark MW, Storms RK, Fortin N, Zhong W, Ouellette BF, Barton AB, Kaback DB, Bussey H. 1994. LTE1 of saccharomyces cerevisiae is a 1435 codon open reading frame that has sequence similarities to guanine nucleotide releasing factors. Yeast 10:953-958. doi: 10.1002/yea.320100710
41. Kentner D, Sourjik V. 2009. Dynamic map of protein interactions in the escherichia coli chemotaxis pathway. Molecular Systems Biology 5. doi: 10.1038/msb.2008.77
42. Khmelinskii A, Lawrence C, Roostalu J, Schiebel E. 2007. Cdc14-regulated midzone assembly controls anaphase B. The Journal of Cell Biology 177:981-993. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200702145
43. Kim J, Luo G, Bahk YY, Song K. 2012. Cdc5-dependent asymmetric localization of bfa1 fine-tunes timely mitotic exit. PLoS Genetics 8:e1002450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002450
44. Knop M, Schiebel E. 1997. Spc98p and spc97p of the yeast gamma-tubulin complex mediate binding to the spindle pole body via their interaction with spc110p. The EMBO Journal 16:6985-6995. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.23.6985
45. Knop M, Schiebel E. 1998. Receptors determine the cellular localization of a gamma-tubulin complex and thereby the site of microtubule formation. The EMBO Journal 17:3952-3967. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.3952
46. Knop M, Siegers K, Pereira G, Zachariae W, Winsor B, Nasmyth K, Schiebel E. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a pcr-based strategy: More tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15:963-972. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199907)15:10B<963::AID-YEA399>3.0.CO;2-W
47. Lee SE, Jensen S, Frenz LM, Johnson AL, Fesquet D, Johnston LH. 2001. The bub2-dependent mitotic pathway in yeast acts every cell cycle and regulates cytokinesis. Journal of Cell Science 114:2345-2354.
48. Li YY, Yeh E, Hays T, Bloom K. 1993. Disruption of mitotic spindle orientation in a yeast dynein mutant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90:10096-10100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10096
49. Lin TC, Neuner A, Schiebel E. 2015. Targeting of g-tubulin complexes to microtubule organizing centers: Conservation and divergence. Trends in Cell Biology 25:296-307. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.12.002
50. Lin TC, Neuner A, Schlosser YT, Scharf AN, Weber L, Schiebel E. 2014. Cell-cycle dependent phosphorylation of yeast pericentrin regulates g-tusc-mediated microtubule nucleation. eLife 3:e02208. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02208
51. Llopis J, Westin S, Ricote M, Wang Z, Cho CY, Kurokawa R, Mullen TM, Rose DW, Rosenfeld MG, Tsien RY, Glass CK, Wang J. 2000. Ligand-dependent interactions of coactivators steroid receptor coactivator-1 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor binding protein with nuclear hormone receptors can be imaged in live cells and are required for transcription. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97:4363-4368. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4363
52. Luo X, Tang Z, Rizo J, Yu H. 2002. The mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either mad1 or cdc20. Molecular Cell 9:59-71. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00435-X
53. Luo X, Tang Z, Xia G, Wassmann K, Matsumoto T, Rizo J, Yu H. 2004. The mad2 spindle checkpoint protein has two distinct natively folded states. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 11:338-345. doi: 10.1038/nsmb748
54. Maekawa H, Priest C, Lechner J, Pereira G, Schiebel E. 2007. The yeast centrosome translates the positional information of the anaphase spindle into a cell cycle signal. The Journal of Cell Biology 179:423-436. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200705197
55. Mapelli M, Massimiliano L, Santaguida S, Musacchio A. 2007. The mad2 conformational dimer: Structure and implications for the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell 131:730-743. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.049
56. Mapelli M, Musacchio A. 2007. MAD contortions: Conformational dimerization boosts spindle checkpoint signaling. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 17:716-725. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.08.011
57. Meitinger F, Palani S, Pereira G. 2012. The power of MEN in cytokinesis. Cell Cycle 11:219-228. doi: 10.4161/cc.11.2.18857
58. Miller RK, Rose MD. 1998. Kar9p is a novel cortical protein required for cytoplasmic microtubule orientation in yeast. The Journal of Cell Biology 140:377-390. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.2.377
59. Monje-Casas F, Amon A. 2009. Cell polarity determinants establish asymmetry in MEN signaling. Developmental Cell 16:132-145. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.002
60. Muhua L, Adames NR, Murphy MD, Shields CR, Cooper JA. 1998. A cytokinesis checkpoint requiring the yeast homologue of an apc-binding protein. Nature 393:487-491. doi: 10.1038/31014
61. Muller EG, Snydsman BE, Novik I, Hailey DW, Gestaut DR, Niemann CA, O’Toole ET, Giddings TH, Sundin BA, Davis TN. 2005. The organization of the core proteins of the yeast spindle pole body. Molecular Biology of the Cell 16:3341-3352. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-03-0214
62. Nitta K, Yoneyama M, Ohno N. 1975. Polymer concentration dependence of the helix to random coil transition of a charged polypeptide in aqueous salt solution. Biophysical Chemistry 3:323-329. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(75)80025-1
63. Park JE, Park CJ, Sakchaisri K, Karpova T, Asano S, McNally J, Sunwoo Y, Leem SH, Lee KS. 2004. Novel functional dissection of the localization-specific roles of budding yeast polo kinase cdc5p. Molecular and Cellular Biology 24:9873-9886. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.22.9873-9886.2004
64. Park CJ, Park JE, Karpova TS, Soung NK, Yu LR, Song S, Lee KH, Xia X, Kang E, Dabanoglu I, Oh DY, Zhang JY, Kang YH, Wincovitch S, Huffaker TC, Veenstra TD, McNally JG, Lee KS. 2008. Requirement for the budding yeast polo kinase cdc5 in proper microtubule growth and dynamics. Eukaryotic Cell 7:444-453. doi: 10.1128/EC.00283-07
