Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of LMA ProSeal™ and i-gel® in adults: Meta-analysis and systematic review

Journal of International Medical Research

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 405-418

  Shin, Hye Won ^a   Yoo, Hae Na ^a   Bae, Go Eun ^a   Chang, Jun Chul ^a   Park, Min Kyung ^a   You, Hae Seun ^a   Kim, Hyun Jung ^b   Ahn, Hyung Sik ^b  

^a College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Airway sealing; equipment; i gel ; laryngeal mask airway proseal; leak; meta analysis

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BREATHING; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LARYNGEAL MASK; META ANALYSIS; OROPHARYNGEAL LEAK PRESSURE; OROPHARYNX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SORE THROAT; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; PRESSURE; PUBLISHING;

ADULT; DEVICE REMOVAL; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; PRESSURE; PUBLICATION BIAS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84971422242     PISSN: 03000605     EISSN: 14732300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0300060515607386     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. L.JolliffeI.Jackson. Airway management in the outpatient setting: new devices and techniques. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol2008; 21: 719–722.
2. Y.H.Kim. Pulmonary aspiration associated with supraglottic airways: ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and I-Gel™. Korean J Anesthesiol2012; 63: 489–490.
3. C.KellerJ.R.BrimacombeK.Keller. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth1999; 82: 286–287.
4. M.Lopez-GilJ.BrimacombeC.Keller. A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in paediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth2001; 11: 319–321.
5. G.KiniG.M.DevannaK.R.Mukkapati. Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: A prospective randomized study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol2014; 30: 183–187.
6. A.DasS.MajumdarA.Mukherjee. I-gel™ in ambulatory surgery: a comparison with LMA-ProSeal™ in paralyzed anaesthetized patients. J Clin Diagn Res2014; 8: 80–84.
7. N.J.BosleyL.A.BurrowsS.Bhayani. A randomised comparison of the performance of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the i-gel for spontaneous and controlled ventilation during routine anaesthesia in European population. J Anesth Clin Res2014; 5: 459–459.
8. G.ChauhanP.NayarA.Seth. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA ProSeal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol2013; 29: 56–60.
9. K.HayashiA.SuzukiT.Kunisawa. A comparison of the single-use i-gel with the reusable laryngeal mask airway proseal in anesthetized adult patients in Japanese population. Masui2013; 62: 134–139. [in Japanese, English Abstract].
10. Y.B.ShiM.Z.ZuoX.H.Du. Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi2013; 93: 1978–1980. [in Chinese, English Abstract].
11. W.J.JeonS.Y.ChoJ.S.Baek. Comparison of the proseal LMA and intersurgical I-gel during gynecological laparoscopy. Korean J Anesthesiol2012; 63: 510–514.
12. T.C.van ZundertJ.R.Brimacombe. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressure during anaesthesia with i-gel™, LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ laryngeal masks. Acta Anaesth Belg2012; 63: 35–41.
13. L.GasteigerJ.BrimacombeD.Perkhofer. Comparison of guided insertion of the LMA ProSeal™ vs the i-gel™. Anaesthesia2010; 65: 913–916.
14. W.J.ShinY.S.CheongH.S.Yang. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal larygngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol2010; 27: 598–601.
15. B.SharmaR.SehgalC.Sahai. PLMA vs. I-gel: a comparative evaluation of respiratory mechanics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol2010; 26: 451–457.
16. J.F.HeuerM.StillerJ.Rathgeber. Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu auraonce and intersurgical i-gel Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity. Anaesthesist2009; 58: 813–820. [in German, English Abstract].
17. I.SinghM.GuptaM.Tandon. Comparison of clinical performance of I-gel with LMA-Proseal in elective surgeries. Indian J Anaesth2009; 53: 302–305.
18. V.TrivediB.Patil. A clinical comparative study of evaluation of proseal LMA V/S I-GEL for ease of insertion and hemodynamic stability; a study of 60 cases. Internet J Anesthesiol2009; 27.
19. S.MaitraD.K.BaidyaS.Bhattacharjee. Evaluation of i-gel(™) airway in children: a meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth2014; 24: 1072–1079.
20. A.LiberatiD.G.AltmanJ.Tetzlaff. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med2009; 6: e1000100–e1000100.
21. Higgins JP and Green S. Cochrane handbook for systemic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration 2011; Version 5.1.0
22. J.H.DevittR.WenstoneA.G.Noel. The laryngeal mask airway and positive-pressure ventilation. Anesthesiology1994; 80: 550–555.
23. P.BarkerJ.A.LangtonP.J.Murphy. Regurgitation of gastric contents during general anesthesia using the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth1992; 69: 314–315.
24. G.LiewB.JohnS.Ahmed. Aspiration recognition with an i-gel airway. Anaesthesia2008; 63: 786–786.
25. W.SchmidbauerS.BerckerT.Volk. Oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-Gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways classic and ProSeal using a cadaver model. Br J Anaesth2009; 102: 135–139.
26. R.M.LevitanW.C.Kinkle. Initial anatomic investigations of the I-gel airway: a novel supraglottic airway without inflatable cuff. Anaesthesia2005; 60: 1022–1026.
27. K.GoldmannN.HochH.Wulf. Influence of neuromuscular blockade on the airway leak pressure of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther2006; 41: 228–232. [in German, English Abstract].
28. B.GibbisonT.M.CookC.Seller. Case series: protection from aspiration and failure of protection from aspiration with the i-gel airway. Br J Anaesth2008; 100: 415–417.
29. S.K.ParkG.J.ChoiY.S.Choi. Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2015; 10: e0119469–e0119469.
30. J.de MontblancL.RuscioJ.X.Mazoit. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the i-gel(®) vs laryngeal mask airway in adults. Anaesthesia2014; 69: 1151–1162.