i- gel™ in ambulatory surgery: A comparison with LMA-ProSeal™ in paralyzed anaesthetized patients

Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 80-84

  Das, Anjan ^a   Majumdar, Saikat ^b   Mukherjee, Anindya ^c   Mitra, Tapobrata ^d   Kundu, Ratul ^b   Hajra, Bimal Kumar ^b   Mukherjee, Dipankar ^b   Das, Bibhukalyani ^b  

^a Nursing Training Institute   (India)

^b NRS MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^c BANGUR INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGY   (India)

^d INSTITUTE OF POST GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

Ambulatory (day care surgery); ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists); Blood pressure (BP) and Heart rate (HR); i gel (i gel); LMA proseal (PLMA)

Indexed keywords

ATRACURIUM BESILATE; DIAZEPAM; FENTANYL; GLYCOPYRRONIUM BROMIDE; MIDAZOLAM; NEOSTIGMINE; ONDANSETRON; PANTOPRAZOLE; PROPOFOL; RANITIDINE;

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; I GEL; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT DURATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896457584     PISSN: 2249782X     EISSN: 0973709X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7890.4113     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sturniolo G, Bonanno L, Lo Schiavo MG, Tonante A, Tranto F, Gagliano E, et al. Day-surgery as a factor in reducing hospital stay. Chirurgia Italiana. 2007; 59(1):41-52.
2. Rhodes L, Miles G, Pearson A. Patient subjective experience and satisfaction during the perioperative period in the day surgery setting: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Pract. 2006; 12(4):178-92.
3. Mitaritonno M, Occhionorelli S, Pellegrini D, Carella M, Carbonara G, Presicce L, et al. Ambulatory surgery: preoperative assessment. Chir Ital. 2001; 53(2): 213-7.
4. Smith I, Cooke T, Jackson I, Fitzpatrick R. Rising to the challenges of achieving day surgery targets. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61(12):1191-9.
5. Schafer MK, Wittenmeier E. Ambulatory and day surgery. Anaesthesist. 2003; 52 (11): 1046-54.
6. Eger EI, White PF, Bogetz MS. Clinical and economic factors important to anaesthetic choice for day-case surgery. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000; 17(3):245-62.
7. Golota VIa, Averina TA. Ambulatory abortion, its advantages and economic effectiveness. Akush Ginekol (mosk).1992; (2):34-7.
8. Jiburum BC, Akpuaka FC. Scope and problems of day-care surgery in a plastic surgical unit. West Afr J Med.1996; 15(4):237-9.
9. Dubois L, Vogt KN, Davis W, Schlachta CM. Impact of an outpatient appendectomy protocol on clinical outcomes and cost: a case-control study. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 211(6):731-7.
10. McManus SA, Topp DA, Hopkins C. Advantages of outpatient breast surgery. Am Surg. 1994; 60(12):967-70.
11. Kambouris A. Physical, psychological, and economic advantages of accelerated discharge after surgical treatment for breast cancer. Am Surg.1996; 62(2):123-7.
12. Ahmad NZ, Byrnes G, Naqvi SA. A meta-analysis of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22(9):1928-34.
13. Hove LD, Steinmetz J, Christoffersen JK, Møller A, Nielsen J, Schmidt H. Analysis of Deaths Related to Anesthesia in the Period 1996-2004 from Closed Claims Registered by the Danish Patient Insurance Association. Anesthesiology. 2007; 106(4):675-80.
14. Part 3: Adult Basic Life Support. European Resuscitation Council. Resuscitation. 2000; 46(1-3): 29-71.
15. Gal TJ. Airway management. In: Miller RD, editor. Textbook of anesthesia, 6th ed. Philadelphia. Elsevier. 2005.p.1617-52.
16. Uppal V, Fletcher G, Kinsella J. Comparison of the i-gel with the cuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2009; 102(2): 264-8.
17. Janakiraman C, Chethan DB, Wilkes AR, Stacey MR, Goodwin N. A randomised crossover trial comparing the i-gel supraglottic airway and classic laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64(6): 674-8.
18. Boothe P, Finegan BA. Changing the admission process for elective surgery: an economic analysis. Can J Anaesth. 1995; 42(5):391-4.
19. Jakobsson J. The airway in day surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010; 76(1): 38-44.
20. Brain AI. The Laryngeal Mask-a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth. 1983; 55(8): 801-5.
21. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2002; 20(4): 871-91.
22. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Puhringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg. 2001; 93(5): 1351-3.
23. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agro F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf SF, et al. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology. 2002; 96(2): 289-95.
24. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Brimacombe L. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2002; 95(3): 770-6.
25. Hayashi K, Suzuki A, Kunisawa T, Takahata O, Yamasawa Y, Iwasaki H. A comparison of the single-use i-gel with the reusable laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in anesthetized adult patients in Japanese population. Masui. 2013; 62(2):134-9.
26. Singh I, Gupta M, Tandon M. Comparison of clinical performance of i-gel with LMA ProSeal in elective surgeries. Indian J. Anaesth. 2009; 53(3): 302-305.
27. Chauhan G, Navar P, Seth A, Gupta K, Panwar M, Agrawal N. Comparison of clinical performance of the I-gel with LMA ProSeal. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 29(1):56-60.
28. Ismail SA, Bisher NA, kandil HW, Mowafi HA, Atawia HA. Intraocular pressure and haemodynamic responses to insertion of the i-gel, laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011; 28(6):443-8.
29. Jindal P, Rizvi A, Sharma JP. Is I-gel a new revolution among supraglottic airway devices? Middle East. J Anesthesiol. 2009; 20(1):53-8.
30. Won-Jung S, Yu-Seon C, Hong-Seuk Y, Tomoki N. The supraglottic airway I-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010; 27(7): 598-601.