65. Pereira G, Höfken T, Grindlay J, Manson C, Schiebel E. 2000. The bub2p spindle checkpoint links nuclear migration with mitotic exit. Molecular Cell 6:1-10. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00017-1
66. Pereira G, Schiebel E. 2005. Kin4 kinase delays mitotic exit in response to spindle alignment defects. Molecular Cell 19:209-221. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.05.030
67. Pereira G, Tanaka TU, Nasmyth K, Schiebel E. 2001. Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the bfa1p-bub2p checkpoint protein complex. The EMBO Journal 20:6359-6370. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.22.6359
68. Rieder CL, Khodjakov A, Paliulis LV, Fortier TM, Cole RW, Sluder G. 1997. Mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells with two spindles: Implications for the metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and cleavage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94:5107-5112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5107
69. Rock JM, Amon A. 2011. Cdc15 integrates tem1 gtpase-mediated spatial signals with polo kinase-mediated temporal cues to activate mitotic exit. Genes & Development 25:1943-1954. doi: 10.1101/gad.17257711
70. Rock JM, Lim D, Stach L, Ogrodowicz RW, Keck JM, Jones MH, Wong CCL, Yates JR, Winey M, Smerdon SJ, Yaffe MB, Amon A. 2013. Activation of the yeast hippo pathway by phosphorylation-dependent assembly of signaling complexes. Science 340:871-875. doi: 10.1126/science.1235822
71. Rothbauer U, Zolghadr K, Muyldermans S, Schepers A, Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H. 2008. A versatile nanotrap for biochemical and functional studies with fluorescent fusion proteins. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 7:282-289. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700342-MCP200
72. Scarfone I, Piatti S. 2015. Coupling spindle position with mitotic exit in budding yeast: The multifaceted role of the small gtpase tem1. Small GTPases 6:1-6. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2015.1109023
73. Sherman F. 1991. Getting started with yeast. Methods in Enzymology 194:3-21. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94004-V
74. Shirayama M, Matsui Y, Toh E A. 1994. The yeast TEM1 gene, which encodes a gtp-binding protein, is involved in termination of M phase. Molecular and Cellular Biology 14:7476-7482. doi: 10.1128/MCB.14.11.7476
75. Shirayama M, Toth A, Galova M, Nasmyth K. 1999. APC(Cdc20) promotes exit from mitosis by destroying the anaphase inhibitor pds1 and cyclin clb5. Nature 402:203-207. doi: 10.1038/46080
76. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27.
77. Sironi L, Mapelli M, Knapp S, De Antoni A, Jeang KT, Musacchio A. 2002. Crystal structure of the tetrameric mad1-mad2 core complex: Implications of a ’safety belt’ binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. The EMBO Journal 21:2496-2506. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.10.2496
78. Snead JL, Sullivan M, Lowery DM, Cohen MS, Zhang C, Randle DH, Taunton J, Yaffe MB, Morgan DO, Shokat KM. 2007. A coupled chemical-genetic and bioinformatic approach to polo-like kinase pathway exploration. Chemistry & Biology 14:1261-1272. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2007.09.011
79. Souès S, Adams IR. 1998. SPC72: A spindle pole component required for spindle orientation in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Cell Science 111:2809-2818.
80. Sullivan DS, Huffaker TC. 1992. Astral microtubules are not required for anaphase B in saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Journal of Cell Biology 119:379-388. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.2.379
81. Surana U, Amon A, Dowzer C, McGrew J, Byers B, Nasmyth K. 1993. Destruction of the CDC28/CLB mitotic kinase is not required for the metaphase to anaphase transition in budding yeast. The EMBO Journal 12:1969-1978.
82. Usui T, Maekawa H, Pereira G, Schiebel E. 2003. The XMAP215 homologue stu2 at yeast spindle pole bodies regulates microtubule dynamics and anchorage. The EMBO Journal 22:4779-4793. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg459
83. Valerio-Santiago M, Monje-Casas F. 2011. Tem1 localization to the spindle pole bodies is essential for mitotic exit and impairs spindle checkpoint function. The Journal of Cell Biology 192:599-614. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201007044
84. Wang Y, Hu F, Elledge SJ. 2000. The bfa1/bub2 GAP complex comprises a universal checkpoint required to prevent mitotic exit. Current Biology 10:1379-1382. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00779-X
85. Winey M, Baum P, Goetsch L, Byers B, Goetsch L, Byers B. 1991. Genetic determinants of spindle pole body duplication in budding yeast. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 56:705-708. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1991.056.01.079
86. Wouters FS, Bastiaens PIH. 2001. Imaging protein-protein interactions by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy. Current Protocols in Cell Biology Chapter 17, Unit 17. doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb1701s07
87. Yang M, Li B, Tomchick DR, Machius M, Rizo J, Yu H, Luo X. 2007. p31comet blocks mad2 activation through structural mimicry. Cell 131:744-755. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.048
88. Yeh E, Skibbens RV, Cheng JW, Salmon ED, Bloom K. 1995. Spindle dynamics and cell cycle regulation of dynein in the budding yeast, saccharomyces cerevisiae. The Journal of Cell Biology 130:687-700. doi: 10.1083/jcb.130.3.687
89. Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC, Tsien RY. 2002. Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric gfps into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science 296:913-916. doi: 10.1126/science.1068539
90. Zal T, Gascoigne NR. 2004. Photobleaching-corrected FRET efficiency imaging of live cells. Biophysical Journal 86:3923-3939. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.022087